MurrayScience
Interview request
editHello, MurrayScience!
My name is Daniel, and I’m a senior at Harvard University currently writing an undergraduate thesis about Wikipedia. I’m particularly interested in how the Wikipedia community decides what facts are relevant and/or notable enough to warrant inclusion on a particular article — especially in regards to articles on contentious topics.
I noticed that you’ve been quite active editing the “Climate change” article over the past few months. So, would you mind if I send you a few questions (via email or right here) about your work editing that article, and the approach that you take? I’d really love to hear from you.
Thanks so much! --Dalorleon (talk) 16:09, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
Note of encouragement + page number request
editHello :). I hope I'm not discouraging you with me clicking on the revert button. Just one to let you know that I do appreciate your contributions, even if my reading of the scientific literature is different from yours.
Small request: I don't understand the page numbering of the OECD report you cited. Is one of the dashes (indicating a range) meant to be a comma, or both? And could you include the publisher and the author? FemkeMilene (talk) 20:25, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
- They're like comma separated page numbers of the parts that were discussed in the sentence. I forget the publisher and author. MurrayScience (talk) 11:17, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
- You may be interested in doing citations to papers automatically, as it's a hassle to do it manually. In preferences (top right, next to your sandbox) there are two options. The first one is the reftoolbar under gadgets, and the second one is the new wikitext mode under beta features. Both make a cite button appear (in slightly different locations), which accepts a doi or url and automatically generates all the necessary information from a citation. It also works for news articles, even as you often still need to add the authors manually there. FemkeMilene (talk) 17:11, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
- They're like comma separated page numbers of the parts that were discussed in the sentence. I forget the publisher and author. MurrayScience (talk) 11:17, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
editArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Funcrunch (talk) 20:38, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
editHello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)