Retired
This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

File:Floridas Turnpike Enterprise.jpg missing description details

edit
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 05:30, 13 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Better source request for File:Floridas Turnpike Enterprise.jpg

edit

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 03:08, 14 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Fusion (music) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fusion (music) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fusion (music) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Λeternus (talk) 09:42, 26 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Virginia Panhandle listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Virginia Panhandle. Since you had some involvement with the Virginia Panhandle redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 18:09, 15 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Antwerp, New York (disambiguation)

edit
 

The article Antwerp, New York (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:2DABS, best to use direct hatnote in these circumstances

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 17:08, 12 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:AirTrain Newark logo.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:AirTrain Newark logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:20, 28 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Category:Three-digit Interstate Highways

edit

Category:Three-digit Interstate Highways, which you created, has been nominated for renaming to Category:Auxiliary Interstate Highways. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:29, 5 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Category:Three-digit U.S. Highways

edit

Category:Three-digit U.S. Highways, which you created, has been nominated for renaming to Category:Auxiliary U.S. Highways. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 01:07, 18 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Pope Rat listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pope Rat. Since you had some involvement with the Pope Rat redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 03:52, 24 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Future 1 Turnpike listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Future 1 Turnpike. Since you had some involvement with the Future 1 Turnpike redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 01:10, 9 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

My anus is bleeding listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect My anus is bleeding. Since you had some involvement with the My anus is bleeding redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Knowledgekid87 (talk) 00:27, 15 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of My anus is bleeding

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as My anus is bleeding, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Largo Plazo (talk) 02:17, 15 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

List of people compared to Bob Dylan listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of people compared to Bob Dylan. Since you had some involvement with the List of people compared to Bob Dylan redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 03:45, 26 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

MfD nomination of Template:User en-0

edit

  Template:User en-0, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User en-0 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Template:User en-0 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 18:48, 23 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Seminole County Expressway logo.jpg listed for discussion

edit
 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Seminole County Expressway logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 11:54, 14 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Osceola Parkway logo.png listed for discussion

edit
 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Osceola Parkway logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 11:59, 14 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Interstate 13 listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Interstate 13. Since you had some involvement with the Interstate 13 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. MB 02:43, 5 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

File:Seminole County Expressway logo.jpg listed for discussion

edit
 

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Seminole County Expressway logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

Also:

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:50, 1 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Poulet Frit Kentucky listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Poulet Frit Kentucky. Since you had some involvement with the Poulet Frit Kentucky redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - Champion (talk) (contribs) (Formerly TheChampionMan1234) 10:06, 13 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

No personal attacks listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect No personal attacks. Since you had some involvement with the No personal attacks redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 02:48, 20 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Kekeke listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Kekeke. Since you had some involvement with the Kekeke redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Gorthian (talk) 02:11, 16 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Interstate 80N (Pennsylvania) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Interstate 80N (Pennsylvania). Since you had some involvement with the Interstate 80N (Pennsylvania) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 18:36, 10 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Parkways in New York City

edit

 Template:Parkways in New York City has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rschen7754 03:10, 2 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Dance Dance Revolution Extreme Plus listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Dance Dance Revolution Extreme Plus. Since you had some involvement with the Dance Dance Revolution Extreme Plus redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. SoledadKabocha (talk) 18:56, 12 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Chessie System logo.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Chessie System logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 10 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

US 88 listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect US 88. Since you had some involvement with the US 88 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix (talk) 01:38, 25 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Tt

edit

 Template:Tt has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 16:10, 31 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Mountain passes of Kentucky

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Mountain passes of Kentucky requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 22:56, 30 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:NYCS time

edit

 Template:NYCS time has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jc86035 (talk) 12:08, 4 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Compass Rose Corporation

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Compass Rose Corporation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DrStrauss talk 15:25, 24 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

A page you started (Reading Cinemas) has been reviewed!

edit

Thanks for creating Reading Cinemas, SPUI!

Wikipedia editor A Den Jentyl Ettien Avel Dysklyver just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Your article Reading Cinemas has limited sources which do not show its notability, I have tagged it as such. Feel free to remove the tag after adding two or three good reliable sources.

To reply, leave a comment on A Den Jentyl Ettien Avel Dysklyver's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Dysklyver 11:58, 4 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Reading Cinemas

edit
 

The article Reading Cinemas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability - primary sources only

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PRehse (talk) 09:31, 8 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Orange Canal and Transit Company

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Orange Canal and Transit Company requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Janet-O (talk) 22:44, 11 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

 Template:NYCS logo has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. epicgenius (talk) 02:05, 13 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox rail standard gauge

edit

 Template:Infobox rail standard gauge has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox rail. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Triptothecottage (talk) 09:22, 4 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Types of road for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Types of road is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Types of road until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Note: I'm not the nominator, but adding the template on behalf of a relatively new editor who initiated the nominated. MT TrainTalk 13:17, 21 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Atlantic, Suwannee River and Gulf Railway

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Atlantic, Suwannee River and Gulf Railway, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kirbanzo (talk) 14:40, 8 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Atlantic, Suwannee River and Gulf Railway for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Atlantic, Suwannee River and Gulf Railway is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atlantic, Suwannee River and Gulf Railway until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. [Username Needed] 12:57, 10 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Category:Bridge-tunnels has been nominated for discussion

edit
 

Category:Bridge-tunnels, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Dicklyon (talk) 06:04, 2 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:PinslyRailroadCompanyP.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:PinslyRailroadCompanyP.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 31 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:Connecticut Highway 14.png

edit
 

The file File:Connecticut Highway 14.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 12 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Peninsular Land, Transportation and Manufacturing Company has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:49, 17 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Jersey Turnpike listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Jersey Turnpike. Since you had some involvement with the Jersey Turnpike redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. BDD (talk) 16:11, 20 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Fuck a duck listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Fuck a duck. Since you had some involvement with the Fuck a duck redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — the Man in Question (in question) 22:25, 8 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Interstate 102 listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Interstate 102. Since you had some involvement with the Interstate 102 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Morriswa (Charlotte Allison) (talk) 07:15, 19 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Interstate 106 (California) listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Interstate 106 (California). Since you had some involvement with the Interstate 106 (California) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Morriswa (Charlotte Allison) (talk) 07:17, 19 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Interstate 109 listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Interstate 109. Since you had some involvement with the Interstate 109 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Morriswa (Charlotte Allison) (talk) 07:20, 19 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of U.S. Route 660

edit
 

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as U.S. Route 660, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Morriswa (Charlotte Allison) (talk) 08:40, 19 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of I-102

edit
 

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as I-102, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Morriswa (Charlotte Allison) (talk) 01:07, 18 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Interstate 102 (California)

edit
 

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Interstate 102 (California), to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Morriswa (Charlotte Allison) (talk) 01:08, 18 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of I-102 (CA)

edit
 

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as I-102 (CA), to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Morriswa (Charlotte Allison) (talk) 01:09, 18 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of I-106

edit
 

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as I-106, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Morriswa (Charlotte Allison) (talk) 01:09, 18 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Interstate 106

edit
 

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Interstate 106, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Morriswa (Charlotte Allison) (talk) 01:10, 18 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of I-106 (CA)

edit
 

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as I-106 (CA), to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Morriswa (Charlotte Allison) (talk) 01:11, 18 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of I-109

edit
 

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as I-109, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Morriswa (Charlotte Allison) (talk) 01:12, 18 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Interstate 109 (California)

edit
 

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Interstate 109 (California), to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Morriswa (Charlotte Allison) (talk) 01:13, 18 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of I-109 (CA)

edit
 

Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as I-109 (CA), to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Morriswa (Charlotte Allison) (talk) 01:13, 18 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

"Misssissippi" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Misssissippi. Since you had some involvement with the Misssissippi redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 22:40, 20 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox rail

edit

 Template:Infobox rail has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox rail company. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 13:50, 22 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of List of highways bypassed by Interstate Highways for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of highways bypassed by Interstate Highways is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of highways bypassed by Interstate Highways until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Imzadi 1979  02:27, 25 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

"Tips on reducing water pollution" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Tips on reducing water pollution. Since you had some involvement with the Tips on reducing water pollution redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:20, 7 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox rail franchise

edit

 Template:Infobox rail franchise has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox rail. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 17:54, 30 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

"List of Disneyworlds in America" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit
 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of Disneyworlds in America. Since you had some involvement with the List of Disneyworlds in America redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. TheAwesomeHwyh 16:44, 25 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:CTA

edit

 Template:CTA has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Jc86035 (talk) 16:10, 14 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Interstate 381 (New York)

edit
 

Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Interstate 381 (New York). Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Morriswa (Charlotte Allison) (talk) 05:52, 4 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Hancock, New York (disambiguation)

edit
 

The article Hancock, New York (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:TWODABS, since one of the two entries is at the base title, this is better handled with hatnotes.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 18:00, 15 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Nichols, New York (disambiguation)

edit
 

The article Nichols, New York (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:TWODABS, since one of the two entries is the primary topic, this is better handled with hatnotes.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 19:26, 15 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Argyle, New York (disambiguation)

edit
 

The article Argyle, New York (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Per WP:TWODABS, since one of the two entries is at the base title, this is better handled with hatnotes.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 02:35, 8 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

"Complete list of NJ Transit stations" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Complete list of NJ Transit stations. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 January 24#Complete list of NJ Transit stations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Elliot321 (talk | contribs) 11:39, 24 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for merger of Template:Tlu

edit

 Template:Tlu has been nominated for merging with Template:Template link. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. JsfasdF252 (talk) 17:03, 18 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

"Super pop pop music by Konami" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Super pop pop music by Konami. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 June 21#Super pop pop music by Konami until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk)
07:32, 21 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:NYCS closed

edit

 Template:NYCS closed has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 21:28, 11 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of CSX milepost prefixes for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article CSX milepost prefixes, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CSX milepost prefixes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 29 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:NYCS time

edit

 Template:NYCS time has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 20:18, 12 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:North Station timeline

edit

 Template:North Station timeline has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 17:37, 18 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Etoniah Canal and Drainage Company

edit
 

The article Etoniah Canal and Drainage Company has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails either WP:GNG or WP:COMPANY. Only ref I found was a chapter: https://www.google.com/books/edition/Acts_and_Resolutions_Adopted_by_the_Legi/3BI4AAAAIAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=%22Etoniah+Canal+and+Drainage+Company%22+-wikipedia&pg=PA276&printsec=frontcover

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 0xDeadbeef (talk) 14:56, 16 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of US 22 (disambiguation)

edit
 

The article US 22 (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation page not required (WP:ONEOTHER). Primary topic redirect points to an article with a hatnote to the only other use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 18 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

"Disney'" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Disney' and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 2#Disney' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. - CHAMPION (talk) (contributions) (logs) 02:20, 2 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:NYCS next

edit

 Template:NYCS next has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 12:35, 20 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Chessie System logo.png

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Chessie System logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 30 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Do you still beat your wife

edit

Hello, SPUI

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Do you still beat your wife for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Caorongjin 💬 11:57, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Original Barnstar
In the snowball's chance in hell you see this, I award you this for your work with roads. Also nice username! DD (ALTERNATE ACCOUNT OF CLYDE FRANKLIN) 23:59, 22 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

"Huhuhu" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Huhuhu has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 June 17 § Huhuhu until a consensus is reached. Dronebogus (talk) 07:03, 17 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of West Side Line (disambiguation)

edit
 

The article West Side Line (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:ONEOTHER; switch to hatnote

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 27 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Peej

edit
 

The article Peej has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 24 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

"XD (Emoticon)" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect XD (Emoticon) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 11 § XD (Emoticon) until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 04:38, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of List of traffic circles in New Jersey for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of traffic circles in New Jersey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of traffic circles in New Jersey (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun (talk) 17:20, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Good article reassessment for Capitol Limited (B&O train)

edit

Capitol Limited (B&O train) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 00:22, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of LUnix

edit
 

The article LUnix has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I could find no adequate coverage of this operating system in order to justify an article on it. Any mentions found were brief mentions mostly just copied from this article or a deluge of a people misspelling Linux, even in books.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 29 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

"Mugwump (Miscellaneous Uses)" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Mugwump (Miscellaneous Uses) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 November 13 § Mugwump (Miscellaneous Uses) until a consensus is reached. Gaismagorm (talk) 02:16, 13 November 2024 (UTC)Reply