User talk:RHaworth/2016 Nov 27

Archives

Archives Edit list Up to: 2005 March 2005 June 2005 August 2005 Oct 2005 Nov 2006 Jan 2006 March 2006 May 2006 July 2006 Sept 2006 Nov 2007 Jan 2007 Feb 2007 April 2007 May 2007 July 2007 Oct 2007 Dec 2008 Jan 2008 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 July 2008 August 2008 Sept 2008 Oct 2009 Jan 2009 Feb 2009 March 2009 April 2009 June 2009 July 2009 August 2009 Oct 2009 Nov 2009 Dec 2010 March 2010 May 2010 June 2010 July 2010 August 2010 Sept 2010 Oct 2010 Dec 2011 Jan 06 2011 Jan 14 2011 Jan 27 2011 Feb 09 2011 Feb 23 2011 Mar 06 2011 Mar 18 2011 Mar 30 2011 Apr 07 2011 May 02 2011 May 22 2011 Jun 08 2011 Jun 26 2011 Jul 26 2011 Aug 18 2011 Sep 06 2011 Sep 28 2011 Oct 17 2011 Nov 04 2011 Nov 19 2012 Jan 29 2012 Feb 26 2012 Mar 10 2012 Mar 31 2012 Apr 14 2012 May 07 2012 Jun 01 2012 Jun 23 2012 Jul 06 2012 Aug 31 2012 Oct 06 2012 Oct 30 JWJ 2012 Dec 05 2012 Dec 27 2013 Jan 22 2013 Feb 05 2013 Mar 06 2013 Mar 26 2013 Apr 15 2013 May 09 2013 Jun 07 2013 Jun 27 2013 Jul 22 2013 Aug 06 2013 Aug 20 2013 Sep 03 2013 Sep 19 2013 Oct 11 2013 Oct 23 2013 Nov 09 2013 Nov 22 2013 Dec 18 2014 Jan 11 2014 Jan 25 2014 Feb 18 2014 Mar 08 2014 Mar 29 2014 Apr 11 2014 Apr 23 2014 May 08 2014 May 22 2014 May 30 2014 Jun 07 2014 Jun 18 2014 Jul 17 2014 Aug 09 2014 Aug 27 2014 Sep 04 2014 Sep 16 2014 Sep 28 2014 Oct 11 2014 Oct 28 2014 Nov 18 2014 Dec 18 2015 Jan 10 2015 Jan 26 2015 Feb 11 2015 Feb 24 2015 Mar 11 2015 Mar 30 2015 Apr 20 2015 May 12 2015 Jun 12 2015 Jul 07 2015 Jul 25 2015 Aug 11 2015 Sep 03 2015 Sep 23 2015 Oct 25 2015 Nov 28 2015 Dec 21 2016 Jan 13 2016 Feb 10 2016 Mar 03 2016 Mar 30 2016 Apr 18 2016 May 16 2016 Jun 02 2016 Jul 09 2016 Aug 11 framework 2016 Sep 02 2016 Oct 05 2016 Nov 02 2016 Nov 27 2016 Dec 18 2017 Jan 10 2017 Jan 31 2017 Feb 23 2017 Mar 15 2017 Apr 20 2017 May 18 2017 Jun 21 2017 Jul 05 2017 Jul 25 2017 Aug 15 2017 Sep 07 2017 Sep 30 2017 Nov 14 2017 Dec 21 2018 Jan 12 2018 Jan 30 2018 Feb 25 2018 Mar 11 2018 Mar 28 2018 Apr 16 2018 May 03 2018 May 22 2018 Jun 14 2018 Jun 28 2018 Jul 19 2018 Aug 03 2018 Aug 20 2018 Sep 07 2018 Oct 01 2018 Oct 24 2018 Nov 16 2018 Dec 02 2018 Dec 26 2019 Jan 27 2019 Feb 18 2019 Mar 06 2019 Mar 17 2019 Mar 30 2019 Apr 14 2019 Apr 27 2019 May 16 2019 Jun 10 2019 Jul 07 2019 Jul 26 2019 Aug 16 2019 Sep 07 2019 Sep 17 2019 Oct 07 2019 Nov 04 2019 Nov 23 2019 Dec 09 2019 Dec 21 2021 Jan 21 2023 Apr 08

Emotional Speech Blocks Syndrome Deletion

[Title width guide. Delete above here if no further edits - already in archive. If further edits, move below here.]

Late reply

This talk page conversation about a mandal page -> Balanagar mandal, Ranga Reddy district is the mandal and Balanagar, Medchal district is a place in the mandal (neighbourhood). Both pages are needed. Example: Tenali mandal and Tenali. -- Vin09 (talk) 12:22, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

• Restored to Balanagar mandal. Why do we need "Ranga Reddy district" in the title? How many more Balanagar mandals are there? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:59, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

It should be Medchal district, recently districts reorganisation took place. -- Vin09 (talk) 04:39, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

• So why do we need "Medchal district" in the title? How many more Balanagar mandals are there? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:34, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Another in Mahabubnagar district. As of now everything is fine. -- Vin09 (talk) 12:49, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of AnupamKaler

Hello Sir, Greetings. As you may aware of that you had been deleted my userpage in August due to blatant usage of Wikipedia but it wasn't my fully fault. Actually I had posted an article which get deleted and the reason stated that it's a promotional activity which wasn't so. Due to lack of citations i couldn't fullfill that compulsory object which led to you to delete my userpage. But now i fully aware of that and can affirm that i won't post any article until I have enough citations. Plz remove ban from my userpage. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anupamkaler (talk • contribs) 14:00, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

• Your user page is neither banned nor protected and your user account is neither banned nor blocked. — RHaworth (talk · contribs)

Please spare some time to provide your email id that i can send you attachment which is showing the following statement "This page has been deleted. The deletion and move log for the page are provided below for reference." Link: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Anupamkaler. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anupamkaler (talk • contribs) 07:14, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

• So what exactly do you want to send me as an email attachment? Why can you not copy&paste it into an email created via Special:EmailUser/RHaworth? What information will it contain that is not given at User:Anupamkaler? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:34, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

I wanted your email id to send the screenshot of whatever is showing on my page, nothing more than that. By the way , i have already been linked my profile in the previous message . I hope it will clear all the confusion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anupamkaler (talk • contribs) 20:55, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

GoGoVan

FYI, the page you just deleted was immediately recreated by the original creator... -- Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 04:00, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

• Hello, just to inform you that I have restored shouted title version because it seems to have been deleted under an incorrect criterion. Please let me know if you would like to discuss this — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:13, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

• Obviously it needed to be merged into draft:GoGoVan but apart from that, no objection. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:34, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Recent deletion

May I know on what basis Talk:Gandak river, Talk:Gandak and other similar articles deleted. — Pratyush (talk) 11:09, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

• You have seen this discussion. But irrespective of that, quite simply redirects do need talk pages except in very rare circumstances which do not apply here. The only ones I have deleted are talk pages of redirects. PratyushSinha101 (talk · contribs) has also spammed dozens of article talk pages. I have not touched those. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 12:34, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

RHaworth, just so you know and because you have been partially involved, this has now escalated to Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Dharmadhyaksha. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 12:55, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

The discussion if anything proves there was nothing with my edits. Spamming? how? All the talk pages tagged were under the scope of respective WikiProjects. Pratyush (talk) 13:06, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

@PratyushSinha101: Please keep all your discussion only on ANI now. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 13:10, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Regarding deleted article "Draft:SprezzaBox"

Hi Roger, My name is Alan and I have been working on drafting an article draft:SprezzaBox. Apologies for my lack of experience in contributing here on Wikipedia also please forgive me if I am writing wrongly to you here. I am trying to follow your requirements with the article link and signature. I noticed you deleted the article due to "G11. Unambiguous advertising or promotion". I also read that the draft article can to be rewritten and replaced with text with a neutral point of view.

My question to you is how I can improve the article and make it neutral. Also if there are any specific parts that stood out as strictly promotional? I am more than willing to revise the article and learn from your expertise. Looking forward to hearing from you and thank you in advance. — AlanLoveLuu (talk) 14:20, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

• Your service should be closed down for encouraging needless consumption. I doubt if I spent $28 a year on lifestyle and grooming items. And I doubt if even the most fashion-conscious guy spends $28 a month on such items. Kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no COI thinks your boxes are notable and writes about them here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:08, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

PUCUT AIMRL speedy deletion

Re: PUCIT AIMRL you have marked my article as speedy deletion.I am sorry if i didn't follow the rules for my first article I want the contents of my article for editing purpose and improve my article quality according to the Wikipedia Policies. — Abeera007 (talk) 19:18, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

• There was no need to ask me twice. Text reluctantly emailed. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:33, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

RACC

I see the following notice for my page, Research Administrators Certification Council (RACC): 22:14, 2 November 2016 RHaworth (talk | contribs) deleted page Draft:Research Administrators Certification Council (RACC) (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion)

I had made suggested edits given to me by other Wikipedia users to get this page published, and had submitted it for review and publishing. It is not advertising or promotion. There is a page referencing one of our certifications (Certified Research Administrator) and as a member of the RACC board of directors, I have been tasked with getting the corresponding page up that discusses our actual organization. Please undelete this page, a lot of hard work has gone into it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amgray19 (talk • contribs) 20:21, 4 November 2016 (UTC) Amgray19 (talk) 20:24, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

• It did not seem too much like advertising so reluctantly restored. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:33, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

I very much appreciate you restoring the article. We are a nonprofit, so it would be hard to advertise something when we don't make money off it. We are a certifying body, much like the AICPA is for Certified Public Accountants. Thank you again, and have a great weekend. — Amgray19 (talk) 22:53, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Template:Infobox Cass County Prosecutor

Hi, I have reverted your deletion of Template:Infobox Cass County Prosecutor since the reason given (T2: Template that blatantly misrepresents established policy) is inapplicable. I realise that it is the reason given in this edit: but I can see no way that {{db-policy}} (which is for WP:CSD#T2 cases (templates that are unambiguous misrepresentations of established policy) and displays "a template that is a blatant misrepresentation of established policy") is applicable to this template. -- Redrose64 (talk) 00:23, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

• Oh dear, I have committed "the greatest treason: to do the right deed for the wrong reason". — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 00:46, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Daron Nefcy as a Redirect page

Why not have Daron Nefcy on Wikipedia as a redirect page instead of an article? -- SpaceGoofsGeekerBoy (talk) 02:33, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

• So whither would you have it redirect? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:49, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Admin's Barnstar
	For the endless "deletes" you do. Pyrusca (talk) 14:04, 5 November 2016 (UTC) Thank you. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:21, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Bot to remove transclusions

Do you know if there is a bot that removes transclusions of deleted AfD'd templates? I see that you followed through on this discussion, which has left about 100 redlinked transclusions in articles. Thanks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 01:47, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

• I do not know of one. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:21, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Battle Gear

Hi RHaworth. I saw that you recently speedily deleted the page Battle Gear under WP:A3 (no content). However, I looked at the article history just before it was deleted, and it looks like it was actually a longstanding redirect (since 2007) to Side by Side (game series) that had been blanked by the user just before they added the speedy deletion template. Speedy deletion should only be performed when all revisions of the page fall under the criteria, so shouldn't we have declined the speedy and reverted back to the redirect? — Mz7 (talk) 21:03, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

• Possibly Iftekharahmed96 (talk · contribs) was trying to clear the decks to do the move that I have done. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:21, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Ah, gotcha. Thanks for clarifying. {{db-move}} or mentioning the move in {{db}} would have been a little more forthright, but no harm, no foul. Mz7 (talk) 21:25, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

• Hi there, thank you for your cooperation Mz7, RHaworth was completely correct with what I tried to do. I wanted to rename the page Side by Side to Battle Gear as oppose to keeping the re-direct as the franchise current name is Battle Gear. I do apologise for going about it the wrong way, I should have clarified a more logical reason for the deletion as oppose to stating that it's content free with my edit. — Iftekharahmed96 (talk) 21:40, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, Iftekharahmed96. I figured there was a reason and was more curious than anything. At the end of the day, Wikipedia is improved. Mz7 (talk) 21:50, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

• Iftekharahmed96, I hope you noticed above that {{db-move}} (one of the G6 deletion reasons) was the tag you should have used. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:23, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

So the next time I'm unable to move a page that should be moved, I should use {{db-move}}? yeah, I'll keep that in mind. Cheers! And thanks for being understanding Mz7. I appreciate it! Iftekharahmed96 (talk) 08:18, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

CybrHome

Hey someone last month had mailed me about CybrHome recently which I recently started using and also started contributing on their crowdsourcing portal last week. I visited its wikipedia page (where I arrived via some cached search result page after googling) but it shows no content. Deletion log showed it used to exist but not anymore. I think the delete was unnecessary and you can restore it. I came here to edit and update about their new crowdsourcing policy and new mobile app launched recently. I don't see any issues with it web app portal cybrhome.com or their mobile app as well. Thanks for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 106.51.234.86 (talk) 23:52, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

• I admit this deletion was borderline. Feel free to go to WP:DRV. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:52, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

RHaworth, Thanks for agreeing. I have added the request on WP:DRV (on 15 nov). You can see it. Kindly restore the page so that I can work on it to update and edit. Thanks again. — 106.51.129.187 (talk) 20:14, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

RHaworth Awaiting your reply. Please look into CybrHome (www.cybrhome.com) deletion issue. Thanks! — 106.51.130.236 (talk) 21:49, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

• There is no need to ping me when you are writing on this page! I am not interested in getting involved in the DRV discussion. If you want a copy of the text, read this. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:44, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, champ

You sure do enjoy deleting things, don't you? I was looking for some information on an optics company named Barska, but apparently, like many, MANY other articles, it was deleted by little ol' you. Just wanted to stop by and say thanks for nothing. Thanks for providing literally nothing at all in the way of information. — The Cake is a Lie ^{T / C} 01:28, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

• The Cake is a Lie, you do not deserve it because of a) the tone of your message above, b) failure to link to the article and c) your claim of "literally nothing" when two admins have told you "A7: article about a company, corporation or organization, which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject". However my simplistic CoI test (look at the contribs history) tells me that you probably do not have a CoI. So I have restored the page to draft:Barska. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:52, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

If the tone of my previous message sounded hostile, it's because that's exactly how it was supposed to sound. Let's get that out of the way. It is, however, very kind of you to restore the article I wished to read with exactly the type of technicality garbage response I remember from Wikipedia's bureaucrats that caused me to leave so long ago. Thanks for that. I'd imagine undeleting articles would be very difficult for you. I do remember those many days of arguing with you lot about how all information is relevant on a website designed to provide information and how you all sure did enjoy removing it because it wasn't informnation enough in your eyes to be information-worthy. Ahhh, the bad ol' days. Cheers anyway, slick. Literally everything you restored is all I needed to know. How's that? The Cake is a Lie ^{T / C} 04:08, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

ZeroVPN has been deleted

Dear Mr. Haworth, Good day. Today I checked the wiki notices box and found this message" 10:51, 8 November 2016 RHaworth (talk | contribs) deleted page ZeroVPN (A7: Article about a company, corporation or organization, which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject)" and now I found I can not edit this article anymore. I am sorry cause this is my first time to create and entry in Wiki, so maybe make some mistake and break wiki rules. Can I recreate this article again? And can you point out exactly what i did wrong so I can correct it. Thanks a million.:D — Preceding unsigned comment added by Temozhu (talk • contribs) 08:03, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

• Unlike the previous person, in your case my simplistick CoI test leads me to recite my mantra: kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no CoI thinks your company is notable and writes about it here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 15:52, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Jones Hope Wooten

Hello again RHaworth, could you email me a copy of Jones Hope Wooten; I am aware that it was deleted for being a copyright violation (after all, I tagged it) but the editor who wrote it would like a copy so they could rewrite it or apply for a release. Best wishes, jcc (tea and biscuits) 19:27, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

• Why are you asking me when the page was deleted by BU Rob13? Why do you want to see the text since it was posted by Njnorland? Why does Njnorland need the text since they have it at the copyvio source. Why do they need it anyway since draft:Jamie Wooten is still live? And why are you bothering with someone who almost certainly has a CoI? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:31, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

My "COI meter" is a little bit more relaxed than yours- Njorland passes my test as they've 1) been editing Wikipedia since 2011 2) bothered to ask for help 3) edited different articles. I'm not saying that means they have no COI, just that they deserve some of my time. I didn't notice draft:Jamie Wooten. And I would have definitively stated that it's at the copyvio source, but the fact is I can't remember whether it was wholly copied and pasted or not- all I remember is an Earwig value of 55% or something around that, and it'd be unfair to say "it's all copied and pasted" if I can't remember myself. Too bad if you won't give the wikitext. Best wishes, jcc (tea and biscuits) 16:47, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) The best thing you can do here, jcc, is to read this, then go here, then you don't need to ask! Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 10:16, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

AGE-u-cate Training Institute

Hello RHaworth, My name is John Brandon. I'm vice president of AGE-u-cate Training Institute. Recently, I worked on an article for 3 days and finally thought it was in keeping within the Wikipedia guidelines for submission. My wife, president of the company, is mildly featured in the article AGE-u-cate Training Institute as the president and founder. We read and re-read the article many times to ensure that it would not appear to be advertising. It was factual and informative with regard to why the company was started. We cited many independent references and tried our best to give potential readers only the facts. When I logged back in this evening to read it again, I learned it was deleted due to unambiguous advertising. I looked at many commercial organization articles in public space to make sure we weren't in violation of Wikipedia rules. One particular article I noted was ACE Hardware. While factual, it did have the ACE Hardware logo plus other "gallery" photos embedded in the text. The ACE article sites many news articles, mainly press releases, that appear to be about promotion of ACE. AGE-u-cate Training Institute while not totally unique, serves an ever-growing need for caregiver training for a rapidly aging world. It has developed two significant training programs that deal with dementia.

I was initially informed by C.Fred that my article was deleted due to unambiguous advertising. Are our 3 days of work in vain... or do we have an opportunity to fix whatever was wrong with it? I honestly researched many commercial company Wikipedia articles that, to us, seemed much more like spam or advertising than the article we submitted. Can you restore our article draft or may I please have the text back with any suggestions that might make it more appealing to you. We did not take the Wiki guidelines lightly. Thanks. Johnhbrandon (talk) 01:54, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

As RHaworth will state, Wikipedia is not the place for COI advertising, regardless of anything or anyone; and it would honestly be best until someone who is not employed by this company, starts an article with actual news sources. I'll note, advertising is never restored and Wikipedia is not a business listing. — SwisterTwister talk 06:57, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

• No need to state it - SwisterTwister has done it for me. With extreme reluctance I have emailed you your spam. About the only chance you have of forcing a page in is to follow this advice. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:43, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Green Garage Detroit page

Hello, My name is Nehe-Miah Scarborough. I am an intern for the Green Garage, a small business in Detroit. My fellow co-worker, Matthew Piper and I authored the Green Garage Wikipedia page that you deleted last week. We were wondering what specific elements of our article you deemed as self-promotion? Also, Could you help us understand how, specifically, to improve it? We strove to be factual, not promotional, when we wrote it. In addition, would you be willing to give us access to the deleted page? The link to the page is Draft:Green Garage Detroit. — NeheScar (talk) 14:58, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

As RHaworth will state, Wikipedia is not the place for COI advertising, regardless of anything or anyone; and it would honestly be best until someone who is not employed by this company, starts an article with actual news sources. I'll note, advertising is never restored and Wikipedia is not a business listing. — SwisterTwister talk 06:57, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

• No need to state it - SwisterTwister has done it for me. Text emailed. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:43, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Deleted page

Hi there. You recently deleted the page about a company I work for, Adaptavist. I was under the impression that it was appropriate to have a Wikipedia page about a company, especially one who's activities are referenced in other Civil Pages. If it is the nature of the wording that you have an issue with then I would like the opportunity to amend the wording. Would consider moving it to Draft so it can be edited to present be factual and less a piece of advertising? Thanks for your time and help. Stephen stephen@sjmorris.com Sjmorris72 (talk) 16:28, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

As RHaworth will state, Wikipedia is not the place for COI advertising, regardless of anything or anyone; and it would honestly be best until someone who is not employed by this company, starts an article with actual news sources. I'll note, advertising is never restored and Wikipedia is not a business listing. — SwisterTwister talk 06:57, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

• No need to state it - SwisterTwister has done it for me. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:43, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Two-Factor Authentication

Hello, Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:34, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Elsa Fraenkel image deletion

The following images were deleted: File:Elsa Fraenkel c 1930.jpg and File:Elsa Fraenkel Scuplture Prof Dr Conrad Mueller mathematician with eyes open c 1932.jpg. They were used in the Elsa Fraenkel article. These files were uploaded under the following license: "File licensed as "for non-commercial use only", "no derivative use", "for Wikipedia use only", "used with permission", or GFDL 1.2 only." since they respectively fall under "pictures of deceased persons, in articles about that person, provided that ever obtaining a free close substitute is not reasonably likely". I believe that this is reasonable for uploading it under the aforementioned license. If it is not, please provide the name of the correct license. — Phantom xxiii (talk) 03:20, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

• New messages go at the bottom of this page. Use wikilink format when referring to pages or files. Read this. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:43, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) You need to have at least CC-BY-SA 3.0 and proof that you either took the work or that whoever owns the copyright has given explicit permission via the Open Ticket Request System that the image is licensed that way. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 10:14, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

• Poor advice Ritchie333. "Free close substitute not reasonably likely" is grounds for using a fair use tag. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:58, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

It was better advice than what you gave, which was to tell them to get lost. FUR is a minefield for new users and best accompanied by a willing expert volunteer. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 14:01, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

• Oh dear, loose wording in mine of 12 Nov above. New threads go at the bottom of this page. A new message within an existing thread goes at the bottom of the thread but the thread is not moved.

Need I add anything to mine of 14 Nov above? The woman has been dead for 41 years and I was surprised that a Google image search on her name seems to throw up very few good hits so you are probably safe to re-upload these images with a fair use rationale. But have you tried contacting Elsa's daughter to see if she is in a position to release these images under a Creative Commons licence? Perhaps you are Elsa's daughter?! — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:41, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

User:Weapon X/Marvel Specials

Hi RHaworth, you deleted my overview/list page which included non-free/fair-use-rational pictures. I somehow forgot that the inclusion of these pictures are not allowed on user pages. The problem is, I still need my list and want to keep it (without the pictures included), but I didn't make a backup and I cant retrieve the source code from history cause the whole page was deleted. Is there a way that you could retrieve and send me the original source code via email? (I won't use the images included again.) Greetings - Weapon X (talk, contribs) 18:30, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

• What's the point - there was nothing there but images? OK, there were dates. So I have emailed you it. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 19:03, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! It had a lot of links, and it's an overview for me for supporting and creating articles. - Weapon X (talk, contribs) 21:20, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of Gosi Khurd Dam

Article Gosi Khurd Dam was deleted giving the reason that it has no meaningful content. It is true that there was no content in the page. There is another article named Gose Khurd Dam. The Dam name is mentioned as Gosi Khurd Dam in most published sources. I created Gosi Khurd Dam article to link it to Gose Khurd Dam. Please let me know if there is any alternative way of doing the same. I am not too familiar with wiki-editing but I as understand it is not possible to change the title of the published article. Your help will be greatly appreciated. — Ysp2015 (talk) 09:20, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

• You certainly need to gain more familiarity. Things to learn: new messages go at the bottom of talk pages; titles are case sensitive - what you created was Gosi Khurd dam; there is a thing called a redirect and article titles are changed by moving them — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:52, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

TEN Music Group

Is there currently a discussion for the TEN Music Group page which you just deleted? Despite being created by a sockpuppet, the article meets notability guidelines. TEN Music Group was the first label to sign Zara Larsson when she was 15 and currently licences the rights to Sony, which it does to a few other artists. "Zara Larsson – The Full NME Cover Interview - NME". NME. 21 September 2016. Retrieved 14 November 2016. It's also been mentioned in quite a few notable independent sources, such as NME as show by the reference. — Uamaol (talk) 11:43, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

• You need to learn to create a link when you talk about a page. If you had done so, followed the link and clicked on "what links here", you would know whether there was a discussion. And don't use <ref> on talk pages. I have emailed you the text. If you can show that they have become notable, feel free to create an article in draft space. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:52, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Originally this, minus the first sentence, was to be posted on the talk page, where the contest link pointed to. When I saved the changes to my edit the page has already been deleted by yourself. — Uamaol (talk) 20:55, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Fuck Trump redirect page

Example: This protester in Maryland is using a sign with this message

Hi, I saw that you had deleted the redirect page I created because it was an attack page. I'm not trying to attack - I'm trying to direct the kinds of things you see on signs in the Protests against Donald Trump page, so that when someone makes a query, they can find the page that is likely appropriate. — Victor Grigas (talk) 12:12, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

• It was questionable whether you should have used your WMF account to create the redirect - but that is unimportant. Definitely a matter for a lively debate at DRV. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:52, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

The WMF account was entirely a login error, on my part! Sorry about that. If you look at the article about the protests for March 19, 2016 you see a line (that I didn't write) which quotes 'Fuck Trump!' and other slogans. Anyway, it appears that the debate at DRV is closed? — Victor Grigas (talk) 01:09, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

• It appears to me that the debate was never opened. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:54, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

About Consortiumnews

You speedily deleted this article, which is quite inappropriate since a Wikipedian argued that speedily deleting this article is inappropriate. Please restore it a.s.a.p. And if you think that it should be deleted, you should AfD it instead. -- RekishiEJ (talk) 07:13, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

• Feel free to raise the matter at DRV. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:54, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

A new user right for New Page Patrollers

Hi RHaworth. A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Microfinance

Hi. I was creating the Association of Microfinance Institutions of Uganda page and within a few a hours it was deleted indicating article G11. Unambiguous advertising or exclusively promotional! You may realise that other similar networks already have such pages on wikipedia so it cant be tagged exclusively promotional. You may point to the issue of references but as you know how pages are created, references are easily input after the page is created. Atleast for a newbie like me but the page was deleted within a few hours after being created. I was actually still working on the summary information! I still believe the content is worth encyclopedic content and I would appreciate if you could restore our page and kindly advise how it can be rewritten to change the notion of being exclusively promotional. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ntalaka (talk • contribs) 07:27, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

• Kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no CoI thinks your association is notable and writes about it here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:46, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Accelerate Brain Cancer Cure

This is regarding your Oct 2016 deletion of the Accelerate Brain Cancer Cure page. You had indicated the reason was A7: Article about a company, corporation or organization, which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject. I would be glad to make any needed edits to the article to demonstrate the importance/significance of Accelerate Brain Cancer Cure. — Sozocreative (talk) 13:19, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

• Restored. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:54, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Joseph Sutton

I would argue that Joseph Sutton is a significant San Francisco literary person. Joseph Sutton’s work represents a broad range of subjects, in both non-fiction and fiction formats, including the immigrant experience, the art of writing, the contemporary family and the all American pastime of baseball. His authorship of 13 books starting in 1991 shows a long lasting contribution to the field, to he will continue to enhance. This entry for Joseph Sutton into Wikipedia is important for people looking for contemporary writing on topics of importance and interest to Americans. Looking forward to hearing back from you. — Justinteam99 (talk) 22:54, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

• I must be going soft: despite your pretty obvious COI, I have restored all your deleted edits. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:20, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Eastbound Strangler

Hello. I requested an undelete and also explanation about why the article was deleted. So it was a G7 author req. but this is a famous unsolved case and there is new attention being drawn to the case lately. I saw a cached copy of the old article and it was very good. How hard would it be to have the article put back rather than pull parts of it from a cached version? — TeeVeeed (talk) 01:01, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

• Please learn: messages begin with a capital letter and without a leading space. Restored. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:46, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Comment noted, and thank you. — TeeVeeed (talk) 11:24, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of the article Dilip Sankarreddy

Hi, I notice that the article Dilip Sankarreddy has been deleted. Terming it as "G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion" is not appropriate, as there is no part in the content that is advertising or promotion. The content is fact-based, notable and has been in existence since many years. What can be done to restore the article? — Townblight (talk) 09:04, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

• I am definitely going soft! My fourth restore within 48 hours! — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:46, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Thank you! Townblight (talk) 13:03, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

The article has been deleted

Hello, Roger! My name is Marina. Unfortunately, the article about AggreGate Platform has been deleted, inspite of its notability has been proved one day. And I tried to update links for supporting documentation, articles, etc. Maybe last time there weren't enough such links. But I'm ready to provide more notability confirmations. Could we discuss this issue with you? Thank you for advance! - Marissabell (talk)

• No need to discuss. Yet another restore! — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:32, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

National Informal STEM Education Network

To whom it may concern: I work at the Science Museum of Minnesota and was posting this page last week: National Informal STEM Education Network (NISE Net). It appears it was deleted immediately - I am new to creating these pages and am trying to understand why this was deleted in order to avoid issues like this in the future. This is an educational page that describes our National Science Foundation and NASA funded project, represented by our website of free educator materials here: nisenet.org Any assistance is greatly appreciated. Thank you! Christina — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karennano (talk • contribs) 17:50, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

• I have a name and it is not Whom It May Concern! And if you want me to look at your website, you need to provide a proper link. Kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no WP:CoI thinks your network is notable and writes about it here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 00:45, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

The Challenge Series

The Challenge Series is a current drive on English Wikipedia to encourage article improvements and creations globally through a series of 50,000/10,000/1000 Challenges for different regions, countries and topics. All Wikipedia editors in good standing are invited to participate.

• Use {{subst:The Challenge series invitation}} to invite others using this template.
• Sent to users at Northamerica1000/Mailing list using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:15, 19 November 2016 (UTC).

Shillary

Re your November 10 deletion of Talk:Shillary could you please give me access to the text I left there? I had a request that if you were not going to discuss it there that it be moved to either RFD or to Talk:Hillary Clinton. I did that out of the courtesy of not cluttering your talk page, but the courtesy of keeping the message intact was not reciprocated, so that is the step I take now.

This was regarding your October 23 deletion of the term as "implausible" which I contradicted with new sources. I put work into cite webbing them and would like to avoid having to repeat that. — Ranze (talk) 18:02, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

• Restored to Talk:Hillary Clinton. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 22:44, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, RHaworth. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Todd and Clare

Hi Roger -- back in October you deleted a page for a dating website called Todd and Clare. The same guy, using the same playbook, has stood up an article for another company called Yamie Chess. It was nominated for deletion today. I am wondering if it passes the smell test from your perspective? Regards, pm. 99.242.25.5 (talk) 02:46, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

• Please read this. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:13, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Retracted. I want to avoid any appearance of WP:CANVAS. Previously I was unaware that was a thing. Sorry to trouble you. ~pm 99.242.25.5 (talk) 00:34, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Deletion Abstraction Games

Dear Sir, I wish to inquire why you've deleted my entry of Abstraction Games. It is an existing company and even has links to it from other pages like from this one: Potpourrii . I request that you reconsider this decision. Thanks in advance, Blazy008 -- Blazy008 (talk) 09:57, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

• You probably have a COI and I should just intone my "kindly" mantra at you. The article deleted after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abstraction Games was 16k bytes long and replete with references. Yours was 4k bytes long and lacked references - so what chance had it of survival? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:13, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Puntoticket article deleted

Hi Roger, my name is Al. You recently deleted the article about Puntoticket. I was trying to update it, with more information, links, articles, etc to prove that . I understand that the company may not be perceived as important outside of Latin America, but is gaining visibility at international level and is selling tickets for all the big events in Chile. I'm ready to provide more notability confirmations and to change the language, if you perceive it as promotional. Can you please explain me how can I improve more the content, so the article be approved? Thank you in advance for your helm - Aldoaller (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:44, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

• Kindly have the decency to wait until someone with no COI thinks you are notable and writes about it here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:13, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

User SOCK suspected, but no SPI Case?

Hey RHaworth! I noticed you tagged B.Bhargava Teja as potentially being a Sockpuppet of Bhargava Krishna , but there was no block and no case took to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bhargava Krishna. I dunno, were you leaving it there for someone else to take a look at? Also, I'm pondering putting a PROD on Sampoorna Premayanam (B.Bhargava is the article's primary editor from what I see) but wonder if it falls under A7 or (quite possibly, judging by the grammar) G11. Any suggestions? MM (WhatIDo WHATIDO?) ^{(Now THIS... I did.)} 00:42, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

There may in fact be enough to tie both of them together, considering the newer account started in 2015 immediately with the same subjects, and the similar name at that too. As for your last sentence, that film is in fact acceptable it seems, and is certainly not A7 or G11. SwisterTwister talk 05:15, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

It is @SwisterTwister: ? Oh okay. The sources just didnt seem to be from verified sources and a Google search didn't seem to bring anything too promising. Then again I never finished Sources at Adoption School. *shrug*. Thanks for putting me right. Good luck if you're opening an SPI. MM (WhatIDo WHATIDO?) ^{(Now THIS... I did.)} 07:41, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

• My feeling was to allow B.Bhargava Teja to continue to operate since they seem to have abandoned the sins of Bhargava Krishna and also their own sin of uploading movie posters and claiming them to be publick domain. But I will leave others to act as they see fit. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:26, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Are articles in this wikilink worth keeping?

Hi RHaworth, I have joined Wikipedia recently and wanted to understand from you whether the articles in the Student organisations section of this page link below should be deleted under A7: Article about a company, corporation or organization, which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject). Student organisations in IIT Kharagpur — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lyoko x (talk • contribs) 05:46, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

• You need to learn how to create a wikilink to a section. I suspect your real question is: "why was KRSSG deleted when two other articles linked to from that section are perfectly firm?" The best advice I can give you is to search this page for where I have used the word "kindly". But you could also follow the advice at the top of the section to which you link and ask at talk:Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur whether your group is notable enough. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:26, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

UTC-05:32:11 article

Why was my article on UTC-05:32:11 deleted for being a "hoax" It is not a hoax. Go to this webpage and select 1800-1849. There are other previously unknown time zones used in the 19th century according to that website, and I intended to make articles for them all. I don't see why we can't have articles for those time zones. Is it because they subtract seconds? We have an article for UTC-00:25:21 — NASAPeepo (talk) 03:00, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

• When you write about an article, create a link to it. One argument is that Dublin Mean Time applied to the whole of Ireland while UTC-05:32:11 applied just to Detroit. I have restored it but I recommend strongly that before you create any more similar articles, raise the matter on a suitable talk page and get agreement. Personally I would like to see most of these [[UTC±…]] titles converted to redirects. "UTC-05:32:11" or "UTC-00:25:21" are utterly implausible search terms. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:49, 25 November 2016 (UTC)
  • I will definitely be creating articles for UTC-15:56 and UTC+14:00:24, formerly used in Manila and Anchorage, respectively. Since those subtracted and added the most to UTC as far as I know. Also, I only know for sure it was used in Detroit. As that is the only city in the whole Midwest that has time zone info before 1970 on that website. NASAPeepo (talk) 18:24, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

RHaworth, you should delete all these alleged time zone articles that were merely local solar mean times before time zones were established in the 1880s, including the Manila, Anchorage, and any local cities.

Hotel California

Can you semi-protect the page to persistent genre warring. 115.164.219.28 (talk) 11:31, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Unsalt request

Hi there, a year ago you salted Luke Ryan. A person by that name has just been drafted in the 2016 AFL draft. Whilst most newly drafted players aren't notable enough for an article, I like to redirect the new players to a list like List of Fremantle Football Club players#Listed players yet to play an AFL game for Fremantle. So, can you please unsalt? Thanks, The-Pope (talk) 15:31, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of File:Poly.pov

Hello,

This was a POV-Ray source file used to generate several standardized polyhedron images for Wikipedia. It should not have been deleted. Can it be restored or at the very least moved to some appropriate location? — LucasVB | Talk 15:48, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Request to restore UkrGasVydobuvannya

Hi there,

I saw you deleted an article I have created. It was not advertising, it was an informational page about the company - a state owned gas producer in Ukraine. Here is a link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UkrGasVydobuvannya

Could you explain which information looked like advertisement to you? Could you please restore it / suggest edits.