November 2023

edit

  Hello, I'm DrowssapSMM. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Isaac van Duynen have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. DrowssapSMM (talk) (contributions) 00:45, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Otto van Veen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Seneca. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:51, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited George Geldorp, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blackfriars.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:04, 22 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

March 2024

edit

  Hello, Odecalchi. I noticed that your recent edit to List of paintings by Anthony van Dyck added a link to an image on an external website or on your computer, or to a file name that does not exist on Wikipedia's server. For technical and policy reasons it is not possible to use images from external sources on Wikipedia. Most images you find on the internet are copyrighted and cannot be used on Wikipedia, or their use is subject to certain restrictions. If the image meets Wikipedia's image use policy, consider uploading it to Wikipedia yourself or request that someone else upload it. See the image tutorial to learn about wiki syntax used for images. Thank you. - Sumanuil. (talk to me) 23:51, 1 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Master of the Egmont Albums

edit

Hi thanks for creating this article. When we translate or borrow from other language wikis it’s a requirement to acknowledge the source. The best way to do this is to include it in your edit summary (e.g. “translated from de.wiki”) and there’s also a translation template you can add to the talk page. I’ve added it for you. Happy editing and please leave a message on my talk page if you need any help Mccapra (talk) 11:52, 17 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Georges Croegaert, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Realism.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:07, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Philips van Mallery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frontispiece.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

October 2024

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  UtherSRG (talk) 14:05, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Odecalchi (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

not aware of making any "disruptive edits". Seems user UtherSG has a bad temper but no capacity to provide grounds for his decision to block Odecalchi (talk) 14:14, 29 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Moot. Block has now expired. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 20:07, 5 November 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

So, it's pretty evident that this was precipitated by edit warring at Cynocephalus. To be honest, at first glance this looks like an WP:INVOLVED overreach by UtherSG, although it's possible that there's a prior consensus or something else that makes this an "obvious" action which would be exempted per the policy. Given the circumstances, I'd be willing to unblock before the expiration date if I see an acknowledgment of edit warring, a commitment to resolve dispute through discussion at Cynocephalus and elsewhere, and a retraction of the unnecessary personal attack directed at UtherSG in your unblock request. If you'd refrained from making that personal attack (or acknowledged that you were edit warring) in the first place, I would likely have already unblocked you at this time. signed, Rosguill talk 18:53, 30 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

removed hatnote

edit

Hi there. I happened to notice that an edit of yours from late last year removed the other uses hatnote from an article. Please see WP:Hatnote for more information about what these things are, and make sure not to remove them, esp. without explanation (see also Help:Edit summary). --Joy (talk) 16:05, 25 November 2024 (UTC)Reply