Moomooocow

Welcome

Hello, Moomooocow and welcome to Wikipedia! It appears you are participating in a class project. If you haven't done so already, we encourage you to go through our training for students. Go through our online training for students

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Please also read this helpful advice for students.

Before you create an article, make sure you understand what kind of articles are accepted here. Remember: Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and while many topics are encyclopedic, some things are not.

Your instructor or professor may wish to set up a course page, and if your class doesn't already have one please tell your instructor about that. It is highly recommended that you place this text: {{Educational assignment}} on the talk page of any articles you are working on as part of your Wikipedia-related course assignment. This will let other editors know this article is a subject of an educational assignment and aid your communication with them.

We hope you like it here and encourage you to stay even after your assignment is finished! Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:43, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Itabora Ferreira (October 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Itabora Ferreira and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 02:01, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Hello! Moomooocow, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 02:01, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Itabora Ferreira (October 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Itabora Ferreira and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 05:24, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Moomooocow. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 14:10, 25 October 2017 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Your submission at Articles for creation: Itabora Ferreira (October 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Itabora Ferreira and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 15:21, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Itabora Ferreira has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Itabora Ferreira. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:22, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Itabora Ferreira (October 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chrissymad was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Itabora Ferreira and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:54, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Itabora Ferreira

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Itabora Ferreira, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 18:01, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

`

Your teacher told you to put SPAM in the encyclopedia?

Hey. What class is it? Who is the teacher? Perhaps they should introduce themselves at Wikipedia:Education noticeboard. There they can seek info on how students can contribute non disruptively. I'll add a student welcome that will shed more light.Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:41, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017

Hello, Moomooocow. Thank you for helping to build Wikipedia-- the world's largest free content encyclopedia. I'm sorry, but  Draft:Itabora Ferreira has been deleted as meeting WP:CSD#G11. "This applies to pages that are exclusively promotional and would need to be fundamentally rewritten to conform with Wikipedia:NOTFORPROMOTION." These must be rewritten from scratch from "reliable, third party sources unconnected to the subject." See WP:RS.

Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Users who do so may be blocked from editing. Promotional content is vigorously deleted. For more information on content that may be perceived as promotional, click User:Dlohcierekim/promo.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia-- subjects must meet notability guidelines with reliable sources providing verifiable information. That generally means someone unconnected with the subject needs to have written a great deal about the subject. Please see Wikipedia:Citing sources . Template:cite has templates you can use in citing your sources. Place the template {{references}} at the bottom of the page, and references cited in the text will appear there.

YOU CAN ASK FOR HELP AT THE TEAHOUSE

Any deficiencies should be remedied before reposting as they can lead to repeated deletions. Wikipedia is not a webhost. You may wish to consider alternative outlets.

If you want to try again, please use the Article Wizard or articles for creation to guide you through the creation process.

You may find this tool useful: Google custom search Don't feel discouraged. My first attempts at creating articles were deleted too. Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:43, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

and now a word about reliable sources

I looked at the links you added. None of the one's I saw mentioned the subject. Reliable sources need to treat the subject in a significant way. Alos, it would be help full to include external links to sources that talk about the subject within <nowiki<ref> </ef> tags.</nowiki> These will allow the cites to appear as footnotes a the bottom. As I do not believe your intent was to add spam. I will undelete. Under no circumstances resubmit until its defects have been remedied. We need confirmation from your instructor as to what class, what school, what instructor. ASAP. Thanks. Dlohcierekim (talk) 18:56, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Testimonials?

I've removed the testimonials. Seriously, what instruction did your teacher give as to creating encyclopedia articles? Not deleting this is a limited time offer. The more the content sinks in, the more I feel I erred in restoring it. If I do redelete it, your teacher will need to contact me before I even think of restoring it again.Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:08, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

In summation

• There were external links on the page that did not mention the subject at all. Of course they cannot serve as WP:reliable sources.
• There was content on the page with no source at all. Please read WP:BLP. Content needs to be sourced.
• There was an external link to web content connected with the subject. This can be used for some content, but will not establish meeting WP:notability
• The bulleted lists may or may not increase the resume appearance.
• Testimonials, mission/focus statements, some quotes can make the page look very promotional. For more info on that, see User:dlohcierekim/promo
• Please see WP:REFB for help with referencing.

There may be more that I missed. Hopefully this will help in the future.Dlohcierekim (talk) 21:14, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Itabora Ferreira

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Itabora Ferreira, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.

You have obviously read none of the advice which has been given to you, nor the reason why the draft was deleted. Creating it again in the same form is a waste of your time, and more importantly a waste of the time of reviewers and administrators. David Biddulph (talk) 22:35, 25 October 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Itabora Ferreira (October 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Whispering was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Itabora Ferreira and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Whispering 01:53, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Itabora Ferreira (October 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Itabora Ferreira and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:20, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Itabora Ferreira has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Itabora Ferreira. Thanks! WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:35, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Itabora Ferreira (October 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Itabora Ferreira and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 03:15, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia.

Your draft has now been deleted 4 times. You have been given copious advice, which you have steadfastly ignored and merely recreated your draft in the same totally unsuitable form. Editors who repeatedly edit in a disruptive manner are liable to be blocked from editing. --David Biddulph (talk) 07:35, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Itabora Ferreira (October 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Itabora Ferreira and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 03:38, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Itabora Ferreira (October 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Itabora Ferreira and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 04:34, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Itabora Ferreira (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Itabora Ferreira and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 08:09, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Itabora Ferreira (November 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Itabora Ferreira and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 01:25, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

November 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you create an inappropriate page. Please stop submitting your article. The subject obviously fails to satisfy WP:GNG. You have been warned multiple times now and yet you continue to disrupt Wikipedia. Please stop. David.moreno72 01:31, 2 November 2017 (UTC)