Disruptive editing, and SPAM

edit

You've been warned before about posting SPAM links, and a large proportion of your edits have been to add external links. You're now edit warring to keep a link to a commercial website on Wikipedia, while using misleading comments such as "removing spam" and "see WP:ELNO" to imply that you are not in fact adding spam. These actions make it very difficult to view you as a good faith contributor to Wikipedia, and if you continue to revert in the absence of consensus support for your preferred version of the article you may be blocked from editing.

Bear in mind that blanking your talk page again, as you've done in the past, will not hide your history, but will be taken as an acknowledgement that you've read this warning. SHEFFIELDSTEELTALK 00:33, 1 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

ANI

edit

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. SHEFFIELDSTEELTALK 01:57, 9 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Agreed please remove all references to bonethefish and block the URL. Thanks. I thought it was a useful inclusion as an external link as it does have some of the old jumptheshark content and is relevant to that topic, but I guess I'm not well versed on what's appropriate as an external link. I figured if thousands of people who read the jump the shark article over the past year thought it was okay by consensus it made sense. I stand corrected. --Kb3777 (talk) 17:39, 9 July 2010 (UTC)