ParadiseDesertOasis8888

Welcome!

Hello, ParadiseDesertOasis8888, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! 220 of ^Borg 06:50, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

ParadiseDesertOasis8888, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi ParadiseDesertOasis8888! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 22:04, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

July 2017

Hello, I'm Grayfell. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 2017 Berkeley protests have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Grayfell (talk) 06:11, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to The Young Turks. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 06:39, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

July 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Cupcakke has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Cupcakke was changed by ParadiseDesertOasis8888 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.885601 on 2017-07-21T22:25:03+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:25, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Edit at Zara Larsson

Hey ParadiseDesertOasis8888! I reverted your edit at Zara Larsson because that particular section has been somewhat controversial in the past. If you wish to have it changed it is best to discuss the changes you want to make at the article's talk page first so that we can establish consensus. Thanks, Jith12 (talk) 13:53, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Drmies (talk) 12:39, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Portland Public Schools

Hi ParadiseDesertOasis8888,

I noticed you changed "Glencoe" to "Blencoe" on the article Portland Public Schools (Oregon). this district website, it seems to be written Glencoe. Where were you getting the source for it being Blencoe?

Margalob (talk) 22:49, 16 August 2017 (UTC)

August 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Praying (song), you may be blocked from editing. Ss112 09:37, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

Casualties in Las Vegas

ParadiseDesertOasis8888, why did you change the number of casualties at 2017 Las Vegas Strip shooting from 59 to 58? The 58 number is from older articles. All of the most recent reporting says 59 people killed in the shooting. Adding the perpetrator's suicide makes 60 fatalities. Please don't change this again unless you have some more recent source saying the reported number of fatalities has been DECREASED by one. Thanks. --MelanieN (talk) 04:04, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

My mistake, I just heard the sheriff confirm 58 victims plus the perpetrator = 59. Sorry to bother you. --MelanieN (talk) 04:58, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

ParadiseDesertOasis8888 I, mostly, agree with MelanieN, BUT, if you change a figure, you should say why in your edit summary and it should be cited. (See WP: Verifiability)
So just changing the figure is not really acceptable unless the source has also been updated, or replaced with another one that supports the change.

Re your WP:good faith edit here to my update to Paradise, Nevada, note that I was deliberately vague about the exact number of injured because I was quite sure it would change, and it did, downwards. It is now 489, as sourced here. See Wikipedia:Verifiability not truth. Happy editing! Regards, 220 of ^Borg 05:09, 5 October 2017 (UTC)

October 2017

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! 220 of ^Borg 06:50, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Telephone (song). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Binksternet (talk) 21:46, 29 October 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, ParadiseDesertOasis8888. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Irma (name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Irmin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Non-free image use

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload files. However, it appears that one or more of the files you have uploaded or added to a page, specifically Flags of cities of the United States, may fail our non-free policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted file of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:22, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Miley Cyrus & Her Dead Petz. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. 115.164.190.108 (talk) 14:21, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

What are you referring to? ParadiseDesertOasis8888 (talk) 20:48, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Flag of Long Beach, California for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flag of Long Beach, California is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flag of Long Beach, California until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 02:52, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Big Town Hero

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Big Town Hero, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. reddogsix (talk) 16:59, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Sunnyvale Flag

You asked about the Sunnyvale flag. When the city's logo changed to the green and white circular logo, its flag changed accordingly. But I was unable to find any images of the new flag in action, sorry. JGriffithSV (talk) 07:42, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Flag of the Village of Mount Pleasant, Wisconsin.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:18, 1 August 2018 (UTC)

Category:Guests on Dr. Phil (talk show) has been nominated for discussion

Category:Guests on Dr. Phil (talk show), which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 02:49, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Please stop adding additional articles to this category while it is being considered for deletion. Please see in particular WP:NOTDEFINING. General Ization ^Talk 03:01, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Please do not bolden the word "stop" when this is a first-time offense. From Wikipedia:Civility: "Try not to get too intense. Passion can be misread as aggression, so take great care to avoid the appearance of being heavy-handed or bossy. Nobody likes to be bossed about by an editor who appears to believe that they are "superior"; nobody likes a bully." and "Be careful with user warning templates. Be careful about issuing templated messages to editors you're currently involved in a dispute with, and exercise caution when using templated messages for newcomers (see Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers). Consider using a personal message instead of, or in addition to, the templated message." Also, remember to assume good faith and not bite the newcomer (or in this case, someone with significantly less edits/experience than you. ParadiseDesertOasis8888 (talk) 03:21, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

The use of bold on the word "stop" is neither an attack nor aggression. It is a call for you to stop a particular editing action that you are engaging in when your previous 30-odd exercises of that action have been reverted (and you have no doubt noted that they were). I also directed you to the particular policy that addresses that action. You are also not a "newbie" after more editing here for more than a year and 3000+ edits. I did not call your good faith into question. General Ization ^Talk 03:27, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

I was warned originally after adding all but two pages to the category. I added the other two before I realized that the others had been removed from the category (you can even see that I reverted one of my own edits after I realized that the others had been removed). It wasn't done in a rebellious way. Also, by assuming that I knew I wasn't supposed to add them after the first warning, you are calling my good faith into question. Lastly, I wasn't calling you aggressive, the section of the article that I quoted said passion that may be interpreted as aggression. I don't think you were trying to be aggressive, you're just passionate about Wikipedia. I'm sure that you've had to deal with a lot of people who add categories without good intentions and you may have just assumed that I'm one of them. ParadiseDesertOasis8888 (talk) 04:46, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

It's all good then. I suggest, however, that you participate in the discussion about which you were notified above, either to contest the deletion of the category or to acknowledge that you now understand why it may be deleted. General Ization ^Talk 04:51, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Also be aware that the notification message is a requirement when listing something for discussion. It is also added automatically by the script that makes up the WP:TWINKLE editing help package that I used to tag the category, start the discussion on the discussion page and notify the creator of the item in question that a discussion is taking place. Geraldo Perez (talk) 03:31, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Thank you...

... for adding references for album and song genres, and adding appropriate categories for sourced genres. Too often I am having to remove unsourced genre fields from infoboxes and corresponding categories, so keep up the great work! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 00:51, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

No problem, glad to know I'm doing it correctly! Thank you for taking the time to come over here and write that. It means a lot! -- ParadiseDesertOasis8888 (talk) 00:54, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Annales de Gergonne

In the article Nimes, the section "Culture" mentions the Annales de Gergonne, which is a mathematical journal. By inserting a pipe you have directed the link to scientific journal. If you have an issue with Annales, that article might be edited. Why did you insert the pipe? — Rgdboer (talk) 22:42, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

If you click on "mathematical journal", you are automatically redirected to "scientific journal". There is no Wikipedia article for mathematical journal. -- ParadiseDesertOasis8888 (talk) 01:07, 28 October 2018 (UTC)

How right you are! Something obvious that I should have seen. Thank you for making the edits and bearing with my ignorance. — Rgdboer (talk) 02:21, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, ParadiseDesertOasis8888. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Sourced genre should be bold and go through with your edit; sometimes editing is a way to start a discussion about something. The important point is to not ignore notes in the infobox (as you did before), which signify that the genres are already established, and it is good practice to check the talk page of an article to see if the changes your propose haven't already been discussed. 183.171.114.43 (talk) 08:55, 11 December 2018 (UTC)

Instagram hashtags

Hi, Paradise ... I am no expert on Instagram or hashtags, but if you go directly to instagram, the trending hashtag has no uppercase-- it is #guaidochallenge-- so I wondered about this edit? I will follow your page for response, thanks, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 01:58, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

All of the sources I've seen use #GuaidoChallenge, which is why I changed it. I didn't look at Instagram but if that's what's trending, then it probably should be #guaidochallenge. ParadiseDesertOasis8888 (talk) 02:50, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

OK, thanks ... so, do you mind if I change it back? I am not that familia with Instagram, but it appears that all hashtags are lower case, so I am unsure here ... SandyGeorgia (Talk) 04:31, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Yeah, you can change it back. I'm not that familiar with Instagram either. ParadiseDesertOasis8888 (talk) 04:44, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

I think I will first look at some other articles on hashtags ... it is possible that it makes no difference! Regards, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 04:46, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Found! Our article on hashtag says they are not case sensitive. Which means that your usage (GuaidoChallenge) probably makes more sense, because it is more readable, and ends up at the same place as all lowercase. So thanks! Regards, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 04:49, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

January 2019

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Russo-Georgian War does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! —DIYeditor (talk) 07:25, 30 January 2019 (UTC)

camps

Hey- I don't know anything about the issues on the re-education camp question, but I tried to create a compromise position [1]. If it's not acceptable, change it as you see fit. Geographyinitiative (talk) 12:54, 23 July 2019 (UTC)

Double spacing (and edit summaries)

Hi there, I have undone two of your recent edits, where you replace double spaces with one space. I haven't looked at more than just these two. There is no need to alter double spacing. See MOS:PUNCTSPACE: "Software condenses two or more spaces to just one when rendering a page, so editors may use any spacing style they prefer." See also wp:RETAIN.

Also, please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history. When editing an article on Wikipedia, you will see a small field labeled "Edit summary" shown under the main edit box. Thanks. - DVdm (talk) 11:53, 12 August 2019 (UTC)

Notice related to Syrian Civil War articles

Please read this notification carefully, it contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Also please note that there's some discussion at Talk:2019_Rojava_offensive#"Reactions" regarding what is supposed to be in the reactions section, specifically, that only reactions by directly involved parties should be listed. That might be relevant to your recent edits. ST47 (talk) 08:45, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

2019–20 Wuhan coronavirus outbreak

Hi your update of the China count was undone as you failed to take into account Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macao. These are listed separately here. To use a figure from the web site used as a ref, you have to subtract the numbers given for 台湾 澳门 and 香港. These may not match the numbers in our article, due to it being out of date. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:22, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

User:Graeme Bartlett, Hello, I used the source for China (https://bnonews.com/index.php/2020/01/the-latest-coronavirus-cases/) which says there have been 1,985 cases, including 10 in Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan. I subtracted 10 from 1,985 to get 1,975. -- ParadiseDesertOasis8888 (talk) 02:32, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

A cupcake for you!

Thank you for providing vital information about the 2019–20 Wuhan coronavirus outbreak! Timwi (talk) 02:25, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Thank you! -- ParadiseDesertOasis8888 (talk) 02:33, 26 January 2020 (UTC)

Sources for virus case count

Hi Paradise. Thanks for keeping up on the grim Wuhan virus numbers. As there's quite a difference between sources right now (almost 200 different between BNOnews and qq.com), may I suggest noting which source you're using, in your update comment. Jw 193 (talk) 01:46, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Okay. I'll be sure to do that in the future. ParadiseDesertOasis8888 (talk) 06:28, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Eugene Gu article

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

You keep restoring the Category:American rapists to the Eugene Gu article. Here's what WP:BLPCAT says: "... Category:Criminals and its subcategories should be added only for an incident that is relevant to the person's notability; the incident was published by reliable third-party sources; the subject was convicted; and the conviction was not overturned on appeal." It is arguable whether or not the sexual assault allegations against Gu are relevant to his notability. What is not arguable is that the article text currently makes no claim and cites no source to the effect that Gu has been arrested for or charged with, let alone convicted of, rape or any other type of sexual assault. Thus, the category's addition is inappropriate. Please stop adding it back to the article. --Mox La Push (talk) 04:41, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for notifying me. Since he was never convicted, I have instead added a different category. Here is the edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Eugene_Gu&diff=940877922 -- ParadiseDesertOasis8888 (talk) 05:08, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Regional languages in the United States

I had to revert your list of regional languages. The list was already debated several times on the Talk page for United States. Each time, it has been rejected for the following reason: There are no "recognized regional languages" at the national level. In certain states (Native languages in Alaska, Oklahoma, and South Dakota; Spanish in New Mexico; French in Louisiana, which you omitted), languages other than English have a very limited administrative function -- much like services offered in eastern Belgium for German speakers. You'll have to take this to the U.S. Talk page and explain why the list is helpful. Thanks. Mason.Jones (talk) 16:28, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:08, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

@Callanecc: I haven't done any of that. -- ParadiseDesertOasis8888 (talk) 18:39, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 18:51, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Covif sanctions

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions - such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks - on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 18:56, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)