Lemonaka

Pending changes backlog
(review log)

Level 5

Very low backlog

[view • purge • update]

---

0 pages according to DatBot 07:45, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

Vandalism information

Level 5

Very low level of vandalism

[view • purge • update]

---

1.98 RPM according to EnterpriseyBot 07:10, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Prince Anahobe

Hello Lemonaka! I hope all is well. I am here to ask about your questionable comment for declining. For the reason of declining, it was put "This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission." Which is fair enough. Yet, for the AFC comment, you didn't provide what specifically was wrong, only one remark about a certain portion, saying " "Yet the Mononobe sent for him to go "Fishing", this was an attempt at making him Emperor. This failed." what the hell is that???". That is absolutely nothing to go off, and gives me no clues as to what specifically is the problem, and what specifically you think should be changed. I changed that bit of the article you asked for, but what else needs to be done? Please do not review the article if you will not provide sufficient reasoning or context clues. I mean this in absolutely no negative way, this is merely constructive criticism and I would like that for the article.

All the best- Camillz. Camillz (talk) 13:31, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Excuse me, but what's the meaning of go "fishing", attempt to make who to become emporer? what failed? You need more context for explain such content, and on the time when I reviewed your draft, there is no reference for that -Lemonaka 15:38, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

Fishing. As in he was taken to "Go fishing" but in actuality they wanted to take him to crown him Emperor, which I have edited. Please attempt to be more professional with this! Camillz (talk) 00:28, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

@Camillz Sure, I've reviewed the content after your change, this read better. -Lemonaka 13:22, 21 July 2024 (UTC)

Thank you very much!

All the best - Camillz (talk) 12:22, 22 July 2024 (UTC)

Bom Bom

I was trying to place a hatnote to indicate a place to look for reduplications that would have similar/same pronunciations. Otherwise, there'd be a larger hatnote. There are other topics to find later such as Baum Baum and Bomb Bomb; as "Bom Bom" was listed at "Boom Boom", and "Baum" and "Bomb" are listed at BOM; those would seem to be the likely locations to list other confusable similar pronounciated terms. -- 64.229.88.34 (talk) 03:51, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

@64.229.88.34 That's a wrongly clicked revert, I've restored it. -Lemonaka 03:52, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for the response -- 64.229.88.34 (talk) 03:54, 24 August 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Institute for Integrated Transitions

Dear Lemonaka,

I noticed that you declined the submission with the comment "Regional initiatives need more source".

I understand that the official website for the organization is not enough as a reference to the initiative.

The regional initiatives section is not fundamental, if I remove that section will the page be accepted?

Thanks for you help Extrasua (talk) 16:33, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

@Extrasua A lot of sentences, in fact, need footnotes or citation, for example, "Donors have included the European Commission and the governments of Ireland, Norway, Switzerland, the Netherlands, Germany, Sweden, Canada and the United Kingdom. et,al." in the #objectives, "it's a member of three NGO networks: the Mediation Support Network, alongside the Alliance for Peacebuilding, and the European Peacebuilding Liaison Office. Their international council includes Gareth Evans, John Carlin, Nasser Saidi and Shaharzad Akbar." in the Organisation Structure and so on before publishing, that means you still need a major revision.
Anyway, thanks for your questions and improvement. -Lemonaka 22:20, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

The page i made wasnt a test

it was for tests on ppls sandboxes to not get deleted like thd 1 on mine Washweans (talk) 10:29, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

Like the test on my sandbox Washweans (talk) 10:30, 7 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 19 November 2024 (UTC)