Ngh93

License tagging for File:Steve oedekerk.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Steve oedekerk.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 23:05, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:DB Sweeny.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:DB Sweeny.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 02:47, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:DB Sweeny.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:DB Sweeny.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mosmof (talk) 02:47, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Steve oedekerk.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Steve oedekerk.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Mosmof (talk) 02:50, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

The source of the file, http://www.spokeo.com/Steve+Oedekerk+1/Jul+29+2006+Los+Angeles+Ca, does not indicate that it is released under a free license: in fact, beneath the image it is labelled "content ©2015 W.E.N.N. All Rights Reserved." Please read WP:Image use policy#Copyright and licensing; even if there is no copyright notice, very few images that you find on the Internet are released under a free license suitable for Wikipedia. JohnCD (talk) 16:37, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:D b sweeney a p.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:D b sweeney a p.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 22:38, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:SteveOedekerk barnyard.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:SteveOedekerk barnyard.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Steel1943 (talk) 22:52, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:JasonRaize.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:JasonRaize.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Steel1943 (talk) 23:57, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted, as you did at File:JasonRaize.jpg. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  SuperMarioMan ( talk ) 20:11, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Sources

Hello, I'm Ponyo. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Paul Tibbitt, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! --Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:36, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

I noticed that you recently used IMDB as a source for information in a biography article. Please note that per long-standing consensus, IMDb does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. You can read more about the reasons for this here, here and here.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 15:50, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

• "Google it" is not an acceptable response to requests that you follow Wikipedia's policies regarding sourcing in biography articles. If you cannot provide a source meeting the requisite criteria, the material cannot be included. See WP:DOB.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:42, 5 May 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Paul Tibbitt.

• Per Wikipedia policy: "Contentious material about living persons (or, in some cases, recently deceased) that is unsourced or poorly sourced – whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable – should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion. Users who persistently or egregiously violate this policy may be blocked from editing."
• Per Wikipedia policy: "Wikipedia includes full names and dates of birth that have been widely published by reliable sources, or by sources linked to the subject such that it may reasonably be inferred that the subject does not object."--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:23, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

License tagging for File:160204-news-joe-alaskey.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:160204-news-joe-alaskey.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:05, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:160204-news-joe-alaskey.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:160204-news-joe-alaskey.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:160204-news-joe-alaskey.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:160204-news-joe-alaskey.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted content borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. McGeddon (talk) 18:15, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

June 2016

Please stop adding inappropriate images to Wikipedia. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Images you find on other websites should only be uploaded to Wikipedia if they are clearly in the public domain, or have been released under an appropriate licence. McGeddon (talk) 18:18, 30 June 2016 (UTC)

Block notice

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:54, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

• Not only do you continue to add unsourced personal information to biography articles when you are well-aware that it is against policy to do so, your edits to Kent Osborne where you introduced four different dates back to back gives the impression that you are not here to edit constructively. If such edits continue once the block expires I imagine the next block will likely be indefinite.--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:54, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:04, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Ngh93 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

@Ponyo:I promise not to have any more unsourced edits. I love editing wiki and It's one of the best things I enjoy. I understand I was blocked because of unsourced quotes. It's because I don't know now to source my edits. Could you teach me how? Wikipedia is so complicated. I'd be very grateful if you unblock me or at least give me an expiration date please. I really adore editing on Wiki. Thank youNgh93 (talk) 19:31, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Per your agreement to use reliable sources moving forward. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:07, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

• I will leave this for another admin to review, but would like to know if you've read WP:RS and WP:BLP? --Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:56, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
• @Ponyo: Yes, I've read the two pages. Although I still find them a bit confusing. I think I'd love to be unblocked now please. I've learned my lesson I will not add anymore unsourced data. I promise. Ngh93 (talk) 23:55, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Can you explain what type of sources are considered reliable in the context of our WP:BLP policy? --Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:14, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

@Ponyo:: The types of sources that are considered reliable in the context to our WP:BLP policy are reliable published sources. Could you please unblock me or at least give me an expiration date please? I promise you that I've learned my lesson. Ngh93 (talk) 21:00, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

{{unblock|@Ponyo: I understand that i need to site my sources. Could you please unblock me so I can edit again? I'd do anything to be able to edit again on wiki. It's my favorite thing to do. And I'm a dedicated editor. Could you please unblock me or at least set an expiry date for me? Ngh93 (talk) 16:15, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

• Ngh93, I will unblock you if you agree to use reliable sources when adding information to biography articles. If you're unsure whether a source meets WP:RS, then you need to discuss the source on the article talk page (or via the reliable sources noticeboard) prior to adding information until you have a better understanding of the requirements. As we discussed previously, website databases such as IMDb do not meet the criteria. Do you agree to these terms?--Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:38, 26 October 2016 (UTC)
• @Ponyo: I agree 100%. I promise when I edit to use reliable sources when adding info to biographies. I've learned my lesson. I'm ready to edit very carefully. And I'm willing to do whatever it takes to understand these complex wiki requirements. Ngh93 (talk) 02:39, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Jennifer Hale article

The birthdate and place have been confirmed by reliable sources. It does not need to be removed. The year is left empty but referenced with footnote to indicate that a lot of effort was taken to verify that the year cannot be pinpointed, see her talk page for more information. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 00:19, 18 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Randy Quaid. Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 21:23, 22 April 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ngh93. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

File:SAGWA-12.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:17, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

• @User:RonBot Sorry about the image upload. I just thought the previous one was rather blurry and small. To be honest, I find these wiki guidelines and rules rather complicated and difficult to understand--especially when in comes to uploading images. I guess I'm just used to uploading new files like on fandom. Well, I looked at the previous image and it didn't seem to have any copyright tags or anything corrupted. Does that mean the better quality version I updated can stay? Or should I upload one with slightly smaller size? Just in case. --Ngh93 (talk) 17:58, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ngh93. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

17th April 2019

Could you not fight with Binksternet over your edit on Barbie Dolphin Magic please - he has reverted your edit for a reason.

Please make constructive and meaningful edits in the future.

THANKS

Malmsimp (talk) 10:04, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

• @Malmsimp I was just trying to improve the plot summary which wasn't complete. It stopped in the middle. And now it's back to the incomplete summary. Could I please fix that again? Don't we useually have hte full film plot written out including the ending? --Ngh93 (talk) 17:06, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

July 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Kaitlyn Robrock, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 02:47, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Ainbo

The website you used for your information appears to be a blog, which is not considered a reliable source. Please do a little extra work before adding sources to verify that they are good sources for information. Also, your edits broke most of the article. Make sure you know how to cite your sources and you use the Preview button before publishing your changes. BOVINEBOY2008 10:45, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

I'm sorry it's just this film's release date is very confusing! Some sources say November (without a specific date) Most say February 10th, 2021. Tell me what date next month does it come out if that's the case? --Ngh93 (talk) 16:44, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

I don't know, I'm not in charge lol. We just go by what the sources say. BOVINEBOY2008 10:26, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

April 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:59, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ngh93 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

With all respect, I think this ban is a bit too excessive and quite unnecessary and leaves me completely heartbroken shocked and baffled. :In all honesty, I thought I was simply correcting an error on the Richard Newman page--i didn't see any sites that didn't include the year 1946. I never have any ill intentions and I am certainly am against any damages or disruptions on this site. :You see I suffer from high functioning autism and it makes me have more difficulty following or understanding certain rules. :For example, I'm still trying to adjust to this site's rather complicated rules (like uploading images with sources). :So could you please allow me one more chance of redemption? This site is very special to me and it helps me express myself.After all, I believe everyone deserves chance of redemption. Nobody's perfect. :So, I'd be eternally grateful and ever so elated if you'd please uplift my ban so I can understand my mistake better and it would definitely help me learn how to prevent it in the future.

Decline reason:

Nothing here convinces me you understand our policies (particularly, our policies around unsourced content) now. Yamla (talk) 18:43, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

UTRS appeal ##57802 is now closed. I should have seen that you'd been blocked for this before and had already made assurances that you would not add unsourced content. Discussion of this block really needs to occur on your talk page. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:37, 1 May 2022 (UTC)

Yeah, I don't know. I'm an Aspie, so . . . . --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:38, 1 May 2022 (UTC)