Quandle

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ramanujan's congruences, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ramanujan's congruences was changed by Quandle (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.909443 on 2011-01-29T16:38:43+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:38, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Ramanujan's congruences

I am glad you were not deterred by the automatic (and incorrect) reversion of your first edit. I reported the mistake to the robot's owner. Please continue to contribute. —Mark Dominus (talk) 17:45, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Thank you! Quandle (talk) 18:01, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

3RR rule warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

Does this actually apply to me? I made an edit and then asked on the talk page for discussion someone reverted it without any discussion so I made my edit again and tried to engage in discussion. They declared that they had come to a consensus (with themselves?) and reverted my edit again... I suppose the alternative would be to have not performed my edit again but then they would simply ignore all discussion (well I guess they did anyway..). Quandle (talk) 14:12, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

WP:AN/I

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Fly by Night (talk) 04:28, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:20, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Ramanujan's congruences

Your comments at Talk:Ramanujan's congruences#Conceptual explanation would be welcome. Deltahedron (talk) 20:32, 3 August 2014 (UTC)