User talk:Supreme Deliciousness/Archives/2012/January

Netzer

Stop, none of that matters. nableezy - 03:42, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

ARBPIA Topic Ban

I see you are trying to attempt to out Netzer Given the exchange starting here and continuing here and here (I have his talk page on watch as we have had some recent exchanges). This is could be considered WP:OUTING which is pretty blatant harassment of user with a case on AE and whom edits in the P-I space. You are just over a month past a 6 month P-I TBAN and are now resorting to outing editors as I can't fathom any other purpose for your inquires about the editor's parentage, It's pretty could make it clear to me the previous bans have had no effect.

Therefore, effective immediately, per ARBPIA General Sanctions you are banned from all articles, discussions, and other content related to the Arab-Israeli conflict, broadly construed across all namespaces indefinitely. If you are able to demonstrate you can edit harmoniously elsewhere in the project, free of violating Wikipedia Policy, you are welcome to petition to have this sanction lifted either to myself or on the Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard. Violations of the TBAN will lead to blocking. --WGFinley (talk) 07:30, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

I was unaware that user had an article about himself. Since his article has information about himself and he's edited it I won't treat it as WP:OUTING. However, he's made it clear he's not interested in discussing it further so you need to drop it or you will be. You are also skating on very thin ice, staying away from anything that could be construed as harassment would be in your best interests. --WGFinley (talk) 07:55, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Perhaps you should also strike out trying to attempt to out Netzer, now resorting to outing editors, and It's pretty clear to me the previous bans have had no effect. As far as I won't treat it as WP:OUTING that is grand. That you won't treat [this] as WP:OUTING when this is not outing is wonderful. nableezy - 14:25, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Agree, revised. But continuing would be, you yourself were here to ask SD to stop. --WGFinley (talk) 15:04, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Yes, because such questions are not relevant. I advise SD to pretend that MichaelNetzer is just a screen name, who the person is should not, and does not, matter. I wasnt here because SD was "outing". nableezy - 15:18, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Wiyam Amashe holds an Israeli Teudat Zehut. which makes him an Israeli!

Wiyam Amashe holds an Israeli Teudat Zehut. which makes him an Israeli! see http://www.one.co.il/Article/193834.html Maccabi Haifa and Him showed his Teudat Zehut to show Ben Ari that he holds Israeli Citenzenship, so please now don't remove his Israeli flag.
  – HonorTheKing (talk) 00:22, 18 January 2012 (UTC)