Merlin889
Welcome!
editHello, Merlin889, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JarrahTree 10:12, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
your edit summary
editA plenty of grammatical errors hardly enthuses a sense of grammatical competency or aptness !! JarrahTree 10:15, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
February 2019
editHello, I'm Nzd. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Supply-chain management have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Nzd (talk) 20:55, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
March 2019
edit{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. MER-C 14:42, 9 March 2019 (UTC)Merlin889 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hi MER-C hope you're doing well. Basically, it wasn't my intention or deliberate attempt to conflict Wikipedia rules and regulations. Recently, I've made an article about a company called Interlog Group which is one of the popular company in my hometown. Since i was new to Wikipedia i wasn't aware of so many things, i had to go through a lot in terms of learning what Wikipedia is all about. I've put all my hard work in collecting resources of this company and I've spent so much time on editing the article as well. Recently, I've even talked to the company(which is not possible but i made it just to successfully publish my first article in Wikipedia) about providing copyright for the logo i uploaded. I' don't know if people misuse Wikipedia by advertising and spamming until you told me about it. I admit the fact that i did involved in lot of editing just to make the article look better(i don't know if too much editing is a spam).I also don't have any idea about advertising either(because i don't know how advertisement work in Wikipedia) but I've seen few articles having advertisement tags on top of their articles. I had a plan to publish another article about my hometown as well, it is bit sad for me that my work and me getting blocked from contribution to Wikipedia.If i did something wrong, i would like you to help me out to correct the issue and i assure you that i won't make the mistakes again. It is also a request from me to unblock my account so that i can again contribute to Wikipedia Merlin889 (talk)
Decline reason:
I don't think you're being honest about your connections to the company. Please read WP:PAID and WP:COI. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:38, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- I seriously doubt your explanation for reasons I will explain to the reviewing admin. MER-C 19:10, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by Interlog Group(Director) for their contributions to Interlog Group. |
Hi MER-C, Ohnoitsjamie, I apologize for not being honest about my connection to the company. In fact, the intention was not to write the article like an advertisement, I reckon, it has been written in the neutral way to comply the Wikipedia's rules and regulations.I also understand the fact that the sources linked to the content must be genuine.Once again i didn't mean to vandalize anything in Wikipedia, if I did I apologize for my mistake and negligence. Anyway, Thank you guys for your patience to have the conversation with me in this talk page Merlin889 (talk).
Orphaned non-free image File:Interlog group logo.png
editThanks for uploading File:Interlog group logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Merlin889 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hope you are're doing good. Basically I've been blocked for covert advertising, but i am sure that the intention was not to write the article like an advertisement, instead, it's written more neutrally to comply with the terms and condition of Wikipedia. Here, I admit the fact that i have a connection with the company for writing the article. Unknowingly, I also committed on editing the article too much after it's published which i shouldn't have done it. Here after i make sure i do things with full awareness or else i seek some advice or help form the admins in the talk page before i committed.Hence i would like you guys to unblock me so that i can contribute again to Wikipedia. Merlin889 (talk) 16:04, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Since you were deceitful about your connection with the company, I am not prepared to unblock you to write further about it (and I suspect other admins will feel the same). Are there any other subjects you would like to write about if unblocked? Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:32, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Hi Boing! said Zebedee, Yes, i would like to write an article about my hometown. I also agree not to edit back my previous article, one that i published Merlin889 (talk).
- If you make another unblock request, another admin will review it. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:35, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
Merlin889 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hope you're doing well. Basically my account has been blocked for advertising on Wikipedia, from now on i make sure i follow the terms and condition of Wikipedia. I've also involved in editing the article too much and I make sure not to edit the article again(one that i published) since i have a connection with the company. My bad that i didn't inform Wikipedia about the connection with the company beforehand of publishing the article but hereafter, i reveal everything before i commit them. Even if i had some doubts, i make sure i ask the admins.So i hope my account get unblocked Merlin889 (talk) 07:51, 6 April 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Like Boing above, I'm unwilling to unblock you without a topic ban in that subject area, given your past editing. Yamla (talk) 13:56, 8 April 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
April 2019
editHi Yamla, I don't understand what i did wrong to get me blocked. This is the article Draft:Interlog Group I've written before i get blocked.I haven't written this article with the intention of writing like an advertisement and i didn't plagiarize any of the content in this article. I've been inspired by so many articles in Wikipedia itself to finish the entire article. I also took my time to collect resources for the sentences I've used in the article. Every time i started writing a sentence, i made sure that the sentence won't portray like an advertisement because Wikipedia won't support advertisement. I don't understand one thing, there are so many companies info is in Wikipedia where most of them written the article like an advertisement(got advertisement tags on the top) and their articles still got published and they are not blocked too. Even most of the celebrities info's are out there in Wikipedia , just like that it is an info of a company(one that i wrote). I reckon i didn't write it like a person who is not at all familiar about Wikipedia because I think it looks more like a descent one. I also admitted already that i have a connection with the company and agreed not to edit it again, then why i am still be blocked. From my question, don't think i am being harsh, just wondering about being blocked Merlin889 (talk).
Hi Jéské Couriano, i would like to write another article about my hometown town and i am sure this is not an advertisement. I would also like to contribute to the things that i know very well. If i wanted to edit the article that i published I would ask the respective admin in the talk page without committing.
Speedy deletion nomination of Interlog Group
editHello Merlin889,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Interlog Group for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.