User talk:Old-AgedKid/archive2024

(Redirected from User talk:Old-AgedKid)
Latest comment: 10 days ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello, Old-AgedKid, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Ahunt (talk) 12:37, 23 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red

edit

Hi there, Old-AgedKid, and thanks for writing several biographies of Mexican women. If you intend to continue covering women, you might be interested in becoming a member of WikiProject Women in Red where we are trying to chip away at the gender gap. You can sign up under "New registrations" on Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/New members. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 06:16, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

  • Firstly, I appreciate you reaching out and acknowledging my contributions to Wikipedia, specifically the biographies of Mexican women I've been working on. It's heartening to see our efforts recognized and I'm glad the articles have been noticed.

I'm fully aware of the gender gap in Wikipedia content and it's a primary reason why I've chosen to focus on women, particularly Mexican women, as the subject of my articles. The underrepresentation is indeed an issue that needs addressing, and I appreciate the work that groups like WikiProject Women in Red are doing to correct it.

Your invitation to join the WikiProject Women in Red has certainly piqued my interest. Having the opportunity to collaborate with like-minded editors committed to improving the representation of women on Wikipedia is an offer that's hard to pass up. However, I would like to have a clear understanding of my responsibilities and expectations before I commit. Old-AgedKid (talk) 09:39, 31 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Sean O'Hollaren for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sean O'Hollaren is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean O'Hollaren until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 11:05, 7 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Eduardo Murat Hinojosa

edit

Hi thanks for creating this article. When we translate or borrow from other language wikis it’s a requirement to acknowledge the source. The best way to do this is to include it in your edit summary (e.g. “translated from nl.wiki”) and there’s also a translation template you can add to the talk page. I’ve added it for you. Happy editing and please leave a message on my talk page if you need any help Mccapra (talk) 12:29, 26 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Elvira Nosari moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Elvira Nosari. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Reading Beans (talk) 13:03, 26 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Mexican politicians

edit

Just for future reference, because Mexico is a country that has had thousands of politicians in its history, it's absolutely not helpful or useful for all (or even any) of them to appear directly in Category:Mexican politicians itself — instead, all Mexican politicians are filed in subcategories for the specific roles, locations and/or time periods that are relevant to their political careers, such as Noé Castañón Ramírez's Category:Politicians from Chiapas, Category:Citizens' Movement (Mexico) politicians and Category:Senators of the LXIV and LXV Legislatures of Mexico.

So, per our rules against duplicate categorization, a person who is already in one or more of those categories should not also be filed directly in Category:Mexican politicians alongside them, because they're all already subcategories of that and thus the person is already in the Mexican politicians category by virtue of being in the subcategory.

Category:Mexican politicians would have to contain thousands of people if it were directly populated itself, which would not be helpful to the reader at all, so individual people should only be in the subcategories, and Category:Mexican politicians itself should not have any individual pages filed directly in it at all.

Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 12:16, 27 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Elvira Nosari has been accepted

edit
 
Elvira Nosari, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 21:36, 28 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Guadalupe Covarrubias Cervantes moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Guadalupe Covarrubias Cervantes. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 19:48, 8 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Ovidio Peralta Suárez moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Ovidio Peralta Suárez. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources, it needs more sources to establish notability and does not comply with Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living persons. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Edward-Woodrow :) [talk] 19:49, 9 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ovidio Peralta Suárez has been accepted

edit
 
Ovidio Peralta Suárez, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jamiebuba (talk) 22:34, 9 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Guadalupe Covarrubias Cervantes has been accepted

edit
 
Guadalupe Covarrubias Cervantes, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 02:02, 11 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Robin Bade moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Robin Bade. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and take a look at WP:SIGCOV. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 10:38, 8 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Regarding your recent article Anahí González Hernández

edit

Hi, @Old-AgedKid, hope all are good and well. As you have started this page so do it in your personal sandbox and then submit it as a draft. And new page reviewer will review your draft. No need to publish incomplete article directly to Wikipedia mainspace. I am moving this article in draft space, complete it there and submit it for review. Thank You, Happy editing. Rasel Hasan🇮🇳 (talk) (contribs) 17:02, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Eike Besuden

edit

Hello, Old-AgedKid,

Thank you for creating Eike Besuden.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

We need more in depth coverage of the subject and their work, such a reviews of their films, or evidence that their career is particularly distinguished or noteworthy.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mccapra}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Mccapra (talk) 04:46, 17 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, Old-AgedKid. Thank you for your work on Arturo González Cruz. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for your work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 00:27, 22 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Robin Bade

edit

  Hello, Old-AgedKid. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Robin Bade, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:11, 26 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Marcelo Albornoz Serrano moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Marcelo Albornoz Serrano. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 14 novembre (talk) 🇮🇹 20:05, 3 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Claudio Ferrada

edit

Hello Old-AgedKid, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Claudio Ferrada, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claudio Ferrada.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Vanderwaalforces}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 20:35, 13 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

replied there Old-AgedKid (talk) 10:38, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hi Old-AgedKid. Thank you for your work on Ángela Hernández Cajo. Another editor, Chaotic Enby, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Notable per WP:NPOL and the sources on the Spanish article are good, I trust you with the translation! I also invite you to join Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Chaotic Enby}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 20:24, 29 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Ciesse Piumini for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ciesse Piumini is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ciesse Piumini until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CresiaBilli (talk) 12:06, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

July 2024

edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from Ciesse Piumini to another page. While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. For example:

Content in this edit is translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.

It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Broc (talk) 13:11, 18 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

About Draft:Intersec - there were two distinct topics this has been about, the first a British magazine/website, the second a French magazine/website

edit

@Redbaron1984, Randykitty, Explicit, Old-AgedKid, Chaotic Enby, Walonsley, and Jnabonne:

I don't have any particular opinion about this, just letting you know what I can see on only en.wp with my magical admin spectacles on.

Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 09:46, 20 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marcelo Albornoz Serrano (July 29)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 17:35, 29 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Old-AgedKid! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 17:35, 29 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Women's biographies

edit

I see that over the years, Old-AgedKid, you have created many biographies of Latin-American politicians, including many more about women. Further to my earlier invitation regarding Women in Red, I think you should reconsider joining as your work would serve as an inspiration to others. You have certainly been helping to increase the proportion of women's biographies on the English Wikipedia which is now close to 20%. As a member of the project, you would have no firm responsibilities but you would be welcome to take part in our discussions and offer adv1ice on future developments. If you wish to join, you can sign up under "New registrations" on Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/New members. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 10:13, 23 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

thank you! I've joined the project. Old-AgedKid (talk) 12:22, 3 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
So welcome to Women in Red! Your biographies are already well presented but you might find some useful tips in our Primer. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 06:51, 4 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Carlos Iván Degregori moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Carlos Iván Degregori, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 07:32, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

thank you. I moved it back to mainspace after some improvement. Old-AgedKid (talk) 14:13, 27 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aqua Security

edit

@Old-AgedKid: Why did you close this Afd in what is clearly a WP:BADNAC. I want you to revert and reopen it. It looks as though you have been canvassed. scope_creepTalk 20:16, 27 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2024 September 29. Daniel (talk) 09:47, 29 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for relisting, I realize that my previous action was inappropriate, and I sincerely apologize for it. Old-AgedKid (talk) 08:59, 30 September 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you! The AfD has already been relisted, and I’m glad my actions did not cause any disruption. Old-AgedKid (talk) 08:58, 30 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red October 2024

edit
 
Women in Red | October 2024, Volume 10, Issue 10, Numbers 293, 294, 318, 319, 320


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Unsure how to expand a stub article? Take a look at this guidance

Other ways to participate:

  Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:07, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

great announcement. I will think and read about it Old-AgedKid (talk) 15:04, 7 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

the talk page will be archived soon

edit

I'm planning to archive my talk page. See you soon Old-AgedKid (talk) 15:01, 7 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

women in red

edit

Women in Red October 2024

edit
 
Women in Red | October 2024, Volume 10, Issue 10, Numbers 293, 294, 318, 319, 320


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Old-AgedKid (talk) 15:03, 7 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

testing the message delivery Old-AgedKid (talk) 15:04, 7 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red November 2024

edit
 
Women in Red | November 2024, Vol 10, Issue 11, Nos 293, 294, 321, 322, 323


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

  Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:43, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hi Old-AgedKid. Thank you for your work on Ali Tayem Mohammed. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

please add "Ali" to his name in the target page (with a good ref)

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 13:30, 3 November 2024 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)Reply