Powertothepeople
Your AfC Submission has been moved
editHello, I'm Timothyjosephwood. I wanted to let you know that one of your submissions to the Articles for Creation project has been moved and is now located at Draft:Muslim Women's National Network Australia as a draft, which is the preferred namespace for AfC submissions. You may continue to work on it as normal in its new location, and submit it for review when you are ready. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or at the AfC Help Desk. Thanks. TimothyJosephWood 13:58, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
Powertothepeople, you are invited to the Teahouse!
editHi Powertothepeople! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 22:03, 25 May 2017 (UTC) |
Your post to User talk:Lankiveil
editDo not try to guess who an editor in real life may be as you did on User talk:Lankiveil. If you continue to link a user to off site names you will be blocked from editing. see WP:OUTING for more information. ~ GB fan 16:13, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- @GB fan: Thank you for correcting me. I will take care in future. Powertothepeople (talk) 22:42, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
edit- Hi Powertothepeople! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 08:54, Thursday, June 8, 2017 (UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Hey there!
editHi! Further to what I said on Talk:Luke Hartsuyker, I really do want to take a moment to welcome you properly to the project. Goodness knows we need more active editors at WP:AUSPOL, and I hope you stick around. I also want to commend you for engaging with the talk pages; many new editors take a while to grasp the collaborative, consensus-based approach we have here and you seem to have picked up on that right from the get-go, so nice work! Sorry to see you've had some lack of responses, but as you may have noticed we're a bit under-resourced at the moment, and it's great you haven't taken that as a cue to stop engaging.
You might notice I've made some changes to Ann Sudmalis following your recent reworking. The goal here was good, but you need to be really careful about POV, especially in biographies of living people. Pretty much everything you added to Sudmalis's page ended up with a negative slant, which we need to watch. I also removed a couple of sentences that I don't think warranted inclusion as trivialities, although feel free to discuss these on the talk page if you disagree. Just remember that we need to have a neutral point of view and encyclopedic tone throughout, and we mustn't let our personal political leanings interfere with editing. From the Sudmalis article, for example, I could tell pretty clearly what your opinion of her was. Ideally, one's edits should betray no clue about one's political leanings (although you are of course free to express those on talk pages or on your userpage).
I hope you aren't discouraged by the above, and please feel free to get in touch if there's anything I can help you with. Frickeg (talk) 05:26, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
- @Frickeg: Thank you for your message and fixing up the page. Please note I only contributed a small amount to the page and some of your changes were to material that pre-dated me. I do question some of your changes, as - if mine were biased one way, I feel yours are biased the other way.
- I believe (as whoever wrote it did) that it is valid to include that she believed that she won some of the polling booths because of interference by a supporter removing the competitor's material. Sudmalis volunteered this information and it was reported publicly. If it is "negative" it is because someone did the wrong thing (don't shoot the messenger).
- The rewriting of what happened regarding council amalgamations doesn't really explain it, and could give people the wrong impression - and admittedly it wasn't written very well by whoever originally contributed it. From what I understand: Sudmalis was publicly critical against the Baird Liberal state government's forced council amalgamations. She signed a petition but didn't read what it said properly. The petition she signed stated an “intention to vote against the honourable Shelley Hancock MP & Gareth Ward MP, as well as the government in the upper house at the next state election” (voting against her own Liberal party in future elections). That didn't go down well. She then sought to have her signature removed from the petition due to the mistake.[1]. However her continued stance was/is against the amalgamations. I don't have a particular perspective on this issue, but believe it should be clear what actually happened and what her stance is.
- Re same-sex marriage, yeah I have a position which is that there is an abundance of evidence that the majority of her electorate does support same-sex marriage, yet she is claiming that she is only against same-sex marriage because of her "conservative" constituency.
- If I went overkill with evidence, it is because on Peter Dutton's post an editor had objected to someone (not me) saying that Dutton opposed same sex marriage (editor then was selectively quoting one citation that made it more ambiguous) so after a lengthy discussion on the talk page which required me providing overkill of evidence regarding Dutton's stance he conceded to a new wording... which included the overkill of evidence.
- If you prefer a shorter simpler writing of Sudmalis's stance, fine, but the current rewrite is not neutral. Sudmalis infers that she needn't listen to her own survey results (which I guess she didn't like the outcome of) because of a "low" participation rate - but scientific practice requires at least 100 respondents to be statistically reliable, and she had 2510 respondents. i.e. plenty. She also suggested that there wasn't that much difference between those who were for or against, when 1552 versus 893 means almost twice as many were for same-sex marriage than against. Quoting her as if it were fact as she misrepresents the evidence is not neutral. And this: "made clear her support for a national plebiscite to decide the issue" is not true. She supports a plebiscite but does not anywhere say that she will vote based on the plebiscite outcome. If she is opposed to same sex marriage, and is currently ignoring all the evidence that her community are mostly for same sex marriage, then there is no evidence to suggest she would vote for same sex marriage even if the Australian public voted for it in a plebescite. As such, the plebescite will not decide the issue (and she doesn't say it will either).
- I don't mind how you write it, but it is important to communicate accurately on her page that her community has shown their support for same sex marriage (I provided an abundance of evidence and citations for this), yet she opposes same sex marriage and claims it is due to her constituency. Those are the facts. Some people will think positively of her for opposing same sex marriage, and other's negatively, so who's to say whether this is negative or positive?
- 4. I don't care one way or another (not my contribution to this page) but am interested to know what prompted the change in information about 2016 election results. I have wondered if there is a suggestion somewhere about how election results should be communicated (wording, which statistics used, etc), which would make things clearer, apples to apples, more neutral, but it seems to vary from page to page as far as I can tell.
- Thank you for taking the time to answer these questions for me Powertothepeople (talk) 08:55, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry about misattributing all those edits to you - I've had a look and you're absolutely right, my bad. Looking more closely at the edits that are actually yours, they are generally much better than those that preceded them! I'll do my best to answer these questions:
- The polling booth sign thing seems like a non-story to me. Firstly, she said she had been told that the materials had been taken down, and then she was making an inference that that was why she won an individual booth (not multiple booths). She was reporting an anecdote, this was then referred to police and appears to have gone no further. This kind of thing is not at all uncommon at election time; in fact I doubt very much there has been any election without at least five or so stories like this. If it turned into an actual thing (like the Cameron Murphy/East Hills mess at the state election), then it would be different.
- You're right that the amalgamations bit was poorly written, which was why I trimmed it down. I agree what is there now could be expanded further, although I don't believe it is inaccurate. The problem is that the whole thing is kind of a mess, and it's hard to accurately depict the whole, rather minor incident without running afoul of undue weight. Would not be opposed to clarification regarding her opposition to amalgamation, but I feel that to go into the petition itself in too much detail is unnecessary.
- My personal position is the same as yours on same-sex marriage, but I do not believe we need to go into all that much detail about it. Of the evidence you provided, the council votes do not say anything conclusive about community support, online petitions and online polls are not evidence of anything, and the Wollongong Young Liberal club is in a separate (and very left-leaning) electorate. Even the mailing list is crappy evidence, because it was not conducted using proper survey methods (it used her mailing list, which is hardly a representative sample). The only way we could definitively say that her community supports SSM is if a reputable polling company surveyed the electorate. I take your point about the low response rate, but struggled to find another way to concisely sum up her response; I personally agree that her position here is pretty weak, but the article cannot agree with that, it just has to present her response neutrally. You have assembled evidence and are presenting a case that Sudmalis is wrong; I think you have a strong argument there, but Wikipedia is not the place for making arguments. Regarding the plebiscite, I think it is clear from the news article that she supports a plebiscite in a proper sense (not in an Abetz-sense), but would not necessarily be opposed to rephrasing if you'd prefer.
- There isn't any standard regarding reporting of election results, outside of complying with the manual of style. I felt the way it was written was unnecessarily wordy, and I don't think anything was really left out in my truncating it. Generally it isn't necessary to mention the opponent by name unless they win or are notable in some particular way (and not just a standard party candidate, which the vast majority are, even in marginal seats). I don't love talking about majorities in numbers rather than percentages, because of how quickly these things can change and how frequently we redistribute boundaries, but there's no ban on them.
- Hope this helps clarify where I was coming from. Feel free to ask me if anything's unclear, or if we just fundamentally disagree about some stuff (it happens!) then the talk page is a good place to get some different perspectives. Frickeg (talk) 09:38, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry about misattributing all those edits to you - I've had a look and you're absolutely right, my bad. Looking more closely at the edits that are actually yours, they are generally much better than those that preceded them! I'll do my best to answer these questions:
Welcome
editG'day Powertothepeople, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; they have helped improve Wikipedia and made it more informative. I hope you enjoy using Wikipedia and decide to make additional contributions. Some resources to help new Wikipedians include:
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Article titles
- Manual of Style
As a contributor to Australian articles, you may like to connect with other Australian Wikipedians through the Australian Wikipedians' notice board and take a look at the activities in WikiProject Australia and associated sub-projects. Wikimedia Australia your local chapter organises editor training workshops, meetups and other events. If you would like to know more, email help@wikimedia.org.au.
If you are living in Australia and want to subscribe to location based notices, you can add location userboxes to your userpage.
Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~; this will automatically produce your name and the date.
If you have any questions, please see Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, try the Wikipedia:Help desk, or ask me on my talk page. Or you can just type {{helpme}}
on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Thank you for signing up! JarrahTree 13:38, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
This was added - just in case you needed to know there is a local Western Australian and Australian element to things JarrahTree 13:43, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Wikipedia and copyright
editHello Powertothepeople, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Ruth Hope Crow have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:00, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Muslim Women's National Network Australia (June 28)
edit- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Muslim Women's National Network Australia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Nomination of Muslim Women's National Network Australia for deletion
editA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Muslim Women's National Network Australia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muslim Women's National Network Australia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 07:09, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
August 2017 at Women in Red
editGlad to see you've become a member of WiR. We have some exciting developments in August (see below). If ever you run into any problems or need assistance, just drop me a line on my talk page.--Ipigott (talk) 09:41, 30 July 2017 (UTC)
Welcome to Women in Red's August 2017 worldwide online editathons. | ||
|
(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)
Alice Easton Law
editHi Powerrtothepeople - thank you for your addition of the new article Alice Easton Law. One small thing though... stub categories should [ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alice_Easton_Law&diff=prev&oldid=800884030never be directly added] - they should be added by templates (e.g., {{NewZealand-bio-stub}}. Adding them directly to categories makes any further sorting a much harder task and also makes assessment of what further stub categories might be needed far more difficult. Please see WP:STUB for any more info. Other than that, though, thanks for the good work! Grutness...wha? 10:08, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
July events from Women in Red!
edit July 2019, Volume 5, Issue 7, Numbers 107, 108, 126, 127, 128
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:41, 25 June 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August 2019 at Women in Red
edit August 2019, Volume 5, Issue 7, Numbers 107, 108, 126, 129, 130, 131
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 06:46, 29 July 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2019 at Women in Red
edit September 2019, Volume 5, Issue 9, Numbers 107, 108, 132, 133, 134, 135
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:25, 27 August 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
October Events from Women in Red
edit October 2019, Volume 5, Issue 10, Numbers 107, 108, 137, 138, 139, 140
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:36, 23 September 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
November 2019 at Women in Red
edit November 2019, Volume 5, Issue 11, Numbers 107, 108, 140, 141, 142, 143
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:59, 29 October 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
editDecember events with WIR
edit December 2019, Volume 5, Issue 12, Numbers 107, 108, 144, 145, 146, 147
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:44, 25 November 2019 (UTC) via MassMessaging
January 2020 at Women in Red
edit January 2020, Volume 6, Issue 1, Numbers 146, 148, 149, 150, 151, 153
|
February with Women in Red
edit February 2020, Volume 6, Issue 2, Numbers 150, 151, 152, 154, 155
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:31, 28 January 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
March 2020 at Women in Red
edit March 2020, Volume 6, Issue 3, Numbers 150, 151, 156, 157, 158, 159
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 19:33, 23 February 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April 2020 at Women in Red
edit April 2020, Volume 6, Issue 4, Numbers 150, 151, 159, 160, 161, 162
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 15:00, 23 March 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
May 2020 at Women in Red
edit May 2020, Volume 6, Issue 5, Numbers 150, 151, 163, 164, 165, 166
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 20:59, 29 April 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June 2020 at Women in Red
editWomen in Red June 2020, Volume 6, Issue 6, Numbers 150, 151, 167, 168, 169
Online events:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 17:11, 25 May 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
July 2020 at Women in Red
editWomen in Red / July 2020, Volume 6, Issue 7, Numbers 150, 151, 170, 171, 172, 173
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:12, 28 June 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August 2020 at Women in Red
editWomen in Red | August 2020, Volume 6, Issue 8, Numbers 150, 151, 173, 174, 175
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:51, 26 July 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September Women in Red edithons
editWomen in Red | September 2020, Volume 6, Issue 9, Numbers 150, 151, 176, 177
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 17:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
October editathons from Women in Red
editWomen in Red | October 2020, Volume 6, Issue 10, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 179
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:11, 21 September 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
November edith-a-thons from Women in Red
editWomen in Red | November 2020, Volume 6, Issue 11, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 180, 181
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 18:49, 28 October 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
December with Women in Red
editWomen in Red | December 2020, Volume 6, Issue 12, Numbers 150, 173, 178, 182, 183
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:41, 26 November 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
A New Year With Women in Red!
editWomen in Red | January 2021, Volume 7, Issue 1, Numbers 182, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 03:02, 29 December 2020 (UTC) via MassMessaging
February 2021 at Women in Red
editWomen in Red | February 2021, Volume 7, Issue 2, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 189, 190, 191
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 14:59, 27 January 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
March 2021 at Women in Red
editWomen in Red | March 2021, Volume 7, Issue 3, Numbers 184, 186, 188, 192, 193
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:49, 26 February 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April editathons from Women in Red
editWomen in Red | April 2021, Volume 7, Issue 4, Numbers 184, 188, 194, 195, 196
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 20:17, 22 March 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
May 2021 at Women in Red
editWomen in Red | May 2021, Volume 7, Issue 5, Numbers 184, 188, 197, 198
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 21:37, 28 April 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June 2021 at Women in Red
editWomen in Red | June 2021, Volume 7, Issue 6, Numbers 184, 188, 196, 199, 200, 201
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 18:50, 28 May 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
July 2021 at Women in Red
editWomen in Red | July 2021, Volume 7, Issue 7, Numbers 184, 188, 202, 203, 204, 205
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:06, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
August Editathons with Women in Red
editWomen in Red | August 2021, Volume 7, Issue 8, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 206, 207
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:27, 23 July 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2021 at Women in Red
editWomen in Red | September 2021, Volume 7, Issue 9, Numbers 184, 188, 204, 205, 207, 208
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 22:30, 26 August 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
October 2021 at Women in Red
editWomen in Red | October 2021, Volume 7, Issue 10, Numbers 184, 188, 209, 210, 211
Special event:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 01:37, 29 September 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
November 2021 at Women in Red
editWomen in Red | November 2021, Volume 7, Issue 11, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 212, 213
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 21:32, 24 October 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
December 2021 at Women in Red
editWomen in Red | December 2021, Volume 7, Issue 12, Numbers 184, 188, 210, 214, 215, 216
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 00:13, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
January 2022 Women in Red
editHappy New Year from Women in Red Jan 2022, Vol 8, Issue 1, Nos 214, 216, 217, 218, 219
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:03, 28 December 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging
February with Women in Red
edit Women in Red Feb 2022, Vol 8, Issue 2, Nos 214, 217, 220, 221, 222
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 15:10, 31 January 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
March editathons
editWomen in Red Mar 2022, Vol 8, Issue 3, Nos 214, 217, 222, 223, 224, 225
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 16:38, 27 February 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
April Editathons from Women in Red
editWomen in Red Apr 2022, Vol 8, Issue 4, Nos 214, 217, 226, 227, 228
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 22:45, 22 March 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
May 2022 at Women in Red
editWomen in Red May 2022, Vol 8, Issue 5, Nos 214, 217, 227, 229, 230
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 04:57, 2 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
June events from Women in Red
editWomen in Red June 2022, Vol 8, Issue 6, Nos 214, 217, 227, 231, 232, 233
|
--Megalibrarygirl (talk) 09:22, 31 May 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in July 2022
editWomen in Red July 2022, Vol 8, Issue 7, Nos 214, 217, 234, 235
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:49, 27 June 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2022
editWomen in Red August 2022, Vol 8, Issue 8, Nos 214, 217, 236, 237, 238, 239
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:59, 29 July 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in September 2022
editWomen in Red September 2022, Vol 8, Issue 9, Nos 214, 217, 240, 241
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:37, 31 August 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red October 2022
editWomen in Red October 2022, Vol 8, Issue 10, Nos 214, 217, 242, 243, 244
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 15:01, 29 September 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red November 2022
editWomen in Red November 2022, Vol 8, Issue 11, Nos 214, 217, 245, 246, 247
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 17:35, 26 October 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in December 2022
editWomen in Red December 2022, Vol 8, Issue 12, Nos 214, 217, 248, 249, 250
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:56, 26 November 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red January 2023
editHappy New Year from Women in Red | January 2023, Volume 9, Issue 1, Nos 250, 251, 252, 253, 254
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:03, 27 December 2022 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red in February 2023
edit Women in Red Feb 2023, Vol 9, Iss 2, Nos 251, 252, 255, 256, 257, 259
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:29, 30 January 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red March 2023
edit Women in Red Mar 2023, Vol 9, Iss 3, Nos 251, 252, 258, 259, 260, 261
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 12:55, 26 February 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red April 2023
edit Women in Red Apr 2023, Vol 9, Iss 4, Nos 251, 252, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:53, 27 March 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red May 2023
edit Women in Red May 2023, Vol 9, Iss 5, Nos 251, 252, 267, 268, 269, 270
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 18:29, 27 April 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red - June 2023
edit Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 6, Nos 251, 252, 271, 272, 273
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:16, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red July 2023
edit Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 7, Nos 251, 252, 274, 275, 276
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:44, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red 8th Anniversary
editWomen in Red 8th Anniversary | |
In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap! |
--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:01, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2023
edit Women in Red August 2023, Vol 9, Iss 8, Nos 251, 252, 277, 278, 279, 280
See also:
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:26, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2023 at Women in Red
edit Women in Red September 2023, Vol 9, Iss 9, Nos 251, 252, 281, 282, 283
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Victuallers (talk) 16:59, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red October 2023
edit Women in Red October 2023, Vol 9, Iss 10, Nos 251, 252, 284, 285, 286
See also
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:54, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red - November 2023
edit Women in Red November 2023, Vol 9, Iss 11, Nos 251, 252, 287, 288, 289
See also Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:23, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red December 2023
edit Women in Red December 2023, Vol 9, Iss 12, Nos 251, 252, 290, 291, 292
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:24, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red January 2024
editWomen in Red | January 2024, Volume 10, Issue 1, Numbers 291, 293, 294, 295, 296
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:18, 28 December 2023 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red February 2024
editWomen in Red | February 2024, Volume 10, Issue 2, Numbers 293, 294, 297, 298
Announcement
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:10, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red March 2024
editWomen in Red | March 2024, Volume 10, Issue 3, Numbers 293, 294, 299, 300, 301
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:23, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red April 2024
editWomen in Red | April 2024, Volume 10, Issue 4, Numbers 293, 294, 302, 303, 304
Announcements
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:43, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red May 2024
editWomen in Red | May 2024, Volume 10, Issue 5, Numbers 293, 294, 305, 306, 307
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 06:18, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red June 2024
editWomen in Red | June 2024, Volume 10, Issue 6, Numbers 293, 294, 308, 309, 310
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 07:06, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2024
editWomen in Red | July 2024, Volume 10, Issue 7, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 312, 313
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 14:29, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red August 2024
editWomen in Red | August 2024, Volume 10, Issue 8, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 313, 314, 315
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 19:59, 25 July 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
September 2024 at Women in Red
editWomen in Red | September 2024, Volume 10, Issue 9, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 316, 317
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 19:02, 26 August 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red October 2024
editWomen in Red | October 2024, Volume 10, Issue 10, Numbers 293, 294, 318, 319, 320
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 08:07, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging
Women in Red November 2024
editWomen in Red | November 2024, Vol 10, Issue 11, Nos 293, 294, 321, 322, 323
Online events:
Announcements from other communities
Tip of the month:
Other ways to participate:
|
--Lajmmoore (talk 20:43, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging