John Cooper KU
Nomination of Amphenol ICC for deletion
editA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amphenol ICC is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amphenol ICC until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 13:54, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
As mentioned there are some major misconceptions happened, actually Amphenol ICC is a separate company to which Amphenol is a parent company. Secondly I was not able to add references like before and was little unaware of adding references. I have made changes according to the suggestions. Please consider the changes and let me know, so that I can edit until it meets the standards.
John Cooper KU (talk) 14:28, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- User:John Cooper KU - Well, there have been previous efforts to create Amphenol ICC that have been deleted as spam. Please state what, if any, your affiliation is with Amphenol ICC or Amphenol, in accordance with the conflict of interest policy, since the only edits you have made have to do with this division of a company. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:21, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
John Cooper KU, you are invited to the Teahouse!
editHi John Cooper KU! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 20:03, 14 September 2017 (UTC) |
September 2017
edit{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. — Berean Hunter (talk) 15:51, 19 September 2017 (UTC)