User talk:SusanLesch/Archives/2021/November
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:SusanLesch. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Orphaned non-free image File:PDP music manuscript screen.png
Thanks for uploading File:PDP music manuscript screen.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:59, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
Minneapolis
User:SusanLesch: I, along with several other editors, suggest the following consensus addition to the article:
The city, once dubbed the "flour milling capital of the world", was the industrial center of the Upper Midwest from the 1880s until about the 1930s. Despite a significant shift away from industrial activity, Minneapolis still remains Minnesota’s major economic and cultural center.
I feel like this is appropriate, factual, and has already been agreed to by other editors I have been in contact with (one of them originally added it to the article too). I am going to make this change (with the suggestion you gave already implemented in the text above) to the article. I appreciate your feedback and hope you respect this consensus edit. Thank you for your understanding.
Cheers and Happy editing! ~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gooob (talk • contribs) 03:20, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
- Consensus should be reached on the article talk page. (It has not been reached for this change.) I will not respond further here. -SusanLesch (talk) 15:05, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
I want to extend my appreciation for the comments you have given on work. It seems to my eyes that the strong and overwhelming consensus on my textual block add is that it is “undue weight” and shall not be added to the article as it is currently written. I will be respecting that outcome. Best of luck to editing in your future~~Gooob Gooob (talk) 16:33, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
- Susan, I have taken this issue to AN/I on account of the disruptive editing from these new accounts and strong indications of sock- or meat-puppetry. You can find the discussion here. --Sable232 (talk) 01:03, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Sable232, you handled this beautifully. Thank you! -SusanLesch (talk) 16:21, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
December 2021 at Women in Red
|
--Innisfree987 (talk) 00:13, 27 November 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging