KzShop

Unblock

User:Bonadea   User:331dot Please look at my unlock request above and read what I wrote. There I explained why I fixed exactly what JackAtkinson22 was fixing before. KzShop (talk) 23:20, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Someone else will review your request(all posts are typically placed at the bottom, for proper flow). Please see WP:MEAT. We don't know who is sitting at the computer. We have to treat two accounts doing the exact same thing as the same person. 331dot (talk) 23:28, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Ok, but can this be considered a multi-account? This is a clear mistake, and many have corrected, and will correct this very error. After all, I was banned for nothing, you just suspect. KzShop (talk) 23:33, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

User:331dot  User:Sir_Sputnik In addition, I just mentioned you, since you were investigating, and therefore, I want you to see my explanation in the application for unlocking. --KzShop (talk) 23:38, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

I have no words. I was banned only because I fixed the same error as another banned user. I don’t know what other evidence to bring, I wrote everything I could. But no one hears me, they banned me and left me unanswered.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KzShop (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am not JackAtkinson22, this is not a multi account, I have nothing to do with him. I saw his post on reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/Kazakhstan/comments/fjpcby/comment/fko9bi7 (for some reason, he deleted this post, but read the comments and understand everything, in addition, here is the link to the deleted post: https://www.removeddit.com/r/Kazakhstan/comments/fjpcby/wikipedia_misinforms_people/ ). Why did you block me immediately without warning? If I have the same goal as JackAtkinson22 (namely, to fix errors in the same articles), this does not mean that this is a multi-account. KzShop (talk) 22:17, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Based on the technical evidence from the system logs, I'd say it's  Likely that you're JackAtkinson22. Even if what you say is true, you'd be proxying for a blocked editor as a meat puppet. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:39, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

NinjaRobotPirate Ok, I could not find the "technical evidence". Your link leads to a general article, not evidence of my guilt. Can you please provide evidence? I repeat once again that I am correcting exactly that mistake, as I saw it in his (JackAtkinson22) post on the reddit. I specifically registered on Wikipedia to fix this particular error. I have nothing to do with him, I am not his friend, relative, I just saw a mistake (on his post on reddit), and I think that it should be fixed. In the end, check out my ip.

Checkusers cannot directly reveal the evidence(even to administrators like me). However, if there is technical evidence to support the block, there is clearly more of a connection here than you seeing posts. 331dot (talk) 09:07, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

331dot But he could be wrong. Or lie. How can we believe prosecution without evidence? Do I have a chance to unlock? Do I need to provide any further evidence? KzShop (talk) 09:21, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

It's really better if you don't accuse the CheckUsers of lying, especially not when two of them have inspected the evidence and are in agreement. If this is a CheckUser block, that means there is technical evidence relating to your computer connections that links the two accounts together. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:42, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

KzShop (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am not JackAtkinson22, this is not a multi account, I have nothing to do with him. I saw his post on reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/Kazakhstan/comments/fjpcby/comment/fko9bi7 (for some reason, he deleted this post, but read the comments and understand everything, in addition, here is the link to the deleted post: https://www.removeddit.com/r/Kazakhstan/comments/fjpcby/wikipedia_misinforms_people/ ). Why did you block me immediately without warning? If I have the same goal as JackAtkinson22 (namely, to fix errors in the same articles), this does not mean that this is a multi-account. KzShop (talk) 09:07, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

That's an exact copy of your previous unblock request, so please see the previous decline reason. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:39, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.