Retired
This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

Welcome!

Hello, Mutchy126, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Blurpeace 03:53, 13 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

March 2011

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Togetherville. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 21:17, 12 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Dog. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. VQuakr (talk) 21:20, 12 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Last warning

edit

You've already been warned several times for this; while I don't think you're making bad-faith edits, you continue to add extraneous/redundant/grammatically incorrect material; more than half of your edits have been reverted for these reasons. Please see WP:COMPETENCE. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:26, 15 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Indeed, see the edit made on Google.Jasper Deng (talk) 19:58, 11 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Re: You've already been warned several times for this; while I don't think you're making bad-faith edits, you continue to add extraneous/redundant/grammatically incorrect material; more than half of your edits have been reverted for these reasons. Pl

edit

What did i do wrong! like i said, Google.com is for the U.S and for example Google.co.uk is for the UK!

Re: Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Dog. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (

edit

Ok! Will do!


Making frivolous, unconstructive edits after final warning

edit
 

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 24 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. OhNoitsJamie Talk 20:31, 11 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Re: Making frivolous, unconstructive edits after final warning

edit

Please Stop being mean to me! I did nothing wrong!!

Perhaps you did. We didn't want redundant (duplicate) text, nor grammatical errors.Jasper Deng (talk) 22:17, 11 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
It seems like you are eager to contribute to Wikipedia; that in itself is not a problem. However, you need to respond to feedback from other editors regarding your edits, and you should spend some more time getting acquainted with core Wikipedia policies, such as WP:MOS, WP:Verifiability, and WP:NPOV. I had no choice but to briefly block you because you continued making the same kinds of problematic edits despite being warned several times. OhNoitsJamie Talk 02:10, 12 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Example

edit

Your first edit after you block [1] is a sentence fragment. Please make more of an effort to follow rules of grammar, avoid redundancy, and follow Wikipedia's manual of style. Thanks, OhNoitsJamie Talk 16:27, 14 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

April 2011

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Weebly appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you.  Chzz  ►  17:55, 15 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of ClixSense

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on ClixSense, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Nat Gertler (talk) 17:17, 1 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply