Kingsmasher678
Index
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Hello, and welcome to my talk page! Please feel free to ask me anything, and refrain from removing or editing the questions or statements of others, unless they violate wiki policy. ___________________________________________________________________
This YuiBalle fella
editIt's quite remarkable. I don't think I've ever seen anyone make as many poor edits in such a short amount of time! I am not convinced they're doing it maliciously, but they certainly seem... incompetent?
Thanks for your work, too, in cleaning up their mess. — tooki (talk) 23:01, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't want to be the first to say that, but I would tend to agree. It's taken up a solid 45 minutes of my life reverting their various edits, and they don't seemed to have learned from communication. What would you say the next step is?
- Kingsmasher678 (talk) 23:11, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Just 45 mins? I've spent a few hours (admittedly, with some excursions when I found the article in question interesting!).
- I don't know what the right step is. Without evidence of it being vandalism (and I honestly don't see any), a block/ban seems excessive, but this user is also unwittingly doing lots of damage. I'd love to for them to just switch to only making properly-cited edits to facts, but not try and change style, tone, wording, or punctuation of existing text. — tooki (talk) 23:38, 15 September 2024 (UTC)
- Let me ping @Joyous! and @Hey man im josh, also @YuiBalle as per WP:TALKDD. I've had positive interactions with both, and they may be able to help us with some perspective. Pending a reply from either of them, I think we should continue to keep and eye out and revert where necessary, while continuing to WP: Assume Good Faith. Kingsmasher678 (talk) 00:12, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your efforts. I do believe this editor is acting in good faith (and indeed a few of their edits areactual improvements), but just lacks the "eye" for it. Let me know if you need me to do anything. — tooki (talk) 17:58, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
- Let me ping @Joyous! and @Hey man im josh, also @YuiBalle as per WP:TALKDD. I've had positive interactions with both, and they may be able to help us with some perspective. Pending a reply from either of them, I think we should continue to keep and eye out and revert where necessary, while continuing to WP: Assume Good Faith. Kingsmasher678 (talk) 00:12, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Usernames
editMost accounts never edit. There's no point in reporting an account until they've edited. Secretlondon (talk) 09:50, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
New page reviewer granted
editHi Kingsmasher678, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.
This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:
- Add Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers to your watchlist to follow NPP-related discussions
- If you use Twinkle, configure it to log your CSDs and PRODs
- If you can read any languages other than English, add yourself to the list of reviewers with language proficiencies
You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you're not alone! Hey man im josh (talk) 12:34, 18 September 2024 (UTC)