Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 09:45, 7 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, NIDMP! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 09:45, 7 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

January 2020

edit
 
Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames which give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only yourself as an individual and which complies with our username policy or request a change of username.

You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and be aware that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. Additionally, if your contributions to Wikipedia form all or part of work for which you are, or expect to be, paid, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If your username does not represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page.

You may simply create a new account, but you may prefer to change your username to one that complies with our username policy, so that your past contributions are associated with your new username. If you would prefer to change your username, you may appeal this username block by adding the text

{{unblock-un|new username|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}

at the bottom of your talk page. Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names.

 Thank you. — Newslinger talk 10:11, 7 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Manoj Kumar at National Institute of Design Madhya Pradesh (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

It is a central govt institute National Institute of design madhya pradesh in india NIDMP (talk) 06:10, 13 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Unfortunately, your requested username doesn't meet Wikipedia's username policy, because it represents an entire organization. Please select another username. Your username can be one that represents yourself as an individual at the organization (e.g. "Jack Smith at the XY Foundation"), but it can't represent the organization as a whole. — Newslinger talk 06:47, 13 January 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Manoj Kumar at National Institute of Design Madhya Pradesh (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Requested username:

Request reason:

I am the person to creating and representing my organization on different different social media platforms.kindly approve it and suggest me to be more clear over here NIDMP (talk) 10:26, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Renamed, therefore unblocked. I want to be very clear, though. We don't want you creating and representing your organisation here. This would be a clear violation of WP:COI and WP:PAID and WP:PROMO. If you do this, you will be immediately reblocked. You are welcome to edit subjects for which you have no conflict of interest, but need to avoid direct edits for subjects for which you have a conflict. Yamla (talk) 12:45, 13 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 14)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Chess were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Grognard Extraordinaire Chess (talk) Ping when replying 08:34, 14 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Blocked

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.