September 2020

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Turkish occupation of northern Syria has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:20, 3 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

September 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh clashes

edit

@Ymblanter: could you look at this user's edits as well? I'm wondering from where these all new users come from. Գարիկ Ավագյան (talk) 19:37, 27 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

@Ymblanter: most likely a sock of Gala19000 or RamdomUser1234. Care to check thisMr.User200 (talk) 13:27, 28 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Disruptive editing accusation

edit

Please refrain from making accusations against your fellow editors as per Wikipedia's policy on assuming good faith and civility. The edit I made was based on the title of the article which simply stated Armenia retook the territory it had lost. Even the sentence you pointed out can be interpreted they retook all of the territory they had lost. However, for sake of compromise, I will reword the sentence that they retook a number of the lost positions. I would also advise you to read up on Wikipedia's policy and assume a less combative stance against your fellow editors. Happy editing, cheers! EkoGraf (talk) 12:14, 28 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Adding information without reading the reference is disruptive, whether you do it knowingly or unknowingly. There are no personal attacks directed towards you with this regard, warning are made to improve Wikipedia, if you feel that warnings are attacks directed towards you personally please see WP:BATTLEGROUND. Resapp (talk) 12:18, 28 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Ummm, no

edit

I see you have removed my previous response from your page, which is a Wiki faux pas, however I will over look that. I also see that this page is new AND you have already been chastised for your disruptive edits. Purported is a polite way of saying alleged, which the picture caption is. It is alleged by so and so, when the facts come out afterwords and the events in the pictures are verified, as this is an ongoing event, then the caption should be edited to reflect a fact.--Degen Earthfast (talk) 14:46, 28 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

RE:Adding original research

edit

Following your advice, I've removed the mercenaries term too from the other side, as it was based on original research too.--HCPUNXKID 11:39, 1 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

SOHR

edit

At first SOHR citation is not enough to prove the matter is true. Do you think that a small sentence like "On the other hand, reliable sources have informed SOHR that Armenian-born Syrian fighters were transported to Armenia to join the war there on the side of Armenia against Azerbaijan" is enough to include such an allegation in Wikipedia infobox? I'm going to remove that phrase for the time being, as there is nothing mentioned here about "Syrian-Armenian militia". Full stop.--Preacher lad (talk) 13:13, 1 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

October 2020

edit