Maumau1978
Joined 26 November 2024
Latest comment: 3 days ago by Maumau1978 in topic Your submission at Articles for creation: Automad (November 27)
This is Maumau1978's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Automad (November 27)
edit Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Automad and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, Maumau1978!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusWđ¶đ¶F (bark âą sniff) 04:47, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
|
- Hello @AngusWOOF, thank you for your fast feedback and help. I will try to gather more reliable sources and update the article accordingly. Maumau1978 (talk) 08:34, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Automad (November 27)
edit Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CanonNi was:
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Automad and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- Hello @CanonNi, thank you for your fast review. Much appreciated. However, that are not just blogs. CSS-Tricks is the biggest knowledge base in the industry since years and run by DigitalOcean with millions of monthly readers. Is that not relevant? One of the other blog posts is authored by Cyon, one of the leading hosting and infrastructure providers in Switzerland. Maumau1978 (talk) 11:16, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Maumau1978 the CSS-Tricks article is written by the software's creator - I don't see how that's independent in any way. The Cyon blog is only a one-paragraph mention, which, even if it were reliable, isn't significant coverage. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk âą contribs) 11:20, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you, I understand. Maumau1978 (talk) 11:25, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- @Maumau1978 the CSS-Tricks article is written by the software's creator - I don't see how that's independent in any way. The Cyon blog is only a one-paragraph mention, which, even if it were reliable, isn't significant coverage. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk âą contribs) 11:20, 27 November 2024 (UTC)