MichaelBBC

Welcome!

Hello, MichaelBBC, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Visitors Lifecycle Management, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ... discospinster _talk 02:19, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Visitors Lifecycle Management

The article Visitors Lifecycle Management has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I am unable to find sufficient secondary sources discussing this concept.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 02:19, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Visitors Lifecycle Management

I have moved this article to your userspace so that you can work on it. It's located at User:MichaelBBC/Visitors Lifecycle Management. ... discospinster _talk 13:26, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Page moved

I moved the page you're working on to User:MichaelBBC/Daniel H Hristov. You accidentally put it in another user's userspace. Jackmcbarn (talk) 19:15, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Daniel Hristov.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Daniel Hristov.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:36, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Daniel Hristov Hristov

The page Daniel Hristov Hristov, which you just moved to mainspace, doesn't meet Wikipedia's guidelines and will likely be tagged for deletion soon. I recommend that you move it either back to userspace or into AfC space if you want to keep it. Jackmcbarn (talk) 19:15, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, MichaelBBC. You have new messages at Jackmcbarn's talk page.
Message added 19:25, 9 August 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Jackmcbarn (talk) 19:25, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, MichaelBBC. You have new messages at Jackmcbarn's talk page.
Message added 19:30, 9 August 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Jackmcbarn (talk) 19:30, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Visitors Lifecycle Management

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Visitors Lifecycle Management, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Jackmcbarn (talk) 20:31, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Web-sales automation

I see that you are acquainted with wikipedia guidelines and you will therefore be aware that all articles have to have reliable independent references to demonstrate their notability. Please add such references to this article ASAP or it is liable to be deleted. Deb (talk) 11:40, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

That is correct I am fairly acquainted with the wiki guidelines. Therefore I will move this article to my userspace until I provide sufficient references. MichaelBBC (talk) 11:43, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Visitors Lifecycle Management

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Visitors Lifecycle Management, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. JNW (talk) 12:18, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

As noted in earlier discussions, this appears to promote a concept without sufficient reliable sources to support its notability. Is WP:COI a concern here? JNW (talk) 12:18, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Daniel Hristov Hristov

Hello MichaelBBC,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Daniel Hristov Hristov for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Mr RD 19:27, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Web-sales automation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Web-sales automation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Web-sales automation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:51, 12 February 2014 (UTC)