Smallangryplanet

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:01, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

March 2024

Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates, as you did to 49.43.231.39. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. ExclusiveEditor _{Notify Me!} 15:27, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Hi @ExclusiveEditor, sorry about that! I misread some external sources and shouldn't have reverted that user's edits. I'll be more careful next time. Smallangryplanet (talk) 18:58, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

It's okay as editors are humans too, and we make mistake. Hope you enjoy editing. ExclusiveEditor _{Notify Me!} ExclusiveEditor 10:14, 8 March 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Steyr HS .50 / HS .460, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaza. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited No Tech For Apartheid, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

When not to use cite web

In this edit to Bangladesh Air Force you switched a citation from {{cite news}} to {{cite web}}. According to Template:Cite web/doc, cite web is sort of a citation template of last resort, to be used only if no more specific citation template applies. The Business Standard is a newspaper. So the correct way to cite it is with cite news, which is for all news articles, whether you read them in print or online. --Worldbruce (talk) 23:21, 13 September 2024 (UTC)

Hi @Worldbruce-- that's my bad, I didn't mean to commit that change, thanks for the note and will try to avoid any further repetitions! :) Smallangryplanet (talk) 17:20, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Al-Ahli Arab Hospital explosion, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC News.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 6 October 2024 (UTC)

Applied Nanoscience

Hi there, I'm getting in touch with you for the recent edit. The original article was written in a way to defame the entity. The user who originally wrote that section was found to violate Wikipedia guidelines on numerous occasions if you'd see. Impact factor or indexing isn't a matter of controversy. Web of Science regularly adds and removes journals if they do not adhere to their quality guidelines. The removal from Web of Science means that the quality has gone down. A journal can either have an impact factor or not be indexed. There's no term called discontinued. It is similar to call a restaurant as Michilen Discontinued. Which doesn't make any sense. Web of Science doesn't specify why the journal won't be indexed for that year. So calling the indexing a controversy is a bit strange. Ozk7654 (talk) 14:39, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

Hmm. The user's guidelines violations seem unrelated to the article in question (they seem to have misunderstood a standard template as an attack) and I see other, similar edits by that user that are still present in the relevant articles. I'm a recent changes patroller so I don't have any particular connection to Applied Nanoscience, but for controversial edits I would recommend creating a topic on the article's talk page so that people who are invested in/knowledgeable about the topic can chime in. Does that sorta make sense? @Ozk7654 Smallangryplanet (talk) 15:25, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

At least for now I'm removing the wrong information on "Discontinued" and that Impact was not released in 2024. The re-indexed values will only come after 3 years and not consequently which is incorrectly stated in the article. Ozk7654 (talk) 17:36, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

@Ozk7654 can you post a topic about that on the talk page, please? Not my talk page :) Smallangryplanet (talk) 17:40, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Tel al-Sultan attack

The article Tel al-Sultan attack you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tel al-Sultan attack for comments about the article. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Abo Yemen✉ 06:54, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Nice one! Thank you @Abo Yemen! Smallangryplanet (talk) 07:35, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

free palestine

free 5.224.59.250 (talk) 10:42, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Welcome to the drive!

Welcome, welcome, welcome Smallangryplanet! I'm glad that you are joining the November 2024 drive! Please, have a cup of WikiTea, and go cite some articles.

Fix a random page lacking sources

Cielquiparle (talk) 13:08, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Thank you @Cielquiparle! Looking forward to it. :) Smallangryplanet (talk) 13:24, 1 November 2024 (UTC)

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is CoolAndUniqueUsername. Thank you. - Butterscotch Beluga (talk) 22:55, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Marking edits as minor

Please don't mark non-minor edits as minor, as you did here; it makes it harder for other editors to review your contributions. BilledMammal (talk) 14:29, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

@BilledMammal sorry, that was a mis-click on my part, I've been doing a lot of citation improvements and CS1 fixes recently so it's habit... Won't happen again. Smallangryplanet (talk) 14:35, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

All good, not a big deal - thank you. BilledMammal (talk) 14:36, 8 November 2024 (UTC)

Doctor Who Planet of Evil

I have just watched episode four and noted the quite deliberate reference to Oates' final words. The doctor's words are on the DVD, and Oates' words are on his wikipedia page, which I linked. How do you want me to reference the DVD? The other quote, about Shakespeare, is also a referencing a wikipedia page. Not sure what the problem is. The doctor says he met Shakespeare, but when he does meet Shakespeare, there is no reference to a previous meeting. Again, it's all on the DVDs. You have left behind the earlier quote, about Romeo and Juliet. What's the difference between this clause and mine? 2A00:23C8:3B00:BB01:B51E:F546:F9A5:B3A8 (talk) 20:57, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

I'm not editing the whole page, I'm a recent changes patroller so I look for things that are uncited or in a worse case vandalism. Ideally if the quote is incorrect there should be a WP:RELIABLE source somewhere explaining it... or you can use https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Cite_AV_media to cite the DVD itself. Smallangryplanet (talk) 21:04, 16 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oreshnik (missile) (November 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chaotic Enby was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Oreshnik (missile) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 19:36, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

@Chaotic Enby thank you for the review - I will definitely add the sources, when I wrote the draft the existing article didn't exist yet, haha! Apologies for the duplicate. Smallangryplanet (talk) 19:37, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

No worries! I was going to accept your draft at first, but the article creator was too fast by a few minutes! Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 19:39, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Smallangryplanet! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 19:36, 21 November 2024 (UTC)