Wikipedia

User talk:RHaworth/2016 Nov 02

< User talk:RHaworth
Latest comment: 8 years ago by RHaworth in topic Abdulrahman M. Al-Ibrahim

Archives

Emotional Speech Blocks Syndrome Deletion

[Title width guide. Delete above here if no further edits - already in archive. If further edits, move below here.]

Restoring a wiki page

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, I had created a page with title 359° – Worker, Writer, World-traveller. Unaware that the page gets published and there is not mean to hide or keep it offline, I request to delete it. However I wish to restore that page with the same content. Kindly help me retrieving it. Thanks, Shweta — Preceding unsigned comment added by 17shwet (talk • contribs) 09:12, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Not deleting a wiki page

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi RHaworth, I had created a page called In Our Bones Tour and I didn't know that I can draft it and I accidentally clicked save changes and made it public. Can you please give me some time to work on it and not delete it. Thanks, Llamaizfab — Preceding unsigned comment added by Llamaizfab (talk • contribs) 10:44, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of the page Moscoman

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Dear Roger, I was wondering what criteria were used to promptly delete the article about Moscoman and what can be done for the article to remain. Best regards, Alex / Diskono (talk) 09:05, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

OnDemandKorea

Latest comment: 8 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, I made a Wikipedia page for the streaming company OnDemandKorea. The page was created solely for the purpose of information. So that people knew the site existed and that it was a legitimate website. I modeled it very closely to other Korean streaming company Wikipedia pages so that it wouldn't be considered advertising/promotion. It got marked for speedy deletion, I contested it, never heard back, and then it got deleted. I sent a talk message asking how I could rewrite it to avoid deletion but never heard anything back. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Farbod628 (talk • contribs) 16:42, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Do you know what the usual wait-time is for a page to go from Draft to Live? Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Farbod628 (talk • contribs) 00:34, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of Medan vi lever

Latest comment: 8 years ago8 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, I am new at making pages, I have contributed before but still a newbie. Sorry. Yesterday (I live in Sweden) I wrote a page on a new movie that has screened in Sweden, the title is "Medan vi lever" ("While we live"). First I wrote in Swedish and then I got a msg to change to English, which I did. I also got a message to enter sources which I did. Among the links was the Swedish Film Database, a completely non-commercial site with data about movies, actors starring in movies, and filmmakers. I also linked to the film director Dani Kouyatés page. When I published the page it was immediately tagged for "Speedy Deletion". I contested the deletion and had a brief exchange with another admin. But after editing the page I did not get any response. And when I checked in today morning I found that the page got deleted.

I am not part of any promotion team. I have not been payed to write a page on Wikipedia, I just wanted to add information about the film, and that's what I explained to the other admin (John). Did I make formal mistakes or what was the reason for not taking into consideration what I wrote? I am an independent journalist and not part of any organization promoting the film, but the page has now been deleted tagged as "unambiguous advertisement or promotion"? Hmmm. It's true that I linked to a distributor site, where it is also possible to move on to purchase tickets through clicking links, but I could easily have removed that link and only kept the links to reviews and the non-commercial data base. I could also rewrite and add info about the film, which is by the way the first movie produced in Sweden to starr a majority of black actors, making film history through this fact.

  • If you are ready to restore the page after changes, please let me know and I will try to comply with the rules I understand exist on Wikipedia and edit the page some more, remove commercially ambiguous links and add some facts.
  • If you will not restore the page, then could you please retrieve and send me the text of the page since I did a huge job translating into English and adding links.

Would be most grateful for a response, and consideration for the fact that I live in Sweden, that is: a completely other timezone. Best, Amintou (talk) 08:12, 7 October 2016 (UTC) Edited Amintou (talk) 08:53, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Just trying to better my English and cutting out some unnecessary facts, didn't expect to get a speedy answer at all. Thanx. Amintou (talk) 09:15, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

And, yes I have looked at the deletion entry, and the pages "What Wikipedia is not" (the part: Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion), "Criteria for speedy deletion", G11, and also "Talk page guidelines". Keeping an eye now on my Watchlist and on this page. :) — Amintou (talk) 09:23, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

  • What on earth makes you think we live in completely different time zones? And in any case if you don't expect a speedy response why on earth should it matter what the time zone difference is? Please note that <br> is very rarely needed in wiki markup.
I have restored the article to draft:Medan vi lever but do not submit it until: a) you have created an acceptable version of sv:Medan vi lever and it has survived for a month or so, b) the movie has been reviewed by reliable English language sources and c) the draft looks like a Wikipedia article: infobox, lede, etc. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:54, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Thank You. I will start editing. A question though: The title is in Swedish. I cannot edit the title. Can the title be altered? If not I am considering whether I should edit this page completely in Swedish and create another one for review in English, with an English title. Thank you for input on this. Amintou (talk) 11:12, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

OK, thanks. Amintou (talk) 08:39, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Ethiope

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I think on your page you meant to say, "an Ethiopian cannot change his skin and a leopard cannot change his spots." You got it backwards. Just FYI. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gregstcyr85 (talk • contribs) 15:01, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

Maya

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Re: user:talk:RHaworth 20:44, 14 September 2016 (UTC). Having worked with computers since 1965 (i.e. for 51 years), for the last three weeks since your message about ‘reverting’ an edit, I am no closer to understanding what you mean. There is neither record nor page locking on these pages, nor are postings appended to the end. Therefore if I am fortunate, I may be able to post something while no one else does so with the version of page I would have uploaded. If there is some other way of avoiding this problem, it is not evident. My only two communications received have been vague and more focused on nomenclature and protocol than content. If I am unable to pass these barriers and hurdles, I will have to capitulate and abandon trying to post something onto Wikipedia. — Ronsark (talk) 15:14, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

  • Ronsark, I also have worked with computers for about 51 years - so what? Editing Wikipedia talk pages does not need knowledge of computers - just common sense. Record/page locking is not needed because warnings are usually given of edit conflicts and nothing need be permanently lost - though I will admit that handling an edit conflict can be a bit daunting for a newbie. Postings can be appended - at the top of a talk page there is "new section" tab (may appear as just a + depending on skin and twinkle, etc.).
To spell out slowly what you did: please look at this "diff" report. I hope you can see that your message deleted a message from Hitcher vs. Candyman. My first reaction was to simply revert your edit as vandalism. But then I relented. The edits by Hitcher and you were 13 minutes apart which does not immediately suggest an edit conflict but I accepted that you could easily have had my talk page open for fifteen minutes while considering your reply so I left this more conciliatory message.
I invite you again to enter your message properly. Now you have another daunting task: to neither prepend nor append but add your message to this section. Hint: beside the title Maya you should see an [edit] link - click on it. Best of luck! — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:54, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

I am afraid I have neither the time nor interest any longer in wading through processes and procedures instead of working on content on the material I had hoped would be accepted by Wikipedia. I have therefore abandoned trying to progress it since I cannot get out of the starting blocks. Pity as the material is of value to many and Wikipedia would be a useful source for people seeking further information. 197.245.244.153 (talk) 07:56, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of Spotware

Latest comment: 8 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Dear RHaworth, You have recently delete a page for a company called Spotware, I have already contested the deletion in Talk:Spotware#Contested_deletion, which was also deleted. My reasons for not deleting this page were given in detail and it was later deleted by User:Explicit. I then wrote the page from scratch and spent several hours looking for alternative sources having taken on board the comments given by Wikipedia admins in Talk:Spotware which has also been deleted.

I need you to be clear on what was not acceptable about the version of the page which was deleted by you, since I corrected the issues expressed by the other Admins, with the exception of changing the entire orientation of my organization. It seems you had other issues. The article was entirely factual and simply explained that we are a company and located in Cyprus and have some products with a basic explanation on what they do, only explaining the functionality which could be backed up by sources not used more than once. The main issue originally raised was the validity of the sources provided and the frequency the same sources were used within the article. This was fixed by not using the same source more than once and by finding "more reputable" sources according to one comment these sources were not qualified in their opinion. I had quoted Bloomberg, Bobsguide, Waters Technology and others. I have to be very clear on the nature of our business, we are strictly Business to Business and the sources provided were industry specific trade publications and indeed very niche. They are not high profile sites aimed at the masses, i.e consumers.

Additionally, their was a comment that the Wikipedia moderation team should be very careful with Binary Options and Forex Trading companies, which I totally agree with, however we are not and do not solicit business from users, we are a technology company who require a Wikipedia page to provide a profile of the company which possible employees and business partners expect an industry leader to have.

The last and most infuriating part of all this is our competitors who provide even less credible sources and at best, the same and still have their pages untouched. This is the second time you personally have deleted our page and it begs the question, is this malicious?

For example: MetaTrader 4, Leverate, ZuluTrade, EToro. I need to be very clear that we are not using Wikipedia to promote links or for SEO, these are simply the sources which we have available for our industry. An industry which we strive to make better. I hope you consider giving this a second thought. Long story short, we really need a Wikipedia page for potential employees and business partners to view us as the credible company which we are. Your attention is appreciated. Jim Greene (talk) 15:54, 7 October 2016 (UTC)

  • What cheek! "We really need a Wikipedia page" as if you had some right to one. Kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no CoI thinks your company is notable and writes about it here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:54, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your feedback, however it seems you have disregarded all of my very valid points and reverted only on a single point which I believe has been taken the wrong way. Please understand this; The page was put up for speedy deletion, this page had existed for over 3 years without issue. I stepped in to contest this since the reasons presented in Talk:Spotware were invalid as did another individual. I restored the page and based changes according to feedback from other moderators in Talk:Spotware. Yes there was a CoI but only on why the page should exist and not within the content itself, take note of the fact that the original content included negative events which occurred in the companies history which only existed there because it was an unbiased article, explaining both good and bad topics. A biased article would try to suppress that information and not promote it on Wikipedia.

I do not believe that Spotware has the right to a page but I also do not believe the company does not have the right either. Since the page has been protected it can not be created by another person. I completely respect your position as an advocate of eliminating CoI in Wikipedia, so I would like you to consider the following, which I think can be reasonably done without conflicting with your integrity nor stance on the matter;

1. Restore the page with simply one sentence to state that company exists, this will act as a place holder for others to discover the page and see content needs to be added, or at the very least removing the protection will be appreciated.

2. Restore Talk:Spotware so anyone who decides to create an article will discover previous reasons why the article was flagged by other moderators and use those guidelines.

Thank you. Jim Greene (talk) 09:20, 9 October 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of FloTHERM

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I don't understand why you deleted FloTHERM. I know this topic and reading the Thermal management page, I noticed that in the "Software" section 3 tools are mentioned. Only one of them, 6SigmaET, has its own page, but it is the least important, as you can see comparing Google's search trends.

I admit to have written a very short description (it is only a beginning), but in what isn't it neutral? Thank you for your answer and for your contribution to Wikipedia, anyway. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karlopiz (talk • contribs) 14:50, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

International Beer and Pizza Day

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello Rhaworth, Some time ago I created a draft for the food holiday known as International Beer and Pizza Day. At that time, the first iteration of the holiday had not come to pass, therefore I was unable to produce enough credible sources. This holiday was just celebrated yesterday, October 9th, and since then I have found that it was a huge hit around the world. To my surprise, several articles were written about it, a large number of bars/restaurants have celebrated with discounts on beer and pizza, and traffic on beerandpizzaday.com has spiked significantly. Many businesses have even created their own banners to celebrate the day. Searching for 'beerandpizzaday' on Twitter will show a lot of people had a good time participating in the new food holiday. Because of all the new development, I would kindly ask that you restore my previous draft and allow me to significantly edit and add to it with new information and credible sources. Below are several source links:

Thank you, NickSaul (talk) 19:12, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

  • This page confirms that you invented this holiday so I should say "kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no COI thinks it is notable and writes about it here". However, I will admit that hoax was an invalid deletion reason so I have restored it. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:16, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

UK Driving License Codes

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
 

UK Driving License Codes listed at Redirects for discussion An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect UK Driving License Codes. Since you had some involvement with the UK Driving License Codes redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 09:13, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

Deleted article - Chocolate Phosphate

Latest comment: 8 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

I was going to create an article chocolate phosphate but was notified that there was one but had been deleted by you. I would like to know the content of that article. Also there is no link to it to fulfil your request to include a link. Thanks, Murray Simon (user mursimon) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mursimon (talk • contribs) 13:56, 11 October 2016 (UTC)

I got the info on the link by typing "Chocolate Phosphate" into the search line and among other things I got this: "A page with this title has previously been moved or deleted. If you are creating a new page with different content, please continue. If you are recreating a page similar to the previously deleted page, or are unsure, please first contact the user(s) who performed the action(s) listed below. 03:53, 11 October 2016 RHaworth (talk | contribs) deleted page Chocolate phosphate (A3: Article has no meaningful, substantive content)".

What I didn't get was a link to the deleted page. As you may remember, the reason was given as "Article has no meaningful, substantive content." I wanted to see what the rejected content was. That is why I sent you the request and did not solicit you for questions as to why I did what I did. And yes, you do sound like a grumpy old man. (I know because I'm also an old man, who made chocolate phosphates as a teenage soda jerk in the early 1950s.) — Mursimon (talk) 02:15, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

  • I am going to persist with asking what you did because an understanding of links is vital for your education not only about Wikipedia but about all web pages. When I key chocolate phosphate (note that it must have a lower case p on the first of phosphate) I do not see any of the message you quote above. The only relevant thing that I see is 'You may create the page "Chocolate phosphate", but consider …'. You must have done something else to get to the page that says "RHaworth deleted". Please try and remember what that something else was. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:16, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

I see what you are saying as the same thing happens to me now when I type "chocolate phosphate" in the key field. But when I am reading this thread between you & I, clicking on the red link "chocolate phosphate" in my first sentence takes me to a page titled "Creating Chocolate phosphate" where the above message can be seen. It doesn't seem logical to me but that is what happens now. Sorry but I don't remember the exact order of things when I first got to that page. I do remember that when I first decided to create a page for Chocolate Phosphate and tried to save it as an empty page, I was told that the page was empty and did I want to continue to which I replied "yes". Or try clicking on this => chocolate phosphate. — Mursimon (talk) 00:39, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

  • Mursimon, excellent: a link, not only in the proper format (newbies often use external link format) but you know that the first character is case-insensitive. You state correctly that you saved an empty page. It was that empty page which I deleted. If you added anything else, there is no record of it. My recommendation is: add whatever you want to say about chocolate phosphate to the phosphate soda article and just create a redirect at chocolate phosphate. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:46, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of Minh Quan Phan

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, I saw that your deleted the page Minh quan phan. Would you please to delete all the content and history of that page, so I can re-write new content with reliable sources? Thanks, Minhquanphan (talk) 18:46, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of BookMyForex

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, I saw you deleted the page BookMyForex. However, I was in the middle of discussion on how to improve it with another wiki editor who was suggesting me the changes. Can you please restore the page so that I can work on to to make it more encyclopedic and informative than advertising or promotional. — Bashir M (talk) 04:34, 13 October 2016 (UTC).

Nnaleche Michael

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I don't see any reason the page I created which can be found on the following link should be deleted https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nnaleche_Michael_Cale. This page resembles a public figure and required more edit, I don't know why you deleted it but am calling on rapid restoration of the page. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.211.57.99 (talk) 16:41, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Urea cycle disorder

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

that was a remarkably long-lasting copyvio, no? don't think i have ever seen one that was here that long before.... thx for deleting. Jytdog (talk) 22:37, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

LegalRaasta deletion

Latest comment: 8 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Hi - I had created page LegalRaasta on Wikipedia. However, you have deleted the page saying it's a R2: Cross-namespace redirect from mainspace. Please let me know what was the issue with the page. We will fix the issue and repost. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Himanshujain1987 (talk • contribs) 04:26, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the response. Please refer to the link - Legalraasta. As I try to access this page - it says deleted by RHaworth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Himanshujain1987 (talk • contribs) 11:02, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

not a test page

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Article is needed. i call for a recreation. experts will fill it.Minimobiler (talk) 11:02, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Draft:FIFA 16 AC Milan Career Season 1

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Since you speedy deleted the previous version of the draft, please comment on the new deletion. Matthew_hk tc 17:09, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Review article which was protected

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello sir, Please review this Draft article DJ Kentalky. It was deleted in (July 2016) because of the Census comment see DJ Kentalky. This deletion discussion proves that Wikipedia Editors are no longer reading the wikipedia policy according to This AFD Sentence. The subject article DJ Kentalky Meets WP:MUSICBIO 1, 4, 6, 8, 10, 11. This reliable source [Vanguard] also passes WP:GNG and Verifiability because its a newspaper site according to what i read. Have a nice day. -- Blaze8724 (talk) 20:50, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Thoth (video game)

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello RHaworth, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Thoth (video game), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. — foxj 19:22, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Page deleted and reason not clear

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello RHaworth, I had created a new page for our sequel movie since the first movie already had one. The new page titled "Surge of power: Revenge of the Sequel". When I got the email about copyright, I posted that I am the web designer for our team. This is the official text for the movie plot, and by me placing it there we are giving permission for it to be there. What if I put a link to the PDF presskit that the text came from? Let me know our team needs to get this page up ASAP. Thanks, Joe — Preceding unsigned comment added by COPC86 (talk • contribs) 17:14, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Todd and Clare

Latest comment: 8 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

IP address comment

Hi RHaworth! I noticed you deleted the Wikipedia article of Todd and Clare for being advertising. Can you remember roughly when it was made - was it a very new article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.7.14.210 (talk) 22:49, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

John Wheaton

I saw that the Todd and Clare wiki page Todd and Clare was "speedy deleted" as it seemed to be an advert for the website. I agree that some aspects of the page (I checked the google cache of it) were less than neutral, but I wonder if you gave the authors a chance to fix the problems before nuking the page. As you may know, T&C Network Solutions is involved in a legal dispute with Julian Assange, and such information should be included on a wikipage about T&C, if such a page were actually visible. — wheatdogg (talk) 06:55, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Eggyolk2000

This entity "Todd and Claire" is involved in an international news event, an alleged attempt to smear wikileaks founder Julian Assange. I have no problem with you locking the page, but the fact that it's possible the persons who created the "Todd and Clare" page are involved in criminal behavior means having some record of what they posted on wikipedia is essential for independent investigators. Please make it available again. At least allow it to be archived on the Wayback. Whether the page is advertising or not, it has historical value in this case. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eggyolk2000 (talk • contribs) 21:40, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

RWH replies

The page was created on 2016-06-23 17:25:10 by Narniakaty15 (talk · contribs). It is not locked. If the Wayback machine did not grab it during its four months existence, then too bad. I recommend creating a new version of the page in draftspace. That way it should give the Wayback machine a six month window to grab it even if the subject is deemed non-notable. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 14:46, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Patentem

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, RHaworth. I'd like to rewrite an article Patentem that was earlier deleted so that it could look more encyclopaedic and not self-promoting, which, in fact, it's not. An article is for information purposes only so people had a clue about the product. Anyways, I wonder if that could be restored as a draft so that I could make improvements. If not, what else can I do to create such page. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Empyreus223 (talk • contribs) 13:30, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Emily Levesque

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

RHaworth, I was involved with the creation of Draft:Emily Levesque at an affiliate-sponsored editathon. Just checking up since your comment said it was moved to now in mainspace but it doesn't seem to have followed the usual move procedure. Did we lose any content attribution? -- Brianhe (talk) 13:49, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Black water restro & Bar

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

@RHaworth: I've noticed that a speedy deletion tag was left in my page. However, I could not see and contest it against the deletion. Can you consider providing me the content for updation of the Page. — Bishal revenger (talk) 04:49, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of 208 Talks of Angels

Latest comment: 8 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion

Dearest friend Roger! You have deleted a page about international musical band 208 Talks of Angels. But please, dearest friend, note, that the page deleted by you according to deletion discussuion is NOT substantially identical to the previously deleted version (deleted by Sandstein), there are new sources and new data about the Band and it's collaborations with regarded musicians. With opened heart I ask you to re-view your desicion concerning speedy deletion and re-check the article's references. Best regards, deep respect and honour, Isaak White (talk) 09:34, 19 October 2016 (UTC) Isaak White

Can you please restore the draft of last article 208 Talks of Angels? Thank you Isaak White (talk) 08:01, 27 October 2016 (UTC) Isaak White

Investigation and block this users

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Good day RHaworth, I really appreciate your words, writing on your user page. I would like you to investigate this case. Wikipedia is not a place where people comes to promote bands, or collect money writing articles especially ghostwriting. This users Obari2Kay and Oluwa2Chainz are under a conflict of interest. Their are involved in WP:PAID as a freelancer. Oluwa2Chainz has contributed a huge amount of edits on wikipedia and has also created huge amount of Articles on Wikipedia. 80% of articles created by Oluwa2Chainz are been paid to write. According to my user page, this user Obari2Kay stated a statement on my user talk page. Their should be block from editing wikipedia and any Good article which their have writing or created should be protected due to spam. -- Historical Ben (talk) 13:14, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Templates waiting

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

There are templates waiting in this category: Candidates for speedy deletion as unused redundant templates. Can you please go and check whether there are deletion candidates. Thanks, -- Osplace 14:56, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

They are not innocent, if the templates are gone they have no reason to exist. -- Osplace 16:14, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Balanagar mandal, Ranga Reddy district

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I think this is not a duplicate one. -- Vin09 (talk) 18:24, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Mawangdui

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Mawangdui is a place, which it is famous because of the Han toms's discovery. in fact, the place Mawangdui is a subdivison, not tombs. I'm editting the title Mawangdui. Thanks, cncs (talk) 16:07 October 20 2016 (utc)

Issue solve

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

RHaworth Don"t believe what this user User:Historical Ben said. By the way he has being blocked. I only have two account which is User:Oluwa2Chainz and me but the one am active on is User:Oluwa2Chainz. See my user page for more info--Oluwa2prince (talk) 17:56, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello Roger, Newbie working on first wiki page - just a draft now so no link. Did not see a category:intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. Trying to create it, shows you deleted it. "08:54, 11 October 2016 RHaworth (talk | contribs) deleted page Category:Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (C1: Empty category)". Can you advise? Many thanks! Student30 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Student30 (talk • contribs) 18:39, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Aron Mitr

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Sir, Aron Mitr is Known indian actor. We have refrences. So why u want to dlt it? 😊 Shamim Azad ANM (talk) 05:30, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of Template:PlayerVB1?

Latest comment: 8 years ago7 comments2 people in discussion

Why did you delete {{PlayerVB1}}? It appears to be used in a number of templates, such as {{RC Cola-Army Troopers roster}} and {{Bureau of Customs Transformers roster}}. See Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:PlayerVB1. Those templates and articles are all broken now. Unless I'm missing something, it should probably be undeleted. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:27, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Same question about {{PSL roster footer}}, {{PSL_roster_header}}, {{FIVB_roster_header}}, {{FIVB_player}}, {{FIVB_roster_footer}}, {{SVL_roster_footer}}. I'm not sure what happened here. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:31, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Looks like this may be the whole list:

I do not think that any of these met the criteria for T3. – Jonesey95 (talk) 06:41, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

  • Osplace, please reply to this on my behalf.
Jonesey95, learn to create links. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:20, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Links created, and thanks for the civil suggestion. There were so many that I needed to copy and paste from the Deletion Log that I neglected to link them. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:35, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. We can move the discussion to there. I have also posted a request for help at WP Volleyball's talk page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:02, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Just so you're aware

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There was some disagreement of your G1 of Twoallbeefpattiesspecialsaucelettucecheesepicklesonionsonasesameseedbun at this page. The closing admin left some advice for you, but since you weren't pinged, I thought I'd leave you a courtesy note. Best, -- Tavix (talk) 02:22, 23 October 2016 (UTC)

Archaeology of Malawi

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, I'm the instructor for a course about African Archaeology, and one of my students was working on a new page - Archaeology of Malawi. Instead of working in her sandbox, she mistakenly put several references that she needed on the article's talk page (before the mainspace page was created). You've deleted that page, I believe. Is there any way to get that information back? I'm not sure. Thanks so much for your help. Ninafundisha (talk) 00:24, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Thanks! Ninafundisha (talk) 22:46, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Confused . . .

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hello, I am new to Wikipedia. I published an article entitled Elevita. It got deleted by you under codes G11 and U5. We don't feel this article was exclusively promotional and need some guidance on what we need to do to try and get it republished. Please advise and let me know what I can do to try and get this article approved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rachel.morrison.call (talk • contribs) 04:52, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Talk:Muttahida Qaumi Movement

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, why you deleted talk page of an existing page? -- Saqib (talk) 12:16, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

  • Call it edit conflict. Rameezraja001 (talk · contribs) and I were both fiddling with the page at the same time. Now fixed. Are you happy that the spelling is Qaumi and not Quami?
Rameezraja001, have you now finished moving the page about? Also, we do not need any more redirects. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:19, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Donald Trump's hair

Latest comment: 8 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

I guess I shouldn't be writing up Donald Trump's penis... I just saw the speedy deletion. I personally don't really think it was "strong" enough to qualify for G10; as an attack page it was rather one by proxy, and in that respect I can't disagree with the deletion and I certainly won't challenge it. I do wonder if it will be challenged. If that's the case, I'd appreciate a ping, since I don't keep up with DRV etc. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 19:41, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

@RHaworth: I don't believe the page was created to be an attack page. If attacking material had been added to the article, I think a better thing for you to have done would have been to revert that and let the AfD continue. It's trending no-consensus at this point, FWIW. — pbp 20:03, 25 October 2016 (UTC)
Hey, sorry for setting you up for that drubbing, which I felt was undeserved. We were both just trying to do our best for the encyclopedia. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 22:54, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Deletion review for Donald Trump's hair

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Donald Trump's hair. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. — pbp 20:06, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Administrators' noticeboard

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. sorry if I am late, I pinged you there initially. -- SI 20:24, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Minimicroeconomics

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I need You help to restore the Minimicroeconomics article, PLEASE! The "Minimicroeconomics" article is not an advertising at all. No money side is intended! It is a new direction in Economics and all people need to know about it and start making use of it and make their lives of a little more comfort and justice. This article is the result of my 35 years long scientific researches in that damned Soviet Union conditions. Now, I am a refugee sheltered by the Commonwealth of Northern Mariana Islands and trying hard to deliver to people of the world of a brand new business called business accuracy business ( I am Ph.D. in Economics since 1981 and can submit the education evaluation from the EREC, California. The language of the article is untraditional because the Microeconomics science came into being in an untraditional way. At that times (and even now!), I was totally isolated from the Economics world and everything is created is created by my own and unique enough terminology. But, if You plunge into the article and add Your sound mind, You will see that everything is meaningful and in place, right and just. Another big misfortune is my language. The English I have is the English I invented by myself of not having money for extended English mastering in nice conditions! I need English proficiency classes. I want to an English University. You, Sir better help me deliver the new approaches and new business accuracy tools to the world than delete it!

The terminology is new. They can be shined up AND people get used to them little by little over the time, I hope. When a new science comes into being, a set of new terms gets coined. I had to coin them as I could in my limited circumstances. One more time, PLEASE edit the article to make more understandable to people! PLEASE let the scientists, educators, investors, all goodwill know of the new science and new tools! You know them much more than I do AND You are able to mobilize people's efforts in turning Minimicroeconomics a normal element in our everyday life. This science deserves it, it has suffered so much! It got deported from many countries. It has survived communism and now is so close to be in people's use. Sincerely and gratefully, Milan Fargo October 26, 2016 Chamorro Time — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.88.85.75 (talk) 02:21, 26 October 2016 (UTC)

KKPK

Latest comment: 8 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Good day sir; Can I recreate the article for Kapampangan Ku Pagmaragul KU (KKPK) International Inc? Thank you and best regards. God bless. -- Jesielyn08 (talk) 09:52, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

It show like this sir when I start to make a draft. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jesielyn08 (talk • contribs) 09:15, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Thank you God bless. -- Jesielyn08 (talk) 09:16, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of Goldfinger mechanism draft

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

May I ask why the page draft:Goldfinger (mechanism)? Would I still be allowed to create this article? Sorry if I did something wrong it was my first attempt at making an article and I was under the impression that as long as I made it as a draft it was OK to leave it blank temporarily. — EvilxFish (talk) 11:24, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

OK, thank you, sorry for putting a placeholder I didn't know that was bad practice here. — EvilxFish (talk) 16:21, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

CybrHome was deleted

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

CybrHome is one of the rising product company in India, the product is also popular in few European countries and US. It is the most notable tech product from the Indian college NITK Surathkal after Practo Health. It helps people explore the internet/websites just like Pinterest helps people explore images. No such quality portal ever existed and this product is like a complete redesigned version of now defunct yahoo directory. To be noted the product has no ads. It is also one of the few govt funded private organization in India (a reason of no announced VC funding yet if you deleted because valuation was not mentioned). I am an avid CybrHome user and crowd-sourcing contributor on their platform (also Wikipedia) and hence I had created that page. The page was very well written with references and as far as I remember it was written from a neutral point of view after several days of research. There was no promotional content and also it was constantly being edited by various editors for improvements. However, you've recently deleted the page completely without any notice or discussion. I completely understand its possible startups/websites may not be your area of specialization and you may mistakenly consider pages of new companies/products on Wikipedia as spam or promotion. So, I request you to please read that page and restore it. I will add more citations if needed and keep adding more press released as and when I read it in future. If you want changes let me know and I can edit it before restoring but I believe people should really know about CybrHome and the product's page should be on Wikipedia. Thanks in advance. DataManiac (talk) 00:14, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

ESCoP

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Re: Draft:European Scientific Cooperative on Phytotherapy deleted as G11. I was working on someone else's draft -- Draft:European Scientific Cooperative on Phytotherapy -- and didn't finish writing extra references for it when you deleted it. Oops. It was G11 and G12 initially -- I removed copyvios from it and rewrote text to not read in promotional biased way. So when I left it alone for the day, it was under-referenced, but not G11 in my view. I was hoping a new nick in the edit history and a 'Contested deletion' on talk page were enough to assist you with seeing what's happening. Oh well. Please check the last revision and restore it if you think the draft qualifies for further work on it. -- Gryllida (talk) 23:13, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. -- Gryllida (talk) 23:57, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Abdulrahman M. Al-Ibrahim

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Dear Mr. Haworth, I have received an email from the office of the Governor of Saline Water Conversion Corporation (SWCC) Saudi Arabia, notifying me that their draft submission of Abdulrahman M. Al-Ibrahim had been deleted as his biography appears on the Global Water Summit website here: http://www.watermeetsmoney.com/speaker/he-dr-abdulrahman-m-al-ibrahim/ and is reserved by copyright. I've copied the message below for your reference: For your information and ready reference the following messages "Doc James (talk | contribs) deleted page Draft:H.E. Dr. Abdulrahman M. Al-Ibrahim (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement: http://www.giievent.jp/gwic307103/speakers.shtml)" and "RHaworth (talk | contribs) deleted page Draft:H.E. Dr. Abdulrahman M. Al-Ibrahim (G12: Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://www.watermeetsmoney.com/speaker/he-dr-abdulrahman-m-al-ibrahim/)" appears on Wikipedia for our submission.

I am an employee of Global Water Intelligence who organises the Global Water Summit (here: http://www.watermeetsmoney.com/the-organisers/ ) if you want to verify my identity you can email me on cp@globalwaterintel.com. I just wanted to let you know that i personally requested this biography from the Governors office, that Global Water Intelligence do not own the copyright of this biography, and Global Water Intelligence is happy for the biography to appear on Wikipedia, as far as i am concerned it is free from copyright regulations. If you need me to add some disclaimer text to the website to state this then just let me know. Best regards, Camilla Prem Global Water Intelligence — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.82.247.183 (talk) 11:05, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:RHaworth/2016_Nov_02&oldid=1172210266"