PS2pcGAMER

Archives
Archive 1 (to April 9, 2006) Archive 2 (April 9, 2006 – May 18, 2006) Archive 3 (May 18, 2006 – October 22, 2006) Archive 4 (October 24, 2006 – March 24, 2007)

Welcome to my talk page. Feel free to leave me a message if you a question, comment, or just want to say hi. Just make sure to sign it (with ~~~~) and create a subsection for it at the bottom of the page.

Admin actions: If you disagree with an admin action of mine, leave me a message and I'll definitely look into it. If you are pretty confident that I have made a mistake, admins should feel free to revert me (just let me know).

TG Dog

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 15:42, 29 March 2007 (UTC) Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Davesmith33"

You will notice if you removed those rose-tinted spectacles that it is DrFrench and yourself who are in fact undoing other people's edits repeatedly, without first discussing them on the talk page.

Can you tell me exactly what is wrong with the following statement: "Richard Hammond introduced a new "presenter" at the start of Series 8, a female Labradoodle named "Top Gear Dog", who is susceptible to motion sickness. However, she only appeared twice in Series 9."? Davesmith33 15:48, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Removing protection from James Brown article

After concerted effort to stop the constant vandalism (especially when the article was featured on the Music Portal in February 2007) to the James Brown article, I had asked the administrators to restore protection. This article was repeated vandalized several times daily up to when the protection was restored to the article. However, I see that you removed the protection from the article? Can you provide your rationale as to why protection is no longer needed? And...on what basis have YOU decided that protection is no longer needed, since I don't see that you have contributed in a significant way to editing the article, followed the history of repeatedly restoring the content of the article, or even spent time reverting the vandalism yourself??? This significant change should have been discussed first on the talk page, where you would have gotten feedback as to why the article was protected in the first place.

In spite of the vandalism that repeatedly occurred when the article was unprotected, this article was still vandalized even by users with accounts older than four days. In fact, the article was vandalized AGAIN right after you removed the protection. Have YOU reviewed the history before removing the protection on the article? I disagree strongly with the removal of the protection and plan to reverse both the recent vandalism and your change to restore the protection a third time or ask the administrators to get involved a third time. lwalt 16:29, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Follow-up to previous message - We have an uptick in vandalizing the James Brown article again. As was the case before, the article was vandalized by both named and IP users (in one case, the same person revandalized the article after that person's initial vandalism was reverted). I've mentioned in my previous message, editors for this article have gone through the exercise of keep up with the constant vandalism on two earlier occasions, which necessitated protection. So, we're right were we started having to chase vandals to keep the article intact. lwalt 20:24, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Davesmith33

I am getting rather frustrated by his actions. It seem to me that as he couldn't have his way over TGD, he's thrown his toys out of the pram. It seeems to me a clear case of WP:DISRUPT. I really dislike the idea of 'running to teacher' but I am sorely tempted to put it to an WP:RFC. I know as an admin you probably shouldn't get too involved where there is existing 'discussion' between you and him, but if you can put your 'neutral head' on, what has been the outcome of similar situations that you've come across in the past? DrFrench 22:17, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

I think I'm going to sleep on it and see what he's like in the morning. If he's doing the same, then I'll go down the WP:RFC route. DrFrench 22:57, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Sadly since his 3RR block, he doesn't to have changed his approach, so I've posted {{rfc-ucc}} on his talk page. Hopefully he'll take note and try to build consensus. DrFrench 20:39, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

TG

There should be a guideline to not submit a TV show for GA while it is still showing. The cruft levels just got too high over the past couple of months, time for another prune. And our friend Dave didn't help things either! --Steve _(Stephen) ^talk 01:31, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Decision about the US Cinema template

After receiving complaints about the inclusion of Template:CinemaoftheUS in film articles, I have discussed the issue with Blofeld and (at least) the two of us agree that it is removed from American film articles (see also talk page). Hoverfish Talk 20:52, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

I have also reduced the size of the template we think it should go in only the central /core articles only not on any film or actor articles. This is only for the American template ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"Expecting you" Contribs} 21:06, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Sorry for the slow reply. Thanks for the update and hard work on coming to a compromise. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 07:45, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Image

Can you delete this:[1]? It's not even really a screenshot. I was going to try to come up with some rationale to use it in the article to illustrate the person's artisitic abilities but I don't think it will pass fair use muster. At least I don't see any way. Thanks in advance. Quadzilla99 12:08, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

I uploaded it by the way, in case that wasn't clear. Quadzilla99 12:09, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Actually I found and added a different tag, maybe you could just look it over, if you feel it doesn't merit inclusion you can just delete it—no explanation needed. Quadzilla99 12:15, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Great idea! I'd be glad to help out. Right now I'm writing an article in my sandbox but I'll contribute today or tomorrow. Quadzilla99 10:02, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Are you thinking of making it an official essay? I mean out of userspace, that way you shortcut to it through WP:FLICKR. It should be fine considering WP:FUCK, WP:BEANS, and WP:SPIDER are out there—I mean I don't personally see why it would get deleted if those essays are out there. It's certainly much more terse, straightforward, and helpful. Granted it does deal with a commericial non-Wikipedia site but only in Wikipedia's context. If I were you I would just be bold and do that. I'm still going to make some contributions by the way, just not right now. Quadzilla99 16:01, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

Arbitration proceedings

You have been included as a 'related party' in a request for arbitration Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Bullying_and_Victimisation_against_Davesmith33 Davesmith33 17:57, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

RFA

Sorry, I forgot to strike down the support vote when changing to oppose, I changed my vote because when I further checked his editing records I discovered the lack of project-space counts. Thank you for pointing that out. Happy editing! Wooyi^{Talk, Editor review} 23:17, 9 April 2007 (UTC)

no speedy delete for Joe Marton

I'll tell you why I'm notable. I am a Novell Support Forum SysOp. There are less than 30 of these in the world, and membership is invitation-only. Such a person has to exhibit a number of qualities to receive such an invitation. To verify that I am indeed a SysOp, please visit the list of Novell SysOps[2]. This makes me more notable than other people, such as Sanjaya Malakar. He has an article because he's a bad singer. I have a great deal of knowledge with Novell products, I help the user community a great deal, and I have been recognized by being invited to an exclusive club. Jmmarton 02:07, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

A difference of opinion on copyright violation

Hey there.

I'm interested to see what you think. In regards to Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Speedies_again..., I deleted an article that you said didn't qualify for db-copyvio.

I find the CSD on it sketchy, and I wondered if you agreed. I went behind you and deleted the article as I felt that copyvios should be deleted on sight, and if a valid contest is made to myself or the Foundation the article should be restored. However, the criterion does seem to read that any sort of hang-on tag means to not delete the article.

I went ahead and deleted Moshav Matityahu as I felt as I should delete on sight, despite the hang on. I see your reason for for declining the speedy on sight, but you did not remove the speedy tag after review. I probably would have done the same in the context of the situation. So basically, I was just fishing for your thoughts on copyright policy and what you would/would not delete on sight as a matter of practice. Happy editing to you! Teke 05:15, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

...and that's an example of how process can work :) Good stuff. See you around, Teke 05:32, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

• I feel that when a plausible claim of permission is made, we don't need to delete on sight. In this case the article (or page as it wasn't really an article yet) was clearly copied from a website. On the talk page, the creator claimed to be the owner of that site and author of the text. This is not a case where the site was a celebrity site or a major institutiuonal or corporate site for which such a claim is highly implausable. I would have put a note on the creator's talk page, indicatign how the claim could be validated (relase on site, or email to foundation's permissions address, and warnign that the text would not remain unchanged. If the creator responded within a day or so saying that he was persuing either option, i would wait. None of that is required, but the CSD does say "and no claim of permisison is made". In this case the article would require so much claenup I'm not willing to undelete and cleanup, but I think that doing so would be proper. Of course a hangon alone is never reason not to delete a clear speedy, althouhg if the hangon was posted only a few minutes poreviously i will usually wiat to see what the creator has to say. All just my opnion, of course. Also, when deleting for copyvio, I think it is a good idea to paste the source URL into the delete reason. DES ^(talk) 22:15, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Hi P- Thanks a lot for your nomination and support in my RfA. Hopefully I'll live up to it- Staecker 12:31, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging

Per your request, I will delete the scanned images.

Anthony22 13:10, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

welcome to wikinews.

Welcome to wikinews — n:template:hello. Happy editing. Bawolff 00:51, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks! --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 00:54, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Jordan Page

I reverted your edit of the Michael Jordan page because he, in fact, was called "Superman" (mostly in 97-98). Chicago media personalities would refer to Jordan as Superman, Pippen as Batman, and Rodman was -well, Rodman (get it, Superman, Batman and Rod-man?). It was a stupid media thing that got Jordan and the team more attention, but it was a nickname nonetheless. Search the Google News archive for [superman batman rodman] for confirmation. RMelon 15:05, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Polish-American Relations

Can some start a Polish-American Relations page —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Kaminski Aleksander (talk • contribs).

User causing problems

I made a comment on User talk:TyrusThomas4lyf that I think should you be aware of, just for the purposes of clarifying the situation regarding this user, since you commented there (see the last section). Read it when you have time, he's made tons of good edits but his behavior needs work and I think he bears a little watching. Also although the other account he has is generally fine (read the talk page message) I'm curious as to why he called this his list:[3] When another user started it. All in all if he could just tone down his behavior and confrontational style he could be a fine editor he has alot of solid edits, there's just a general belligerence about him that is off-putting. Quadzilla99 08:43, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Ok I will but I just wanted to make it clear that his behavior goes farther than just his edit history under his current username. I'll keep an eye on him. Quadzilla99 19:22, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Smallville Images

Yeah, sorry about that. I didn't know what the tag was, and some were just "uploaded newer version" instead of complete replacement. I'll try and make sure that I do that from now on. Did you get all of them?  BIGNOLE  (Contact me)

There were others, I took care of them.  BIGNOLE  (Contact me) 12:05, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Milo emil halbheer

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Milo emil halbheer . Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. DES ^(talk) 20:34, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

I'm fine with your comment, and the origial did sound rather like all too many vanity pages. It was more the "gold medal" (which turned out to be sourcable) than the Lovre declaration (wahich wasn't in the sources I found). I am sure you acted in good faith. But I see a lot of editors overusign the A7 tag, and a number of cases where admisn are IMO too quick on the delte button with stuiff that claims notability but is poorly written. I brought this to DRV as much as a public example to others as anything. Not to admonish you in any way -- we all make mistakes and have differences of judgement -- but because this way others can (I hope) learn from this example. I trust that you don't see bringing such things to DRV as in any way an attack or anything but a disagreemnt with a particular action. I had and have no such intention. DES ^(talk) 21:00, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for your further edits on this. i hadn't wikified Germany and Switzerland beacus both were linked to in the leading sentace -- but perhaps it looks odd to have a list of which soem are links and some are not. DES ^(talk) 21:58, 27 April 2007 (UTC)

?

What are you talking about?GSalt 14:15, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

CZ-85 Image

I'm curious why you deleted the image I provided for the CZ-85 pistol. I thought I submitted it correctly with the proper permissions.

Gustloff

Thank you!

Thank you for your comments on my talk page about the closing of the FPC, I summed up the pro's and con's and the image did not have enough consensus for promotion and was listed on April 13, then I closed it as npt promoted and ut was re-opened for no reason with an edit summary saying something like "closed by a new user". I needed someone to back up what I'd done because I didnt think I was in the wrong. Thanks a lot! The Sunshine Man 15:57, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

commons:Commons:Help_desk#Derivative_works_question

Hey, I replied there. Please do upload your pictures to commons, our current policy is that as long as the copyright is fine, it's fine with us, and the copyright for these photos is fine (that is, presuming you agree to release them under a free license :)). Yonatan ^talk 00:49, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		I award you this barnstar for your kind and caring attitude throughout the FPC nomination of the tomato picture phenomenon, you were kind and extremely polite. Happy editing! The Sunshine Man 10:19, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks :-). I'm sorry the situation was made so difficult for you, but thanks for sticking through it all. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 10:20, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Its fine, I'm OK, maybe I got too ahead of myself, I still intend to contribute on a daily basis here. Kindest regards - The Sunshine Man 10:31, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

VandalProof queue

Hi AmiDaniel/Betacommand/PS2pcGAMER. There's quite a queue building up for authorisation to use VandalProof. I'm hoping someone's going to be available to go through the list and grant/refuse permission as necessary. Cheers, A bit iffy 11:08, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:TopGearDamonHill.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:TopGearDamonHill.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:17, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

For the record, I'm the one who orphaned it :p I did forget to tag it as {{orfud}} though. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 01:21, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Red Flag

Hello, I've reverted your edits to the Red Flag article. "Boxes of food from China.", the image you introduced are not boxes of food from China, point in fact it's a real world image... hence they're boxes of food from the shop. It's also debatable as to if the image is free. Matthew 09:15, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

See creative work. Somebody has spent time to position everything creatively, package it etc. It's improbable that two people would independently create the same work. Not to mention the image isn't even from the episode, and has an non-episode background. Matthew 09:20, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

"Not sure if this image is truely [sic] free (as in a real police car) or a creative work", notice how it says "this", not "the images"; as in specifically referring to that image. What I'm sure of is this: The food crates are creativity. Also, I'm not interested in reading the "help desk" of a failed project, so I don't intend to read it. If you can provide adequate sourcing as per WP:V that the crate of food isn't copyrighted I'll rescind my objection. The onus is not mine, but yours. Matthew 09:28, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Jericho Cop

Where did you find the picture of the Sheriff's Car in Jericho. Where is the set located in Van Nuys. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:cwk14724:cwk14724 (talk • contribs).

The picture of the car was taken on the set. The location of the set (although I am not sure what is left of it) is listed on CBS's website: [4]. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 08:58, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Jericho Cop 2

Can You send mi pics of the emergency vehicles or upload them to wikipedia or send them to my e-mail. What do you do for the show? (cwk14724@yahoo.com) <small--cwk14724 (talk) 19:53, 14 Jun 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, but I only have the one image that is on Wikipedia already. I don't work on the show, I was just invited to visit the set by a member of the crew and that's how I got the pictures. Have a good day. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 22:53, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Jericho Cop 3

Can you send me a link of where i can see the set on the WIndows Live map [live.local.com] --cwk14724 (talk) 09:01, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

I hate to sound like a jerk, by why don't you just put the above address that is in the link two threads above into the website yourself? The imagery was before the set was built, so there isn't really anything to see. All that can be made out in the hospital and library. Main street is the short North-South road in the middle of the image. Anyway... [5]. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 01:02, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Message to my IP

hey, you sent me a message saying that there was vandalism or something like it coming from my IP. I'd just like to apoligeise and say it won't happen again. This is a family computer and it gets used by a lot of people including family friends. I'll find out who did whatever happened and give them a dressing down. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 86.142.201.138 (talk • contribs).

New to VandalProof

Hi, I was recently approved by Betacommand to use VandalProof. However, once I downloaded the 136 zip file and VP137.exe file, I cannot log in. The program can locate my username and password, however, it says: "No priviliges found." Also, I clicked on the button Verify Authorisation, yet it still didn't work. Can you please help? Thanks. σмgнgσмg 06:55, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Ford Focus ST

A tag has been placed on Ford Focus ST, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD A1.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. --Rrburke^(talk) 02:34, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:TopGearNews.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:TopGearNews.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 13:51, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

VandalProof Backlog

If you're not to busy could you check out the VP registration page - theres like a two week backlog on the page. Thanks Fattyjwoods ^{(Push my button)} 05:49, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Vandal Proof Request Backlog, Can you clear it? Prom3th3an (talk) 11:35, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Vandal Proof Request Backlog, Can you clear it? Prom3th3an (talk) 11:35, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Vandal Proof

Thanks for clearing the backlog, and granting me access :-) here have a cookie Prom3th3an (talk) 10:28, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Prom3th3an has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. {{subst:if||| {{{message}}} ||subst=subst:}} To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Thanks a lot for VP auth!Cheers. Prashanthns (talk) 12:05, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Vandalproof

Thanks for the approval, but if you get the chance, could you "unapprove" User:Tim.bounceback from the list—this is my old username that I no longer use. Cheers, —paranomia^{happy harry's high club} 00:28, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Oops, I forgot to do that last night. All done now. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 01:29, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

Backlog

Thanks for your work on the Vandal Proof approval page, but I'm afraid that there is still a backlog. If you've got time, could you please fix the backlog? Thanks J.T Pearson (talk) 12:49, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

I second this, it's getting quite long. FusionMix 13:50, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

Vandal Proof

Can you please approve me for VandalProof? I've had my name in for a while now, and I have enough edits. Cheers! - DiligentTerrier (and friends) 13:39, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Sorry guys, I have been really busy in real life. I have been meaning to get to this and I haven't forgotten. You can also try asking some of the other moderators if you haven't already. If not, I'll try to do it within the next week. Thanks for your patience and I know it is frustrating because you are trying to get access to something that will make your vandalism hunting a little easier. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 23:35, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Top Gear presenters images

Hi, I noticed that the images of the Top Gear presenters you uploaded to the commons have been nominated for speedy deletion. It would seem that it's because you pasted the contents of the email into the description page rather than forwarding it onto permissions-commons@wikimedia.org - can I ask you to do this if you still have the emails, they're great images and I'd hate for them to be deleted on a technicality. Thanks, AlexJ (talk) 15:19, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

I'm not sure, when people contact me through flickr's PM I get an email with the contents of their message. Might just be the way my preferences are setup there. If your account didn't do that, then it's a situation I'm not familiar with, and I guess the screenshots idea is probably the best one. I'm not sure if the OTRS email (permission-commons@wikimedia.org) accepts attachments but there's only one way to find out. Once you've sent an email, I'd add {{Otrs pending}} to the image description page on commons instead of the speedy message, which should hopefully stop the other two being deleted. On your other point, I totally agree that it's ridiculous to delete something within 10 hours of notification, and more so that a complex case such as this (where some evidence of permission is provided) is covered by a speedy delete in the first place. Hope you can get it sorted. AlexJ (talk) 23:55, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Elevation Church

I began to make an article for Elevation Church but found that one already existed but was deleted. After reading the deletion log and seeing that it was speedy deleted for a7, I think I can write an article that establishes notability, but am I required to get administration approval before recreating a deleted article or can I just create it on my own?Ltwin (talk) 06:53, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Vandalprrof

Do you know what has happened to Vandalproof? It no longer seems to be working. I am asking you because you are listed as a moderator and user:Daniel seems to have disappeared. SpinningSpark 09:39, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

--Dabackgammonator (talk) 04:58, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Merry Christmas from Promethean

O'Hai there PS2pcGAMER, Merry Christmas!

PS2pcGAMER,
I wish you and your family all the best this Christmas and that you also have a Happy and safe new year.
Thankyou for all your contributions to Wikipedia this year and I look forward to seeing many more from you in the future.
Your work around Wikipedia has not gone un-noticed, this notice is testimony to that
Please feel free to drop by my talkpage any time to say Hi, as I will probably say Hi back :)

All the Best.   «l| Ψrometheăn ™|l»  (talk)

+1 Barnstar

		The Editor's Barnstar
		You were very kind, patient, and helpful to me when I was having problems here. I really don't think I ever got the chance to fully thank you, so thanks. You're a great editor. Quadzilla99 (talk) 21:11, 4 October 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Juwan Howard/archive2

As a reviewer at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Michael Jordan, I thought you might consider commenting at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Juwan Howard/archive2.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 01:32, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:FPArchiveBarMay2006

Template:FPArchiveBarMay2006 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji 22:43, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Protein Society

I see that on 27 April 2007 you deleted an article about the Protein Society, apparently out of concern for a copyright violation. I took notice of this just now while attempting to find such an article, prompted by seeing a new article about the Biophysical Society. I do not think we disagree that this scientific society is notable and that it ought to have an article. I note, for instance, that there is still an article about the societies journal, Protein Science, as well as references to awards people have received from the society.

So what can I say without triggering a deletion? The new article page referred me to you, please give me some help.

For instance, their web site says: "The Protein Society is the leading international society devoted to furthering research and development in protein science."

Can I say, "The Protein Society is an international scientific society devoted to furthering research and development in protein science."?

Can I say, "The Protein Society is an international scientific society. Its purpose is furthering research and development in protein science."?

--AJim (talk) 19:55, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Anniversary

Wishing PS2pcGAMER a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 00:24, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Notification of pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 19:29, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Notification of imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 17:23, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. WilliamH (talk) 01:53, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:4Kids Entertainment (logo).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:4Kids Entertainment (logo).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 07:36, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Notice of change

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Million Award

		The Million Award
		For your contributions to bring Michael Jordan (estimated annual readership: 5,269,000) to Featured Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers. -- Khazar2 (talk) 03:22, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

The Million Award is a new initiative to recognize the editors of Wikipedia's most-read content; you can read more about the award and its possible tiers (Quarter Million Award, Half Million Award, and Million Award) at Wikipedia:Million Award. You're also welcome to display this userbox:

This editor won the Million Award for bringing Michael Jordan to Featured Article status.

If I've made any error in this listing, please don't hesitate to correct it; if for any reason you don't feel you deserve it, please don't hesitate to remove it; if you know of any other editor who merits one of these awards, please don't hesitate to give it; if you yourself deserve another award from any of the three tiers, please don't hesitate to take it! -- Khazar2 (talk) 03:22, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Top Gear broadcasters and video releases

The article List of Top Gear broadcasters and video releases has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:NOTTVGUIDE, WP:TVINTL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rob Sinden (talk) 11:40, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Cleaning up Special:WantedTemplates

Hi, due to quirks in the way that Wikipedia parses javascript pages, curly braces are parsed as templates, unless they are inside of <nowiki>...</nowiki>, <pre>...</pre>, <syntaxhighlight>...</syntaxhighlight> ... As a result of this, two of your script pages, User:PS2pcGAMER/sd.js and User:PS2pcGAMER/welcome.js, are generating links in Special:WantedTemplates (in particular links to Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:' + 'subst:User:PS2pcGAMER/welcome and Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:' + 'subst:User:PS2pcGAMER/sd). Recently, an interface editor attempted to fix this by adding <nowiki> at the top and </nowiki> at the bottom of your script pages. This didn't work because you already have <nowiki>...</nowiki> on those pages. It would be great if you could add <syntaxhighlight>...</syntaxhighlight> tags (you don't have these) at the top and bottom of your pages like this which will prevent your page from generating links in Special:WantedTemplates. Thanks for your help! Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:41, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Hi, it looks like you are no longer active (last edit back in 2011) so I am going to go ahead and delete these two pages. Please let me know if you still need them and I would be happy to restore them. Thanks! Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:47, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Drug Design and Optimization Lab

The article Drug Design and Optimization Lab has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability. No refs. Orphaned for a decade.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PepperBeast (talk) 16:06, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:UploadedFP

Template:UploadedFP has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 17:49, 13 December 2022 (UTC)