Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 05:52, 7 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nuthin' Under A Million (N.U.M.) (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Greetings. I see that my user has been blocked from editing. I am the only user in this account, and it's saying that I am not so it blocked me. I'm just trying to understand the process and issue. I am a new user on Wikipedia. Should I change my user name? Would this help? Thanks so much for your time and consideration.

Decline reason:

Sorry that the blocking administrator did not make the reason for the block clear. However, I am reasonably confident that what was meant was that your username implies that the account is used to edit on behalf of a group, whether or not only one member of the group is actually doing the editing. If that were the only problem, I would unblock you and invite you to apply for a change of username. However, there is another problem. Your editing to date has clearly been promotion of your group. Wikipedia is not a medium for promotion or advertising, and in addition editing an article on a subject in which you have a close personal involvement is strongly discouraged, as you will have a conflict of interest, which makes it likely that your editing will not be impartial and objective. (And, in your case, your editing so far confirms that.) If you wish to contribute to other areas of Wikipedia then you are perfectly welcome to make another unblock request, suggesting an alternative username to change to and describing in broad terms what sort of editing you expect to do. However, as long as it seems that your only purpose is to use Wikipedia to publicise your group you will probably not be unblocked. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:06, 10 January 2012 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nuthin' Under A Million (N.U.M.) (talk) 01:54, 10 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nuthin' Under A Million (N.U.M.) (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Greetings. I apologize for the confusion. I am an avid user of Wikipedia and inquire the information it entails daily, but this was my first attempt at researching, creating and editing an actual article. This has been the only project I've been editing since I've registered for a user name because I just wanted to learn the ropes of creating an article to then continue on with creating and editing future articles. My intensions were not to publicise, promote, or advertise the group by any means and with understanding the Wikipedia guidelines better, can see how some of the material in the article was misleading. Therefore, I would like to edit that out (the itunes references) and re-edit and add additional resources correctly to be able to resubmit it. In hopes of achieving this, I would like to create other Wikipedia articles and edits as well. Also, in picking a user name I should of paid a little more close attention that it didn't have to be the actual name of the article that I was creating...thinking each article you create has to have a different user name. It all makes sense now...to create articles and edits under one user name. I hope this information helps and would love to continue my efforts with creating and being apart of the Wikipedia family. Thanks so much again for your time and consideration.

Decline reason:

First off, allow me to apologize again for the way this block has been handled. The admin who blocked you should have explicitly explained why you were blocked, and also should have explained that you are "soft" blocked, meaning you are welcome to simply abandon this account and register a new one with a non-infringing name at any time. So, I'm declining this request only because you have been adequately warned about the problems witht hte type of edits you have been making but nobody explained to you that you don't actually need to request unblock to change your name, it is much simpler to just start another account. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:50, 13 January 2012 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock-un}} Nuthin' Under A Million (N.U.M.) (talk) 19:51, 11 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Here are a few key questions:

You are currently blocked because your username appears directly related to a company, group or product that you have been promoting, contrary to the username policy. Changing the username will not allow you to violate the three important principles above. Nick-D (talk) 07:48, 12 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nuthin' Under A Million (N.U.M.), a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 04:36, 16 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your article submission Nuthin' Under A Million (N.U.M.)

edit
 

Hello Nuthin' Under A Million (N.U.M.). It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Nuthin' Under A Million (N.U.M.).

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Nuthin' Under A Million (N.U.M.)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 11:21, 29 October 2013 (UTC)Reply