December 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Raleigh, North Carolina have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 13:16, 3 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Raleigh, North Carolina. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. - Donald Albury 13:52, 3 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

March 2021

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jason Derulo, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. General Ization Talk 21:38, 28 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Link wouldn't paste but he is expected his first child. TVNewsFreak1 (talk) 21:41, 28 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

April 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm Doc Strange. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on DMX (rapper), but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 03:27, 9 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to DMX (rapper). Thank you. — Chevvin 03:27, 9 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

He has died just minutes ago... TVNewsFreak1 (talk) 03:29, 9 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Cerelyn J. Davis. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. PamD 05:24, 24 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 24)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 20:30, 24 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, TVNewsFreak1! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 20:30, 24 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Black News Channel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mike Hill. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 25 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Start Your Day (May 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Qwerfjkl were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
 Qwerfjkl | 𝕋𝔸𝕃𝕂  (please use {{reply to|Qwerfjkl}} on reply) 06:12, 25 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Start Your Day (July 10)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 07:40, 10 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding User:TVNewsFreak1/sandbox

edit

  Hello, TVNewsFreak1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:TVNewsFreak1/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 24 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Start Your Day

edit

  Hello, TVNewsFreak1. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Start Your Day, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:02, 10 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Start Your Day

edit
 

Hello, TVNewsFreak1. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Start Your Day".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 07:41, 10 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

January 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm Mvcg66b3r. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, WVEN-TV, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 13:59, 26 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

August 2022

edit

  Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Isabel Vincent. Thank you. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 07:23, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Reply


  You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TVNewsFreak1. Thank you. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 07:49, 4 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Im here to appeal TVNewsFreak1 (talk) 03:17, 27 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TVNewsFreak1. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  TheSandDoctor Talk 18:33, 7 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Appeal

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TVNewsFreak1 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I’m here to appeal my block permanently I want to say that I do forget to cite the sources sometimes and sometimes I forget to edit the page or even log in. I’m sorry about that. The Isabella Vincent story Shaun King on Instagram who is verified said his address and info was exposed by her I forgot to cite that post as he was being targeted in a way for white supremacists to come into his property. I will remember to Vite I will also learn how t figure out the references mistake also. TVNewsFreak1 (talk) 03:22, 27 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Appeal

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TVNewsFreak1 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I don’t know why I’m blocked most of my information is cited so I have trouble add references I have to learn that but most of my information including the tv stations are true. I get them for station Facebook pages tv news blogs or websites like TVSPY and TVNewsCheck among others. Yes sometimes I forget that I’ve logged in or forget to, however I also forget to Vite I will keep in mind to cite them before finishing editing them.TVNewsFreak1 (talk) 03:10, 27 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TVNewsFreak1 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I’m here to appeal my block permanently I want to say that I do forget to cite the sources sometimes and sometimes I forget to edit the page or even log in. I’m sorry about that. The Isabella Vincent story Shaun King on Instagram who is verified said his address and info was exposed by her I forgot to cite that post as he was being targeted in a way for white supremacists to come into his property. I will remember to Vite I will also learn how t figure out the references mistake also. TVNewsFreak1 (talk) 03:39, 27 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

I can accept that you may have unintentionally edited while logged out, but you're going to need to better convince us that you will make a better effort to cite your sources. 331dot (talk) 08:13, 27 August 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Im sorry for forgetting to edit I will remember to Vite sources I will also practice on the references editing also. I block from even reappearing so I’m am replying to you to give me another chance. I sometimes have forgot and edit without finding the source I will copy the source and cite it first before editing I promise to do that. TVNewsFreak1 (talk) 16:50, 6 October 2022 (UTC)Reply