Billie Piper refs query

edit

Hi, I was looking at the changes you made to Billie Piper. Out of interest, what was wrong with the original source I added about the engagement? (Were you just concerned with the credibility of the source?) Also, why was the Hello magazine story better than the one from The Sun? Anyway, I've found a better ref for the engagement in the Sunday Mirror, hope that's ok. Cheers, Kevin Judson 23:20, 8 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

The original sources didn't support the content specified to an extent making them appropriately inclusive to the article. Of course, the new reference is fine, superior to the one I put up. I only put up the one I found, I don't think this one was up when I went wading through the internet for appropriate sources that weren't the same thing from March that claimed a wedding announcement was due to arrive any day. Which is why the Hello article was more appropriate than the one from the Sun, which was from January whereas the one from Hello was more recent and more definitive. Ta for the dedication. Leeson 23:48, 8 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the explanation. My fault for not reading the story more closely. Kevin Judson 00:09, 9 July 2007 (UTC)Reply