User talk:Malcolm Pullom/sandbox

Review

This is a nice, well-written article, but i have some concerns about the sourcing. Of your sources, only three (the FAA record, Great Circle Mapper and Business Remixed) are independent of the subject, and of those three, only one (Business Remixed) provides any significant coverage. More third-aprty sources would do the article a lot of good.

• Per Wikipedia:WikiProject_Aviation/Style_guide#Airports_2, you should try and create an "Airlines and destination" section.
• Nice use of the {{convert}} template, by the way!
• Be wary of using promotional language in the secion on the "Aviation Program" (that header should be in sentence case: "Aviation program", incidentally) - phrases like "state-of-the-art", "the only facility of its kind" and "specializes in" belong on a marketing website, not Wikipedia.
• Reference 5 is a dead link.
• You can take out refs 7, 8 and 10 altogether, as well as the multiple citations of references 1 and 6; one citation at the end of the paragraph is sufficient.

Yunshui ^雲_水 08:07, 6 August 2014 (UTC)