User talk:Mauriziok/Miss World 1990
{{Talk header}} {{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= {{WikiProject Beauty Pageants |class=List |importance=Low}} {{WikiProject Lists |class=List |importance=Low}} {{WikiProject London |class=List |importance=low}} }}
Judges section restored
editI have restored the judges section content (diff). The content is directly relevant, significant and of importance relative to the article's topic, and its omission reduces the quality of the article. Information about the people who judge the performance of a large number of contestants in a contest is highly relevant. Provision of information regarding the judges is credible to provide a balanced overview of the event. North America1000 08:54, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
- I have again removed the unsourced, irrelevant fancruft. The Banner talk 19:51, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
- Your rational for re-removal is partially subjective, and does not address my rationale for the content's restoration above. Many articles about competitions have information about judges. For example, see American Idol and Top Chef for starters. It's very likely that offline sources are available that provide coverage. Internet coverage of 1990 events is not plentiful, because the internet was not in widespread usage at this time. North America1000 18:01, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
- Why don't you add sources to prove your point instead of speculating about sources? Your opinion is subjective in its own right and your choices for the shows to compare (WP:OTHERSTUFFEXIST) show an USA=bias.
- The article needs sources conform WP:RS, not related sources or plain speculation. The Banner talk 21:27, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
- Your rational for re-removal is partially subjective, and does not address my rationale for the content's restoration above. Many articles about competitions have information about judges. For example, see American Idol and Top Chef for starters. It's very likely that offline sources are available that provide coverage. Internet coverage of 1990 events is not plentiful, because the internet was not in widespread usage at this time. North America1000 18:01, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
- And it is nice that you have added some sourced to back up their claim for fame, it are no sources that they were judges and that the judges are relevant. The Banner talk 07:52, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified (February 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Miss World 1990. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081011030455/http://www.pageantopolis.com/international/world_1990.htm to http://www.pageantopolis.com/international/world_1990.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:30, 2 February 2018 (UTC)