Jonah161

Welcome!

Hello, Jonah161, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 00:51, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

White Anglo-Saxon Protestant

It has come to my attention that you are making very arbitrary decisions on the WASP page and that you are constantly reverting my edits before discussing it with me. Also, it has come to my attention that you are making up your own WP rules and are removing content from your talk page to cover up that you are relatively new to Wikipedia yourself. Another example would be that you first mentioned that the names on the WASP page were mentioned in a reference and then suddenly you deleted everything when you disagreed with an edit claiming the opposite. Please do not revert my edits again until you have discussed them with me. Also, please sign your messages after commenting on my talk page. That is a compulsory rule on Wikipedia. Thank you.--Danteday (talk) 00:45, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Alabama Republican and Democratic Special election sections

I was the one who wrote those two sections regarding Roy Moore and Doug Jones. While it is my personal desire that Doug Jones win the election, that is beyond my capacity as an editor on wikipedia. I put information on both Roy Moore and Doug Jones. Roy Moore has had a controversial past. Not only is there documentation, I personally witnessed this because I will be former resident of Alabama this December 13th. Secondly, a Democrat has to be careful about abortion in the state. Both of those sections had sources and were not opinion pieces. I will be reposting these sections later, but I encourage your input to help balance any biases you see out of my work. In fact, if you'd like to put the section back into place and add to them, I'd strongly encourage it. I was not finished with either second and have not had as much time as I would have desired to make the sections worth while. Any help would be appreciated. Thank you for your time. --Inunotaisho26 (talk) 13:20, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Update UTC Nov 4, 2017 00:32

I appreciate your honesty. I have a text document with changes and cited sources. Contact me via email (don't care if it is via proxy or not), and I will send you text of what I am working on with sources. I could use some extra input. I do want to avoid appearance of being partial. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Inunotaisho26 (talk • contribs) 00:32, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Update UTC Nov 4, 2017 1:06

Fair point on placing that information on the Persons wikipedia page. Turns out that issue has been covered on the Roy Moore side (don't know who did it and not interested in finding out). Would have been better had you said that up front and explained your reasoning instead of bashing me over the head.

Fortunately, I can live with that this round, but in all seriousness the Doug Jones side of this thing has not been touched all that much. This maybe your purview since you are an Ohio Democrat with no emotional stake in the race. The I have enclosed the source I originally pulled from in this message. --Inunotaisho26 (talk) 1:06, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jonah161. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Mike Yenni for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mike Yenni is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Yenni until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:14, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of John Wickes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Wickes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Wickes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:43, 24 September 2020 (UTC)