Morten
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
I wasn't sure if you were watching the discussion, so I just thought I should let you know I had a new idea, if you want to take a look at the talk page. Taric25 —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 12:25, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Pearl necklace (sexuality)
editAn editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Pearl necklace (sexuality). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pearl necklace (sexuality) (4th nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:06, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Centilitres
editHi Morten, though centilitres are used in Europe, this is not the case in Australia, and in America the use of centilitres is discouraged. See page 4 of [1]. I know that the Bartenders have fixed on the centilitre, but for a general English-speaking audience, the mL is much more familiar. Cheers, Michael Glass (talk) 23:59, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
- Have a look at WP:UNITS, section "which unit to use", 2nd bullet. Since you agree that bartenders use cl, this unit should be used in all cocktail definitions. --Morten (talk) 13:53, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
The second point of the introduction says, "Familiarity: The less readers have to look up definitions, the easier it is to be understood." If we were writing just for bartenders, I would agree that centilitres would be more appropriate, but Wikipedia is for the general reader. Generally, English-speaking readers are more familiar with millilitres than centilitres, so millilitres have the edge for familiarity.
Ordinarily I believe in following the sources exactly, but in this case, there is no rounding error and all we are doing is moving a decimal point so I believe that it is better to use the more familiar unit. Remember that English-speaking countries only began to use the metric system in daily life in the 1970s, so they adopted the SI version of the system rather than the more elaborate version that was adopted in Europe. You will note that in the United States, the largest English-speaking country, the use of centilitres is discouraged. So you can see why the general English-speaking public is less familiar with centilitres than, for instance, the Danes. Best wishes, Michael Glass (talk) 23:20, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Fixed your talk page archiving
editHi! I took the liberty of fixing the auto-archiving settings at the top of this page. --rchard2scout (talk) 12:19, 27 May 2021 (UTC)