Smuthusami

Welcome to Wikipedia! Drop by the Teahouse anytime for a cup of tea, or some help with editing!

Hello! Smuthusami, you are invited to join fellow Wikipedia editors in the Teahouse. The Teahouse is a place to ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Sarah (talk) 20:52, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

I noticed your submission in Articles for creation, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sister R.S Subbulakshmi. Thanks! It will be reviewed by a volunteer soon.

Before it can be added to Wikipedia, your submission should have references. All articles on Wikipedia should have inline, numbered references after facts, showing the 'reliable source' (a newspaper, book, etc.) where the information can be checked, so that all information is verifiable.

Here's a video tutorial - hit play, then right-click for "full screen".

Here's an example of how to add references:

Chzz is 98 years old.<ref> The Book of Chzz, Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref>

He likes tea.<ref> Smith, John. "[http://foonews.com/Article42 Interview with Chzz]", Foo News, 1 April 2010. Retrieved 2011-05-22. </ref>

== References ==

{{reflist}}

That makes the references automatically display as small numbers^[1] which will link to the details in the section titled == References == at the end. You can see that example in action here.

Please add references to your submission, which will be reviewed as soon as possible. See also, Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners. If you need any help, just put {{helpme}} at the end of this page, followed by a question or get into our live help chat chanel at #wikipedia-en-help ^connect.

Best, ChzzBot IV (talk) 00:03, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Sister R.S Subbulakshmi.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via live help, or on the

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Yunshui 雲‍水 12:12, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Sister R.S Subbulakshmi, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Jamietw (talk) 18:37, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Issues with your contributions

Hi, as much as we appreciate contributions and encourage people to become involved, we do have some basic rules etc here on Wikipedia. I have had to revert pretty much every edit that you have made because they fail the most basic tests. I think that it would be worthwhile for you to take a look at our Five Pillars, which explain such concepts as verifiability and neutrality. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 23:57, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

With regard to your message on my talk page here, it is usually best to keep conversations in the place where they were started. In this case, that means your own talk page. As far as the content of your message goes, it seems clear to me that you responded before reading the item that I suggested above, otherwise you probably would not have mentioned the family sources etc. Please do not add content relying on such sources to articles. -Sitush (talk) 10:25, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your recent sourcing - that is much better. It is not a great idea to rely mostly on a single source but, hey, we are getting there. - Sitush (talk) 23:32, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Thank You. THese are the attempts of a newbie. I have the information hence I appreciate the guidance that you are offering. am getting to be more aware of the rules and regulations. I am meanwhile continuing to update these articles. So please do look out for more comprehensive updatesSmuthusami (talk) 23:52, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

That's ok. We are all new once, and none of us ever stop learning. Some of the policies etc can be very confusing but, believe me, stick around and you will get the hang of things. There are plenty of friendly people around and this place works on consensus and good faith: even if you come across someone who disagrees with you, there is a reasonable opportunity to state your case provided that you keep calm etc. You will not always "win" and no-one is always "right", but generally we muddle along pretty well. - Sitush (talk) 00:06, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi, this edit and similar treatments are not how we do things. If something can be sourced to a page or to a range of pages (such as "pp. 13-14") then we do that. What we do not do is cause people to jump all around a series of disconnected pages to verify disconnected statements. We have ended up with a citation that says "Felton, Monica (2003). A child widow's story. New Delhi: Katha. pp. 13, 14, 26, 36, 226. ISBN 9788187649915." - can this be fixed, please? - Sitush (talk) 08:58, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 24

Hi. When you recently edited Nilakanta Mahadeva Ayyar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Presidency College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/A Sankariah.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Hghyux (talk to me)(talk to others) 15:05, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Nilakanta Krishnan image

There is a request for an image to be uploaded for Nilakanta Krishnan, which you edited. Please help with some image, without copyright restrictions. One option is the cover of his autobiography. I am not sure of the copyright issues. Please see http://www.amazon.com/Sailors-Story-Admiral-Nilakanta-Krishnan/dp/8189534149 Anant (talk) 11:21, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/K.S. Chandrasekhara Aiyar concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/K.S. Chandrasekhara Aiyar, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:34, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission K.S. Chandrasekhara Aiyar

Hello Smuthusami. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled K.S. Chandrasekhara Aiyar.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/K.S. Chandrasekhara Aiyar}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Darylgolden^(talk) 01:12, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)