Soler99
Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution
edit
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Self-organization into Draft:Self-Organised Learning. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 23:55, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
The section I copied from was originally entered by me previous to December 2016 in the section Self-Organization and was then pruned?? by another contributor/moderator. I have decided to expand and make a full entry but myself and my helper Usr talk:Ishy2015 were new and obviously made some errors in starting/creation.