Soren121

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

March 2016

Hey Soren, could you please kindly stop editing the Miraculous Ladybug page for a while? My Internet is laggy and you're constantly saving the page, so my edits are getting really messed up, and I still have to go back and check what you edited and reedit it again. It's getting very frustrating. Thanks. Weslam123 (talk) 01:09, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Oh, I didn't know. Sorry, I'll stop for a bit. Soren121 (talk) 01:14, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

That's okay, thanks for understanding. It was also why I made that edit with a whole bunch of stuff I wasn't supposed to add: I didn't have much time, my Internet was poor, and I saved it without knowing. Thanks for letting me know though. I'm currently adding a description for the first origin episode, and should be done in 20 minutes, so whatever you want to save, save it after that. Thanks! Weslam123 (talk) 01:40, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Got it. Thank you! Soren121 (talk) 01:42, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

I should be thanking you, I appreciate your understanding. I actually think it's going to take me longer to write the episode summary, because I'm having trouble trying to make it short. Go ahead and save your edits. Weslam123 (talk) 01:53, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

I don't actually have anything more to add right now, but thanks for letting me know. Soren121 (talk) 01:54, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Got it. I'm about to upload the summary and log off. If you're free, do read it and try to shorten it for me. I don't really have the time to, and I think it's far too long, but as of right now I can't really think of anything I can cut out from it. Thanks! Weslam123 (talk) 02:34, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Hey Soren121, I'm having a lot of trouble with the HTML coding for the first origin episode's summary. Could you help me out and see if you can fix it? The problem lies in the source coding, I don't know what went wrong. Thanks! Weslam123 (talk) 02:09, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Whoops, you fixed it already. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Weslam123 (talk • contribs) 02:11, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Yep! You forgot to close the ref tags for Wayzz. When you're referencing an earlier citation, you need to put a forward-slash (/) before the end bracket, like so: <ref name="" /> Soren121 (talk) 02:14, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Yeah haha I forgot to put it in and was wondering why the code wasn't working. Thanks again for fixing it! I'm trying to find sources for the Princess Fragrance and ladybug shirt claims, could you see if you have any information on those? I undid an edit by someone who added in the Princess Fragrance, and I can't find a reliable source for it. I also remember reading something written by Astruc where he said that he met a woman wearing a ladybug shirt and that inspired him to draw a few sketches of Ladybug, but I can't find it anywhere. Thanks! Weslam123 (talk) 02:18, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Sure, I'll see what I can find. Although, in the future, please refrain from adding information to an article that you know you don't have a source for. If you're certain a source exists, you could add a {{citation needed}} tag, but I don't know if other editors generally approve of people adding citation needed tags on their own edits. It's worth a shot, though. Soren121 (talk) 02:25, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

Hey Soren121! Okay, thanks for covering me by adding in the Twitter source and note, I appreciate your help. Just two things: Could you check the Talk page (under B-class section) and see if my list more or less sums up what you, AngusWOOF, and I, discussed on? And also, I'm thinking of adding a sentence under "Marinette's parents" section (In Secondary characters), stating that, like, Marinette's parents ship Adrien and Marinette. I've got a source for it, it's the Gamer episode, at 7:22, 8:32, and 9:56. The only problem is that I'm not too sure how to phrase it; after all, I highly doubt that putting "Marinette's parents ship Adrien and Marinette" is fit for a Wikipedia article. Any ideas how I can phrase it? Thanks! Weslam123 (talk) 06:12, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

@Weslam123: Yes, your revised B-class list looks good to me. And yeah, "her parents ship Adrienette" sounds pretty unprofessional! Hehe. I would say something like "they're very fond of Adrien". I don't have the episode saved to re-watch but as I recall, they just brought them tons of snacks and commented on how nice Adrien was, right? Soren121 (talk) 06:17, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Yes, I agree. I was thinking of putting that they're fond of Adrien in there, but it would be preferable if we could also put in that they ship Adrienette. Of course, in a more professional manner. The problem is how to put it in a professional manner. Well, they did bring them snacks (which Marinette turned down, poor Adrien), but basically, in 7:22, Marinette's parents were watching Adrien follow her up into her room, and were like sighing dreamily at them. In 8:32, they tried to spy on them (opened the trapdoor slightly to watch), and in 9:56, Sabine was holding the plate of vegetable pie cookie thing while Tom just stared at them. I think that counts as shipping already. And okay, maybe we can put the B-class list in a separate topic and put it at the top, so everyone can see it; let's work on those points. Weslam123 (talk) 06:25, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Also, why did you de-capitalise the "les aventures"? Weslam123 (talk) 06:27, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

I think the issue is that we're drawing a conclusion from all of these points in the episode, and WP:NOR says we can't imply a conclusion that isn't explicitly stated. Personally as a fan, I think it's pretty obvious that they ship it, but until Tom & Sabine say something to that effect, I don't we can put it in the article.

As for the French title decapitalization, it's like that on the French Wikipedia page and on TFOU's website. Although, now that I look, Tele-Quebec has it capitalized...I wonder why... Soren121 (talk) 06:34, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Hm...looks like the title is capitalized in TFOU's press kit. I've changed it to upper-case throughout the article. Soren121 (talk) 06:39, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, like how Hawk Moth is actually Gabriel Agreste (seriously it's so obvious in the origins). I really should read up on Wikipedia policies again... My memory is getting rusty. I forgot the part about original research and explicit statements. Yeah okay, then. Hmmmm... Well okay; Thanks for the heads up! Weslam123 (talk) 06:44, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

I've also just checked the French dub episode (was going to look at Marinette's bun in Reflekta) opening titles, and the "Les Aventures" is capitalised. Weslam123 (talk) 06:46, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

---

What do you think of this:

• We should have a section to explain the mythology and history behind the Miraculouses and how they work; basically everything that has got to do with the Miraculouses
• We should have a section for the webisodes, with a small table to list out the ten webisodes, along with really short summaries (one sentence)
• We should have a section to elaborate on Marinette/Ladybug and Adrien/Cat Noir's personalities, along with the four relationships that go along with them (aka the love square of confusion)
• We should improve our sources, especially for the French air dates; those are ridiculously hard to find, and we need them or the dates are at risk from vandalism or removal
• We should add a picture of Master Fu's Miracle box (the black hexagonal box with the seven Miraculouses inside)
• AngusWOOF has suggested that we expand Merchadise, and possibly make it a sub-section, though how we can do that is questionable
• We may want to add in a section for tertiary characters, which are basically minor recurring characters that don't play a big role in the show, though it's not necessary
• We need to clean up article:

• Decide on ordering of episodes, after season one is complete
• Boost Reception section, though that will be quite hard
• One sentence paragraphs should be minimised; others combined into the paragraphs
• Scrub for weasel words (appears to be, seems like), synthesis ("we know that", "it is obvious that"), and some of the summary redundancy (eg "She likes him. Because she likes him, she...")
• Vary how Hawk Moth creates the villains as the verbiage tends to be redundant for each episode.
• Add more content for main and secondary characters, though not necessary
• Trim down the origin episode summaries (We can either leave it, demolish 80% of it and keep only the core plot, or take half of it and try to combine it with the Miraculouses section)

Weslam123 (talk) 07:01, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Perfect! Soren121 (talk) 07:06, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Soren121. You have new messages at JSH-alive's talk page.
Message added 14:27, 1 April 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

JSH-alive/^{talk/cont/mail} 14:27, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Re:Miraculous Ladybug PNG

If you missed my post on the other message wall, I got the image from the Disney Channel UK page. I made a low-resolution version of the logo if you want to upload it, as I cannot. It's about the same size of the Steven Universe logo, so I hope it's the right size. Nyantatata (talk) 21:11, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

@Nyantatata: Okay, thank you! Soren121 (talk) 21:12, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Miraculous: Tales of Ladybug & Cat Noir-response

During my addition for Miraculous: Tales of Ladybug & Cat Noir, one of those characters had included Adrien's father Gabriel who wasn't listed there like Marinette's parents were and I thought the Mayor of Paris would've been also notable. As for any of the characters on the page that have been akumatized, we could've at least left the abilities of the different supervillain forms. --Rtkat3 (talk) 22:12, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

@Rtkat3: The Mayor could be notable, I agree. Gabriel is iffy, though I personally wouldn't contest his inclusion. I don't see the point of including the akumatizations in the characters list if the characters themselves aren't notable. The episode summaries already include details about the akumatizations. Soren121 (talk) 22:18, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Miraculous- Tales of Ladybug and Cat Noir title card.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Miraculous- Tales of Ladybug and Cat Noir title card.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Columba (email client) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Columba (email client) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Columba (email client) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 21:52, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Update on hilda season 2 info release

Sorry about that I just there not rule about that but thanks for telling me. 😀 Adon042002 (talk) 03:07, 20 November 2019 (UTC)