User talk:S0aasdf2sf/Archive2

Proposed deletion of NirCmd

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article NirCmd, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No assertion of notability

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Ironholds (talk) 13:15, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

free Norton upgrade

Shouldn't we mention on the free upgrades for Norton products. I stumbled upon this GENUINE Norton link: http://www.symantec.com/home_homeoffice/support/special/upgrade2007/vista/migration_start.jsp?site=nuc --Tyw7‍ ‍‍ (Talk ● Contributions) Leading Innovations >>> 18:30, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

I have already uploaded a new version. Can you do a cleanup of the image. There are some white edges remaining. I think the above information is significant since it can save the readers money instead of buying a new upgrade. On a side note can you please update the infobox of the Norton AntiVirus article. --Tyw7‍ ‍‍ (Talk ● Contributions) Leading Innovations >>> 23:04, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

I'll be taking a look. TechOutsider (talk) 23:07, 13 March 2009 (UTC)TechOutsider

As for NAV, just fill the infobox with the same info found in NIS. TechOutsider (talk) 23:12, 13 March 2009 (UTC)TechOutsider

Yo. You need to scale the image down. It's too big and not web-res, per say. It still looks fuzzy when viewed at reduced res. TechOutsider (talk) 23:17, 13 March 2009 (UTC)TechOutsider

You do it. I don't know how to. --Tyw7‍ ‍‍ (Talk ● Contributions) Leading Innovations >>> 23:19, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Can you take another sshot ... this time with the "default" theme please? TechOutsider (talk) 23:21, 13 March 2009 (UTC)TechOutsider

You do it. --Tyw7‍ ‍‍ (Talk ● Contributions) Leading Innovations >>> 00:08, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

I have NAV TechOutsider (talk) 02:19, 14 March 2009 (UTC)TechOutsider

Done! A new version with "default" theme is uploaded. Can you do a cleanup of the image. There are some white edges remaining. On a side note, I think the information of the free upgrade is significant since it can save the readers money instead of buying a new upgrade. --Tyw7‍ ‍‍ (Talk ● Contributions) Leading Innovations >>> 18:01, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

The colors are inverted. Please take a look ... http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/archive/0/0d/20090315192334!Norton_Internet_Security.png

You will need third-party sources, not just a website from Symantec.com TechOutsider (talk) 20:44, 15 March 2009 (UTC)TechOutsider

I have uploaded two version, one cropped using ms paint and one using Adobe Photoshop Elements. The two versions are clearly stated in the comments page. As with my other images, please do a clean up if needed. --Tyw7‍ ‍‍ (Talk ● Contributions) Leading Innovations >>> 04:15, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Norton Internet Security

Hi, I replied on my talk page -- SF007 (talk) 20:22, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

I replied again on my talk page -- SF007 (talk) 21:17, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

LiveUpdate

Hello, S0aasdf2sf. You have new messages at Talk:Norton LiveUpdate.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Tyw7‍ ‍‍ (Talk ● Contributions) Leading Innovations >>>

Another comment on LiveUpdate talk page. --Tyw7‍ ‍‍ (Talk ● Contributions) Leading Innovations >>> 18:57, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Hello, S0aasdf2sf. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norton LiveUpdate.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Tyw7‍ ‍‍ (Talk ● Contributions) Leading Innovations >>> 13:54, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Recent AFD Listings

Hey, TechOutsider. I noticed you've listed a few articles for AFD. Please follow the rest of the instructions on the appropriate article pages to begin the deletion discussion, you need to create the individual AFD pages.Spring12 (talk) 22:05, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Talk:Norton AntiVirus/Archive 2

I have nominated Talk:Norton AntiVirus/Archive 2, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talk:Norton AntiVirus/Archive 2. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. TechOutsider (talk) 22:34, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Norton 360 Screenshot

Do you have a screenshot of the latest stable release of Norton 360. The one listed is of a pre-release software. I am sure that someone has a stable version 3. Please update the screenshot. As you may have noticed, I have Norton Internet Security. --Tyw7‍ ‍‍ (Talk ● Contributions) Leading Innovations >>> 14:02, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

I might muster up the patience to install that junk Symantec is marketing. TechOutsider (talk) 23:37, 24 March 2009 (UTC)TechOutsider

Why is Norton 360 junk? I not making fun, I just want to know. Based on their advertising, I though that Norton 360 is the flagship product of Symantec, as with every renewal, they are nagging me to go 360, ditching the Norton Internet Security. Which is better in your opinion, Norton Internet Security or Norton 360 v3. --Tyw7‍ ‍‍ (Talk ● Contributions) Leading Innovations >>> 23:46, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

N360 is just NIS's menus cut and paste all over the place. No innovation. And too many pop-up notifications; many which are simply useless. Just run Norton Insight, press "Refresh" and you get a popup. The interface feels clunky. I hate how each window now flashes when hovered over. NIS is ok, however I don't need a separate firewall. I use NAV. TechOutsider (talk) 23:34, 27 March 2009 (UTC)TechOutsider

Misabot

Instead of manually archiving articles, why don't you let Misza Bot do the job. Just see the top of my talk page for an example. You can change the interval and the folder. Just search for Misza bot (I don't know the correct spelling). --Tyw7‍ ‍‍ (Talk ● Contributions) Leading Innovations >>> 23:48, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

I have already place an auto Miszabot command translusion (whatever you want to call it) on top of the Norton Internet Security. To auto achive use the following commands:

{{User:MiszaBot/config |maxarchivesize = 31K |counter = 1 |minthreadsleft = 0 |minthreadstoarchive = 1 |algo = old(30d) |archive = Talk:Norton_Internet_Security (name of article)/Archive %(counter)d }} --Tyw7‍ ‍‍ (Talk ● Contributions) Leading Innovations >>> 12:02, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. TechOutsider (talk) 13:55, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Just a quick request to ask you to use edit summaries more often, even if just fixing something, typing "fix" as an edit summary is more useful than none at all, I'm sure I don't need to give you the standard template, you have been here for long enough! Jenuk1985 | Talk 01:45, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Hmm I've been using edit summaries since a couple days ago. I've been very specific too; "fix wikilink "MP3" or something to that effect. Maybe I missed one or two...TechOutsider (talk) 01:48, 25 March 2009 (UTC)TechOutsider

Please don't take this the wrong way, as I'm only trying to help you (and other editors who wish to see at a glance what the edit is), if you look at your recent contributions, there are a lot of gaps where edit summaries should really have been provided. Also its worth noting that the default summary when editing a section (where it just lists the title of the section), is equally not useful, and should be expanded to say what you have done. It doesn't need to be wordy, a single word will do in many cases (e.g. for this, I will add to the end of the summary "reply"). Nobody is perfect, I understand that, I forget edit summaries too sometimes. Jenuk1985 | Talk 01:52, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Norton Insight

I have nominated Norton Insight, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norton Insight. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. TechOutsider (talk) 20:36, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, S0aasdf2sf. You have new messages at Tyw7's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Tyw7‍ ‍‍ (Talk ● Contributions) Leading Innovations >>> 12:02, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

hey buddy

hey there Tech, how you doing? Glad you like the Gimp program. I took a look at what you've been up to lately, saw you're now doing a peer review on NIS so I dropped my thoughts on it. I downsized the graphic a tad on NIS lead too, if you prefer the bigger size, just revert - I'm not particular about it, just thought it made things look a little better. I see you're starting on Ghost too - cool. I might even drop a few edits in there as well later on. Your work is looking good my friend, glad you're doing so much here. Hope all is going well for you IRL as well. ;) — Ched ~ ^(yes?)/_© 23:25, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Hey long time no see! I'm fine. Loving Gimp. Thanks for downsizing the picture. It probably would have been downsized anyways; several users have complainedTechOutsider (talk) 12:16, 29 March 2009 (UTC)TechOutsider

RE: the GA. I'll need to look a little closer to be sure, but I'm wondering if you're trancluding category with projects. I think that once an article makes GA, the category really isn't an issue. I would think that NIS would fall under the Wikipedia:WikiProject Computing as far as assessment. Maybe here would be the place to ask?

My understanding is that category is basically just a file system to find articles of a similar nature. The project, sort of defines how the GA standards apply to an article that would fall under that particular group of articles. You couldn't really use the guidelines from a person WP:BLP for an article about software. The basics for GA would always apply. Is the lead well writen? Is the subject explained in enough detail? Is it stable, no edit wars? Are the resources and references good ones and are they used properly?. I'm sorry I haven't spent more time on the NIS article yet - I've been reading up on sock puppets and have a few other articles I'm researching - but I will look in more detail soon. Do you want me to just "edit" or put suggestions on the peer review page? Might want to get a few other opinions from peer review too, since I've edited the article before. And good to talk to you again too!! OK - I've gotta run for a bit, but I'll try to get some of the NIS stuff done before I hit the sack tonight. — Ched ~ ^(yes?)/_© 23:02, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

You're busy. Suggestions would be great! TechOutsider (talk) 00:52, 30 March 2009 (UTC)TechOutsider

OK ... finally got back to the peer review. Did what I could, and added comments to peer review page Let me know when it's actually under the GAR so I can watch and maybe help. Looking good my friend ;) — Ched ~ ^(yes?)/_© 08:41, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

MJ peer review

Hi Tech, you accidentally added comments to an old peer review, but you should remove that and place it here. That said, there is nothing wrong with you adding such comments to the regular talk page. Best. :) — R² 03:21, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

NIS Help

Hello there, you asked me to create an account so i did. I am happy to help you. Please let me know how you would like me to help you. I only worked at Symantec for less than a year but did work at WholeSecurity so i do know a bit about all that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Beecaver67 (talk • contribs) 07:23, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Great! Could you read Norton Internet Security? I would love to have a third opinion on the article, and some fact checking. Remember to sign your name using the four tides ... 12:27, 31 March 2009 (UTC)(your username here) TechOutsider (talk) 12:27, 31 March 2009 (UTC)TechOutsider

Actually, if you just use the four tildes ~~~~ , it automatically puts your name in, you don't have to do the {Your username here) thingie. — Ched ~ ^(yes?)/_© 16:22, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Ahh, thanks! TechOutsider (talk) 16:25, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

HEY! .. just left a note on the peer review page, and yep you were right about Norton already having sold the biz by the time the first Windows version came out .. but check this out .. I don't know if you're planning on doing anymore work on Norton stuff, maybe you're going to concentrate on something else, but .. Symantec announced that they are reviving the old "Norton Utilities". Found the article here — Ched ~ ^(yes?)/_© 17:44, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Cleanup

Can you please do a cleanup of the following images:

• Image:NortonAntiVirus Icon.png
• Image:NortonInternetSecurity.png

Thanks,
Tyw7‍ ‍‍ (Talk ● Contributions) Leading Innovations >>> 17:40, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

What do you mean, cleanup? Those are the old icons; pretaining to eariler versions of NIS/NAV. TechOutsider (talk) 20:34, 31 March 2009 (UTC)TechOutsider

I have uploaded them. There might be white spots remaining, etc. --Tyw7‍ ‍‍ (Talk ● Contributions) Leading Innovations >>>21:14, 31 March 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.98.195.128 (talk)

I am going to revert your edits; I will remove the tick mark myself. Your images are too low quality TechOutsider (talk) 22:14, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, S0aasdf2sf. You have new messages at TechOutsider's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Tyw7‍ ‍‍ (Talk ● Contributions) Leading Innovations >>> 17:43, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Another comment

Hello, S0aasdf2sf. You have new messages at TechOutsider's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Tyw7‍ ‍‍ (Talk ● Contributions) Leading Innovations >>> 12:03, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Congratulations

Hey there TechOutsider, I just wanted to stop by and congratulate you on getting Norton Internet Security expanded and promoted to GA status. Very good work! ;) — Ched :  Yes?   : ©  01:28, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

It was hard. Next time I'm going to pick a narrow(er) topic. TechOutsider (talk) 01:31, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Indeed! My taking another look is probably moot now, TechOutsider, as it's since been reviewed. I wish you luck with those future endeavors! –Whitehorse1 20:10, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

No wonder most articles with GA status concern local events; I see Ched's working on a raceway. TechOutsider (talk) 22:29, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

How about Norton 360. --Tyw7‍ ‍‍ (Talk ● Contributions) Leading Innovations >>> 04:36, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Well we can collaborate then. After I tweak it some I might get a peer review. TechOutsider (talk) 13:14, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

How about now. There is no activity in the N360 article. Have you given up the article or are still interested. P.S. This message is typed through another WiFi network, hence a different IP address. --Tyw7‍ ‍‍ (Talk ● Contributions) Leading Innovations >>>

I'm thinking about the article. It still doesn't flow just right. Yeah, I'll just get a peer review. TechOutsider' (talk) 00:14, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

malware

I copy pasted the old malware file to User:TechOutsider/Ched-malware. Hope that helps. — Ched :  Yes?   : ©  20:55, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Testing

testing my new sig ''TechOutsider'' (talk) 21:47, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Not sure

Hey there TechOutsider - I have no idea what your views on it are, but I just wanted to stop by and say Happy Easter. If it's not a day you celebrate, then I'll say Happy "just another day". Hope all is going well. ;) — Ched :  ?  21:08, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! Happy Easter to you too! TechOutsider (talk) 21:09, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

Your comments at PR were most helpful. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 22:59, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. No problem, it's my pleasure. I once worked at Lucent Tech., and found your article to be interesting. Also, I was hoping my article, Norton 360, would be peer reviewed quicker; peer reviewing another person's article makes them feel good :) and hopefully they will look in to the backlogs, like I did. TechOutsider (talk) 23:38, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Reflist

Please note the following regarding the use of multiple columns on the reflist documentation section:

{{reflist|3}} will create a three-column list. Three-column lists are inaccessible to users with smaller/laptop monitors and should be avoided.

Thank you.—RJH (talk) 15:53, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Norton 360 GA

Norton 360 has been nominated as Good Article. Please follow this link to review it: Wikipedia:Good_article_nominations#Computing. --Tyw7‍ ‍‍ (Talk ● Contributions) Leading Innovations >>> 06:19, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

I can't review it; I already tried to give it an informal assessment and couldn't come up with any problems =\. And you are not supposed to review an article you have contributed significantly to. Are you reviewing the article? You may qualify.TechOutsider (talk) 00:02, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

I don't know if you saw the peer review; however the article may need a Reception section. Let's hold off the GA review, what do you think? TechOutsider (talk) 00:06, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Bubble tea!

Tyw7‍ ‍‍ (Talk ● Contributions) Leading Innovations >>> has given you a bubble tea! Bubble teas promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a bubble tea, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy drinking!

Spread the bubbliness of bubble teas by adding {{subst:User:Download/Bubble tea}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!

Orphaned non-free media (File:NortonInternetSecurity Icon.png)

Thanks for uploading File:NortonInternetSecurity Icon.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:50, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

World of Nations Celebration

I generally make it for one of the days, just to sample the food. Pictures would be a nice addition to the article. Mgreason (talk) 20:38, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Like a gallery? Or just a selection of photos? TechOutsider (talk) 22:15, 22 April 2009 (UTC)