User talk:Millermk/Archive (2012-1)

Backwards summary

The edit summary here is backwards. Could this be a bug in Huggle?  -- WikHead (talk) 04:35, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

If it was automated, you might want to report it as a potential bug on the Huggle talk page.  -- WikHead (talk) 04:43, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Not a problem. Happy editing! :)  -- WikHead (talk) 05:32, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Now why did you revert?

My edit summary indicates the material is uncited. Gooolog (talk) 18:11, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

This was just garabage material inserted by people over the years.Gooolog (talk) 18:13, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

I did say uncited. Then another editor reversed it, and I straightened it out with him. Then you reversed me. Gooolog (talk) 18:16, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Can you restore the edit? Gooolog (talk) 18:19, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	I am Awesome Rozy18 (talk) 18:31, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

March 2012

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as on User talk:Rahulmothiya, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. Rahul Mothiya ^{(Talk2Me|Contribs)} 12:36, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Atomic Kitten

Hello. Your use of HG has given you a false positive on my recent edits on Atomic Kitten. My edits were actually removing unsourced "fancruft" information, not adding it. Thanks. 88.110.250.5 (talk) 15:11, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Notification

You are mentioned in this thread at NCHQ and may wish to comment. -- John of Reading (talk) 07:01, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Microsoft Wave

Hello Millermk90. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Microsoft Wave, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims coverage in reliable sources. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 04:46, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: The Miller Group

Hello Millermk90. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of The Miller Group, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 20:27, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

If you are looking for vandalism ...

check-out the ineffective use of wikipedia edits by Special:Contributions/Arthur Rubin 99.181.134.196 (talk) 07:17, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

No examples?

? 99.181.134.196 (talk) 07:36, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Wikihate

I'm keeping these comments because I thought they were kinda funny... especially the link :)

I'll block you, everything I wrote is true idiot — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.21.106.172 (talk) 07:39, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

https://encrypted-tbn1.google.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcS4JWGrB7Br3Zr9Y4bbAkN5swMWsZ4G-G14y-KBOZeoiLNyS4f_7Q — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.21.106.172 (talk) 07:45, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

I HATE YOU — Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.135.145.23 (talk • contribs)

get a life you unemployed virgin — Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.135.7.11 (talk) 18:52, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Confusion

You reverted for unexplained content removal, but it seems your revert removed content, too? - Zhou Yu (talk) 07:28, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Link

I'm here to talk about the link I provided about the attendance for "WWE Night of Champions 2008", yes it's a video but it tells you what the real attendance is of the event around the 00:10. The real attendance of the event was 16,151 while the one you guys have is false. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.106.252.243 (talk • contribs)

spado da lato

I merged it with rapier, because it is a kind of rapier and it is an uncited stub. Tinynanorobots (talk) 02:23, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Page blanked by author

Hi. Though page blanking is usually vandalism and needs to be reverted, it is worth looking first at the page history, because quite often the author has blanked his own page, as with Julius Evan Taguinod just now. In those cases the best thing is to tag it {{db-author}}. It can be confusing for an author who realises his page is inappropriate and blanks it, if his page is at once restored and he is accused of vandalism for the blanking and told it was unconstructive. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 10:02, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Canning Bridge Rail Station

http://www.transport.wa.gov.au/ABOUT_P_PT_Plan2031.pdf see page 23 this is source of claim that Canning bridge rail station requires an upgrade. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.206.58.176 (talk) 11:37, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Dubious Edits Etc

Hi Millermk90

I would like some advice relating to the Antisect Wikipedia page.

Since 19 March this year a Wikipedia user operating from 3 differint IP addresses has made more than 40 disruptive edits to this page which have been unsourced, potentially libellous, sometimes malicious and abusive and frequently out of context. The individual has also used the page to air personal grievances and has on more than one occasion blanked the entire page or sections of the page.

Unfortunately this is not something that can be resolved by approaching said individual. Is there anything that can be done to stop this type of disruptive editing as if nothing else it is now becoming rather tedious. The user has already received warnings from Wikipedia on a number of occasions.

If this is not the right place to ask for this advice, I would be extremely grateful if you could point me in the right direction.

Many thanks 94.8.24.16 (talk) 11:58, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Homecoming (poem)

If you withdraw an AFD, you can just close it yourself. I've closed it for you. No need to wait on an admin. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:29, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Wrong revert reason

Hi! This edit, which you reverted and notified the user about was not an AfD template removal. Just letting you know you probably mis-clicked in Huggle. Regards. —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK 09:47, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Vandalism reversion mistake

Hi, why did you revert your own vandalism removal at the Apricot article? This edit was well and truly worth reverting. Graham87 15:43, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Just got a little confused. I misread it and thought it said fuzzy, which I thought probably would be considered a good faith edit so i reverted just to be sure I wasn't being too harsh. Millermk90 (talk) 17:50, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

List of A Haunting episodes

You recently undid a blanking in this article because it wasn't explained. Unfortunate, because it turns out season 5 doesn't actually exist, at least not according to the channel that broadcasts the show if the external links are anything to go by. It appears the titles in the so-called season 5 are altered from existing episodes in season 2 and 4 (as far as I can tell). The same user also added a bunch of nonsense about gay mental hospitals, darth vader and retards. I hope I reverted everything, but a closer look might be required. - 87.211.75.45 (talk) 14:58, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of List of features removed in Windows 8

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on List of features removed in Windows 8, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. A:-)Brunuś (talk) 16:29, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

RaidCall Deletion

I would like to know who RaidCall page was deleted, and if you read the contents on the page; it shows its not promotional at all. The article gives the users a general knowledge on the Client, and how it works. That's about it. The page serves the same purpose as Ventrilo, Mumble, TeamSpeak etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.62.177.70 (talk) 23:57, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

The information has sources

Thanks for your message. I have a number of questions.

1. How does one go about obtaining consensus? 2. How does one go about gaining consensus when nobody engages in a constructive way (i.e., by either agreeing or disagreeing with one's viewpoint on the article's content and giving reasons for either)? 3. Does a lack of such constructive engagement not give an editor carte blanche to edit what (s)he sees fit? If not, does the reticence of others equal an editing prohibition? 4. Even if the consensus were against me, would that be to say that Wikipedia represnts a democractic view of the facts? That if enough Nazis get together, Hitler becomes a nice, misunderstood guy? What use is that to anyone? 5. Specifically in this case, you say the information has sources. I don't dispute that. However, the information, sourced or not, has no place in that article. It's akin to placing sourced information about, say, Elvis Presley's actions on the Wiki page for Barack Obama. I've begun a Dispute Resolution Noticeboard section here: Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Suicide of Tyler Clementi". Thank you. . Perhaps you'd like to participate. Hypesmasher (talk) 01:01, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Auction Hunters

I have a problem with the Auction Hunters Page. Allen Lee Half is a paid actor. He has been in Movies and TV shows. CSI Miami, 2001 movie Rodentz. I have proof that he is an actor, not a second generation antiques dealer. http://movies.nytimes.com/movie/287896/Rodentz/overview . Or you could just go to www.nytimes.com type in Rodentz review. you will see his name. Also They are breaking the Law The Sherman Act of 1890 and "bid rigging". If you have that page up it should be Accurate for the public. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.28.33.115 (talk) 06:52, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for your contributions. SwisterTwister talk 18:57, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Kamalashile

hey Miller

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Kamalashile with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Millermk90 (talk) 09:43, 15 May 2012 (UTC) You mentioned this in my talk page, as you said i should used sandbox for testing, initially i was not aware of it, currently i have fixed it properly using wikitable. Please let me know if things are looking fine now. And if it looks ok. can i remove this topic from my talk page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vishwakumarmc (talk • contribs) 15:08, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Millermk. You have new messages at AndrewN's talk page.
Message added 05:54, 26 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

AndrewN ^talk 05:54, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Millermk. You have new messages at AndrewN's talk page.
Message added 06:02, 26 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

AndrewN ^talk 06:02, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Millermk. You have new messages at AndrewN's talk page.
Message added 06:15, 26 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

AndrewN ^talk 06:15, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

		The Articles for Creation barnstar
		Thanks for your help clearing out the massive backlog! AndrewN talk 06:17, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Copyvio

Can you explain this? I have been unable to discover the copyvio. Ryan Vesey Review me! 07:16, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

A pie for you!

Much obliged, thank you! AntonioRusconi (talk) 10:47, 26 May 2012 (UTC)