January 2016

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Doner Company has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Doner Company was changed by Smallmegan (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.864566 on 2016-01-04T21:38:53+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:38, 4 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Smallmegan, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Smallmegan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:21, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ron Foth Advertising (January 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 20:34, 8 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ron Foth Advertising (January 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Devopam was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Devopam (talk) 06:27, 20 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Conflict of Interest? Paid Editing

edit

  Hello, Smallmegan. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:

  • avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
  • instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you.

  • Your pattern of editing meets that for paid editors. If you are not a paid editor and do not have a conflict of interest, you can ignore this. However, if you are an undeclared paid editor, your account can be blocked. LaMona (talk) 16:15, 21 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ron Foth Advertising (January 27)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RadioFan was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
RadioFan (talk) 02:23, 27 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: City Square Steakhouse (February 1)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 21:10, 1 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: City Square Steakhouse (February 5)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 20:23, 5 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ron Foth Advertising (February 12)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by LaMona was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
LaMona (talk) 01:02, 12 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ron Foth Advertising (February 18)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
DGG ( talk ) 03:44, 18 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Disclosure

edit

Hello, thanks for joining Wikipedia! I notice that a lot of your edits are on the topics of Ron Foth Advertising, and I wonder if you have some connection with them. This isn't necessarily a problem, but if you do you should file disclosure explaining any conflict of interest to ensure transparency. That's a link on how to do it and here's an example of what a disclosure looks like - but let me know if you have any kind of questions about this. Blythwood (talk) 22:05, 4 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

September 2016

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 20:47, 13 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Ron Foth Advertising

edit

Hello Smallmegan,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ron Foth Advertising for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Blythwood (talk) 20:48, 13 September 2016 (UTC)Reply