User talk:Mvcg66b3r/Archives/2024/January

Happy New Year, Mvcg66b3r!

Happy New Year!

Mvcg66b3r,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 20:30, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 20:30, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Slow Down with the AfD nominations!

I see you have been nominating several dozen low-power television stations to AfD in the past couple of days. While the ones I have been able to view all appear to be plainly non-notable, I'd suggest reducing your throughput somewhat to allow others to be able to review them thoroughly in case some of them are notable. If not, I may choose to report you to ANI. Let'srun (talk) 17:43, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

You're right, I'll start looking at them little by little and give others a chance to look at them. Maybe you can help. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 17:48, 7 January 2024 (UTC)

KXAS-TV

The edit made on the KXAS-TV page regarding the events revolving around the unseen end of the Rams at Lions NFL playoff game was in no way, shape or form "vandalism". Why the removal? 47.184.144.158 (talk) 05:24, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

WP:NOTNEWS; WP:NPOV; did not belong in lede Mvcg66b3r (talk) 05:29, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Fine, removed from the lede. Re-added in what was a more appropriate place. Then you removed it from there? Why? 47.184.144.158 (talk) 05:42, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Did not express a neutral point of view; as I said, you might want to talk to @Sammi Brie: and see if she can help. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 05:43, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

I will edit from a completely neutral point of view then. 47.184.144.158 (talk) 05:46, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

It's probably undue at any place in that article, to be totally honest. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:00, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Why so? I even added a citations needed tag. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 06:02, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

You add it correctly, as a "Controversy", then turn around and almost immediately remove it. I do not understand the reasoning whatsoever. Please explain? Thanks. 47.184.144.158 (talk) 06:07, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

See Sammi's post above. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 06:08, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Is it an event so notable that it generates life of its own? Usually not. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:39, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Nice, but you still have not explained the deletion. 47.184.144.158 (talk) 06:48, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

https://www.yelp.com/biz/channel-5-nbc-kxas-tv-dallas? 47.184.144.158 (talk) 07:01, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Accessibility issues

Hello @Mvcg66b3r. Thanks for bringing those accessibility issues on various Florida articles to my attention. I found a nice balance, #FF9100 for backgrounds; and #333333 for text. This passes the WCAG Grading Standard, I used this resource: https://www.whocanuse.com/?bg=ff9100&fg=333333&fs=16&fw=, for reference (found it via Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Accessibility). If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to reach out to me. Would rather you do that, then edit anything without consoling for my input first. Much appreciated. Freeholdman12 (talk) 23:34, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Anyways, the color combinations on these templates shouldn't be changed at all, without WP:CONSENSUS. If you need help, just ask my good friend @Sammi Brie:. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 23:44, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of WOCW-LD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article WOCW-LD, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WOCW-LD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 17 January 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of KGKM-LD

The article KGKM-LD has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Subject does not meet the GNG, due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 22:32, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of KVQT-LD for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article KVQT-LD, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/KVQT-LD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 21 January 2024 (UTC)