Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, Producerengineerarmy. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Keith Uddin, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

  • avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
  • instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. -- ferret (talk) 22:39, 28 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

January 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm Ferret. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Keith Uddin have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. -- ferret (talk) 22:39, 28 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Die Another Day (song), without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not always sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —IB [ Poke ] 15:33, 29 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Standing on the Shoulder of Giants. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- ferret (talk) 15:44, 29 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove the {{copyvio}} template from articles, as you did with Keith Uddin. Your action has been reverted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept non-free text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted, and removing copyright notices will not help your case. You can properly contest the deletion at Wikipedia:Copyright problems. If you are the owner of the material, you may release the material under the Creative Commons and GFDL licenses, as detailed at WP:IOWN. Alternatively, you are welcome to create a draft in your own words at Talk:Keith Uddin/Temp. If you continue to insert copyright violations and/or remove copyright notices, you may be blocked from editing. —IB [ Poke ] 05:03, 30 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- ferret (talk) 12:37, 30 January 2017 (UTC)Reply