Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 27)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jovanmilic97 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Jovanmilic97 (talk) 16:04, 27 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Sauvahge! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jovanmilic97 (talk) 16:04, 27 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

That is only brief overveiw, you will see that majority regional variants have their own main articles in adition to being covered on general article of Art Nouveau. See Vienna Secession, Stile Liberty, Jugendstil etc. Sauvahge (talk) 16:10, 27 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 27)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This is basically a duplicate of the information already provided on the Art Nouveau page. This page is simply not needed as its already well covered on mainspace
Sulfurboy (talk) 16:28, 27 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

It is not a duplicate, it goes more in depth, has more pictures which is essential for something visual like art and can be greatly expanded by other editors that participate in this topic. Basically all other regional styles have dedicated pages. Sauvahge (talk) 16:35, 27 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Edit warring

edit
 

Your recent editing history at Art Deco shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially, as the page in question is currently under restrictions from the Arbitration Committee, if you violate the one-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than one revert on a single page with active Arbitration Committee restrictions within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the one-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the one-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Coldcreation (talk) 13:36, 12 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

My sandbox

edit

Bbb23 I request courtesy deletion of my entire sandbox, I wrote it and do not want to see it misused. Sauvahge (talk) 15:58, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Deleted per G5.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:01, 14 March 2020 (UTC)Reply