Pijushbhatta

== Pijushbhatta, you are invited to the Teahouse! == Please add my paper named "Human Coronavirus (Covid-19) Disease Vaccine" published in IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences, Vol. 19, Issue 5, Ser 17, pp 22-24, May 2020 (available in net) in wikipedia coronavirus vaccine site, this paper indicates very simple and cheapest way to produce coronavirus (Covid-19) vaccine.

Hi Pijushbhatta! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Dathus (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:24, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

Citing your own work

Hello, Pijushbhatta, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but your recent edits at Rabindranath Tagore and Harvesting lightning energy appear to have been primarily intended as pretexts to add references to your own work (i.e., articles written by Pijush Kanti Bhattacharjee). Citing your own material as a source for Wikipedia content is problematic for a number of reasons, and when done in multiple articles, it can be taken as a form of self-promotion or citation spam. AtticusX (talk) 15:14, 12 December 2015 (UTC)

Continuing to cite your own work

Hello, Pijushbhatta, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but your recent edits at Global warming and Quantum computing appear to have been primarily intended as pretexts to add references to your own work (i.e., articles written by Pijush Kanti Bhattacharjee). Citing your own material as a source for Wikipedia content is problematic for a number of reasons, and when done in multiple articles, it can be taken as a form of self-promotion or citation spam.

Note that in some past cases individuals have been blocked or banned from Wikipedia for editing in this manner. Shock Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 13:52, 10 May 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 10:45, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

October 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Gravity, Electromagnetic radiation, Earth's magnetic field and Electromagnetic spectrum, you may be blocked from editing. - DVdm (talk) 08:15, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Antenna (radio). DVdm (talk) 08:22, 17 October 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  –Darkwind (talk) 09:48, 17 October 2019 (UTC)