SJUstudenteditor

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, SJUstudenteditor, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to 67 Special seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Laterthanyouthink (talk) 09:53, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Brett H. Coulter

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Brett H. Coulter, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. PRAXIDICAE🌈 16:19, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

June 2022

Hello SJUstudenteditor. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:SJUstudenteditor. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=SJUstudenteditor|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. PRAXIDICAE🌈 16:20, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

I will rewrite the article in a less biased way I totally understand and NO I am not being compensated for creating this article. I interviewed a director of firm for a school report on my summer internship. I do have a connection to the subject I quite liked his story but I am not getting paid and I will rephrase in an encyclopedic manner. I read the wikipage on how to properly do that and I hope to have this article published for my professor at SJU !

Thank you SJUstudenteditor (talk) 07:57, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox/Brett H. Coulter (June 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:SJUstudenteditor/sandbox/Brett H. Coulter and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:SJUstudenteditor/sandbox/Brett H. Coulter, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 16:28, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

I will rewrite the article in a less biased way I totally understand and NO I am not being compensated for creating this article. I interviewed a director of firm for a school report on my summer internship. I do have a connection to the subject I quite liked his story but I am not getting paid and I will rephrase in an encyclopedic manner. I read the wikipage on how to properly do that and I hope to have this article published for my professor at SJU !

Thank you SJUstudenteditor (talk) 07:58, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello, SJUstudenteditor! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 16:28, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:SJUstudenteditor/sandbox/Brett H. Coulter

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:SJUstudenteditor/sandbox/Brett H. Coulter, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. bonadea contributions talk 16:28, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.

You appear to have a close connection to the subject on Wikipedia that raises concerns about a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged.

Anyone with a conflict of interest must avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing articles related to you, your family or colleagues, your organization or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);

   and you must always:

4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

Note that you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. Even if you are not being paid, you are expected to disclose any close connection with the subject of the article, using the connected contributor template.

For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you.

Deb (talk) 17:13, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi I apologize I will rewrite the article in a less biased way I totally understand and NO I am not being compensated for creating this article. I interviewed a director of firm for a school report on my summer internship. I do have a connection to the subject I quite liked his story but I am not getting paid and I will rephrase in an encyclopedic manner. I read the wikipage on how to properly do that and I hope to have this article published for my professor at SJU !

Thank you SJUstudenteditor (talk) 07:59, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi. Thanks for your message and I understand your predicament. If you are doing this through the Wikipedia Education Program, your supervisor/mentor should have informed you of the conflict of interest rules. You do have a conflict of interest, which you need to declare (see the page I referred you to above). This doesn't necessarily prevent you from creating an article, but you would need to be able to write it in a completely unbiased and non-promotional way, and that takes a bit of practice. If writing an article is part of your course, it might be better to choose another topic (though I realise it's not easy to find topics that aren't already represented). There are various places you can look for ideas, e.g. Wikipedia:WikiProject_Women_in_Red/Redlist_index and Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/Requested Articles. Deb (talk) 08:21, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Hi yes!

I have spent the last few hours rephrasing the entire article to sound completely unbiased and informational, and yes I am happy you understand my predicament lol. I have gathered a plethora of historic information and I didn't separate opinion when writing the career history profile I am working on for college. So I would absolutely like to try my hardest to write all the information unbiased. I would love to contribute to Wikipedia the right way and share the information I researched on Mr. Coulter... I hope my revisions find you well !

-Ethan SJUstudenteditor (talk) 09:22, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brett H. Coulter (June 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gusfriend was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brett H. Coulter and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Brett H. Coulter, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 11:22, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Brett Coulter

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Brett Coulter, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. WikiVirusC^(talk) 13:42, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

Copy of reply from Talk:Brett Coulter

Copying my reply from talk page of article so you can read it still if it gets deleted.
It seems it has been discussed with you on your talk page already in the past on previous drafts and attempts at creating the article. Right now the article is listing every possible detail and achievement about Coulter and WP:REFBOMBing it with passing mentions. It reads like a CV not an encyclopedia article. First thing you should do is find some sources to show his notability, because even if you get past the promotional tone, notability will need to be passed as well. I would suggest going back to the article of creation process with a draft, and ask for other advice on ways to make improvements there. WikiVirusC^(talk) 14:19, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

July 2022

You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying, you may be blocked from editing. Your previous replies to this inquiry are unsatisfactory. Please explain your exact connection to the subjects you've written about before editing anything else. PRAXIDICAE🌈 14:33, 1 July 2022 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 21:57, 1 July 2022 (UTC)