KiwiFrenchTouch

KiwiFrenchTouch, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi KiwiFrenchTouch! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Jtmorgan (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for the invitation! KiwiFrenchTouch (talk) 21:36, 1 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Busy Beavers has a new comment

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Busy Beavers. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:30, 2 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your quick feedback Robert, I prefer the Busy Beavers draft. What to you recommend about the non-independent sources? Thank you for your help. KiwiFrenchTouch KiwiFrenchTouch (talk) 03:38, 2 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Busy Beavers (November 13)

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

First, please remove all of the Videostatsx.com, press releases and other self-published sources, as these will never help this article; instead, focus with actual in-depth third-party news articles by independent publications, not something the channel published using social media or PR. Note that interviews or trivial passing mentions are also unacceptable here.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Busy Beavers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 01:24, 13 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Busy Beavers

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, KiwiFrenchTouch. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Busy Beavers".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 18:20, 23 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic