May 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Money emoji. I noticed that you recently removed content from Rightpedia without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. 💵Money💵emoji💵Talk 16:31, 1 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Metapedia, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. - zfJames Please ping me in your reply on this page (chat page , contribs) 16:34, 1 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, Rightpedia 1488. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Rightpedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. - zfJames Please ping me in your reply on this page (chat page , contribs) 16:35, 1 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Metapedia, you may be blocked from editing. Shellwood (talk) 16:44, 1 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

May 2018

edit

  You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Eleonora Goldmann. Thank you. - zfJames Please ping me in your reply on this page (chat page , contribs) 16:59, 1 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

ANI discussion

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Doug Weller talk 17:03, 1 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Blocked

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ian.thomson (talk) 17:27, 1 May 2018 (UTC)Reply