User talk:Mdann52/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive - June 2012

8-15 June

badtrash78

Hello Mdann52. Regarding the AirXCell page. I am the original author and I believe I have made the appropriate correction. May I ask you what I should do to have the spam tag removed ? Thanks for your answer :-)

I will investigate and advise you by this time tomorrow Mdann52 (talk) 16:34, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Please read WP:POVCorre, rewrite it then report back Mdann52 (talk) 17:31, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Class Project

MDann52: I, as the instructor of this College English course, apologize for the disruption. Today's lecture: "The value of Wikipedia," aimed at proving the point that the open-source can, indeed, be valuable because "not everyone can edit." Through meta-moderation, page policing and self-regulation, these pages are highly controlled, as my nefarious student who deleted the paragraph learned today. Thank you for allowing us to see this lesson in action! - Carrie O'Connell (coconnel51) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.38.219.130 (talk) 17:22, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Glad to be of assistance!! Mdann52 (talk) 18:07, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Please help my edits get approved!

Hi -

Thanks for sending me a message! I have just finished a draft of my new edits to the page Time's Up! on its talk page. I am new to editing on Wikipedia so any advice you can offer would be great! What do I do now? Should I wait until people edit my edits then try to move it to the actual article instead of just the talk page?

Palderoty (talk) 20:23, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Ciara

Hi,

I'm a fan of Ciara's and I notice that her article's main picture is an old photo of her. And since I'm a new user I am unable to change it since it is a semi-protected page and I know that you said there has to be a consensus to change it, so could you please help me with this? I have an updated photo of her which embraces her growth. with that being said, If you will could you please help me change it?

Thank You, Akira Devon — Preceding unsigned comment added by Akiradevon1 (talk • contribs) 11:14, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Hi there. Can you first propose the move on the talk page of the article. If no-one objects, add another edit semi-protected template

Thanks, Mdann52 (talk) 11:20, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

Mdann52, thank you for your welcome (and the cookies!!! ;o) best regards, Webwhippet Webwhippet (talk) 17:24, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

ThePirateBay edit reverting

My edit to the India section on the TPB article was reverted once by Cluebot, after which I reverted it back, since it was not vandalism. It was once again reverted back by you citing vandalism. The edit has been re-reverted. Please see the reversions/edits that you make before classifying anything as vandalism. 117.194.98.151 (talk) 18:24, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Link to "diffs page" regarding the deletion of posts help request

Hello, you answered my help request 45 minutes ago. I placed the needed information here on my talk page. Thanks. Dale Chock (talk) 10:44, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Help

Hello! I know the simplest way, but I want to know how to add other types of citations through my editbox. And also when I am going to nominate an article for good or featured article, I cannot use this simple reference method. Please help. Regards, Vishal14K | Talk 13:24, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

If you look along the blue bar at the top of the edit window, you should see a button marked "cite". If you press this, the menu you were on about should come up. Regards, Mdann52 (talk) 15:43, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Talk:Linguistic relativity

I was about to leave you a note about this. I'm going to remove that again. I don't think you're seeing the whole picture; see

• Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Dale Chock continued

where there's talk of blocking Dale Chock for his behaviour towards Maunus. I also suggest you remove that silliness from my talk page before I do. Br'er Rabbit (talk) 16:02, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

• I was beaten to it. Br'er Rabbit (talk) 16:03, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

  (edit conflict) Yes, beware of those {{helpme}} requests! It's always a good idea to poke around and try and find the full story before acting on them. It looks like Maunus is taking a wikibreak, so we should probably leave the controversial talk page messages out of sight while he's not here to do anything about it. Best — Mr. Stradivarius ^{(have a chat)} 16:07, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Sorry about that Mdann52 (talk) 16:09, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Maunus is far the more valuable and clueful editor in this dispute; don't be trolled so easily. Br'er Rabbit (talk) 16:13, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

fyi; Dale Chock (talk · contribs) has been indef-blocked. Br'er Rabbit (talk) 20:07, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. Mdann52 (talk) 20:11, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Vandalism Caution

Watch what you flag as vandalism, sometimes it really isnt :-) If I'm not 100% sure its vandalism I open the page in Firefox <3 ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ Talk ♪} ߷ _{♀ Contribs ♀} 16:57, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

To clarify Solaraas comment, please take note of Wikipedia:Help desk#User abuse on vandalism flagging/reverting, and be more careful. It's his talk page, he can remove a prod warning if he wants to, to go through warning and reverting everytime he removed something was just unnecessary--Jac16888 ^Talk 16:59, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

WP:UP#CMT--Jac16888 ^Talk 17:16, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

Vandalism?

Can you stop using too "strongly" your script/tool/whatsoever because I don't understand why I couldn't update my OWN talk page? What's the matter seriously? Maxxyme (talk) 17:00, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

CSD #A7

Hello Mdann52! You recently placed {{db-corp}} on G.M College, which is an educational institution. Actually educational institutions are no more covered by this criteria as you can see here. So if the article in question still satisfies the Deletion Policy you can try any other deletion method. Happy Editing! --SMS ^Talk 16:28, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Level 1 warning removed

User talk:Br'er Rabbit deleted the Level 1 warning you posted. This user may not be aware that users are generally not permitted to delete posts to their talk pages. Edits you made on related pages have also been reverted. 66.27.48.94 (talk) 00:58, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

On the contrary, editors generally are permitted to delete posts from their own talk page. See WP:BLANKING. Also, please don't provoke the wascally wabbit, as he is apparently using RADAR. (Previously I thought those big floppy ears only contained audio monitoring equipment, but it seems I was wrong.) --Demiurge1000 (talk) 02:01, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Don't feed the trolls ;) Br'er Rabbit (talk) 02:24, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Simon Murphy (conductor)

Thank you for approving a page I created - Simon Francis Murphy (conductor), however I thought I deleted this, replacing it with this one, which is better/updated: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simon_Murphy_(conductor)

Could you either delete the page Simon Francis Murphy (conductor) or redirect it to Simon Murphy (conductor). In any case the header of the article should be Simon Murphy (conductor) and not Simon Francis Murphy (conductor).

Thanks! Jack Duggan (talk) 07:49, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

 Done

Conserve Wildlife Foundation of NJ

Hi Mdann52,

Thank you for reviewing my article called the conserve wildlife foundation of NJ. I saw that the article was denied. After the first time it was denied, I added about 7 news articles to fulfill the notability requirement. I saw that you said that I need to add more secondary sources. How many more do I need? I would really appreciate your help.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Riverline5 Here is my user page.

Thank you so much. riverline5(talk)Riverline5 (talk) 14:38, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

I would recommend at least 10 independent sources Mdann52 (talk) 15:44, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Individual Education

Hi mdann52,

Just a head's up that I have more than tripled the number of independent sources in my article to 15. They are primarily journal articles. Do you think this will be sufficient or do I need to keep researching? It has been expensive accessing the articles online.

Cheers Rorynisan (talk) 15:35, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

That should be fine - before, you needed more Independant sources. If you resubmit it, I will check it Mdann52 (talk) 15:43, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

It has been resubmitted. Thanks! Rorynisan (talk) 18:56, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your help getting this thing locked and loaded!Rorynisan (talk) 20:58, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Response to not completeing the request to change his club status to Lille.

WOW wikipedia sure is a unrealiable source then. How can one article state http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transfer_window that the transfer window is closed until the 1. July when another article can claim that it's possible to transfer before? There is no consensus then... The french article says nothing about when the transfer will go trough it only says something about the deal complete which is a whole different story. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Storemike (talk • contribs) 13:50, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

As an editor, I can't accept a link to another Wikipedia page as reliable. If you can provide a external source, however, the I can Mdann52 (talk) 15:43, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Help with article I created for Justin McAuliffe reviewed by you

Hi Mdann52, Thanks for taking the time to review the article I created for Justin McAuliffe. I am new to creating articles and although I tried my best I figured I might make a mistake. I read your comment but unfortunately I do not know how to proceed. I would appreciate if you could give me some direction of what to do to make my article up to wikipedia standards. Your comment on my article was that it did not provide context. I read the writing a better article and the section on context. I followed the suggestions and wikilinked some more terms, but other than that I can't really figure out what type of improvements to context I can make. The article gives a good amount of context. Could you please point out any specifics? Yourhelp is appreciated, I want to get into writing more wikipedia articles!

Thank you,

Steven — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevenjake1980 (talk • contribs) 16:39, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

I have re-revewed it, and accepted it. Sorry for the accidental button-press, Mdann52 (talk) 16:42, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Thank you sir, I like the pun generator by the way. Have a great day. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevenjake1980 (talk • contribs) 19:50, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Thank you

Hello, Mdann52. You have new messages at Tattoodwaitress's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Inappropriate use of STiki

Now I see you are very eager to join in on the condemnation here, aren't you? GotR ^Talk 18:29, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

16-23 June

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Holbi_Group

Hello Mdann52!

You've recently reviewed and rejected my article (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Holbi_Group) submission and I was wondering if you could explain why? There is a mentioning of relliable resources, which after careful reading, I still don't quite understand, why it is an issue.

Looking forward to your response!

Thanks in advance, Elena. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ElenaBiz (talk • contribs) 14:23, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Recent Edit Request

HI i recently made proposed an edit on cannibis(drug) page. you said we need to remain neutral? I'm confused at what you mean its been proven that marijuana can cause depersonalization. people need to understand that so more do not suffer. if you are a pot enthusiast yourself please do not let your personal opinions override rational ones. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.81.135.211 (talk) 06:51, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

I am not questioning the fact it causes depression, but we can't say this outright. And I don't take drugs, as you ave tried to infer from your comment. Mdann52 (talk) 12:40, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Disruptive editing and promoting by users 76.175.157.240 and James Mojo

Thanks for warning those two user accounts (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:76.175.157.240 and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:James_mojo) - apparently they are the same person - about his/their disruptive editing and promoting on the Tim Dog. They keep typing a URL (diaryofahollywoodstreetking.com) into articles to promote the blog of Jacky Jasper. The URL currenlty appears two times on the Jacky Jasper article. James Mojo was also warned about this promoting violation in 2011, as you will see on his Talk Page. Why is he allowed to continue editing when he keeps doing this after being warned? Thanks for your help on this? 76.189.101.150 (talk) 22:26, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Jacky Jasper

Hello Mdann52. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Jacky Jasper, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: article contains multiple assertions of importance. If you believe the subject not to be notable, please use WP:AFD instead. Thank you. SoWhy 10:23, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Your edits on Jacky Jasper

I saw the edits you made on Jacky Jasper but I'm sorry, I am not satisfied at all with the edits you did NOT make. They include the following: Paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 are completely unsourced. The 3rd paragraph makes the outrageous, uncited claim that Jasper won a Grammy Award, which is completely false according all the research I did including reviewing the complete lists of Grammy Award winners. (You can also Google the topic - Jacky Jasper Grammy - and you'll see all sites which say the Grammy claim is false and where he's been asked to prove it, which he's never done.) By not removing this, it sends the message that anyone can make the claim, with no proof, that they've won a Grammy (or Oscar, Emmy or Tony) and it will be allowed to stay in the article? The 3rd paragraph also has "RICK JAMES" in it (all caps). The 4th paragraph is completely promotional language about Jasper's blog, but you didn't touch it except for removing the URL to his blog. It says, "Instead of using this outlet to create only his own success he teamed up with industry leaders to bring much needed resources and information back to the street. Jacky serves up daily industry news, exclusive interviews,and reviews almost everything!" In the 5th paragraph, the first sentence details sexually explicit arrest charges of a living person that are based solely on a citation from a tabloid site? The 5th paragraph is also obviously very poorly written (grammar and puncutation). I feel the entire article warrants being removed. However, if that's not going to be done I am asking that you please at least make edits based on the above substantive ojections. The article is obviously written from a fan's perspective and is being used for promotional purposes. Thanks for your continued help on this. 76.189.101.150 (talk) 11:02, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

P.S. By the way, just so you know, I do appreciate the interest you took in making the edits you DID make. I know your intentions are to do the right thing. I should have mentioned this above. 76.189.101.150 (talk) 11:27, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Got your note. Thanks. Regarding Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jacky_Jasper, I did some research and found information that says "Jacky Jasper" is not even the guy's real name; that it is actually the alter ego of a guy named Greg Comeau, who has/had several other aliases. Google it. You won't find any information on this guy from a "credible" source that will qualify him (Comeau or "Jacky Jasper") as being notable. Jasper completely fails the rules of notability. So based on that criteria alone, hopefully the article will be deleted. Then, the many other violations in the article itself won't matter any more. One other note, the music group the Jasper article says he was in, The Clayborne Family, doesn't appear to come close to passing the notability smell test either. Should that be put up for deletion, also? Thanks. 76.189.106.160 (talk) 15:06, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Joseph O'Lawlor

Hello Mdann52, I was surprised that my article on General O'Lawlor was rejected for lack of sources when it had 13 of them. It did rely most heavily on the first one - does that need to be plainer? John — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jc33a (talk • contribs) 11:32, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Hello again, I have tidied up the article quite a bit. I think it looks a look better now. Regards John Jc33a (talk) 00:11, 25 June 2012 (UTC)jc33a

Swamilive

FFS! The guy is a well known and persistent sock puppet with a long history. He even has his own category of proven sock puppets that includes over a hundred entries! Suggestion: Do a search on "Swamilive". (Include categories and talk pages) Pdfpdf (talk) 15:55, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Manil Suri Photograph

You'd responded to my request on how to add a photo to the page on me. I've added the photo, and the owner of the photo, Jose Villarrubia, has e-mailed his consent to permissions-en@wikimedia.org Hopefully, that's everything. There is a strange command line above my photo on Manil Suri, though - something about frames. Could you remove it? Thanks. Jacobian59 (talk) 20:51, 18 June 2012 (UTC) I need to do some reasearch into this issue.... Mdann52 (talk) 20:59, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

About the magnetometer page

Someone added a bunch of stuff from way back in the past that seems to be specific to one company. Someone deleted that stuff and put in some new stuff. You then went an deleted the OK stuff and put back the waaaay out of date stuff. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.86.214.133 (talk) 21:47, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

Conserve Wildlife Foundation of NJ

Hi Mdann52,

So I now have 13 news articles. Can you please look at my page and let me know if it is good to submit it again for articles for creation?

Thank you for your help!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Riverline5 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Riverline5/sandbox

riverline5(talk) Riverline5 (talk) 01:51, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Your reply to notability issue

Hi, I received your reply to User_talk:76.189.101.150#Notability_-_Help_Request. Thanks. What do you mean the other three (Alpern Tarlow, Snyder and Tarlow) already have AfD's on them? I looked at those three articles and there are no notices on any of those pages. I do, however, see the speedy deletion notice on Graff that you added.

I might start an account. I haven't decided.

By the way, how do I reply to you directly from my talk page (so I don't have to come to your talk page to do it)? It's strange writing for help on one page, then having to go to another page to reply.

Also, my internet provider changed my IP slightly yesterday (it always changes every few weeks or months), so now when I sign things on here, it has the new IP. It's confusing because they don't match. And all my discussions are on the old one (76.189.101.150).

I'm really curious to hear why those three articles you said have AfD's on them don't show that on their pages. I don't see any notices on any of them. Thanks again! 76.189.106.160 (talk) 16:40, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

If you post directly to your talk page, I will be alerted through my watch list. About the AfD's, Look on the articles talk pages. Mdann52 (talk) 17:02, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the update. I see that both Graff and Snyder now have speedy deletion notices. And I went to Peter Tarlow's talk page and saw the (hostile) discussion from 2008 about whether to delete it. Wow. As far as Sara Alpern Tarlow, I still don't see anything regarding deletion on her talk page (Talk:Sara_Alpern). Can you give me the link to the page that shows it? If she passes the notability test, then the majority of associate professors in the U.S. probably do, also. I'm basing this solely on the article's content and (lack of) references to show notability. 76.189.106.160 (talk) 17:35, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Ultimate Spider Woman

I'm sorry but I party said that you can help me! --Ultimate Anna (talk) 01:23, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

I'll go and find out what he meant Mdann52 (talk) 16:15, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

 Not done The translation of the copyright licence is :-

"© This file is not free (does not meet the definition of Free Cultural Works). In accordance with the decision of the Wikimedia Foundation, it can be used in the articles of the Russian section of Wikipedia only under the criteria of fair use. Any other use (as in the Russian section of Wikipedia, and outside it) may be a violation of copyright."
Therefore, I can't put the picture in question into the article Mdann52 (talk) 16:22, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

I'm not asking you it is from there take the picture here's the link! There you can select any image Ultimate Spider Woman, or rather the cover! http://hawnee94.tumblr.com/post/24717323850 --Ultimate Anna (talk) 18:27, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

 Not done I believe the image is non-free, therefore I WILL NOT upload it. If you upload it, however, then I will put it up. Mdann52 (talk) 15:35, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Calm down, I have a computer image with all data! After all, earlier in the article there was a picture of the cover of Ultimate Spider-Man # 98, just the fault of my sisters have it removed, she wanted to correct this mistake, but was blocked don't know anyone! And she asked me as an older sister to help, but do not know how it should be done and that is why I appealed to the clever people and they advised me to you, but I'm not forcing anything to do! If you do I can't help, you can for me to find any administrator, to consult! --Ultimate Anna (talk) 05:23, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Relax in the Russian version of the article Jessica loading the image was I! But here my name is not accepted and I came here under a different name! --Ultimate Anna (talk) 23:31, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Believing everything you hear

If this warning was based on something an unregistered user told you on IRC, my advice is... don't base anything on something you're told on IRC. Base it on information you have actually seen yourself on Wikipedia. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 21:04, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

It wasn't. It appears it may be wp:povpush From a user using accounts and IP's, but I am not 100% sure, so I included an extra message Mdann52 (talk) 15:11, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

24th-31st June

Thank you for your kind offer

Thanks for your offer of help, Mdann52 - I am a newbie so hope I have typed this in the right area! Best regards, webwhippet Webwhippet (talk) 19:36, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Inappropriate behavior ?

There is an existing content-dispute on Nair article between me and User:Sitush on the phraseology of a lead sentence. 9 NPOVs provided by me for not acceptable to him , yet adhering to wikipedia guidelines I made no effort to edit the sentence while the consensus-talk was going on. Inspite of the User: Qwyrxian /QW (administrator) makes an wnwarranted threat “Should you edit the article to follow one of your alternatives, we'll revert you” – See here . I explained to User:QW- if that was my intention, I would have not be discussing-consensus in the talk-page in the first place and that his comments were unwarranted. In between, User: Sitush suggested an NPOV of adding an (s) to a word- That was not acceptable to me. So the consensus building had failed. Inspite of this, User:Sitush went ahead and made the addition of (s) without consensus-generation. UserQW (administrator) does not object to it. Assuming good faith, I was willing to ignore this silence and unwarranted edit and hence asked User:Sitush to revert his edit and to generate “collective-editorial consensus” before doing so. It was requested to the Users that consensus in Nair article needs to be a “collective-editor consensus” and not UserQW-UserSitush consensus as that is inappropriate. See here. Such behaviors have from these two users occurred in the past – an examination of Nair-talk page history will reveal it. Immediately User Sitush places a formal notification that explains discretionary ban on my talk page !!!. See here. This is the same user who earlier had engaged in ad hominem and belittling at me in another article –Iyengar talk page and OTRS Volunteer Response Team had adviced him not do so. See here. Even you had asked me contact you again if such things happen. Are such behaviors acceptable from Users ? . VSVettakkorumakansnehi (talk) 14:05, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

semi-protect edit request

In case you are unaware 72.235.213.232 submitted what appear to be good sources for the requested it. Rather than familiarise myself with the history and so, I thought I'd let you know they are there. Callanecc (talk) 02:49, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Ultimate_Spider_Woman.jpg

This image has been removed, but it was written that you can replace it you can download the other! But I don't know how to download! --Ultimate Anna (talk) 07:36, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

No I can't - it is copywrited! Wikipedia can not use copywrited images. Mdann52 (talk) 10:04, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

copywrited! What does it mean?! --Ultimate Anna (talk) 16:57, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

WP:Copyright FAQ. Mdann52 (talk) 19:13, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

And can you tell me in brief explanation? --Ultimate Anna (talk) 19:17, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

No, read the page. Mdann52 (talk) 19:20, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

My English is bad, I know! --Ultimate Anna (talk) 19:29, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Basically, you need the image owners permission to upload an image. Mdann52 (talk) 19:33, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Well, if you put all of the data of an unfree image, you can upload it?! --Ultimate Anna (talk) 19:37, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Then it should be ok. Mdann52 (talk) 20:12, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

I'm sorry, what? --Ultimate Anna (talk) 22:11, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Ultimate X-Men 40 Cover.jpg Because this file somewhere and somehow downloaded?! Only do not know how! --Ultimate Anna (talk) 18:50, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

If you can't help me or don't want to then I'm not upset! --Ultimate Anna (talk) 05:25, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Just a heads up: Ultimate Anna is very likely a sock of the indefinitely blocked Shawnee Smith/Hawnee94. They do know how to upload image to Wikipedia, they just don't get the non-free content policies. They have also uploaded the same image to commons to try an circumvent the policies here. Lastly, they started out on the Russian Wikipedia with the same focus and seem to have had similar trouble there

- J Greb (talk) 11:28, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Android version history

Hi Mdann52. Are you cancelling the request for semi-protection on this article, has it been denied, or did i just place it wrongly? Thanks and have a nice day Jenova20 12:44, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

I couldn't find what you want to be edited. Place it DIRECTLY ABOVE the part you want changed. I will look at it later. Mdann52 (talk) 12:46, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

::The part i want changed? I did request semi-protection for the page and not an edit request right? Thanks Jenova20 12:48, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Ignore the above, i just noticed what i did. Thanks for clearing that up for me Jenova20 13:05, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for editing the HHsuite article

Many thanks for your service to the wikipedia community and for editing and checking my article about the HH-suite software package. Best regards, Johannes

(talk) 19:15, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.57.45.255 (talk)

Automatic Differentiation Content Undo

I had added additional content regarding CppAD that was removed.

The information pertained to a new project, CppADCodegen, to which I and the original author of CppAD have contributed. This project allows to perform source code generation using CppAD (much like CasADi).

Could you please revert your undo.

Best regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by JoaoRLeal (talk • contribs) 09:49, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

The Board of

You can look and say which of these images would be more went to the article? http://hawnee94.tumblr.com/page/2 --Ultimate Anna (talk) 11:56, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Hey? --Ultimate Anna (talk) 02:21, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

You need to upload the image you want. I do not upload images as a general rule Mdann52 (talk) 09:07, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

And that is, that I did not correct?--Ultimate Anna (talk) 12:12, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Please note that, due to Sockpuppetry Claims against you, I WILL NOT offer you anymore help until you explain why you are block evading. Thanks,Mdann52 (talk) 12:52, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

I'm here to stay won't stop! I only wanted to deal with the article Ultimate Spider Woman! And I would have gone! --Ultimate Anna (talk) 14:31, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

June 2012

Hi Mdann52. Thank you for your work on patrolling new pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I'm just letting you know that I declined your deletion request for Institute of Management and Development, New Delhi, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to look at the suggested tasks for patrollers and review the criteria for speedy deletion. Particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion, proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. Not a blank page. Adjkasi (discuss me | changes) 09:29, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5