Samlaptop85213

Archive unblock requests 2011

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Samlaptop85213 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have been editing articles in a nicer way now. My vandalism has stopped completly and I would like to come back to Wikipedia please. I have been editing the Bop It article with an IP address (that proves that I haven't vandalised)

Decline reason:

Block evasion isn't usually considered a reason to unblock. PhilKnight (talk) 21:58, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Samlaptop85213 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have decided that I would like to edit Wikipedia and I would want my block to be shortened to 1 year. 1 year feels like a long block and my life would probably change by then. So in short, 1 yeaer block, there will be no more vandalism, no more personal attacks and not more Wikipedia:sockpuppets.

Decline reason:

No. You had your chances, you blew it. Badly. Repeatedly. Now is not the time to request that we forgive you sometime at some finite future, given no evidence you will be improving. DMacks (talk) 19:04, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Samlaptop85213 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I would now like to help and make constructive edits to Wikipedia. i am very knowledgeable on video games and electronic games and I would be wiling to help. I have more wisdom now on why it's wrong to Vandalise and I would also like to upload some photos to improve articles.

Decline reason:

Your past history and recent socking suggests that if you are unblocked, you will continue to repeat the same behavior that resulted in your indefinite block. If you still think you should be unblocked, send an email to unblock-en-l @lists.wikimedia.org. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 19:43, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Time has indeed moved on, can you just confirm, for the record, that you have not been editing here at all since your previous unblock request.  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 12:53, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Why should we trust you this time, given that you've been given a second chance already? I remember unblocking you before, that did us no good. -- Luk ^talk 12:54, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

I have been editing at my own Wiki which is here: http://samwiki.wikkii.com/wiki/Main_Page

This shows that I can make constructive edits and I am no longer a vandal.--Samlaptop 13:00, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

For what it's worth... last week I blocked an IP sock of Sam at Simple English Wikipedia. Looking at that IP's global contributions, it appears he was editing here as well. Additionally, the "Sam's Wiki" that he links to showing that he can make "constructive edits" is little more than a playground, not a productive, collaborative wiki. either way (talk) 13:29, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Yeah. At least i have been making constructive contributions and when my account is unblocked I'll be able to improve on articles that I know a lot about.--Samlaptop 13:40, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

So you're saying the fact that you sockpuppeted (even though you promised in your previous unblock requests you'd never do that again and even though you were blocked for sockpuppeting in the past) shows that you can be constructive? You need to get a clue. I don't think flaunting "I broke the rules but broke them constructively" is a good argument to be making when requesting an unblock (especially after our last unblock of you failed miserably). either way (talk) 13:55, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Well this time, I know that it's perfectly wrong to vandalise and I wiil not fail misserably this time. I do have good knowledge in games and electronic games and there are several games such as Loopz that I can create an article about.--Samlaptop 16:33, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Well you have failed miserably, as no one seems prepared to unblock a prolific socker. You only route is now is to e-mail as suggested by User:Fastily above, or appeal to the ArbCom - Wikipedia:Appealing_a_block#Appeal_to_the_Arbitration_Committee. Frankly IPv6, where we can all have one static IP address won't come soon enough...  Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 22:00, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Harry Potter Magic Spell Challenge.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Harry Potter Magic Spell Challenge.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:07, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Harry Potter magic spell challenge listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Harry Potter magic spell challenge. Since you had some involvement with the Harry Potter magic spell challenge redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 05:16, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Brain Warp has been nominated for Did You Know

Hello, Samlaptop85213. Brain Warp, an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed,has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 12:01, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Samlaptop85213 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #26011 was submitted on Jul 19, 2019 15:54:18. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 15:54, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Unblock Request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Samlaptop85213 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello Admins of Wikipedia I have managed to sucessfully get my account unlocked after 9 years of being blocked as one Admin from the English Wikipedia and Stewards from Wikimedia trusts me on editing Wikipedia after 9 years of being blocked. Since I got blocked on Wikipedia as a teenager, I am now more mature online. I managed to get unbanned from forums that I got banned on originally and I manage to get 2 jobs and completed the contract for both. I also passed several college and university courses. I also take part in discussions on chatrooms like Discord and speak to people online and run a YouTube channel on my favourite games. There are plenty of things to update on this Wiki and I feel like I can contribute without vandalsing this wiki. I understand why I was blocked in the first place and now that the Stewards have unlocked my account is a sign that I can return to Wikipedia (Simple and EN) without disrupting it. Thanks Sam 07:58, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

We almost never give people a fourth chance. You have a multi-year history of abuse here and have already been given a second and a third chance, and you blew those. Still... This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

• Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
• Read our guide to improving articles
• Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
• If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas. Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:
  1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
  2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
     • do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}});
     • do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]);
     • do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]);
     • do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
  3. Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
  4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
  5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose: {{reflist-talk}}. Once you have added the template, click Publish changes.
• Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
• When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
  • If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. Yamla (talk) 10:53, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

unblock discussion

Ordinarily I would happily give a 2nd chance, but that's already been given, albeit long ago. Can you give examples of constructive edits you would make? Other admins need not hesitate due to my reticence, should they desire to accept/decline.  Dlohcierekim (talk) 10:47, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Pinging User:Dlohcierekim just in case you missed this --kingboyk (talk) 01:05, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi Dlochierekim. Here are some examples I like to change to the Bop It article. I have managed to find some references for each new Bop It game that has been released since Bop It Tetris in 2013.

Looks good to me. @Yamla:???-- Dlohcierekim (talk) 03:12, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Article Addings

Copied content from Bop It; see that article's history for attribution

Bop It!

In 2008, Hasbro secured the copyrights to the instructions for Bop It!. At the 2009 London Toy Fair, Hasbro allowed attendees to try out Bop It!. Bop It! has a new optional input "Shout It", which requires a player to shout into the microphone. The Bop It! has three difficulty levels: "Novice", using only voice commands, "Expert", using a random mix of voice and sound commands, and "Master", calling out voice, sound, and color commands. If the player scores 100 points in either of the less difficult modes, the next most difficult mode is unlocked. Players that achieve a score of 100 points in "Master" mode are considered to have beaten the game. Hasbro also added a multi-player game called "Party" where all the Bop It commands are replaced with body parts like "foot", "hip", and "arm". Bop It! requires 3 AAA batteries to operate.

Bop-It! Bounce

After securing the copyrights to the instructions in 2009, Hasbro made announcements regarding the newest member of the Bop It game line, entitled Bop-It! Bounce during the 2010 Hasbro Toy Fair. This toy features a ball and a small hand-held trampoline. There are six games that may be played on Bop It! Bounce including three games that emphasize the speed or number of bounces and three games that emphasize the player's ability to control the height of the bounces.

• Max Bounce - Players compete to achieve the greatest number of bounces in 30 seconds.
• Infinite Bounce - Players compete to achieve the greatest number of bounces without a time limit.
• Hang Time - Players compete to bounce the ball the highest.
• Right Height - The player must listen to vocal cues from the Bop It! Bounce, calling for higher or lower bounces until the correct height is achieved when a chime sounds.
• Little-Middle-Big - As with Right Height, the player must listen to vocal cues from the Bop It! Bounce calling for bounces of "big" height, "middle" height, or "little" height.
• Free Form - The toy produces different tones as the ball bounces to different heights.

Bop It! XT

In 2010, the instructions for the Bop It! XT were copyrighted. The Bop It! XT is the fourth edition of Bop It Extreme with the same commands but adding a new command, "Shake It". Also, "Spin It" is now orange. The game was demonstrated at the London Toy Fair and was released in 2011. The Bop It! XT is based on the gameplay of the Bop It! and returns the "One on One" mode and adds the new Pro level. In order to beat Bop-It! XT, the player is given a set of three commands to remember and must perform them in order with a mix of voice, sound and color commands 100 times.

Bop-It! Smash

In 2012, Hasbro introduced Bop-It! Smash at the New York Toy Fair. Bop-It! Smash features color changing lights in a central area called "The Zone". Players score by "smashing" two Bop-It! buttons together when a zone light is either green or blue. Bop-It! Smash has 3 various game modes: Solo, Pass It and Multi-player.

In Solo mode, the player scores five points for smashing a blue light and one point for smashing the green. If the player smashes the amber light, the voice will say "Yow!" (followed by a negative comment such as: "Try harder!") and a game life will be deducted. After 4 rounds, the level is completed and a Bonus Round will begin. The player can get 5 or more bonus points. During a level (except bonus rounds) the player can earn a life back if they smash another blue light after smashing an amber. In the Pass It mode, the player has three attempts to try and smash a green or a blue. If they smash an orange light 3 times, then the game is over. In the Multi-player mode, up to 6 players can play. The winner is the last one surviving after all other players have lost all their lives.

Bop It! Tetris

In January 2013 The Tetris Company have announced that they have signed a deal with Hasbro to make some real life Tetris themed games with their brands. In August 2013, Hasbro launched a Jenga themed version of Tetris and a Bop It themed version of Tetris. It features a "Marathon" mode and additional modes based around different gameplay styles (Blast, Double Drop and Shuffle). In the Marathon mode, the player can take advantage of the bonus rounds to score over 800 points. The highest score achieved so far is 860.

Bop It! Beats

In 2013, Hasbro released a game called Bop It! Beats which first appeared on Amazon in December 2013. Bop It! Beats has five game modes - Classic, Classic Party, DJ, DJ Party and Remix and has thrree difficulty levels - Rookie, Expert and Lights Only. It also has five actions - Bop It, Spin It, Scratch It, Reverse, Repeat and Flip It. In the Clasic mode, there are 4 rounds and each round has a different set of songs. The first two are Pound the Alarm by Niki Minaj and Levels by Avicii. In the second round, there are two songs that Hasbro chose to use in the game. The highest score in Classic is 263 and the highest score in the DJ mode is 147 if played in the Expert level in the DJ Party mode. The game also has a Remix mode on which you can play any action sound effect you want on the turntable of the game.

Bop It Micro Series

The Bop It! Micro Series was a version of Bop It released in 2014 by Hasbro. It uses the three basic ations Bop It, Twist It and Pull It and it has two game modes - Solo and Pass It. The game also has three volume levels. The highesct score in the Bop It Micro is 100 and as the player scores closer to 100 the pitch of the gameplay will speed up. As Hasbro released it as a series of games - several character themed version of the Micro Bop It followed which include - Bop It R2D2, Bop It BB8, Bop It Groot and Bop It Minion. In Addition to these characters, Hasbro have plans to release a Bop It Olaf and a Bop It Chewbacca sometime in 2019.

Bop It! New Moves (2016 Bop It)

In 2015, Hasbro copyrighted the instructions to a new model of Bop It to be released in 2016 called Bop It! New Moves (aka: Bop It Refresh or the Bop It 2016). In Janurary 2016, a YouTube channel called KIdsToysTester relased a video of a working prototype of the game. In Feburary 2016 at the New York Toy Fair, Hasbro demonstrated the new Bop It. The game was released worldwide in June 2016. The game has 3 main actions - Bop It, Twist It and Pull It and 10 actions that uses a motion sensor. These actions include - Whip It, Drink It, Selfie It, Comb It, Answer It, Saw It, Hammer It, Cradle It, Sing It and Golf It. The game has four modes - Action, Action Pass It, Classic, Classic Pass It, Beat Bop and Beat Bop Pass It. The Action mode has a maximum score of 200 points and the Classic and Beat Bop mode has a maximum score of 100 points. The game is the first and only Bop It to have a motion detector that detects when to change the batteries. It will remind the player with a sad pitch changing voice saying "My batteries are running low." when the batteries need changing.

Bop It Maker

In 2017, Hasbro released the follow up to the Bop It! New Moves called Bop It Maker. The game was first demonstrated at New York Toy Fair in 2017 and was released in July 2017. The Bop It Maker has 10 slots avaliable on where the player can record their custom moves for the game. The game has four new actions - Bop It, Roll It, Shout It and Squeeze It. The game has three modes - Solo, Party and Classic. In the Solo mode, the game uses the four moves and all the recorded moves. In the Party mode, the game plays like Solo but instead the "Pass It" command is issued. In the Classic mode, the voice says "Bop It to Start!" and plays a little faster than the Solo mode. Each mode can score up to 100 points.

Bop It Classic

In 2019, Hasbro released a new version of Bop It called the Bop It Classic. The game was released in the US in July 2018 with a worldwide release expected in September 2019. The game has four moodes - Solo, Pass It, Beat Bop Solo and Beat Bop Pass It and has three actions - Bpo It, Twist It and Pull It. The game's programming is based of the Bop It Micro but it game unit is bigger than the Micro. Each game mode has a maximum score of 100 points.

References

References

• Bop It Tetris High Score = https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojgMFikMzxM
• Bop It Beats = https://www.amazon.com/Hasbro-A5768-Bop-Beats-Game/dp/B00EDBZ7BY
• Bop It Micro = https://shop.hasbro.com/en-gb/product/bop-it:0EF96D48-5056-9047-F5AD-89F2F31000DA
• Bop It Chewie = https://www.laughingplace.com/w/articles/2019/02/17/toy-fair-2019-hasbro-star-wars-reveals/
• Bop It Groot = http://www.mureview.net/toy-fair-2017-hasbro-games/
• Bop It R2D2 = http://content.webcollage.net/apps/cs/mini-site/very-uk/module/hasbrouk/wcpc/1441138095358/tab/overview-d96caf22?suppress-site-prefs=&enable-reporting=true&from-pp=&wc-target=&showtabs=&channel-product-id=1600002068
• Bop It BB8 = https://ttpm.com/p/21630/hasbro/star-wars-bop-it-bb-8/
• Bop It! New Moves = https://ttpm.com/p/19291/hasbro/bop-it/
• Bop It Maker = https://ttpm.com/p/24287/hasbro/bop-it-maker/
• Bop It Clasic = https://www.kmart.com/hasbro-bop-it-electronic-game/p-A049135342?plpSellerId=Kmart&prdNo=6&blockNo=6&blockType=G6 ttps://www.smythstoys.com/uk/en-gb/toys/games-puzzles-and-books/board-games/social-games/bop-it-/p/180164

--Sam 12:43, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Samlaptop85213 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have written some things that I would like to add to the Bop It article and have found references for the games I have looked at. If you unblock me, I will add these games into the article I written for above.Sam 15:33, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Accept reason:

With the consent of the blocking admin(s), I have lifted your block. Please check out WP:RS so you understand the comments I made about youtube not (generally) being a reliable source. Also, a polite reminder... I strongly believe we can trust you won't return to your previous disruptive habits; please prove me correct. :) Happy editing, welcome back. Yamla (talk) 10:22, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

@AGK: AGK, you are the blocking administrator (though probably don't remember, as it was almost five years ago). This user has followed the steps in template:2nd chance. They often relied on youtube for sources, which is generally inappropriate under WP:RS, but I strongly feel in this particular case, the user has completed the 2nd chance requirements. While they have been problematic in the past, almost five years has passed and I believe this is a good candidate for unblocking. Obviously if they return to their previous disruptive habits, they'd be blocked again. Do you have any objections if I lift the block? --Yamla (talk) 11:34, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Hey Yamla. LessHeard vanU was actually the blocking administrator, and no longer holds that permission. My involvement in 2014 was merely to adjust the block (revoking talk page access, it looks like). For whatever it's worth, I would agree with tentatively unblocking this user. AGK ■ 12:32, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

@LessHeard vanU: Any objections? :) --Yamla (talk) 12:50, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

I have no objections to an unblock. I might advise a pre-emptory warning about any poor behaviour, when considering their record. LessHeard vanU (talk) 16:20, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Hey Yamla. Lessheard vanU says he has no issues in unblocking me.--Sam 08:13, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Protected edit request on 2 August 2019

Since I am now unblocked, can someone give me access to my userpage and remove the tag? Thanks.--Sam 11:11, 2 August 2019 (UTC) Sam 11:11, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

 Done — xaosflux ^Talk 11:51, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Welcome back to Wikipedia. GSK (talk • edits) 19:53, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

Thanks GSK for the beer. It's nice to be editing on my main account again.

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Boogey Ball Game.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Boogey Ball Game.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 16:17, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

File:I'm a Celebrity - Spider Cutscene Sounds.ogg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:I'm a Celebrity - Spider Cutscene Sounds.ogg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 16:25, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Stop!

The files you are uploading are violating WP:COPYRIGHT and WP:FAIRUSE and generally have obviously false source or licensing information, along with bogus licenses and invalid fair-use rationales. You are placing the Wikipedia project in jeopardy. This must stop immediately. --Yamla (talk) 16:55, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

OK. I won't upload these images again.Samtastic 17:06, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

File:I'm a Celebrity - Spider Cutscene Sounds.ogg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:I'm a Celebrity - Spider Cutscene Sounds.ogg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Blocked

That's it, you are done. You were warned about your continued violations of WP:COPYRIGHT and WP:FAIRUSE. I told you to stop immediately. You agreed. Then... again, another upload, another violation of WP:COPYRIGHT and WP:FAIRUSE. Enough. Your block history is littered with blocks for your disruptive behaviour, followed by unblocks after you promise to stop. This has been going on for more than a decade. WP:GAB will tell you how to contest this block, but please understand that I don't expect any unblock request to be successful at this point. --Yamla (talk) 21:09, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

No I don’t want to be blocked just for uploading files. All I wanted to do was to upload samples to show the meaning of the article. I would like to help make constructive edits to Wikipedia and upload images of handheld games without violating the policies here on Wikipedia.Samtastic 08:20, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

You were warned. You agreed to stop. You broke your agreement. This isn't the first time. Or the second, or the third, or the fourth. If you want to be unblocked, you know how to make a request. I strongly oppose lifting this block. Also, it looks like you engaged in block evasion as 46.211.28.196. --Yamla (talk) 12:44, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

That wasn't my IP address. My IP address is longer than that and I haven't engaged in any block evasion lately.Samtastic 12:52, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Are you seriously expecting us to believe there's no violation of WP:MEAT here? That you have no idea who that editor is? That a random editor came along and happened to see your block? That beggars belief. --Yamla (talk) 12:53, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

I don't know who that editor is.Samtastic 13:02, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Uh huh. I don't believe you. Anyway, I'm done here. Make an unblock request or don't, it's up to you. You know how. --Yamla (talk) 13:04, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Noting for the record that Thibba, a blocked sock from 5 years ago, has awoken, still using the same edit pattern as Samlaptop, to harass on meta multiple editors involved in tracking him here on enwiki. DMacks (talk) 17:21, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

He has continued to harass users by putting messages like “I like vandalism”! on users talkpage, including up to 2020-11-19. HurricaneTracker495 (talk) HurricaneTracker495 22:22, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

UTRS 38745 has been declined

UTRS appeal #38745 declined.

At this time, the English Wikipedia unblock team is declining your unblock request and will not hear your case anymore. Your final avenue of appeal is to email the Arbitration Committee at arbcom-en@wikimedia.org. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:15, 20 December 2020 (UTC)