User talk:TenPoundHammer/Archive 14

DYK for Edison Mall

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:05, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Mesa Distance Learning Program

Can you please review that article? --Please leave me a {{talkback}} if you reply here. Thanks, Tyw7  (☎ Contact me! • Contributions)   Changing the world one edit at a time! 14:56, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

What I mean review is the quality of the article. Currently I've tagged it with start but have improved it since then. Hopefully it would be a c or b article :/ --Tyw7  (☎ Contact me! • Contributions)   Changing the world one edit at a time! 21:24, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion converted to PROD: InstantDB

Hello TenPoundHammer. I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on InstantDB to a proposed deletion tag, because I do not believe CSD applies to the page in question. Thank you. GedUK  21:58, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

2. Hannoversches Infanterie-Regiment Nr. 77

I declined the speedy. You marked an incomplete article started only recently for speedy deletion as a test page. It actually is a valid stub. It says what the subject is, and gives references. (and when you do tag for deletion, please remember its required to say so in the edit summary). 108.21.112.38 (talk) 05:54, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: 1 E-7 m²

Hello TenPoundHammer, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of 1 E-7 m², a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you.   -- Lear's Fool 03:46, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

I've struck the above template, which I added accidentally; you're obviously sufficiently experienced not to need the newbie message! I've declined the A1 because as far as I can tell, the subject is very clear. I'm still interested to see what your thinking was; I can certainly see some problems with this class of article.  -- Lear's Fool 03:49, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

I think this is a relic of the "old" Wikipedia, created during a time when there were so many gaps in information that pretty much any new article was acceptable. I think that whole series of articles would be better merged into a single list at Orders of magnitude (area). It would also solve the problem of the somewhat confusing article title, which mixes an ASCII type "E-7" with a modern superscript 2, something which was confusing to users even eight years ago as seen here. —Soap— 02:01, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

"why doesn't costa rica have a stub template"

Try {{CostaRica-stub}} or in this case {{CostaRica-geo-stub}} ? PamD (talk) 00:02, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

1942 Sun Bowl

I happen to agree with you on this, but, stupidly, an infobox with any substantive information in it is considered enough. I got slammed by the radical inclusionist crowd on this point at my second RFA so it has kind of stuck with me ever since. I can't imagine why someone would create an article without bothering to add a single sentence of actual text. It was previously a redirect, I think I'll revert it back until such time as someone can be bothered to string five words together to explain what this is. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:31, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		For all those {{expand}} deletions. I understand now why it couldn't have been done in AWB and I appreciate the time you're taking to do it the right way. —Soap— 01:44, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Thomas Fairfax (Walton)

Neither template was {{Refimprove}}! [1]. I do not think that maintaince templates that do nothing for a reader (Refimprove is one of the exceptions) should appear in article space. Templates such as {{expand}} and {{one source}} are more suited to talk pages as they are inter editor communications and that is what the talk page is for. -- PBS (talk) 02:56, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Expand tag cleanup

Please, check my comment in User_talk:Magioladitis#Removal_of_.7B.7Bexpand.7D.7D. -- Magioladitis (talk) 11:09, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

List of people from Cornwall

Please could you add an explanation for this {{self reference cleanup}} on the talk page.--Felix Folio Secundus (talk) 11:27, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Familymusicparty.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Familymusicparty.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 13:29, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Reellife.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Reellife.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 13:43, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Troutcloser.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Troutcloser.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 14:08, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

LOL -- I thought this was an image for trouting an editor who closed a discussion badly. :-) --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 14:55, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

I did too. However, I'm curious hammer. Why would you go through the trouble of uploading an album cover then redirect the album article as "not notable"? --Ron Ritzman (talk) 16:13, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brazil – People's Republic of China relations

Hi there, I ask that you follow WP:BEFORE next time prior to nominating an article for deletion. I'd like to assume good faith on this issue, but it is difficult to do when you nominate an article for deletion about the relations between countries with 37 billion US dollars in bilateral yearly trade. The simplest of goggle searches revealed many articles which cover the topic in-depth, some of which I have added to the article. Thanks--TM 18:05, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Cookies

173.49.140.141 has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Who said IPs can't reward cookies? For your manual help with {{expand}}. --173.49.140.141 (talk) 22:14, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Jeopardy! theme music redux

The person who keeps insisting that the Chris Bell music debuted in Season 27 is back, this time under an IP tracing to the University of New Mexico. Should we consider semi-protection. RJaguar3 | u | t 03:35, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Stub tag placement

Hi, I'm stub-sorting and it would be helpful if you could remember to add {{stub}} tags in exactly the right place - after everything except inter-wiki links, as per WP:FOOTERS. It's easier to find them if I know where they'll be, and easier to edit it into the sorted stub tag if I don't have to move it first. Thanks. (Just done a batch of RER stations - I can see I'm picking up the pieces from the deletion of {{expand}}!). PamD (talk) 08:59, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Harmony House

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 12:03, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Wheel of Fortune

When will you find out if you made the final cut to be on Wheel of Fortune? EnDaLeCoMpLeX (contributions) • (let's chat) 17:53, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

• "If"? I believe you mean "when". :D There's no exact time. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 17:59, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
  • Good luck! JTRH (talk) 18:07, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
    • Hahaha, oh my bad! Well I hope it's soon. EnDaLeCoMpLeX (contributions) • (let's chat) 18:09, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Smurfing PROD

Hi,

I'm not sure if you are aware, but when an editor deletes a PROD (such as at [2]) for any or no reason, it should not be restored. (See WP:DEPROD) For that reason, I undid your edit restoring the PROD tag. If you want the article to be deleted, you should take it to AFD. Thanks, RJaguar3 | u | t 22:37, 23 January 2011 (UTC)

Highland View Academy listed for deletion

I have listed Highland View Academy for deletion. I noticed you had participated in previous AfDs of high schools and thought you might participate. The discussion is located at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Highland View Academy. WikiManOne (talk) 05:50, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Porchcrop's talk page.
Message added 07:01, 25 January 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Martin (Transporter character)

Hi there. I was considering doing a non-admin closure, but while consensus appears fairly clear I feel that it's probably one established contributor short of NAC territory. I was wondering if you would be happy enough with the proposed solution; that while the character is not notable, the article now serves as an overview of the franchise, which is worthy of an article. (I'll keep your talk page watchlisted). Regards, —WFC— 16:56, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Cool. Haven't done an NAC before so thought it was best to be on the safe side. Regards, —WFC— 17:09, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Liev Schreiber

hi.I'm gonna translate Liev Schreiber's article to persian.the problem is I dunno the correct pronunciation of the name and family name.would u please help me with this? thx in advance--(u can answer in ur talkpage)jasmine (talk) 17:37, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

• I meant the english pronunciation!!!!!!!!!! did u think I asked u about persian?!LOLjasmine (talk) 17:52, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
  • simple.cuz u were one of the ppl that edited that article.thx anyway.jasmine (talk) 18:10, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Ampere

Regarding this post — you do realize that the "expand" template has been deleted, right? Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 05:42, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

I was dismayed to find that out yesterday until I found Template:Incomplete is available as an alternative. Thanks for pointing that out, I guess I forgot to go back and fix that. -- Beland (talk) 18:27, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

Online Ambassadors

I saw the quality of your contributions at DYK and clicked on over to your user page and was pretty impressed. Would you be interested in helping with the WP:Online_Ambassadors program? It's really a great opportunity to help university students become Wikipedia contributers. I hope you apply to become an ambassador, Sadads (talk) 23:31, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

More cookie

Gimme danger has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can Spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

I figure you probably ate the one from above and might be a bit peckish. Gnoming is hungry work. Danger (talk) 09:55, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Attention for otters

"No, seriously"--Shirt58 (talk) 11:57, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

Andre Dreey-C Caram

Hey- looks like you beat me to closing the AfD after I deleted it... I walked away for a second. Anyway, since it looks kind of bizarre now (and since I deleted it) I'm going to remove your closing rationale and just leave mine in place, hope that's not stepping on any toes. l'aquatique[talk] 20:48, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

The Price Is Right runtimes and commercials

Hi. I see that you revised the runtime in the show's Infobox to exclude commercial time. The show has shrunk its runtime and expanded the commercial time over the years. A current episode is only about 38 minutes of content, as verifiable by watching the episodes at cbs.com. Do you think the Infobox entry should be changed to "38-48," or should we try to find out if it's possible to chart how the runtimes have decreased over the years? If the latter, I'm not sure where to start. Best, JTRH (talk) 05:23, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Sale of the Century

Hi, TPH. Would you care to take your deletionist weed-whacker to the OR, opinion, and unsourced information-laden Sale of the Century (US game show)? Thanks! JTRH (talk) 20:25, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the response. What I'm specifically concerned about at the moment is a section of long, unsourced, opinionated OR (and long since tagged as such) about how the 1980's version did in the ratings against the various competing programs on CBS, and the usual "episode status" comments like "the show is believed to have been wiped" (believed by whom?). I'm not sure you need any background knowledge of the show to do those kinds of edits. JTRH (talk) 20:33, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Environment article deletions

Before putting up any environmental articles up for deletion can you discuss it at Wikipedia:WikiProject Environment. Thanks. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 06:59, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Wheel of Fortune gameplay

It got split off from the main article at some point, because the parent was becoming large enough to be unwieldy. Most of it, I think, can be sourced from the parent article, though whoever did the splitting didn't move the cites along with it. I'd leave it for now, or tag it for improvement. Maybe someone will prune the parent down to the point that the gameplay information can be folded back into it. JTRH (talk) 19:38, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up

I was actually leaving a note for Tikiwont thanking him for the close and asking if he was authorized to collect my NPP card when you left me that message. It's been quite some time since I've reviewed the csd page I guess. --Onorem♠Dil 18:38, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Dick Levy and sources

Hello, I want to explain something about how I frequently participate in AfD debates. Often, I have time to edit when I am away from a personal computer. Now, for example, I am in a motel in Mount Shasta, about 200 miles away from my home in the Napa Valley. I am editing on a Droid X smart phone. It is versatile but limited. I can do Google searches and read sources but I can't cut and paste URLs and format them as references with this device. I feel that I have the right to partipate in AfD debates when I have spare time and am away from my PC. If you take a look at my editing history, you will see that I create lots of new content, and work hard to add sources and expand and improve various articles up at AfD. I hope this helps you understand my good faith editing style a bit better. I will add a few sources to Dick Levy when I get home. Wishing you well. Cullen328 (talk)

Checking in to let you know that adding references to Dick Levy is still on my "to do" list. I am back from Mount Shasta but must now go to Los Angeles on business. Cullen328 (talk) 23:42, 25 January 2011 (UTC)

As I promised, I've added four sources to Dick Levy and have expanded the article somewhat. Cullen328 (talk) 23:38, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Thank you

Thanks for working to fix up the MFD I was adding. I noticed only after the fact that the first two AfDs had the page name slightly different, so I guess they would not have pulled up properly. Risker (talk) 20:10, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

Deletion review: The 50 Most Loathsome Americans

In regards to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The 50 Most Loathsome Americans, while I was sleeping, within 3.5 hrs of the article being listed for deletion it was gone, which gave me NO time to reply.

So, as per WP:DRV, this is Step 1 of Instructions:

"discuss the matter with the deleting administrator and try to resolve it with him or her first."

The request for deletion and the five votes cited:

• not notable

Always an easy charge to make but work to defend against, I will cite the following as beginnings of references based on a simple Google search:

[3] [4] [5]

This is perhaps the most significant issue, but also one that should not have resulted in a speedy deletion.

• "attacking"/G10

The page is not an attack because it merely restates the fact that the named individuals were listed in the "Loathsome" articles produced by The Beast. That an individual appeared in six different annual lists is a simple FACT. That The Beast used the word "Loathsome" in the title of the page is a simple fact. That a fact may be unflattering should not be criteria for removal.

• "implicitly violates BLP"

A late edit (which I cannot quote directly because it was deleted!) mentioned that The Beast listed their reasons for inclusion of each individual. That an individual was listed by The Beast is again a simple fact and not slanderous.

-- Limulus (talk) 20:52, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

My nomination

Thanks for your help in fixing the problem with my nomination. Guess I'd better check next time. Second time this has happened. Student7 (talk) 01:27, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Wikiproject Award

Thanks for the notice; you're right that I missed the G2 tag. Please don't place irrelevant tags, such as A10 on non-mainspace pages, since it can easily lead to confusion by admins. Nyttend (talk) 02:31, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Sorry

sorry [6] .. I just pushed the button. Please don;t blank the page. Zulu Papa 5 * (talk) 03:03, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Friends of the Five Creeks

Hello TPH. I don't really know you well, but during my years at Wikipedia, I've run into you a lot, and know you are a very seasoned wikipedian around here. I nominated a local organization for deletion not too long after it's creation, not our of some personal vandetta, but because it is really not notable. It only gets 18 google hits and 71 news hits (75% of both the ghits and news hits come a local periodical in Berkely) and the article says that the organization's main contibution has been saving part of creek alongside a mall parking lot. The article is well formatted, and I have nothing against the authors, but I am baffled as to how this has gotten so far out of control. I would just like you to take a look at it and let me know if organizations of this size acutally are notable and if perhaps I'm mistaken.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 13:49, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Billboard Update

Where do you get this? I've always been curious to find out. EnDaLeCoMpLeX (contributions) • (let's chat) 23:36, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at EnDaLeCoMpLeX's talk page.
Message added 01:17, 2 February 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DYK for Crestwood Court

Materialscientist (talk) 06:03, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of 20th Century Masters – The Millennium Collection: The Best of Maureen McGovern for deletion

Hi, TPH. I had discovered that you put the article that I provided "20th Century Masters - The Millennium Collection: The Best of Maureen McGovern" in the category of deletion nomination. I had tried to find other sources besides Allmusic, but all I could find were articles on this particular CD from the websites of Amazon, CDUniverse, Musicstack, and other websites of retailers. I honestly own a copy of this particular album, so the primary source of the article was the album itself. I'm not sure if this helps but I wanted to bring that to your attention nevertheless. I've tried to find reviews by other sources for AllMusic, but I haven't found any as of yet. It will be greatly appreciated if you could give me some time to find any reviews and sources. Feel free to write back soon. - Jpete Jpete (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 06:25, 5 February 2011 (UTC).

extravagance AfD

Anything to add to the recent explosion of ill-will? I'm giving serious thought to accusing two editors there of disruptive editing -- Colonel Warden being the lesser offender of the two, little as I like to admit it. Yakushima (talk) 11:35, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Help Needed

Hi TenPoundHammer, since I've seen you in the WikiProject Country Music, I was wondering if I've could get some help from you. I've been lately working in the article of Willie Nelson, that I want to improve and nominate to good article. It does need some cleanup and sourcing, and beacuse of its size and importance to the project it would be better if there's some more people involved. I will also contact other members of the project. Thanks for your time and hope to hear from you. --Gduwen (talk) 17:53, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Yea, Currently I'm working on that, but I was thinking that it would be good if a bunch of users related to the project work together, we could divide the sections to work on, and would be easier. --Gduwen (talk) 18:46, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

Ok, thanks for answering so quick, take all the time you need anyway.--Gduwen (talk) 16:19, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jasmine Murray (2nd nomination) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephanie Edwards (singer) (3rd nomination)

Are you sure you really mean "textbook WP:BLP1E"? The policy states it applies to "low-profile" individuals. Appearing on American Idol can hardly be described as low-profile. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 02:04, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Oh, I do agree with you that low-seeded Idol contestants tend to get redirected to their season articles if they've not done anything else (and they have not been discussed in detail in sources). That's not a BLP1E, however, which is for low-profile individuals. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 02:15, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

User:Beta cafe/Enter your new article name here

In regard to this page, please note that redirects from the mainspace to userspace are subject to speedy deletion, but not necessarily the other way around. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:38, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Semi-pro football discussions need feedback

Hello! You have participated in WP:AFD disucssions involving semi-pro football teams in the past. The following two AFD discussions could use additional weigh-in as they appear to be stuck in "relisting" mode:

• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seaboard Football League
• Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northeastern Football Alliance

I am placing this notice on talk pages of users who have shown interest in the past, regardless of how they !voted in the discussion. If you do participate, please mention that you were asked to participate in the discussion.--Paul McDonald (talk) 22:05, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Inspection 12

This prod you laced last September has been contested. Courcelles 19:29, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Otters?

Off topic comment: I was hoping to see some pictures of your otters somewhere in your user space. 'Specially if they're helping you and all.... ~Amatulić (talk) 02:37, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Shalom Show

Greetings Ten Pound Hammer, RE: The Shalom Show on TV. May I ask you to assisit me with this article that I submitted? I saw that you made a change and I apologize that I'm not adept. TtonyB was kindly helping correct things, but I don't know how to reach anyone and would like the article to have it's problems resolved. There are references available and it is also quite easy to verify and confirm that the asrtile is true and accurate. This television show has been broadcast since 1979 and is still on the air. I do not know how to provide References. I apologize also that I probably am not communicating with you the correct way. I wish this was as user-friendly as email. About References: I know many of the credible and famous people who have appeared on the show could serve as references, if they are acceptable pursuant to Wikipedia guidelines. Some names appear in the article and their names are hyperlinked to their organizations; These include recent guests on The Shalom Show include Senior Pastor Bob Coy of the Calvary Chapel, Dr. Abraham S. Fischler, Congressman Allen West, and Stan Chesley. Ttonyb1 wrote: If I have a good secondary reference, I should send it to you and he will add it to the article; Could Dr. Abraham Fischler, the President Emeritus of Nova Southeastern University serve as a secondary reference source? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abraham_S._Fischler He would be glad to. How do I submit him to Wikipedia as a secondary reference source? Could YouTube serve as a reference? http://www.youtube.com/user/SHALOMshowTV Right now there is quite a lot of interest and media coverage of Congressman Allen West appearing on the Shalom Show: http://www.therightscoop.com/allen-west-speaks-truth-on-islam-israel in the United Kingdom http://focusuk.wordpress.com/2011/01/26/alan-west-on-the-shalom-show http://www.jltv.tv/profile.php?user=ShalomShow2010 I know there were other articles published about this show. Checking in Google just now I found: http://www.bnaibrith.org/opeds/Kohn11192010.cfm Bnai Brith is a big international organization: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B%27nai_B%27rith http://www.thehotjoints.com/2011/01/24/video-rep-allen-west-talks-islam-and-israel-on-shalom-show/ http://vodpod.com/watch/5416396-rep-allen-west-talks-islam-and-israel-on-shalom-show I see there are now 5 External Links: Official website JLTV official site Davis, James D. (1986-08-08). "'Shalom Show' Appeal Growing Beyond South Florida Viewers". Sun-Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, Fla.). http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/1986-08-08/features/8602160585_1_holy-land-western-wall-stations Retrieved 31 January 2011 Davis, James D. (1990-02-17). "'Shalom Show' Trip Productive, Stressful" . Sun-Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, Fla.). http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/1990-02-17/features/9001250068_1_shalom-show-jewish-national-fund-israeli Retrieved 31 January 2011 Davis, James D. (1996-09-13). "Host Sees 'Shalom Show' As Opportunity For Understanding". Sun-Sentinel (Fort Lauderdale, Fla.). Could you please assist me? I would ask that my article please not be deleted. May I ask you to remove that risk, simply because the article is correct and factual and may just need more References. Many thanks! Josephn18 (talk) 04:49, 14 February 2011 (UTC)

Jake Mathews

Could you please help me set Starkravings (talk · contribs) straight? Eric444 (talk) 17:37, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Emu

Hey TPH, are you gonna start the FAR of Emu soon? Its been over a month. GamerPro64 (talk) 22:12, 15 February 2011 (UTC)

Thousand Dollar Bee

Oh my goodness, now I know there's an even deep chasm of game show awfulness than the The Reel to Reel Picture Show, which I thought would never be the ultimate low for the genre. The theme will pierce my brain for years! Nate • (chatter) 02:12, 16 February 2011 (UTC)

Winter/Reflections and 20th Century Masters: The Millennium Collection: The Best of Boyz II Men

Hi. You PRODded these, and they were deleted. Undeletion has been requested at WP:REFUND, so per WP:DEL#Proposed deletion I have restored them, and now notify you in case you wish to consider taking them to AfD. regards, JohnCD (talk) 14:19, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Erna Lazarus

The article Erna Lazarus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article has had no sources inserted since it was tagged in 2007. That's long enough. It should be rescued or deleted. If rescued, the filmography should be turned into a "Selected filmography" and cut down to six notable films, per guidelines

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. David in DC (talk) 17:03, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Erna Lazarus

I've nominated this article for deletion, after the PROD notice was lifted. The article has been tagged for no having no sources on the article's page since 2007. WP:DEADLINE does not extend into infinity. The only source the editor who deleted the prior prod notice could find was evidently not sufficient to establish notability. assuming good faith, if it we're, the editor would have put it into the article, instead of onto the talk page. I agree. It's not enough to pass WP:GNG, let alone WP:BIO. I can find no better. If (A) the tag has been there since 2007 and (B) the editor who opposes Prod can find no source that establishes notability, and (C) I can find none either, WP:DUCK. David in DC (talk) 18:43, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Wizard of Odds

In 2009 "Wizard of odds" (no capitalization of "odds") redirected to Michael Shackleford, whose nickname is the "wizard of odds". Wizard of Odds (capital "Odds") redirects to The Wizard of Odds (game show). Wizard of odds is now the disambig page but not labeled as such. I suppose I should have finished all this back then but must have forgotten. Sottolacqua (talk) 18:03, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Template:WikiProject Coheed and Cambria

I've declined your speedy deletion nomination of Template:WikiProject Coheed and Cambria because it is still widely transcluded. Please orphan it (or arrange for it to be orphaned) first, but feel free to renominate when this has been done. Thryduulf (talk) 21:58, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Template:Sichuan Radio

Regarding this. How is that CSD tag not ridiculous? It is a page that is a complete parent page and subject page. -Porchcrop ^{(talk|contributions)} 08:56, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Deluxefan.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Deluxefan.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fixer23 (talk) 08:45, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Edit war

Hello. You appear to be involved in an edit war on Spliced (TV series). While the three-revert rule is hard and fast, please be aware that you can be blocked for edit warring without making 3 reverts to an article in 24 hours. You are not entitled to 3 reverts and are expected to cooperatively engage other editors on talk pages rather than reverting their edits. Note that posting your thoughts on the talk page alone is not a license to continue reverting. You must reach consensus. Continued edit warring may cause you to be blocked. Toddst1 (talk) 19:07, 27 February 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Boise Towne Square Mall/GA1

Hi there! I have commenced this GA review, but having commenced it I have identified significant confusion about the scope and topic of the article that needs to be addressed prior to the review proceeding. Could you please stop by the review page and see if you can unravel it so that the review can proceed? Thanks! - DustFormsWords (talk) 01:59, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Cutlery Project

Hello,

I feel your template is misplaced. By the Criteria on miscellany for deletion it states if it's a Project to either make it a task force or tag it with an inactive template. It still falls short on that criteria as we have had activity on the project's talk page recently and just yesterday I cleaned up the "to-do" list in the main page[7] and we've had activity in their fairly recently before that in 01/11 and 02/11. It may not be the most active project on Wiki, but it does help keep the related articles in a semblance of order. That said, I would not object to redesignating it as a task force under another project. Initially I considered it as part of the Military project's weapon task force, but those folks would only be interested in military knives, same as martial arts, tools, art, outdoors, cooking, or guns. This is a field that can span many different projects yet still remains somewhat specialized. Thanks for reading my thoughts on this.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 21:26, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks.--Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 19:24, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

Please don't

Please don't mess around with my, or my bot's, user space.
— V = IR (Talk • Contribs) 22:14, 5 March 2011 (UTC)

Getting rid of information

I understand the deletion of the Space Pirates (from the Metroid series) articles, as well as the list of digimon by rank, but whether you like it or not, the minor characters of Spliced are a part of the show. Honestly, i am really getting really sick of all of the information that has been lost, including the variations of Necrons 60.231.118.190 (talk) 03:57, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Double warning

Re this edit, I warned this user for the same attack about 20 minutes before. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 22:16, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

ANI

Nice otters, Hammer. Hey, see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Unusual_pagemove. See, but refrain from typing--there's nothing that can be done, I think--WP:DNFTT. Drmies (talk) 15:45, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Filibustering

Thanks. I appreciate and shall heed your advice. --Wkboonec (talk) 16:14, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of season one episode articles of House for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the articles Paternity (House), Occam's Razor (House), Maternity (House), Damned If You Do, The Socratic Method (House), Fidelity (House), Poison (House), DNR (House), Histories (House), Detox (House), Sports Medicine (House), Cursed (House), Control (House), Mob Rules (House), Heavy (House), Role Model (House), Babies & Bathwater, Kids (House), Love Hurts (House) and Honeymoon (House) are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paternity (House) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. _Xeworlebi ^(talk) 14:46, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

You were invited to the deletion discussion due to your earlier involvement in a similar matter but have not offered your opinion yet. While not required it would be greatly appreciated. The AfD is located at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paternity (House). Thanks. _Xeworlebi ^(talk) 18:40, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Policy Question

Hi TPH, I was just reviewing the history of the Dollyrots page and I noticed that on September 17, 2010 (14:55) you reverted a backlink to a CSI episode. Your summary comment was Removing backlinks to Stuck On You (CSI: NY) because ""; using TW. My question is, why did you delete the link? I assume there's a policy, but I'm not aware of it. Thanks, Rob. Robman94 (talk) 19:43, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Because I'd been using unlink to remove backlinks to CSI episodes I redirected. I think most of them have been restored. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 20:24, 7 March 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. Robman94 (talk) 20:26, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Uncharted (chart)

Yes, yes it is. I feel it to be a huge waste of space and time on Billboard as well as on Wikipedia. EnDaLeCoMpLeX (contributions) • (let's chat) 22:38, 12 March 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Conceptual Jungle

Hi, TenPound, would you mind if you discuss at WP:DRV? There is a deletion review of Wikipedia:WikiProject Conceptual Jungle listed at WP:DRV that you vote delete at WP:MFD. Please join the discussion here. Thank for your time, regards, JJ98 (Talk) 22:26, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Wheel

I just fact-tagged it yesterday. Can you please wait more than 24 hours before you decide it's unsourceable and delete it? JTRH (talk) 02:18, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

AFD

Hey I'm planning on putting the AFD for AFD back up... moar lulzy... if that's ok with you. (i.e. take the MFD down instead?) — Coffee // have a cup // essay // 02:16, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

I just wanna tell you how I'm feeling

Gotta make you understand.... :) Dawnseeker2000 02:19, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

Move Servers to Canada

Would you so kindly comment there? =) CycloneGU (talk) 02:43, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:April fools/April Fools' Day 2011

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:April fools/April Fools' Day 2011, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:April fools/April Fools' Day 2011 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:April fools/April Fools' Day 2011 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. OSborn ^arf_contribs. 02:56, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

CSD#A9

Thanks! That's a new one on me... Catfish Jim & the soapdish 13:40, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

April Fool's

I was thinking of creating a fake policy page called "Requests for Jimboship" and making you the candidate. Do you think I'd get away with pulling that one for the day? I know you are a regular participant in April Fool's jokes. CycloneGU (talk) 15:37, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Okie, I see you're active, can I guess this is not of interest then? CycloneGU (talk) 23:21, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Happy April Fools! I hope you didn't take my prank in bad light. And it's Pink! --TitanOne (talk) 15:30, 1 April 2011 (UTC)

I had no idea to go about doing this but I had in mind something more than I did. I wanted to nominate your user page for deletion on the grounds that "This user deliberately causes harm to wild animals by having them sit in front of a man-made contraption that emits harmful radiation. In addition, there is no concrete proof that these animals behave this way in the wild, therefore disrupting their normal daily life cycle." Draconiator (talk) 04:41, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Trouted

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

See Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Special:Log Lanthanum-138 (talk). 15:08, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Rickrolling

Haha, yeah! That's funny EnDaLeCoMpLeX (contributions) • (let's chat) 23:11, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

User:Authenticpinoy

There's no more reason to delete this as a test than there is to delete my sandbox as a test. Kindly lay off on the personal attacks. Nyttend (talk) 23:39, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

3RR report

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

A 3RR report has been filed at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring--JOJ ^Hutton 01:52, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Achmednut321

I noticed your comments to Achmednut, and would like for you to know that I have already reported them to ANI for their edit on the Mad episode list. Sarujo (talk) 02:05, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at N419BH's talk page.
Message added 05:23, 3 April 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your comments on "Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Albie_(cartoon)"

Hi TenPoundHammer :) I read your statement on the above AFD (now closed as Keep) and just wanted to note that I agree with you about one of the sources (toonhound) not being reliable, but the BCDB (Big Cartoon Database) most certainly does come under WP:RS as far as I'm aware, yes it's user generated content, but it had editorial overview prior to publication. It might be wise to pass this for inspection to get it checked, but I don't think WP would have a problem with it in general. Fish^Barking? 11:42, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Wikiprojects

Some days ago, you took part in Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Conan O'Brien and suggested that we should have an essay named Wikipedia:Not everything needs a WikiProject. I wrote some initial ideas, but feel free to expand it with your own perspectives on the topic. MBelgrano (talk) 19:08, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

???

I did not vandalize his name was revealed in "Muscle Woman" you owe me a apology. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mordecai3333 (talk • contribs) 01:20, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

MfD

I have reverted this pointy edit of your comment at MfD. By the way, if you agree with my addition of another article to the MfD, would you leave a comment there affirming it? Thanks, Cunard (talk) 23:04, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

for making me laugh. Cheers, Jenks24 (talk) 17:14, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Reaper Eternal's talk page.
Message added 21:36, 11 April 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Possible AfD

Hi, TPH. I wonder if you'd like to take a look at this: [[8]]. This is the biggest collection of unsourced, crufty (and badly written) minutiae I think I've ever seen, and that's saying something. There was an AfD resulting in Keep a year and a half ago, but the show has left the air since then and the amount of detail in here is even less relevant than before. I've never started an AfD, I'm not familiar with the process, and you know how it works. Thanks. JTRH (talk) 23:08, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Country Top 40 Singles Articles

I was wondering what the policy is on creating articles for country music top 40 singles that didn't break the top 20. There are a couple of Clay Walker singles I was thinking of creating articles for but before I did I just wanted to make sure I could. Thanks. Gilliganfanatic 18:25, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Ok, sounds good, thanks! Gilliganfanatic 18:30, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Invitation to take part in a pilot study

I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Wikipedia contributors." I would like to invite you to a short survey. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates only 5 minutes. cooldenny (talk) 18:50, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

RE: Honey Bee (Blake Shelton song)

I have just responded to your message on my talk page. Oddbodz (talk) 10:08, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Oddbodz's talk page.
Message added 16:31, 15 April 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Adding TBD to the list of a band's discography on their page

Hi. I've recently been in a debate about adding TBD to the list of a band's discography on their page. The person who removed it cited your law as grounds for removing it. I was wondering, do you think it is ok to add this, as long as I don't create an actual page for the album until it has a name? Woknam66 (talk) 04:43, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Mfd relisting

I'm wondering how I can relist Mfds, for example this? Also whether I should relist if I am the nominator (or indeed a participant)? Thanks for any guidance you can give me. Regards. --Kleinzach 06:14, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for doing this. --Kleinzach 01:57, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

This one could do also do with relisting: Wikipedia:WikiProject Piers. Thanks. --Kleinzach 10:28, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

RE: Proposed deletion of Sam Marin

Why did you propose Sam Marin for deletion on the basis that it "had no references"? I already added a reference to that article!--King-9 (talk) 00:48, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Help with someone who just isn't getting it...

I need you and everyone else who sees this message to weigh in on this guy so we can explain to him why "Is" is supposed to capitalized in titles because he's just not getting it. He's a stubborn one. -- GunMetal Angel 16:55, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Bonfire (Third Eye Blind song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bonfire (Third Eye Blind song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bonfire (Third Eye Blind song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

Sorry if it turns out you really couldn't care less about this, but I noticed in the history you seemed to have doubts about the song's notability way back in 2009, and so I thought I would leave you a notice in case you might want to weigh in. Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 19:12, 19 April 2011 (UTC)

Lonestar albums

Will do. Eric444 (talk) 21:21, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Hey

Just as a note, be careful when placing prods on articles. I just discovered that you prodded Short Stories twice; the more recent one here you know about, but also this from September 10. The PROD template may only be used once per article and you prodded this one twice.

Just an FYI, no harm done. CycloneGU (talk) 15:38, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ps shake.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ps shake.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:04, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

1/0

I was busy and didn't go into detail. DS (talk) 13:56, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Honey Bee (Blake Shelton song)

The DYK project (nominate) 18:04, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Florida Splendid China

Why did you delete the links to the images when there was a request for images in the article talk page? It provided a perfect opportunity for someone to pick one out.Jchurchward (talk) 22:41, 25 April 2011 (UTC) Those are my images, where can I give permission for their use?Jchurchward (talk) 23:46, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

April 2011

Please do not attack other editors, as you did on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1/0 (web comic). If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

This warning concerns your personal attacks at [9] ("I thought you were smart" and "Try again, n00b"). Such attacks do not do anything to advance your argument (which I think is correct on the merits); rather, they diminish it, as well as your stature as a long-standing editor who ought to know better than to behave this way. Regards,  Sandstein  19:43, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Sottolacqua's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Official source for TPIR episode count

[10] Close enough? JTRH (talk) 02:57, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

"The show's 7000th episode was taped in late 2009."? JTRH (talk) 11:56, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1/0 (web comic) (2nd nomination)

Recommending to withdraw this AfD and take it to Deletion review instead since it was closed within 12 hours of your nomination. CycloneGU (talk) 19:23, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for attending to that. CycloneGU (talk) 19:29, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject templates

There's no good reason to get rid of a template that's present in lots of page histories, especially when you tag it under an inapplicable criterion. Don't be such a speedy deletion wonk. Nyttend (talk) 22:02, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Hey

This is a newly created AfD for an article that clearly violates WP:HAMMER as well as being WP:CRYSTAL. Is there a speedy delete option for such pieces? According to the A9 rules, it doesn't qualify. CycloneGU (talk) 01:47, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Panic stations

I've changed your redirect of the shorts to go straight to the target page, not to a redirect to the target page. I think. (And dealt with the other thing, which was how I found this...) :) Peridon (talk) 19:58, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Regular Show / J.G. Quintel

It's going to be Monday at the earliest before I will have any time to investigate this page so I suggest you ask at WP:RFPP. Thryduulf (talk) 00:56, 1 May 2011 (UTC)

His Way, Our Way (Sinatra Tribute)

I actually now don't think His Way, Our Way (Sinatra Tribute) is really that notable now. I mean, there are probably lots of albums released like this on iTunes. I don't think this one would really be notable to keep as an article unless some sign of notability appeared that would make this thing stand out among other things that are released on iTunes like this. Please respond on MY talk page. --How may I serve you? Marshall Williams2 Talk Autographs Contribs 01:34, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

What do you mean? --How may I serve you? Marshall Williams2 Talk Autographs Contribs 01:39, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

But remember, before you add a Prod you have to first double-check that there is not already a previous one in the page history. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 03:13, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Notability

Hi TPH

I see you made some edits to an article at some point. Do you think the topic is notable? The article survived an AfD discussion in 2006, but I am not convinced of the reasoning. What do you think?

^Bongo_matic 17:52, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

A bit borderline; there's mostly just the Allmusic bio and a review or two. There's also this pretty substantial article, so I say it meets the WP:GNG criterion of multiple, non-trivial third party sources. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 18:07, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for looking. ^Bongo_matic 01:07, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Brynaalbum.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Brynaalbum.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:38, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Laura Bryna

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Laura Bryna. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Bryna - recently deleted at AFD. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Bryna - recently deleted at AFD - you might like to discuss new information at [[Talk:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Bryna - recently deleted at AFD|the article's talk page]].

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Off2riorob (talk) 20:14, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Laura Bryna

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Laura Bryna, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion notice, which will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 20:17, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Laura Bryna for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Laura Bryna is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Bryna until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Off2riorob (talk) 20:17, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

I'm going to be blunt about some of the advice I will give you, about the recent chain of events, so I apologize in advance if I said anything out of line.

The recent post you made on the administrators' noticeboard attacked the nominator, which in all due respect, isn't a very attractive way to try and get an admin's attention to the deletion discussion. Please be careful when doing this. And also, if the article was listed at deletion review instead of being created so quickly after it had been deleted, perhaps it might have saved the trouble of all this mess and confusion. This would have been a much better way to go about it. Lastly, as AfD policy says, please don't remove CSD tags from articles you have created yourself.

Regards, :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 05:18, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Talk:I Have a Dream

Hello, thank you for your message. I gave there some exerpts' sources.

Regards, Kertraon (talk) 09:09, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

This is not how civilty in editsummaries works my friend

This edit summary popped up in my watchlist [11]. Just wanted to let you know that that is not how civilty in edit summaries works.·Maunus·ƛ· 19:56, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

If I recall correctly, there are many previous warnings. This and this are two of the most recent ones. TPH, what is the next step here? Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 20:35, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

And looking in your contribution history for the last couple of weeks I found these[12][13][14]. This has got to stop. The next time I see something like this from you I will not hesitate to block you long enough to give you time to read our policies about civilty. Thoroughly.·Maunus·ƛ· 20:58, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Question about deletions

Greetings, You seem to be one of the main folks in the stuff for deletion category of edits so I thought you would probably have the answer to a question I have had for a while but never bothered to ask.

I have noticed that there are piles of subpages under the User namesspace for users who are banned. What is the policy on deleting these types of pages? My opinion is if the user is banned and has been for sometime then they do not need the following types of subpages. I have included some examples:

1. Scripts such as User:Perseus, Son of Zeus/huggle.css
2. User sandboxes especially those that are empty such as User:Perseus8235/Sandbox2
3. Personalization pages such as User:Perseus, Son of Zeus/Editnotice. Especially when said pages do not appear to render anything on the users page.
4. test pages and pages the user apparently created to build articles such as User:Perseus8235/Taipei Metro EMU C321 --Kumioko (talk) 17:15, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, is there someplace that mentions pages like those or is that just from experience? Also, would that be a Speedy deletion due to beingn a banned user or should I just submit that to the regular Misc for deletion? Those are just examples, there are a lot more. One thing to note though. User:Perseus, Son of Zeus/huggle.css is a personal settings page so it will not allow me to submit that one. I already tried. Thanks again for the help. --Kumioko (talk) 17:24, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

Ok thanks, Ill start hacking away at them. --Kumioko (talk) 23:05, 7 May 2011 (UTC)

"Just a Kiss"

Hello TenPoundHammer! You might not know me, but I have seen your work on country music related articles. You're really great. I was wondering if you could help me expand "Just a Kiss" article. I'm currently developing it on my sandbox. You can find the links needed on the sandbox's talk page. I'm not good in English, so I must have made mistakes. Feel free to expand the article using those links. Thank you. Novice7 (talk) 17:51, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for helping me out. Novice7 (talk) 04:02, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

May 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you are reminded not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. —Ruud 14:04, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

Song stub

TPH, I found out about the song stub thing from another editor and you're right. I thought all articles were stubs, but they're not. I will be careful. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. David829 (talk) 18:25, 15 May 2011 (UTC)

inre Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Numb to life

While agreeing with you that the article is WP:TOOSOON, I hope you might support a redirect (for now) to Jason Cook (actor)#Career. While the film itself does not yet show notability, the filmmaker (whose article I am improving), himself does. What say? Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 19:37, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Jacob Lyda

It is all on one line, for me at least. EnDaLeCoMpLeX (contributions) • (let's chat) 15:11, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

Please Explain...

...this edit. I have since reverted to the revision on January 28 of this year which contained production information for the album, as well. There is no reason to remove it from an article about the album that the production information refers to. Also, the TPIR appearance was in promotion of the album and thus it belongs there. Someone actually added it to the Lonestar article the day it aired, and I've now added the reference that was added there (which I didn't realize existed). You seem to be a bit Delete-happy; take time to look for something before just deleting it, and add a reference if you can find one. Don't just randomly delete information without doing any research on your own; after researching, then a case could be made for deleting. CycloneGU (talk) 19:16, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

I was trying to remove the erroneous personnel information added by an IP vandal, and the Canadian Country Albums chart info since that chart is on WP:BADCHARTS. If you'd checked the information in the personnel section vs. the band's article, you'd see that the personnel info was bogus — Keith Horne was never in Lonestar, and I don't even know who Michael Hill is. I didn't realize I'd accidentally removed the info about TPIR as well. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 19:20, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

I've copied your post to here - I like keeping all conversation in the same location per the notice on my talk page.

I'll take a look at the production info in AllMusic and do a quick comparison. CycloneGU (talk) 19:21, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Totally wrong. The only name that matches is Biff Watson. Also, as someone who writes for a country music website, I know that Chuck Cannon is almost never a backing vocalist. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 19:24, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

I actually found my way there on my own. I'm going to revert the edit back again, but I'm going to remove names as I find them erroneous. Anything I don't find at AllMusic will be dutifully removed. Give me a few minutes before quick-reverting, I went to make an edit and was greeted with "References". CycloneGU (talk) 19:27, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Why did you revert it again if you know it's wrong? It took me 30 seconds to restore the listing to a correct one. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 19:31, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

ETA: Turns out the IP vandal was copy-pasting the credits from the Lonely Grill album, which I added back in July 2008, and adding a couple of his own fabrications on top of that. I have that particular album, and have just double-checked it against the liner notes — everything checks out on Lonely Grill. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 19:34, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

(edit conflict)

Because I was going to have it trimmed down within five minutes, I was doing my own scan through the site. I work that way. =P

As it is now it matches up, the rest of the names are either composers (covered in the track listing) or things like "art", "design", "research" (research?), "photography"...all covered better in other areas if at all. I don't know if I'd call a background vocalist a "musician", however. At the same time, a separate category for one person would be silly. Either way, it matches up now and I'm happy with it. CycloneGU (talk) 19:40, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

(edit conflict) The "composer" credits are just the songwriters on the album. I have no idea why Allmusic does that. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 19:41, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, I know that. I merely ignore those entries. I think AllMusic likes to include them because they don't work on a one page format; they have five different pages for everything. Can you imagine Wikipedia operating in that fashion? So much hair would be littered in cyberspace from being pulled out that it wouldn't be funny. CycloneGU (talk) 19:49, 23 May 2011 (UTC)

RE:

Just this is Wikipedia; if people are curious, they would go here to look. If it is redirected, then how will people find facts about him? Atum World There's an Acadia for that too!

Oh, and BTW, you really own otters? Atum World There's an Acadia for that too!

They Don't Understand

I never knew there was another Jeff Wood. Thanks for letting me know. David829 (talk) 13:25, 26 May 2011 (UTC}

about the article you want to delete, I copy paste my answers

If you knew how to read, you would have red in the main article AND in the talk page, that 1: fastest-selling object means record sales of this object in one week and 2: that everybody in the web among authors and the audience uses this expression "fastest-selling album" for the highest sales in one week. The two others article about UK and USA in wikipedia use it too, why don't you go delete them too ? The truth is that you give pretexts to delete my article cause you disagree with some content, especially the truth it brings. I think you can't bear the fact you just discovered an other music than european or american music existed. You should better thank me to now having a little more culture than ask for deletion. Don't give me false pretexts ok ? Don't be hypocrit.

And moreover all the "best-selling albums" pages are original researchs ! Why don't you go delete them ? Hey ? Simple question. I think they don't bother cause they are close to your vision of music : european and american. But, accidently, there's a strong japanese music too. We can't bear this idea. So go deleting the new article. Look at yourself in the mirror and don't bring wikipedia policy in this debate : you only want to delete the article cause it brought you a new perspective about world music and you can't bear it.

Last thing : yes I don't know all the things about the wiki technology, but I'm learning, and then though I'm not a good wikiman like you, I worked hard to make this article as best as I could and keep make it better every day since its creation. The community must participate, not bring the articles to deletion. It's a coward thing, or it's nothing. Since the beginning I'm the only one who made things, except the guy who told me there were dead links. but he asked the article to deletion because of that ??? Come on, every article on wikipedia should be deleted if dead links were a lethal thing. And moreover, I fixed them. And added official sources. This last point show how hypocrit oyu are. The source hsow the sales in one week, so we can make a ranking of fastest-selling albums. It's the right expression. Do you have any culture ? Are you something more than wiki super-geeks ? One last thing, I'm going to bed now.Sancho21 (talk) 21:49, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Red links

Hello! What is so bad about red links? Fleezer (talk) 21:33, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

You may be interested in this AFD

List of Bratz products is up for its second deletion nomination here. You took part in the first one so I thought you might be interested. Ryan Vesey (talk) 03:16, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Jeopardy! international tournaments for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeopardy! international tournaments is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeopardy! international tournaments until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ѕōŧŧōľäċqǔä (talk) 15:32, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Harry Potter parodies

I'm aiming to give this list a cleanup. You want to join me? Serendi^podous 21:01, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

An opinion?

Some more eyes, minds, and keyoard-rattlings could be helpful here and here, if you're so inclined. —Scheinwerfermann ^T·_C23:55, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Eric Church template

I was thinking of creating a template for Eric Church, but I saw one was created and nominated for deletion by youback in 2009. He has 6 songs with articles now, plus two albums and one coming soon. Do you think he should have one now, or is it still not really worth it, thanks. Gilliganfanatic (talk) 22:21, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks! Gilliganfanatic (talk) 22:34, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the barnstar! I had a lot of fun adding all the reviews and quotes for Clay Walker. Gilliganfanatic (talk) 15:31, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Shea Fisher

Because they weren't sourced. Is their even an archive for such chart? EnDaLeCoMpLeX (contributions) • (let's chat) 13:44, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

EXACTLY! There's absolutely no reason to take the time to create a chart, and then not even archive it for verifiability. EnDaLeCoMpLeX (contributions) • (let's chat) 13:57, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Dave Haywood

Thanks a lot for doing the page on Dave Haywood. I couldn't figure out how to start the article in terms of the text format Wikipedia uses. And what's up with the otters and the bat? --DorkyA.N. (talk) 15:35, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Manually archived

Hi TenPound, I've manually archive two threads myself to the 14th archive since the bot doesn't archive with no dates. Btw, I admitted that I've withdrawn the deletion of WikiProject Cartoon Network myself, and reopened again, and you attempted to vote delete, and it was kept as historical. I am not a bot myself, so just doing my job here. JJ98 (Talk) 07:23, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Category:Songs written by Lady Antebellum

Sorry. Cant help at the moment. Foreign keyboards qnd holidays. --Richhoncho (talk) 16:03, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Dinah

I don't know what you mean by a source "consisting only of a track listing." The release date is given on the cited source, which is why it was cited.

In any case, I can't imagine what you'd consider a reliable source for an album, especially since the company issuing it is defunct, so their own site is unavailable. Frankly, if I had control of Wikipedia, I'd scrap this whole "reliable source" nonsense and go back to the way it was a few years ago. In fact that's why I've almost given up editing on Wikipedia. There are very few sources for information that qualify as "reliable sources" according to the strict definition. -- BRG (talk) 00:06, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

You have said, "And 'a few years ago', even then, it was NEVER acceptable for an article to be sourced to a website with literally nothing but a track list.)" A few years ago, there was no such thing as a requirement that anything be sourced, let alone that the source fall within some reliability guidelines. I am also puzzled, anyway, by your comment that the source is "nothing but a track list." The source cited gives, e. g. a release date, which is why it was cited. In any case, you have not come anyway near answering my question as to what you would consider adequate sourcing. I cannot imagine very many albums that have sources for the information that would exceed what the source I dave has -- please give me some guidance here as to what YOU would consider an adequate source! -- BRG (talk) 17:57, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Dinah Shore is hardly a "no-hit wonder." So your comment is irrelevant. I still want to know — and you continue to resist telling me, after I've asked at least THREE times — what is your minimum requirement for "adequate sourcing"? For it is clear that Dinah Shore was a major artist of the recording industry, and to me this means that the "notability" question is satisfied because of that fact. A collection of the most important hits by a major artist is per se notable. -- BRG (talk) 13:12, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Bob Stewart (television producer)

Hi, TPH. Would you mind putting Bob Stewart (television producer) on your watchlist, if it isn't there already? I just cleaned up a big chunk of it, pruned a list of his shows, and moved the unreferenced unsold pilots to their own section with a fact-tag. I have a feeling someone might come around to undo it, I don't have time to babysit the article, and you're really good at quick reactions to things like that. JTRH (talk) 16:51, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

TPIR

Well, thank you for the apology. That certainly negates most of what's been said in the last couple of hours.

I shouldn't have called you an idiot, but Bobby, you seriously do have an awful reputation in the game show community, and you're the only one who can fix that. That said, I really would like to know how to get the episode count sourced, and I do understand that by Wikipedia's policies, the fact that no one but me has ever bothered to count them is a problem. Heaven knows you and I don't get along, but it seems to me that if there's anyone who can help with this, it's you. -TPIRFanSteve (talk) 19:24, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

Gumball

To each their own. Information from those websites is seldom more informative than what Wikipedia provides, especially TV.com, as their guide for Gumball is in shambles. I think it would be more informative to link to the official facebook page, but apparently that wasn't allowed, although linking to unofficial stuff like TV.com is. Doesn't make sense to me, but it's not that big of a deal. --HuntsmanTZ (talk) 17:19, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

The Lost Trailers

I am new to Wikipedia. Yes, I am the publicist for Stokes Nielson of the Lost Trailers, as I disclosed early on. Our only agenda, however, is to make the page accurate. Wikipedia refers to the band in past tense. The Lost Trailers existed before the group of players who had commercial success, and it continues to exist today as an ongoing music project (sort of like "Broken Social Scene") under the direction of Stokes Nielson, who owns the brand. We have used information from published reports and press releases and from Mr. Nielson's own archives as reference. laughingpenguin Laughingpenguin (talk) 07:01, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

Sunday nite, 6/12/2011 - TPH - I am so muddled by all of the changes and don't want to muck it up. Thank you for acknowledging my good faith. Can you change the edit back to my last edit? Do I have to do it? When I got your message, I was going to change it back but it opened up a revert page with yet more rules and regs. I really just want to get this right for Stokes Nielson. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laughingpenguin (talk • contribs) 03:17, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

Template:M2 to ft2 Template:Km2 to mi2

I started deleting the unused, redundant conversion templates, but I see that Template:M2 to ft2 Template:Km2 to mi2 is used in a number of articles. Don't we have to convert those (so to speak) before deleting the template? (edited to refer to correct template)--SPhilbrickT 10:56, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

GAR

Looking back at this, perhaps if the edit comment could have been a bit more explicit, it might have drawn more editors to the article. For future reference... LeadSongDog come howl! 04:33, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Pumped

I have cited you as an example at a village pump discussion. No offence is intended by this; it just seemed helpful to the discussion to have some real examples. It would have good to have your own view there too. Warden (talk) 09:19, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

'Til I Can Make It on My Own

TPH, if you can, could you please make a new article for the song '"Til I Can Make It on My Own". It seems the old article was deleted. There were two versions of the song. I believe the first was by Tammy Wynette and second was by Kenny Rogers and Dottie West. Thanks, David829 (talk) 16:55, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

Would you double-check the version reverted to - to be sure this is the one required. Skier Dude (talk) 02:15, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

'Til I Can Make It on My Own

Thanks for letting me know about know, I thought that's what might have happened. David829 (talk) 16:05, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

RE: Boat Drinks

I created "Boat Drinks (song)" because this article already exists. Reverted your redirect and then added some new sources. It should be good enough for the policy. If not, here: [15]. Geeky Randy (talk) 20:39, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

It was an answer to your question; not an argument, defense or point. You felt the need to redirect the article because it didn't have reliable sources; if you feel the article needs a hatnote, why not go through the same effort? Geeky Randy (talk) 20:54, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

The songfacts source was already there before redirect. I usually don't like including songfacts as a source, but it contained the exact text out of a book. Should I have simply just sourced the book itself and the page number? It certainly would've been difficult to verify. I actually have the book right in front of me and would be happy to change the songfacts source to the bibliographical citation. Which do you find more appropriate? Geeky Randy (talk) 21:00, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Outline of relationships

I've overhauled the outline.

I respectfully request that you withdraw your nomination to delete. Thank you. The Transhumanist 08:48, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Thank you. The Transhumanist 01:06, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Wheel

Okay, but how can a source be verified by someone who doesn't want to pay for the privilege? JTRH (talk) 01:07, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Fair enough. JTRH (talk) 01:12, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Don't remove the Rescue tag before the AFD is done

You removed the Rescue tag [16] saying WP:POINT. Care to explain that? Dream Focus 08:43, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Notice how more people showing up ended up improving the article and it ended up being Kept? That happens a lot when things like this are nominated. Common sense alone should've told you this person was notable to begin with. Please follow WP:BEFORE and try to work on articles instead of tagging so many for deletion all the time. Nothing is gained by the pointless deletion of articles. Dream Focus 00:37, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Mashable

Yeah, I hear you. I've been hanging out in the AfD section for a little while now, so I can see how it would be frustrating when people go through the trouble to find articles but don't take the time to improve the article as a result. I'm going to see if I can't make a new section using the sources I noted, because I'm not happy with the Awards and Conference sections being the only sections in the article. I didn't mean to be harsh in my initial commentary-- I was just surprised, so I apologize about that if I came off as disrespectful. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} 23:58, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

• That was odd. [17] The first time you nominated it for deletion only six months ago [18] it ended in snow keep. Someone found sources and linked to the news articles for you. Why did you feel the need to waste time nominating it yet again? Dream Focus 01:03, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

• Because I didn't think any of the sources in the first AFD were any good. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 01:36, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Deceased Wikipedians

Is this necessary? I mean, sure, on articles it makes sense to use neutral language, but on a page dedicated to the memory of Wikipedians? There's certainly no need for a strictly neutral language on that page, is there? --Conti|✉ 08:41, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Out of respect to those who have lost someone close to them? Seems like a rather obvious reason to me. For that same reason I'm not going to fight over it. It just seems somewhat odd to basically say "It's called 'died', get over it" on that very page, is all. --Conti|✉ 18:58, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Oops sorry - I saw nothing on the Talk page about this so started a discussion on it there. I was baffled by the reverts but I hoped that a consensus might be possible. Sorry to clutter your Talk page - the tb thing is down there somewhere ... cheers DBaK (talk) 10:18, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Friendship is Magic

WHAT?? I checked the page's history and the only thing I just edited is a few things! You're blaming me for moving the whole page? Check it again! Rarity: HOW COULD YOU?? Blackgaia02 (talk) 10:33, 30 June 2011 (UTC)

No it's my bad too. I also did that name moving in the last few months due to the official titling the fans gave. So....UGH!Blackgaia02 (talk) 00:16, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Google hoaxes (2nd nom)

I don't understand your argument this time, because the sources were already there on the page, even when you posted the AfD. I realize there were tons of primary sources from Google or Google blogs to verify the hoaxes occurred, but there were also third-party sources in there at the time you nominated, the very ones I mentioned in the AfD. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} 00:58, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

(I thought this would lighten things up. No hard feelings.) I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} 05:31, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:Deceased Wikipedians.
Message added 10:15, 1 July 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I hope that opening a discussion on this might be helpful. Best wishes DBaK (talk) 10:15, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Someone set you up the Nyan.

100px

Order of Nyan

Nyan, nyan, nyan, nyan, nyan, nyan, nyan, nyan, nyan, nyan, ny-ny-ny-ny-ny-ny,nyan, nyan, nyan, nyan, nyan, nyan, nyan, nyan, nyan, nyan, nyan, nyan! Nyan, nyan, nyan, nyan, nyan, nyan, nyan, nyan, nyan, nyan, ny-ny-ny-ny-ny-ny,nyan, nyan, nyan, nyan, nyan, nyan, nyan, nyan, nyan, nyan, nyan, nyan! Ny-ny-ny-ny-ny-ny-ny, Nyan, nyan, nyan, nyan, nyan, nyan, nyan, nyan, nyan, nyan, ny-ny-ny-ny-ny-ny,nyan, nyan, nyan, nyan, nyan, nyan, nyan, nyan, nyan, nyan, nyan, nyan! Rainbow Dash 01:24, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Duck family tree

Please read this page. Nyttend (talk) 17:32, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Replacing your "declined" A10 at List of my Little Pony Tales

From what I can see, you're the only person suggesting a split. The "decline" and removal of my A10 template is a WP:COI issue. Let's wait for an admin to decide, shall we?! — Fly by Night (talk) 03:27, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Non-free files in your user space

Hey there TenPoundHammer, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User talk:TenPoundHammer. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

• See a log of files removed today here.

• Shut off the bot here.

• Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:02, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Oforia

Hello TenPoundHammer. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Oforia, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The article makes a credible assertion of importance or significance, sufficient to pass A7. Thank you. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 22:34, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

Isn't Deletion the Ultimate in Vandalism. Extinction baby. what planet are you editors on? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.7.23.169 (talk) 05:26, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the heads up Canadaolympic989 (talk) 17:27, 6 July 2011 (UTC)

Wheel of Fortune

You are no doubt right about the special terminology such as Mystery, Free Play, and so on. I have watched the show only casually, when trapped in a motel with no Internet and nothing to read, for example. This makes me only dimly familiar with the details, and for that reason I don't think I could explain the game clearly. It would be difficult for anyone to explain this game to a Martian or, more plausibly, to someone who had never watched anything on television. If I were starting from scratch, I'd probably start by describing an actual game, play by play, including mention of the setting, audience, and "umpires". If that got too wordy (as it probably would), I'd compress the description to what I considered to be the essence of the play-by-play. I don't know if that approach would work, but I'd give it a try to find out. Hope this helps. It's just an idea. Finetooth (talk) 16:54, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

Kellie Pickler

I didn't notice I did that originally, thanks for pointing it out and thanks for the advice. I'll know for next time. ChrisTofu11961 (talk) 21:05, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Haha that's good that he was able to get the book. I'm sorry I couldn't be the one to get it, but I think my parents would be furious if I bought such an expensive book like that. Thank goodness for people like Eric444. ChrisTofu11961 (talk) 21:13, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Petersonmodern.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Petersonmodern.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:11, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Dekkappai

He's just trolling; his new hobby is disrupting discussions involving editors he particularly dislikes, like me. The best way to deal with him,in my opinion, and in the spirit of this discussion [19], is just to say "Forget him" and move on. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 20:15, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

I've just noticed that youtube pulled the video I linked to in the AFD, which pretty much kills the joke. You can watch it here [20], although the article spoils the "surprise". Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 01:02, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Actually, the preferred expression is: "Fizz off you old flipper!" And it's not trolling if you don't expect anyone to take it literally or seriously. I was called much worse, right on the Admin page, due only to my editing interest, and then my articles stalked and AfD'ed. All while the Admins sat around mumbling "AGF" "NPA" "CIVIL", etc. So consider the template below in such a spirit, Hammer:

You appear to be in violation of the WP:FUCK policy. Please cease giving a fuck immediately. Continuous evidence of giving a fuck may result in your immediate blocking without warning.

As Hullaballoo points out, since I've given up all hope on this hell-hole, even he and I, the bitterest of enemies, have been able to banter a bit. Nice, huh? I don't even consider myself here now, I'm working on content elsewhere as I type this. Now you and he go on about your business, and I'll catch up with you later... Have a nice day. Dekkappai (talk) 02:40, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Aw, that's so sad

(;

--Nuujinn (talk) 23:15, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Wikilove

		The Country Music Barnstar
		A well-deserved barnstar for your years of dedication to music articles. Wikipedia would not have such good coverage of country music if it were not for your efforts. Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 02:25, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

Wikilove

So, dude, try this on for size... xoxo, Carrite (talk) 05:06, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

This editor is a
Senior Editor III
and is entitled to display this Rhodium
Editor Star.

ANA episode list

I was not finish the ANA ep list yet. I was going to add more episodes but I was tired. But never mind anyway. You undo it. It was going to be great but you ruined it.

Brandon J. Marcellus (talk) 23:38, 13 July 2011 (UTC)

If you have the time.

Could you give me your thoughts on WP:RAINBOW, since your essay inspired me to create it? Rainbow Dash 15:29, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Balham

Agree with Secondary: "Why have you let the article languish unreferenced if you think the band is notable and you can prove it? Where have you been? Go ahead - save the Alligators. I can support that." Add those references you've found, and I'll gladly withdraw. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 02:30, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Ah, my friend, you know well that AfD is not the Article Improvement Workshop. The Alligators are closer to your preferred musical style than mine — have at it! ;-> Carrite (talk) 02:43, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Re: Geraint Watkins

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Gongshow's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

 Gongshow ^Talk 04:44, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Re: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Store Wars (Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends)

Well TenPound, since the article has little coverage, it meets WP:GNG. I doubt that episode would meet the notability, it currently fails WP:GNG. I going to fix some of the dead link and try get into GA status as possible. Well, since you tried vote delete for the Cartoon Network WikiProject, I've have converted Cartoon Network WikiProject into a work group of WP:ANIMATION to help get many new members as possible. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 14:57, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Yes, for example, just like Destination: Imagination which is GA which it meets WP:GNG. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 15:08, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Lump sum redux

(In response to this)

Tell me, what does the following tell you about what a lump sum is:

The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development distinguishes between "price analysis" and "cost analysis" by whether the decision maker compares lump sum amounts, or subjects contract prices to an itemized cost breakdown.

In 1911, American union leaders including Samuel Gompers of the American Federation of Labor expressed opposition to lump sums being awarded their members pursuant to a new workers compensation law, saying that when they received lump sums rather than periodic payments the risk of them squandering the money was greater.

The Financial Times reported in July 2011 that research by Prudential had found that 79% of polled pensioners collecting a company or private pension that year took a lump sum at their retirement, as compared to 76% in 2008.[8] Prudential was of the view that for many retirees, a lump sum at the time of retirement was the most tax-efficient option.[8] However, Prudential's head of business development, Vince Smith Hughes, said "some pensioners are beginning to regret the way they used the tax-free cash. The days of buying a shiny new car or going on a once-in-a-lifetime holiday may be gone.

It doesn't tell me anything -- and I've got a postgrad qualification in Finance. So I really don't see that the addition of such material "fixes" the article. Hrafn^Talk_Stalk^(P) 18:44, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Kudos

Thanks for the withdraw at this AfD. It is the rare nom at AfDs who will give the matter a second look, after discussion and refs are identified, and consider changing his !vote. Best.--Epeefleche (talk) 18:52, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Because no one else will give me WikiLove, I have to give it to myself.

Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 23:06, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Is a kitten really that safe with an otter? CycloneGU (talk) 22:06, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

fyi

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=439835184&oldid=439828252 Geo Swan (talk) 20:48, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Trout

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

For this closing comment in the AfD. It's admirable that you will revisit and withdraw a nomination, but your choice of closing comment leaves something to be desired. CycloneGU (talk) 22:01, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Songs by producer

Hi, I note you have created some categories in Category:Songs by producer. I have made a few comments regarding guidance over at WPtalk and I’d like to see your comments. Cheers. --Richhoncho (talk) 10:10, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

RFC/N discussion of the username "I Jethrobot"

A request for comment has been filed concerning the username of I Jethrobot (talk · contribs). You are invited to comment on the discussion here. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 22:37, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

RE: Lenny Gault

Sorry, I didn't realize you were waiting on me to change my vote. EnDaLeCoMpLeX (contributions) • (let's chat) 23:48, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

"Just a Kiss"

Hello TenPoundHammer. I see that you've nominated "Just a Kiss" for GA status. I thought of nominating it myself but then realized that the song's still charting and may chart outside North America sometime soon. I feel the article's prose is a bit sloppy at some places and that we can add lots of new information to it (especially to the music video, live performances, critical reception section etc.) If you're willing to, we can nominate the article together after one/two weeks? I hope I've not hurt/discouraged you. Thanks, Novice7 (talk) 06:48, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Belgium

Hi TenPoundHammer. I have been editing the Belgium article since so long that I have sincerly no idea where references are really missing. could you please add the {{fact}} labels where you think they should be. I'll try and find the time to help. Thanks a lot. Vb 14:19, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at I Jethrobot's talk page.
Message added 20:19, 21 July 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 20:19, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

WP:USCHARTS

"When using the Bubbling Under Hot 100 positions in a table, add 100 to the corresponding Bubbling Under peak if the song never entered the Hot 100 proper (e.g. 101 for a song that peaked at #1 on the Bubbling Under and got no higher). Ideally, a footnote sould indicate that this is a Bubbling Under peak" - is there consensus for this? Eg at Here I Stand (Usher song) I did not add 100 to the Bubbling Under peak. —Andrew_stalk 20:49, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Big Kenny Singles

I found all of those singles that I added to the page on Amazon.com. Just search for Big Kenny and you'll see them. They are all singles, but not radio-play singles. They were released through his Glotown Records label. (I also responded to your question on my page). — Preceding unsigned comment added by BuddylBat (talk • contribs) 19:25, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

I'm Holdin' On to Love (To Save My Life) and titling

Hello, I saw your comment on Talk:I'm Holdin' On to Love (To Save My Life), and I raised a discussion based on the titling of words after parenthesis. Please see Wikipedia talk:Article titles#Naming songs, should the first word in a parenthesis be capitalized?, and comment if you can. Thank you. -- ipodnano05 * ^{leave@message} 19:38, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for the message about fixing the redirect

I just wanted to thank you for fixing the redirect, and for leaving a message on my userpage. Many thanks - it is much appreciated. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 15:08, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Toddst1's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dude.

That was about nine months ago. HalfShadow 02:38, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

I screwed up (without any otters to blame)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:2bobburns was closed by you because I had speedied the page; but the criterion I used explicitly excludes talk pages from eligibility for speedy deletion. I've restored the deleted page; but not sure where to go from here; the situation never arose before in my experience. -- Orange Mike | Talk 16:39, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

• Perhaps you should read the article on Percussive Maintenance, then.

• With my sincere best wishes Si Trew (talk) 22:38, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

• • Nice work there at Percussive Maintenance. That definitely needed some tidy up. I can add some refs for it but the tidy up makes it a lot better. Si Trew (talk) 23:03, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

John Berry (musician) listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect John Berry (musician). Since you had some involvement with the John Berry (musician) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). FordPrefect42 (talk) 23:45, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Remergence

Hello TenPoundHammer, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Remergence, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: so many albums and a label with a wikipedia page suggest the groupmeet WP:MUSIC. This should be discussed. Suggest AFD if you stand by deletion request. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Spartaz ^Humbug! 22:06, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Remergence

Hello TenPoundHammer, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Remergence, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: I already declined this. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Spartaz ^Humbug! 22:39, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

• You know the rules, you don't retag a declined speedy just because you disagree with the admin. Please don't do it again. Spartaz ^Humbug! 22:41, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Drnhawkins

Hi TenPoundHammer.

At Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Drnhawkins, I'd like to agree with your statement. I think you've misworded your statement (Tell me why we should sweep them under the rug and say "well, it's not only in userspace, it doesn't matter"), and I have tentatively edited to highlight for you (the edit). Would you please review? --SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:43, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

ANI Notice

[21] Spartaz ^Humbug! 22:52, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Keith Urban peak

Billboard magazine September 28, 2002, Hits of the World section pg. 54, [22] Canadaolympic989 (talk) 19:54, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

James Bonamy

Regarding this edit, the user who added Halsey as the director of "The Swing" has been using multiple accounts to add incorrect music video directors for years. I found the correct director and sourced it. Eric444 (talk) 13:17, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Shoe Show

I have started a new discussion on the "Shoe Show" page to correct errors on the page. I attempted to correct these errors last week and noticed they were reverted to a previous version. Vickiayers (talk) 19:40, 1 August 2011 (UTC)Vicki Ayers

Speedy deletion declined: 2006 Disney Channel Games

Hello TenPoundHammer. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of 2006 Disney Channel Games, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A10 requires that the article has been recently created. Thank you. PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 21:14, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Thanks!

Bronies over at Ponychan were throwing such a fucking fit over it that the mods 404ed the thread. Rainbow Dash !xmcuvg2MH 00:13, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Rango

Well, I guess we should do what we do when different RS cites give conflicting information, as sometimes happen with celebrities' birth dates: Say "... X [cite] or Y [cite] (sources differ)." However, given that an aye aye is an African animal, if we're going to cite the DVD commentary, we need to cite exactly who is claiming this and provide a timestamp. Otherwise it's like citing a book without a page number. --Tenebrae (talk) 04:00, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at [[User talk:User talk:JamesAlan1986|User talk:User talk:JamesAlan1986]].
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I dont know. I'm using my phone to reply right now cause I am going some where ask around and see what maybe a good one but when you post it post it infront of the messge thats there that message was posted ok? JamesAlan1986 (talk-contribs) 02:44, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Baggage claim

Hello,

WP:BEFORE suggests that the nominator ought to look for sources and add them to the article if found. Two editors have helped you find sources. I hope that you will expand and reference the article. If you choose not to do so, then I will, once you have withdrawn the AfD or the closing administrator has closed the debate. I bid you peace. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 05:24, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

"Add the sources you found, then I'll withdraw" Fair enough. I am getting ready for bed right now, and I know that my wife wants some company, so I will get to it in the next few days. Thank you. Also, please be aware that, even though I often disagree with you, I do feel that you are playing a valuable role here on Wikipedia. Feel free to challenge me at any time when I make a mistake. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 05:36, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

I added some of the sources, and was about to say so until the AfD was withdrawn. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 05:41, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

meow wars

hi: yeah that seems to be the case, at least afa the web. im still hopeful that a book can be found on the history of usenet or the internet that would be usable as a source. so far, tho, i havent had any luck in the Columbus, Ohio local library, or in the Sacramento local library. im taking a trip to San Francisco soon, so i havent lost hope just yet. if you would, please dont mark it as a stale draft just yet. theres got to be something out there somewhere, and im determined to find it. -badmachine 19:46, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

inre User:MichaelQSchmidt/Newcomer's guide to guidelines

You are cordially invited to User:MichaelQSchmidt/Newcomer's guide to guidelines as I feel its going live is imminent and I value additional eyes and input. Also, there has been a suggestion for a possible name change. Maybe a contest. The caveat being that it must be simple and easy to remember, and give a clue to what the essay contains. I'm thinking maybe WP:Newcomer's guide to policy, guideline, and editing or WP:Newcomer's PG&E or WP:NGPGE. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 04:58, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Everything (Lifehouse song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether Everything (Lifehouse song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed here until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence and not on a majority of votes that follow Wikipedia policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Rp0211 ^(talk2me) 16:27, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Somebody's Chelsea

Just wanted to drop you line to say I absolutely loved your review of "Somebody's Chelsea". I love this song, and I'm with you, I'll be terribly upset if radio doesn't play the hell out of it. EnDaLeCoMpLeX (contributions) • (let's chat) 17:04, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Cleanup template

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 August 13 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.183.70.187 (talk) 16:06, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

FYI

Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject_Council/Directory/WikiProject#When_is_a_project_inactive.3F.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:11, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

ANI thread

I have responded to the ANI thread. I am very sorry about this incident. It was not intentional: please read my comments at ANI. Please don't block me, as I've learnt my lesson. --4 T C 13:29, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

On naming....

My essay User:MichaelQSchmidt/Newcomer's guide to guidelines is hours away from mainspace. I'd appreciate your looking in. But I am here to seek your opinion on these thoughts. - Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 18:27, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

"Rolling in the Deep"

Hi Ott. Thanks for the response. I'll reply at the same talk page. --Efe (talk) 12:57, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the response Ott. That was a substantial discussion. Perhaps I could use that as reference. Many articles are having the same dilemma. --Efe (talk) 14:49, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Correction

On your post to Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Quarl, you said that the person is not admin. If this is refering to User:Quarl, then *BZZZZZ* WRONG! If the user you mean is User:Shroffameen, then I think you might want to go change your vote. LikeLakers2 (talk) 20:25, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Keep on Walkin'

It came to my attention that on july 31th you seem to have amused yourself by redirecting a number of articles/entries titled either [Keep on Walkin'] or [Keep on Walking] to new locations, now filed under respectively [Keep On Walkin'] or [Keep On Walking], leaving a supposedly explanatory note that " On is an adverb in this context ", which is ofcourse completely irrelevant as an argument or motivation for your actions.The only thing relevant,which could possibly justify a such uninvited " favour " would be if the songs/albums in question are actually called [Keep On Walking'] / [Keep On Walking] with a capital O instead of with a minor o.Judging from promotional material this seems questionable in case of 2 or more of the examples.I wonder whereto you´d redirect an article on a fictive song/album titled [ i Iz b4 E x-abt off da See ] or [ you Has 2 bekiddin' ] Flight714 (talk) 00:50, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

"On" is a phrasal verb in this context ("Keep On"). MOS:CAPS says that phrasal verbs are capitalized. In this case, "Keep On" is the grammatically correct capitalization. The same would go for, say, "Turn On the Radio" or "Turn Up the Music" or "Keep On Loving You". Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 01:36, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

You seem to miss the very point that music; songs / albums and their titles just aswell as litterature etc are all bodies of artistic character and the creators of such are entitled to name their pieces of work anything they like, regardless of grammatical rules or internal Wikipedia regulations on how to titulate or list this or that.Such considerations are for librarians for internal use.Wikipedia is public domaine,just like a public library, and anyone should be able to find anything under it´s rightfull original name or title.If an artist has deliberately chose to name a song [ Keep on Walkin' ] with a lower case o, then all the wikipedia librarian can do is to loyally file it correct under that title, and not start a futile and highly irrelevant debate about nothing.The title is what the artist once decided and not subject for anyone to change to tally or be in accordance with personal ideas of correctness.Flight714 (talk) 02:30, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Arthur Davenport - Singer Songwriter

Hello TenPoundHammer. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Arthur Davenport - Singer Songwriter, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: yes, it's copied, but the source page carries a CC-BY-SA and GFDL release. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 20:28, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Calm down

Please, calm down and assume good faith. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 20:41, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Please do delete my Arthur Davenport - Singer Songwriter page

The COPYRIGHT DONATION WAS VERIFIED when you tagged it for deletion. I have granted permission to copy material already on line by putting that permission explicitly on the site where that material is posted. Thank You. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arthurdwall (talk • contribs) 23:52, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Contested prod of Munch Man

I have removed the {{prod}} tag from Munch Man, which you proposed for deletion, because I think that this article should not be deleted from Wikipedia. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Ntsimp (talk) 06:15, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Don4of4's talk page.
Message added 19:32, 19 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

~ Don4of4 ^[Talk] 19:32, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Don4of4's talk page.
Message added 19:47, 19 August 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

~ Don4of4 ^[Talk] 19:47, 19 August 2011 (UTC)

Shania Twain discography

Can you please participation in the discussion here? Thank you. Eric444 (talk) 01:25, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Hello

This is twice now that you have come and "attacked" me (for a lack of better term) on my talk page. Attacking me was really uncalled for. It's not like I go and vandalize the page like some of the previous people have done on there. I try and do the best I can and cussing at me is not the way to go about things. I'm giving you a fair warning now. Not to be mean but the next time you come and cuss at me over a simple mistake I will be reporting you to an admin for it. You do not do that on here and you must always assume good faith before and talk NICELY to people instead of going and cussing at them and what not. And just cause I do a lot of work on the page doesn't mean I did it. It's possible that another contributor did it by accident and it got missed in the editing, but going to me and cussing at me isn't right. I'm only being fair and I'm asking you nicely now to please stop coming onto my talk page and doing that. Thank you. JamesAlan1986 (talk-contribs) 19:35, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

I just got a proper look at what you did and I got two things to say. 1. There was no reason to remove what you removed. 2. It's pure vandalism to remove something just cause you don't like. Please refrain from doing this again. JamesAlan1986 (talk-contribs) 19:50, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Hello

I am SORRY that I linked to the wrong people. Sometimes I am not sure which person wrote the song. So what is wrong with linking it to the dab page until someone correctly wikilinks it? Next time I will make sure to check. Ngs61 (talk) 22:10, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

No problem. Also I did not realize the "reviews" field in the infobox isn't used anymore, I just thought it was being updated or improved. I will make sure check accordingly and use the correct infoboxes. Thanks for the reply, Ngs61 (talk) 01:43, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Re: Creeggan

Good question. In situations like these I go by the ol' Wiki principle, AGF: Assume Google Failed. :)  Gongshow ^Talk 05:48, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

John Cowan (musician)

You wrote about this article which appears to be the biography of a living person but without any reliable sources. It has been tagged as requiring such sources for 3 years now. Do such sources exist? If so please add them now or the article may be deleted. Andrew Davidson (talk) 22:13, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

I see that you have tagged the article for deletion yourself. Doesn't that tag go on the article page, not the talk page? Andrew Davidson (talk) 22:28, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

I wouldn't worry too much about that. I had a look for sources for John Cowan. I found that there were lots of people by that name - murderers and such. There didn't seem to to be much about the musician. The John Cowan title will probably end up being a disambiguation page. Andrew Davidson (talk) 22:43, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

Bill Medley

So sorry about that. I can't explain how I could do such a mess. Thanks for your help. Yone Fernandes (talk) 06:44, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Numbers station

Hey! Thanks for boldly removing the growing pile of trivia ! ›mysid (☎✎) 23:58, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Boo

whats with the silly otter thing.............. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.128.238.61 (talk) 09:34, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Cliff Hangers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cliff Hangers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cliff Hangers (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --Gh87 (talk) 11:41, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Deletion discussions aren't about "winning" or "losing".

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

For comments like this in a recent AfD. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 14:45, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

I just came here to tell you the same thing because of this ("Learn your English, okay?!?") and this ("Don't be stupid."). I have discounted your opinion in evaluating the outcome of the discussion and will block you if I come across another AfD in which you make personal attacks against others. Regards,  Sandstein  06:13, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Lyrics in songs

Could you please stop removing brief quotes of lyrics from songs, giving WP:LYRICS as the reason? WP:LYRICS does not say what you seem to think it says. In fact, it says that such quotes are allowed by fair use provisions of copyright law, and then it gives a bunch of examples of GA and FA articles that do such quoting (either inline, via blockquotes, or by showing a section of sheet music). Thanks. Wasted Time R (talk) 10:24, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

Merge discussion for Cliff Hangers

An article that you have been involved in editing, Cliff Hangers, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Gh87 (talk) 20:27, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

For the otters

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

• Hope they like the attention... and food! (And no, you did nothing wrong; how terrible to call the otters bad influences...) Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:49, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

This is what I think the WikiTrout should be used for: mainly just general nonsense and/or for fun. LikeLakers2 (talk | Sign my guestbook!) 15:58, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Content

I don't mean to be rude but you've consistently shown yourself to be one of the shittiest judges of content and judges of encyclopedic material in wikipedia's history. Do you ever actually google search or look in google books mate? ♦ Dr. Blofeld 19:20, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

He doesn't seem to bother to check. Complained to me about an edit I did not make, and wrote in capital letters as well (does he realise that it is rude to shout?) Hzh (talk) 11:41, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

MfD section deletion

diff ... you mean you haven't been editing here since 1970? Noob!!! :-) --Surturz (talk) 02:01, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Sorry I didn't noticed that it excists! :-)

Donatello13 (talk) 15:08, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dopamine (band) (2nd nomination)

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You put the AFD tag on their 2 album articles but forgot to mention them in the AFD. I deleted them under CSD G8. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:16, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Piratesbest.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Piratesbest.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:23, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Category talk:Albums by producer

Hi, I see you made some contributions on the above talk page. Perhaps you would like to weigh in again at WPProject Albums where the discussion has started again. We need some otter contributions! --Richhoncho (talk) 09:21, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Katarighe's talk page.
Message added 23:12, 11 September 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 23:12, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	Thank you for asking if the article is nominated for deletion or speedy deletion. I reward this for your appreciation and send me an award for my great help. Thank you! Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 23:16, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Lists of number-one country hits in the United States

I filled in the gaps back to 1970. Could you help me source them? Eric444 (talk) 01:20, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Whitburn should work. Eric444 (talk) 01:50, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

All I've been able to find is this and this. Would either of those work? Eric444 (talk) 04:37, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

I can't believe how difficult that peak is to verify. All I could find on Billboard's website is that it debuted at #59 and got at least as high at #45. It wasn't one of the week's greatest gainers when it peaked, and then it went recurrent the next week. It's not listed on Allmusic and Country Weekly only publishes the Top 30. Eric444 (talk) 04:51, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

User:Northamerica1000

He won't respond to you and will just delete your message. He is adding the rescue tag to everything he sees. I lost count at 50. Bgwhite (talk) 05:23, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Questionnaire

Hi there, I wonder if you would be interested in helping me with my research on Wikipedia. I am writing a dissertation on Wikipedia as part of my undergraduate course at the University of Cambridge. What I am asking is for you to complete a questionnaire with a number of general, subjective questions about your experiences working on Wikipedia, for example concerning Wikipedia's culture, your motivation in participating and so on. It should take 10-20 minutes. Participants will be anonymous if requested. More information is available if you are interested. Thanks! I really appreciate any time you can give! Thedarkfourth (talk) 07:28, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Declined speedy of Template:Idea

It doesn't qualify for G7, the author didn't request deletion. Thanks, Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 00:19, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Ks0stm's talk page.
Message added 00:53, 15 September 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 00:53, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Twitter

I just wanted to let you know, that I am currently following you on Twitter. ;) EnDaLeCoMpLeX (contributions) • (let's chat) 01:28, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Johnny Lee Biography

Tenpound,

What to want? A signed birth certificate? This is something you have no knowledge of so please stop removing. The proof is alive and well in Columbus, Ohio. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.72.247.200 (talk) 22:08, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

minor point on your signature

Your signature is over-long and confusing - it looks like an extension of the text, and the links mnot in the places one expect for user and talk page links. can you either rewrite it as a more normal signature, or add some CSS so that it looks different than the regular text? thanks. --Ludwigs2 15:52, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

International Space Station

The article's future is really looking up. Editors are coming on board making real refreshing changes and improvements to the article. It's not just a breath of fresh air, it's a good gust. The relief from FA status is just what was needed ! This is brilliant ! Another editor has also noticed and suggested a TOC overhaul, even wrote up a draft on the talkpage, although, it's too early in the updating to do that I think, the article is in flux with a cleanout and so forth. There is so much material to be sorted out. Penyulap _talk 15:09, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

I would love to ask a favor, if you have a moment, would you look at the TOC for the ISS article. I've used 'limit depth of TOC' and a lot of shuffling of sections, and I would love to know if it's heading in the right direction. I'm unsure if the depth limit is a good idea or not, I would value your opinion highly. Penyulap _talk 13:55, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Greater Boston

Of course I saw the big red warning, I just chose to ignore it. I figured that somebody else might see it and get so offended as to make the executive decision to either expand or delete the section it's attached to. Thanks for taking the time out of your day to bark at me. Happy editing, CSZero (talk) 00:53, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

OK. I don't edit as much as I used to, so I haven't gotten used to the new one. Do you think that's the appropriate tag for that section? My issue is more around WP:UNDUE.

Thanks! Will do. CSZero (talk) 01:34, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Same Old Train article

Hello TenPoundHammer:

If you're interested could you create the article for Same Old Train? It won the 1999 Grammy Award for Best Country Collaboration with Vocals, and this seems to be your area of expertise. Best, Albacore (talk) 02:14, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Hello

No hard feelings, I hope, with respect to the dispute on my talk page. I think perhaps the thing to do with the split Celine Dion discography is to put all the material from the ledes on that page, and then maintain the lists of singles and albums, respectively, as "List of" pages. Cheers! bd2412 T 02:42, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Apollo Hoax in Popular Culture

An article that you have been involved in editing, Apollo hoax in popular culture, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apollo hoax in popular culture (2nd nomination). Thank you. Senior Trend (talk) 05:10, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

By the way, what happened to your cluebat? Senior Trend (talk) 23:40, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Article of concern

I noticed that you nominated NewsChannel for deletion a week or so ago, and it was deleted via consensus at AfD (very correctly, in my opinion). Could you take a look at Eyewitness News and see if you think that it suffers from the same problems? To me, it looks like the creator of the page is trying to argue that there is some sort of "Eyewitness News" brand, when, as far as I can tell, it's just a term that was used by a bunch of news stations. I've previously rendered some negative opinions about this topic in other forums, though, so I don't feel comfortable nominating it for deletion. And, I may simply not be seeing the actual, underlying validity of the article, so your eyes may help. Thanks. Qwyrxian (talk) 23:24, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

FAR noms

I don't know what you may have in the FAR pipeline but articles listed here can be nom'd anytime someone feels like it. They've already had talk page notices done; in some cases years ago. Brad (talk) 10:33, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Research into the user pages of Wikipedians: Invitation to participate

Greetings,

My name is John-Paul and I am a student with the University of Alberta specializing in Communications and Technology.

I would like to include your Wikipedia user page in a study I am doing about how people present themselves online. I am interested in whether people see themselves in different ways, online and offline. One of the things I am looking at is how contributors to Wikipedia present themselves to each other through their user pages. Would you consider letting me include your user page in my study?

With your consent, I will read and analyze your user page, and ask you five short questions about it that will take about ten to fifteen minutes to answer. I am looking at about twenty user pages belonging to twenty different people. I will be looking at all user pages together, looking for common threads in the way people introduce themselves to other Wikipedians.

I hope that my research will help answer questions about how people collaborate, work together, and share knowledge. If you are open to participating in this study, please reply to this message, on your User Talk page or on mine. I will provide you with a complete description of my research, which you can use to decide if you want to participate.

Thank-you,

John-Paul Mcvea
University of Alberta
jmcvea@ualberta.ca

Johnpaulmcvea (talk) 20:33, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Do NOT replace speedy tags after an admin has declined them.

Regarding Triumverate, as I said in my edit summary, I was going to decline that speedy request even before I saw that another administrator had done so. So your replacing it again because of the so-called misunderstanding was still invalid. Do not do this. I see from Spartaz's comment that there has been previous discussion of this behavior of yours. LadyofShalott 21:20, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Tell Her

Sorry man, no such luck. Canadaolympic989, Canadaolympic989 23:38, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

well

I think your edit comment here was unfair, and against my will I find myself a bit offended. It is not like I don't contribute enough as it is, with more than 11k pages on my watchlist and too longs hours spent every day. I appreciate what you and other editors contribute and I try not to remark on how they choose to spend their precious time. I don't really remember, but my guess is that at the time I hit this article I was going through a series of articles doing a specific task and I just wanted to focus on what I was doing. I saw something else that needed doing so I tagged it, thinking it is better than ignoring the problem, and maybe I'll return to it later (which I forgot to do), or someone else will, like yourself. I'll probably be sorry I even mentioned it in an hour, but anyway, perhaps I just expect more from someone as experienced as yourself. --Muhandes (talk) 07:34, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Recent Richard III edits

I appreciate your wanting to clean up questionable material on WP, but I think on Richard III (film) you were overzealous on certain counts.

Your best edits here are wanting to tag with the template that Olivier only wanted to cast Brit actors, and Olivier's motives for breaking the fourth wall. The assertion that Walton had a recurring musical theme could be WP:OR, though is easily verified from watching the movie.

I think you slightly misunderstand the use of the "weasel" tag, and something else should be used for the phrase "could be considered". Weasel is meant to be used when the text is vague about the outside support for a statement.

You were harsher on DVD Movie Central than on DVD Beaver, but the editor of DVD Movie Central is a known Hollywood film technician, a published novelist, and has appeared on the Colbert Report, so in spite of his self-published status, this still fully complies with WP standards for "reliable sources". (WP explicitly allows self-published material by anyone also published in known reliable venues, such as the personal blogs of known New York Times reporters, etc.)

TO cite Amazon.com to establish that a particular CD exists and to get its basic description is completely legitimate. Please don't ever tag anything like that.

Even more obviously, to cite Premiere magazine to establish that a film was listed by Premiere on some "100 films..." list is entirely legit, and you should never tag anything like that.

You don't need to tag a subset of the "cast" section with a tag that says you need to put into prose rather than list. The "House of York" section was a subset of the "cast" section.

A gray area is the credibility of the "Richard III society". They were originally established to push a point of view, that R3 did not commit the crimes attributed to him. However, this isn't exactly a "fringe" view. While this is believed by a minority of historians, it's a very substantial minority (as opposed to the very slim minority of historians who think Edward DeVere wrote Shakespeare's plays) and is heavily debated among serious scholars. Furthermore, The cites in the article to the R3 society are not pertaining to their main thesis.

Finally, there is absolutely no reason at all to doubt the credibility of online essays published by Criterion Collection, none, nichts, nada. They are one of the best and most important distributors of DVDs around, one of the first to introduce bonus features, letterboxed films, and they only release old classics in pristine cleaned-up editions. The were the first DVD alternate audio commentaries, and still have some of the best audio commentaries out there always by well-known film historians, and they also debuted "special edition" DVDs. They are a pioneer. Frankly, of all your tags, your tagging this as a possibly unreliable source is absolutely baffling.

Feel free to restore your three tags, but the other tags you made are, I think, unwarranted and should be left alone.--WickerGuy (talk) 17:09, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

MOre on R3 Society edits

As I noted above, citing the Richard III Society is a grey area, since they push a POV, but not a fringe POV. However, neither of the R3 Society cites has anything to do with that POV, and they in turn cite sources. The cite from them regarding Olivier's feelings about Jed Harris in turn cites Olivier's own book On Acting, so that should be fine. The cite from them regarding Olivier's alteration of the play is their author quoting another critic (John Cottrell) who wrote of full biography of Olivier. It would be technically better for our article to cite the original autobio of Olivier and Cottrell's bio of Olivier, but if we don't know the page numbers, I think the cites from these in the articles on the R3 Society page can stand. Also in the second case, the R3 Society writer is Paul Trevor Bale, an established film editor in the British film industry.--WickerGuy (talk) 19:34, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

My own fixes & "filibuster"

I have changed the sentence you tagged about casting from "Olivier chose to cast only English actors" to "Olivier cast only English actors". You also tagged with a very dubious assertion about why Olivier chose to break the fourth wall (talk to the audience) which I'm pretty certain is just false, so I have deleted that one. The third bit you tagged with I think can stay, but I am going to reword it slightly.

A "filibuster" is an attempt to delay a decision by prolonging discussion with obstructionist intent. I honestly don't think I have done that. Rather, since your tags were so extensive and copious, I chose to analyze each and every one of them, since each of them was problematic for a slightly different reason. Regards--WickerGuy (talk) 21:41, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Film score

I have addressed some of the legit concerns you raised about the film's musical score by adding some citations. I didn't address them at all above. Regards,--WickerGuy (talk) 22:04, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

"Locash Discussion"

It basically talked about how the musicians are wonderfully nice people whom we should all befriend. DS (talk) 23:25, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

'cause I'm not obligated to. DS (talk) 19:02, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Portal deletion

[23] goes to my own withdrawn nomination. Dougweller (talk) 05:53, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Ignore, fixed it. Dougweller (talk) 05:57, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Singles by record label

I didn't realize those categories existed. I'll start populating them this week. Eric444 (talk) 15:31, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cuckoo clock in culture

There appears to be a red link into this page from Cuckoo clock in culture. Bearian (talk) 15:32, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Lucas Hoge

I helped a new user creating new article Lucas Hoge, the other day. I thought possibly you might be interested - maybe you can improve it a bit. It's up for DYK. Cheers,  Chzz  ►  14:45, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

EGG

See World Series Year. Frietjes (talk) 21:54, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

Re:

Wow, thanks for noticing. :) Toa Nidhiki05 00:01, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

R3 Edits Redux

I think you are right that we cannot use DVDBeaver as a "reliable" source, especially as the author (gary Tooze) has been accused on three separate occasions of plagiarism. I was slightly inclined to cut him some slack as he has been interviewed in venues WP considers reliable, but he has never actually published in such venues, which is the formal WP criterion for permitting self-published.

However, the amazon review is a different story. WP guidelines (at WP:RELIABLE) explicitly state (emphasis added by me)

self-published media...are largely not acceptable. This includes any website whose content is largely user-generated, including the Internet Movie Database, Cracked.com, CBDB.com, and so forth, with the exception of material on such sites that is labeled as originating from credentialed members of the sites' editorial staff, rather than users.

As the Amazon review was written by their editorial staff rather than an Amazon user, it clearly passes the criterion as stated above.

Thank you for your vigilance. Regards & cheers--WickerGuy (talk) 01:34, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

PS A quick check establishes that DVDBeaver has been used as a source in about 15 other movie articles, which of course proves nothing re Wikipedia:Other stuff exists. I think Tooze's technical knowledge of the film transfer process gets him some brownie points, but he still, IMO, fails the WP criterion for reliability (as you stated).--WickerGuy (talk) 01:45, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Redwall AfDs

I think you maybe ought to nominate World of Redwall for deletion, maybe bundle it into the current List of Species AfD. I gave up on trying to keep the articles cruft-free and encyclopedic years ago (lost interest in the series too, tbh), and Wikia's now visible and viable for fans of the series. So for whatever it's worth I think your deletions were the right thing to do, even if I'm s'posed to be an inclusionist. No need to notify me about any further AfDs (Redwall or otherwise) either, with my !vote cast I'm heading back off into retirement. McJEFF ^(talk) 04:59, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Al the Octopus

HI TPH, just to let you know, I've reverted you on this one. You declared it non-notable, but I found there was plenty of coverage. I've added a sampling of the sources that exist. Best, Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 19:14, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Lakes Mall

Materialscientist (talk) 12:03, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Re: Polish-Soviet War

I think this section is important, although most of the content is in its subheadings. I cannot think where we could move the one sentence, as logically, it is the best place for it, neither. I think MoS allows such situations, am I wrong? --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me} 16:55, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Lady Antebellum

Hello TPH. I have nominated "Just a Kiss" for GA and have added your name to the nomination. Thank you, Novice7 (talk) 13:56, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

Ooh, the Roughstock review, right? Aah. Novice7 (talk) 03:57, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Yeah, it can sometimes be taken as a COI (COS, I think). I wanted this to be a shared nomination since you helped me and the article, a lot.

		The Special Barnstar
		I award this barnstar to TenPoundHammer for expanding "Just a Kiss" and helping me out. Thank you TPH. Novice7 (talk) 04:28, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello TenPoundHammer! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you  have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to  know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation  also appears on other accounts you  may  have, please complete the  survey  once only.  If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you  have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:31, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Tothwolf/Expand testcases.
Message added 04:49, 24 October 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

My sincere apologies for not knowing how Wikipedia works exactly and possibly responding in the wrong places, I can provide you with whatever you want, I have a decent amount of press material that I am happy to send you. Please just let me know how to submit the material to you. Many Thanks

Hi, With the greatest respect you are causing me some stress here, Music of Life is a well known independent music label in the UK, it has had hits and licensed music all over the world since 1986, you are proposing deleting it from Wikipedia? If you would like more information then please don't hesitate to let me know but I ask how you would feel if somebody said that your life's work is irrelevant and deserves to be deleted - why? I would appreciate it so much if you could please not delete the Wikipedia page for Music of Life, it's absolutely accurate and represents many years of work. http://www.discogs.com/label/Music+Of+Life Many Thanks Simon (Megalaser)Megalaser (talk) 21:41, 30 October 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Megalaser (talk • contribs) 21:29, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

not here?

i am here and did not appreciate that you put on my talkpage that i am not here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Immeëmosol (talk • contribs) 21:23, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

List of Billboard Hot 100 chart achievements and milestones

Hey, let's not yank out full sections of this yet. If it remains a "keep" at AfD I'm more than willing to cut it down and work with others to see what can be kept. Hang on just a bit, k? Thanks. - eo (talk) 13:07, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Reminder

Hi TPH,

Just a quick reminder - it's only fair to warn article creators when you put an article up for speedy deletion. I'm aware that Twinkle can sometimes not do this, so you may want to check if that's how you nominate articles. I'm referring to the Tiger Love (band) article; I've left a message at the article creator's (Orangejoysoda1). Cheers. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 17:16, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Summaries like this and this are unacceptable. I know that a couple of admins have threatened to block you this year over stuff like this, and (although I haven't looked through all your edits) I get the impression that this kind of thing is happening less often. You're still unhelpfully sarcastic in some AfD discussions, though. I don't want to see you blocked. Of course it's okay to get frustrated sometimes (I can relate!), but do you have any other ideas as to how to make it less likely that your frustrations don't turn into attacks on other editors? Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 00:03, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

no more priority parameter in WikiProject Biography

Old habits die hard... From Talk:Luke Laird, the "priority" parameter in WikiProject Biography is no more. See Template:WikiProject Biography for what replaced it.

Now for more important matters. What happened to your otters? You used to list them on your userpage. I hope they are ok. Your username always makes me smile because of the name and it reminds me of otters. Glad I edited your talk page so I could see two cute otters. Bgwhite (talk) 06:35, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

re: Bigger Picture Music Group

So you know, this was about this - apologies if misplaced >.< Nikthestoned 09:30, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Got a minute?

Hey.. can you give your input on the talk page of Helena Beat for me? thnx NYSMtalk page 13:25, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Deleting portals

Why not go through user:Zetawoof/PortalList and get rid of some of the really awful stuff, rather than starting with featured portals? Here's one for you: Portal:Baroque period, abandoned after a few edits in 2011 and left as just an introduction with no content. Or Portal:Cisco Systems, a mess of redlinks from 2009. Portal:Dragons isn't exactly a work of art, with no content, just a front page. Your choice of the three portals you've nominated for deletion isn't showing you at your best. Regards, Bencherlite^Talk 20:27, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Worth adding Wikipedia talk:Portal#Purpose of the Portal space to WP:CENT? Bencherlite^Talk 20:45, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Portal:Dragons

FYI: There's WP:CSD#P1, so as long as it's CSD-able as an article, it's CSD-able under P1. Truth be told, actually, that I've deleted so few portals over the past few years that I didn't even know what the CSDs for portals were. :P --slakr^\ talk / 21:20, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Wheel logo?

I think the message you left for me should have gone to George Ho? JTRH (talk) 12:06, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Must've overlooked it. JTRH (talk) 14:04, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	I don't actually think you're particularly deserving of a barnstar but clearly we should start giving you some just to keep you from weeping uncontrollably at the thought of the grave injustice done to you. (I think I'd make a fine participant of WikiProject Barnstar Awarding) Pichpich (talk) 18:25, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

The Lost Fugitive Award

	The Lost Fugitive Award
	Congratulations. You have just received The Lost Fugitive Award. This is reserved for editors that I believe are doing good work on wikipedia. It should be considered a great honor. Lost Fugitive (talk) 00:03, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

List of Billboard Hot 100 chart achievements and milestones

Hello TenPoundHammer. Just to let you know, I have removed a lot of garbage-trivial information that was on the above article. Till I Go Home (talk) 10:11, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Village pump (technical).
Message added 06:48, 21 November 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

—mc10 (t/c) 06:48, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Brettjamesalbum.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Brettjamesalbum.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:33, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Civility

You appear to have momentarily forgotten about WP:CIVIL here. Hopefully it won't happen again. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 22:18, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Brettjamesalbum.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Brettjamesalbum.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:29, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Selena

I responded swiftly to some of the singles/albums you tagged as "un-notable". Best, Jonayo! ^{Selena 4 ever} 14:18, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Paradise (Coldplay song)

Hey, can you look at something for me about this article.. this douche keeps adding the Triple A chart to this article, even though I believe it isn't properly sourced and goes against WP:Record charts. What do you think? NYSMtalk page 00:22, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Hey

If I may, I believe Alpha (Selena album), Muñequito de Trapo, And the Winner Is..., Preciosa (album) and Dulce Amor should have the same fate as Mis Primeros Éxitos. BTW you may want to look at these as well. Best, Jonayo! ^{Selena 4 ever} 16:16, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Montgomery Gentry

The article Montgomery Gentry you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Montgomery Gentry for comments about the article. Well done! There is a backlog of articles waiting for review, why not help out and review a nominated article yourself? ♫GoP♫_T^C_N 18:35, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

This user helped promote Montgomery Gentry to good article status.

List of songs about Rainbows

Hi, Seeing as you nominated the list of 9/11 songs, I thought you'd love (do I mean dislike?) this particular list. Lists of songs about the moon, the stars and whatever next? Cheers. --Richhoncho (talk) 21:27, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

LOL. What is is about the word "trivia" that some don't understand? --Richhoncho (talk) 11:43, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

And now one of the editors who want to keep has just created List of songs about bicycles, presently up for AfD. Cheers. --Richhoncho (talk) 17:12, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Good Article Barnstar
		Thanks TenPoundHammer for helping to promote Montgomery Gentry to Good Article status. Please accept this little sign of appreciation and goodwill from me, because you deserve it. Keep it up, and give some a pat on the back today. --Sp33dyphil © • © 06:46, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Re:

I'm looking for more reviews of the song, as well as some background info. Maybe a more in-depth look at the music video. I want it to be big enough for a DYK nom, and I don't think it is quite there yet. :) Toa Nidhiki05 04:23, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

User:Richhoncho/Song lists

I have started an appraisal of lists about Foo at User:Richhoncho/Song lists. Perhaps you would like to read, amend or add. If you want to comment, perhaps better on either my or your talkpage. Cheers. --Richhoncho (talk) 20:16, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Michael Ray Bower

Though we're lacking SIGCOV on this actor, it has been confirmed he hits WP:ANYBIO in that when younger he did receive a notable award for "Best Young Actor Co-starring in a Cable Series" for Salute Your Shorts,[24][25] and his body of work is itself verifiable. My thought is that even if fa topic might fail WP:GNG, the instructions at WP:N state "A topic is also presumed notable if it meets the criteria outlined in a subject-specific guideline listed in the box on the right"... sending us to the subject-specific WP:ENT and its criteria of "Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions." I know SIGCOV is the easiest way to determine notability... it's just that guideline does not mandate it as the only way. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:47, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Barnstar

What happened to the barnstar I gave you? I spent a lot of time figuring out how to use the wikilove button.--Lost Fugitive (talk) 19:18, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

What is the link for that?--Lost Fugitive (talk) 23:45, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Reply

Hello. You have a new message at GoingBatty's talk page. GoingBatty (talk) 17:55, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Weasels

Oh, it's a reference to {{weasel-inline}} (not a particularly good reference, but it's the third "-inline" signature I've had). - Jarry1250 ^{[Weasel? Discuss.]} 18:28, 20 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Past the Point of Rescue (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jim Rooney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Aston Martin, Wankers are people too!

Having a bad day? I don't mind you've wiped the section about film appearances of these cars but there must be some who do. Country and Western is of less than no interest to me so I avoid it. Can you take a lead from my example? Eddaido (talk) 06:24, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Such lists are considered trivia and should be avoided. "Such and such character drove an Aston Martin in such and such film" 800 times adds nothing of value to the article. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:43, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

A rather more trivial list. Eddaido (talk) 20:05, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

The only difference I can see is that fewer people would be interested in the performances of the singers. Eddaido (talk) 20:29, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Krakatoa

Originally the three current (? I havent looked them for a long time) and rather messy articles were one and when it was vandalised it was sheer hell trying to work out what had been put in or left out and keep the one article to make sense.

There is a project that tried to prevent ad hoc deletions of popular culture related articles - however I think I can see your point (I think, about the article) about this one (the other articles about Krakatoa are as messy and deserve a lot of attention).

I will try to look at it more carefully - and would rather see a pruned article remain in existence than for it to be bazzooka'd out completely - there is a brilliant book about how Tibet was used in western culture to contain a range of western culture ideas about the exotic - Krakatoa has not has such a book (but deserves one, specially about fears about volcanoes etc) - but I do believe a worked on article deserves keeping... cheers and have a safe christmas SatuSuro 09:48, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Hippos in Tanks

You know music stuff better than I do, so wanted to get an objective opinion. Dennis Brown (talk) 00:40, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

popular culture sections

In the last week you seem to have removed about two dozen or more popular culture sections from articles; some are minor sections containing 2 or 3 dubious references, but most of them are important, containing the use of the theme as an important element of notable and even famous cultural works, which can easily be documented. there is no rule against this material, and your reckless and indiscriminate removal appears to me both pointy and unconstructive. I have reverted most of the significant ones. (In cases where you seem to have deleted the entire section because of one foolish entry, I restored it without the entry. One or two other editors did similarly before I got to them. In one case, you reverted them back, without discussion. I suggest one of two courses: I think the best course is to examine the list for insignificant individual items, and remove them one at a time, discussing on the talk page any challenged item. Alternatively, start an rfc on the existence of these sections. If you do the first, I'll certainly support you with respect to any of the nonsense that sometimes makes up a usually small portion of these sections . If you choose the second, I'll oppose you as strongly as I can, andI remind you that in the last year or two I have won the great majority of the AfDs on such articles that I think worth engaging in. I think the consensus will be firmly in favor of them, but you of course have the right to challenge it. But if you revert the restoration of these sections I will do what I reasonably can to stop you. We've fought about this on and off over the years, but even if I agreed with you, I would still say that I think you're going much too fast and drastic to accomplish anything. I consider them not just encyclopedic , but of essential importance--the relationship between cultural works is what makes up culture. . DGG ( talk ) 07:41, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Lonely Days, Lonely Nights

What is your justification for reverting my restoration of the article on this song, other than just wanting to ? Bwmoll3 (talk) 03:10, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

• I imagine that TPH reverted your restoration because the article was completely unreferenced, and described a song that seemed not to meet the notability requirements, and was also covered in enough depth in the parent album's article. I would've done the same. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 06:29, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

He made no reason for the deletion of the information in the article. Neither did you Bwmoll3 (talk) 11:06, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up. I nominated the songs for deletion if you'd like to participate here. Eric444 (talk) 22:50, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

A nice round robin

Hi,

Are you still interested in the idea of at least some non-admins being able to view deleted pages? I understand that the proposal was shot down previously by foundation counsel; however I believe I have at least two possible answers to their concerns.

One possibility is to make this prospective (apparently the antonynm of retrospective although I'm not so sure) - that is to say that only edits deleted after its implementation can be viewed. For revisions such as libelous edits or copyright violations and so on, there can be a hard delete, lying some way between this soft delete and oversight, which will function just like a present deletion. Admins could also have the power to toggle a deletion from hard to soft (or to undelete) - so selected deletions made before this feature is implemented could be made soft.

The second possibility is to introduce a procedure somewhat like RFA where users are given permission to view deleted edits by the community. As admin privileges are currently granted not just based on trust in general, but also on trust that the tools will be used appropriately, there is a much greater pool of users who would be eligible to be given this permission.

And of course, it is perfectly possible to use both of these systems at once.

I have cross posted this to a few users who were active in the discussion in 2008 - I don't feel this is a violation of CANVASS because I have not made the proposal myself - the reality is I need an experienced Wikipedia with some "street cred" to make it. I already attempted to steer a discussion of a similar proposal this way, but sadly that discussion is irretrievable (see here - or even better, don't!). Because I have posted this to a few users, I would be greatful if you would reply at User_talk:Egg Centric/Proposal and perhaps we can get a discussion going!

Thank you!

Egg Centric 22:58, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

P.S. - silly me, I forgot to link to the original discussion in 2008. Here it is: Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)/Persistent_proposals/Straw_poll_for_view-deleted

Destiny USA article rebuild

I'm creating a new Destiny USA/Carousel Center page when the mall renames later this year. Basically, I'm merging the information from the Destiny USA, History of Destiny USA, and Carousel Center page into one page with a newly expanded history, which will replace the "Former Anchors" list and make it a bit more like the Walden Galleria article. User:TheListUpdater/Destiny USA is the page. I've done some work on it, but it still needs a bunch of work: there's definite gaps in the history, several bare references, and clutter from the old Carousel Center page. I ask that if you do take a look at it, please don't remove anything, and just add the < ! -- tag if needed. TheListUpdater (talk) 18:26, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

• I think I finished it, but because it contains heavy references to Destiny USA (and treats Carousel Center as Destiny USA's former name) and combines three articles, I'm going to leave it as is for now.TheListUpdater (talk) 02:06, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Where have you been?

FAR and FARC could use your hammer over there :) Brad (talk) 08:39, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Category:Songs written by Dean Miller

Why can't we get together and delete all the single entry categories? Shame somebody has already deleted before the nomination ran it's course. Maybe I should have commented rather than support the nomination. Oh well. Next time. --Richhoncho (talk) 09:28, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bedford Mall

Re: your comment, I would have to agree in this case. I honestly was on the fence about this one; that's why we have discussions at XfD. Bearian (talk) 17:51, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Only One Moon

Can you post the American track listing for Only One Moon? "Did You Fall in Love with Me" isn't on my copy, but it is on Everybody Knows. Eric444 (talk) 17:47, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

What track number is it? Does it replace one of the songs on the posted track listing? Eric444 (talk) 23:31, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Re: your Edit

Hiya !! I saw your edit taking out the "anchors" section on Bayshore Mall. I'm sure you are totally correct, but could you give a better explanation of why you took out this historical information? The only explanation on the edit summary is "Anchors: No". Since that section was there when I started trying to add citations, and looks like it was there for a long time, could you tell me why you removed it entirely with no explanation or help on the talk page? You removed the only reference to Macy's being in the mall as well as the history of the anchors of the mall. Thank you for your explanation! Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:05, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanation. I couldn't find an Internet source for Macy's either, but I have correspondence out with the company to find if they ever were in Bayshore. If they say they were, it's a simple trip to the library for old newspapers for a source. It's certainly not important enough to worry about either way. Thank you for telling me about the list, unfortunately that's what was there for five years before I touched the page, so I left it. I tend to be bold by adding citations, not taking away things that were there when I started poking. But thank you for the changes and the knowledge. Fortunately this is the only "real" mall up here so I have no more of these to do. With best wishes, Ellin Beltz (talk) 13:30, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Dustin Lynch

I was about to prod the article, but say it was started by you, so here I am. Article says it reach #42 on the charts. I can't find him on the billboard charts. What chart did he reach #42 on?

I still miss seeing your otters. How are the real life otters doing? Bgwhite (talk) 06:39, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

ANI and notifying people

You recently posted a thread to WP:ANI about TheEunuch (talk · contribs), but forgot to notify them, so I did it for you. --NYKevin @150, i.e. 02:36, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Staunton Mall, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Safeway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of The Lower East Side of Life for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Lower East Side of Life is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Lower East Side of Life until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. CrazyHos12 (talk) 04:37, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

• Oh, the new editor who does a few inclusionist-type edits, creates a user page saying he saves articles for the Article Rescue Squadron, and then AfDs something. Oh, yes, they are brand new to Wikipedia, yes sirree.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 05:46, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Guerillero's talk page.
Message added 02:40, 1 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Guerillero | My Talk 02:40, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

University of Dreams

Thanks for fixing the rationale, but it was decided to be deleted way back then, what happened? Boobymonster (talk) 05:23, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Punaiset Messiaat

Hey Hammer, I looked at that CSD candidate and the associated ones, but can't see the forest for the trees because we seem to be dealing with a walled garden of sorts, and I am unwilling to click through all the bluelinks to see if there isn't associated notability. I suggest AfD for the lot--unless, of course, some deletionist admin walks by and grants you your pleasure in the meantime. Note: I did not remove those speedy templates. Happy fishing, Drmies (talk) 18:39, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

MFD discussion

Maybe I was being a little mean. I'll collapse that part of the discussion if that would be agreeable with you. --Tothwolf (talk) 04:36, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Re:Samad_(crater)

Re:Samad_(crater)

There is entire Category:Impact craters on Enceladus Bulwersator (talk) 15:18, 4 February 2012 (UTC)

Re: Utah

I just haven't been very active on Wikipedia much at all lately. Also, I would have to go back and find some proper sources before I can finish it. But yes, I was strangely enough actually thinking about this the other day, and wondering what it would take to finish it. Not very many people seem to be active around the Utah articles lately, so I've been exploring what I could do to keep them updated. bob rulz (talk) 10:10, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Cottonwood Mall (Utah), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Albertsons (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 5 February 2012 (UTC)

Guidance, navigation and control

I de-prodded this as notable. You otters know what to do next. Bearian (talk) 01:39, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

This is notable because it is a real field of study, complete with conferences. See the talk page for the IP newbie's attempted contesting of the prod. Bearian (talk) 01:50, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

I placed a reason on the talk page, per your request. Bearian (talk) 01:56, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at WP:BOTREQ.
Message added 03:03, 8 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I responded. Tim1357 ^talk 03:03, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

I responded on my talk page a few times and also on WP:BOTREQ. Tim1357 ^talk 04:16, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

schoolcruft

• context

I thought I was the only person who still worked on cleaning up school articles: [26], [27], [28], [29]. Glad to see you around. (I prefer a reply here) tedder (talk) 22:39, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

• Actually I'm removing transclusions of {{NOT}} because I think the template is grossly misused. (It's at AFD.) Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 22:41, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

And {tl|NOT}} is the same as {{Unencyclopedic}}? Works for me. tedder (talk) 22:45, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Rouse Properties

Ah, man... I shoulda waited until the AfD finished before I reported the bug. :) But seriously, why isn't your response a case of WP:INHERITED? I'm legitimately curious, not trying to Wikilawyer your !vote. Thanks! Livit⇑^Eh?/_What? 22:55, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Churchill's advocacy of chemical strike against German cities

Hi. You recently proposed this article for deletion as 'overly specific and redundant'. I have contested the prod, as I think the topic of the article, though specific, is notable, and I don't think there's any other article that contains the same information. If you still think it should be deleted, feel free to take it to articles for deletion. Robofish (talk) 11:07, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Indoor games and sports

I've contested this prod as well. In this case, you thought it was overly broad rather than overly specific, but I again think it's a legitimate topic. Robofish (talk) 11:21, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Buy Here Pay Here

Hi,

I removed the PROD from Buy Here Pay Here because, although the article had lots of original research and few references, the subject is clearly notable and the old article can be helpful for organizing facts found in the references. I replaced the old article with a referenced stub. Please let me know if you are interested in helping rewrite the article once more, with references. Thanks, RJaguar3 | u | t 07:50, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

WP:IINFO

TPH, I get that we differ on notability and inclusion, but twice in the past week I've seen you quote WP:IINFO for things clearly not covered by WP:IINFO, which currently is limited to plot-only fiction, lyrics, and stats. Please take the time to re-read it and see what it actually, currently says, and adjust future nomination statements accordingly. Cheers, Jclemens (talk) 19:31, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Talk:Yu-Gi-OH! Duel Monsters: Duel Vocal Best!!.
Message added Sarujo (talk) 23:07, 10 February 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

ICCF Finland

national organizations are usually notable: see the other articles on the other national ICCF federations, all of which I think would be considered notable here by the community, though of course you have the facility to test it.. In any case , such an organization certainly makes enough claim to importance--a much weaker consideration than notability --to pass speedy A7. DGG ( talk ) 03:59, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

• And please have a look at Disco Fever now. Hammer, I appreciate your work here and usually I agree with you, but you've been around long enough to know that one shouldn't be too trigger-happy. Happy days, Drmies (talk) 04:07, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Sorry about this...

but I've declined your speedy on the Funny Face thing, because it's not a company. Products can't be A7ed. I wouldn't know about the notability - don't think it got marketed here, but I don't remember seeing Kool Aid here either. It'll have to be prod or AfD. (Looks like it's one of those days...) Peridon (talk) 09:45, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Samu (Zen) deletion

Thanks for updating me as to the potential deletion of Samu (Zen). I made some changes to the page in light of the tags, did this remedy any problems you saw, or are there more? Thx.

P.S. Please reply to me on my Talk page so I get an email. Thx.makeswell (talk) 17:06, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Bad day? Good day? Off your diet and bingeing?

Just makes me nervous to see *anybody* make 135 edits in less than two hours, and removing tags and prod'ing and all, whew! I get the searching on old unencyclopedic tags, not necessarily agreeing (not a specialty of mine) but then could you say more than "(rm)", perhaps "(rm quite old tag)" or even identifying the tag "(rm quite old unremedied unencyclopedic tag)". And the succinct (prod) and (drive-by) could be a tad more reassuring...? 24.28.17.231 (talk) 00:05, 12 February 2012 (UTC) (I'm brumating)

• The unencyclopedic tag is up for deletion, which is why i'm removing it. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:35, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
  • Shouldn't its fate be decided before mass-removing from use? LadyofShalott 02:06, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
    • This one looks like a slam dunk delete. Most of the transclusions were misused (some people were confusing it for {{notability}}), and the rest were problems that I fixed in the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:07, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

List of Drowning Victims

I have removed your proposal for deletion of, and have started addressing the issues of, the page List_of_drowning_victims. More discussion on the talk page for that article. Ross-c (talk) 11:18, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

PROD for Nal Stop

Hello! I have Un-Proded the article as it is included in the Template:Pune topics. Hence better to discuss it before deleting. Sounds reasonable? -Animeshkulkarni (talk) 10:56, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Plastomer

As you say, there are links to three different topics: it does not disambigute just one topic. Nyttend (talk) 20:18, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

I will not delete a page under a criterion that does not apply to it. Stop trying to get me to violate deletion policy. Nyttend (talk) 20:19, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Kindly refrain from calling people idiots and from forum shopping to find another admin to speedy delete the page. Nyttend (talk) 20:21, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

No, it does not. Last time I checked, when someone opposes deletion, it is not uncontroversial. Nyttend (talk) 20:28, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Go complain at WT:CSD, not to me, because I didn't make the rules. Because policy says that administrators should take care not to speedy delete pages or media except in the most obvious cases, I'm going to follow it to give the creator a chance to respond at the AFD. Nyttend (talk) 20:36, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: All I Ask For Anymore

Hello TenPoundHammer. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of All I Ask For Anymore, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: See WP:MUSTARD for naming convention. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 21:20, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Sorry about that. I've moved the page. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 21:48, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Question

TPH, I was wondering if there's any good way to look through Wikipedia for articles that got tagged for improvement (for example, improving sourcing from being nearly non-existent) years ago that haven't been touched and that might therefore be good to look over for possible removal. The "Free Independent Traveler" discussion spurred this thought...it was tagged initially something like five or six years ago (it may have been some sort of "fad term" at the time) and never got improved.Tyrenon (talk) 06:15, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Thanks a bunch. I'm not sure how to use the bot to generate a list of "look these over" articles. However, I also got a link to WP:DUSTY from it, so that's a good starting place for now. Thanks a bunch.Tyrenon (talk) 06:30, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Ah, my bad. Is there a way to access the longer list that was generated?Tyrenon (talk) 07:04, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

About List of people in Playmen ...

Hi TenPoundHammer, I'm writing to ask you to (at least temporarily) withdraw this nom, as I'm working to adress the problem you have pointed. About the red links, the 90% of them are notable Italian actresses, they have articles in other-lenguages-Wikipedias and have enough books & news sources and film/tv/stage credits to pass WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR and to have an article in WP; sadly the actual situation is mainly caused by a general poorness of articles about Italian genre cinema, that from about one year I'm trying to repair. As said by WP:LSC, it's reasonable to expect the articles about these persons could be forthcoming in the (short) future, and I'm personally working on that, as from yesterday I created articles about Martine Brochard, Jenny Tamburi, Ines Pellegrini, Lory Del Santo, Anna Maria Rizzoli, Maria Rosaria Omaggio, Nadia Cassini, Erna Schürer, Tinì Cansino and more.

No prejudice in speedily renominating these articles in one month if the red links will still appear too much.

Regards, Cavarrone (talk) 11:35, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Accidental removal of content from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 February 15

Hi TenPoundHammer,

I noticed that an edit you made earlier today using Twinkle seems to have accidentally removed a lot of listed deletion discussions from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 February 15. I think I've added them back in, but I just wanted to let you know that something went wrong with that edit. I don't use Twinkle, so I don't know what might have happened. If you don't know what caused the problem, maybe someone should report this error to whoever maintains Twinkle. Calathan (talk) 22:53, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Nom for deletion of legal case SAS Institute vs. World Programming

The nominated removal of page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SAS_Institute_lawsuit_with_World_Programming would be a shame because this case as outlined by many experts represents a most important legal case. To remove this other landmark cases such as Borland vs. Lotus should also be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.134.115.74 (talk) 14:04, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

WP:PROD

Please read WP:PROD. I'm not required to give a rationale when removing PRODs. On the other hand, PRODs are only intended for uncontroversial deletion nominations which this clearly was not. As you clearly are incapable of determining whether a nomination is uncontroversial or not, please do not use the PROD template in the future. —Ruud 12:51, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

No vandalism!

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. BjörnBergman 22:34, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

My confusion on how to remove a redirect, or propose to.

Thanks for the tips. I've never tried/proposed to delete anything before, and for the special case of a redirect, I found the docs a bit of a hard maze to wander. I was trying to remember what I've done on private MediaWiki installations, which is obviously different.

So, don't blank it; OK. And I guess I tagged it for the wrong queue. (And I don't know if tag or queue are the wrong words there...) This was my first try using Twinkle. "XFD" in the Twinkle menu seemed to be as close as I could get. This may not come up much, with a redirect, but what is the best way propose redirect deletion, whether with Twinkle or without? Thanks! Ale And Quail (talk) 04:15, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

...Ok. So just 'XFD' from the Twinkle menu would do it, along with no misguided futzing with the page. Thanks. Ale And Quail (talk) 04:23, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

xargs

Hello! You might want to withdraw your AfD nomination of xargs article due to feedback in AfD discussion. Unless you still think this article should be deleted, please close the discussion with "withdrawn" resolution: there are just too many current AfDs right now, the navigation became problematic. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 14:35, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Words without (fill in the blank)

Howdy. Noticed that you added a link to Words without vowels at WP:Articles for deletion/Words without consonants. Were you intending to make it subject to the deletion discussion? If so, an AfD tag atop the vowels article would be appropriate. If I've misconstrued, then just never you mind. Cheers! JFHJr (㊟) 18:38, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Lovelies

Can you go ahead and merge it please, as you have indicated has already been done.--Michig (talk) 21:58, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Editor's Barnstar
	A nice start...[30][31] SummerPhD (talk) 02:21, 19 February 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:NOT

Template:NOT has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BrandonSkyPimenta (talk • contribs) 02:01, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

All My Children location AfDs

Hello. Since you started the AfDs for Pine Valley (All My Children) and Llanview, could you also pay an eye to Wildwind of the same franchise? I don't want to start another AfD myself while the other two location AfDs are running, and I'll likely forget to nominate Wildwind after the other two AfDs have run their course. – sgeureka ^t•c 09:25, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Re: All I Ask For Anymore

Sorry for the mistake. I'll pay more attetion next time. And thanks for the advice! :) Bisbis (talk) 23:55, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Deletion notice for Protective Action Guide for Nuclear Incidents

The problem, as I see it, is that proposing Protective Action Guide for Nuclear Incidents for deletion is too strong. It's basically a death sentence that will cause the material to be erased because of the mere 7-day grace period. The NOT template was a better tag for this article, I think, because eventually somebody would salvage this. Jason Quinn (talk) 03:30, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

Greece songs

I've declined your speedy for now, as the author has been around for a fair time and there's an AfD into this article. I've contacted the author about the apparently irrelevant reference link at this and other articles. If you can dig anything up (either way), could you put into the AfD? Ta. Best wishes to the otters. Peridon (talk) 12:10, 25 February 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	Thank you for all your efforts in deletion discussions! If you accept the nomination, I'll post you at RfA. ChromaNebula (talk) 00:32, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

I would heartily endorse. Edison (talk) 04:53, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Backyard Ballistics

Thanks for your redaction. Edison (talk) 04:53, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Please reassess

Please reassess your concerns regarding the deletion of Richard Landis. I have added additional wp:rs and facts of notability. I hope you'll agree this article meets inclusion criteria. Thanks - My76Strat (talk) 04:39, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Substituting the TfD template

I'm sure it was a mistake, but please don't substitute {{tfd}}, it just makes a big mess. Thanks! Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 19:17, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

TfD of Template:Expert-subject

The next time you nominate a template that is used by the standard implementation of Twinkle please leave a note at WT:Twinkle. – Allen4names 05:08, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

My bad. I TFD'd a lot of stuff recently and that one slipped through the cracks. I remembered to notify for {{NOT}}. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:38, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Okay. – Allen4names 15:33, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Synthesis

The main problem is that the Bubbling Under charts have different rules than the main charts. You cannot drop from the Hot 100 to the Bubbling Under chart. This means that if the song that would be number 101 on an extended Hot 100 has already had a higher position, it won't be number 1 on the Bubbling Under chart. Thus, "Extended Hot 100" number 101 is not the same song as "Bubbling Under" number 1. By listing a song as 101 in a discography, we are claiming the two are equivalent when they are not. That's not only a WP:SYNTH violation, it gives the wrong answer.

Whitburn uses a shorthand to include the Bubbling Under chart, and that's his business. The way it is done on Foo Fighters discography#2001–2010 is the only way I know of to include a Bubbling Under position in a discography and comply with our policies.—Kww(talk) 11:15, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Inappropriate rationales in AfD Nominations

Please review User talk:TenPoundHammer/Archive 14#WP:IINFO. In Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of April Fool's Day jokes (2nd nomination), you again made an argument that is entirely unsupported by the text of the quoted policy. Rather than delivering a template warning you that you're acting in a disruptive manner, I thought I'd try again with a personal appeal: please stop this. It's disruptive. If you can't actually come up with a real reason to nominate something for deletion, then you really have no business starting such a nomination in the first place. It may be a bit more work if you forced yourself to nominate articles using policies and guidelines in accord with what they actually cover, but I am confident that any article that ought to be deleted by policy can, in fact, have a valid rationale written for it that does not rely on deception. If you continue to nominate articles based on inapplicable policies, I will seek sanctions on you, such as a topic ban from AfD. I sincerely hope that will not be necessary. Jclemens (talk) 05:07, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Navagation Boxes

I found your message, thank you letting me know the template and Bubbling under hot 100 thing. Much appreciated. David829 {talk) 19:45, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

speedy

Whether or not List of most highly populated countries isd an appropriate article , it does not meet the conditions for speedy G`1, which is for utter nonsense, not just incoherent or poorly thought out articles--if indeed it is such. The policy, WP:CSD, is very clear about the limitation of this criterion, and I find it difficult to believe that with your long experience at deletion processes you are not aware of that. DGG ( talk ) 08:40, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

• Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Back off the Hammer". Thank you. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:42, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Merge discussion over the article List of Hot 100 number-one singles of the 2010s (U.S.)

Dear TenPoundHammer. I just wanted to let you know that a merge discussion is currently taking place regarding the content of this article (as you probably remember, you participated in an AfD held over this article in the past) and the content of the rest of the U.S. number-one by-decade series of articles.

Please express your opinion on this matter in the current discussion. Thank you. TheCuriousGnome (talk) 21:05, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Deletions and RFC/U

Raised at Wikipedia:Requests for comment/TenPoundHammer Andy Dingley (talk) 11:16, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Expert-subject

FYI, see these threads. thank you. Frietjes (talk) 16:09, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

WP:DUSTY

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Svick's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

User<Svick>.Talk(); 15:40, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Dead portal

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:SAARC ended in "keep", though the portal is dead since 2007. Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Ceramic Art and Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Rapid transit ended in "delete", though these portals were dead for a much shorter time. What is the policy, guideline or tradition here? Do we delete long dead portals, or do we not? I have posted the question to the Village Pump as well. Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 12:22, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) MfD is a bit of a crapshoot at time due to low participation. The nom rationale was weak, and an admin who happens to have a strong feeling towards pretty much any Asian topics happened to comment on it. Should it remain stagnant, it's likely that said page's inevitable future recurring MfD will result in deletion. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 00:39, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Hammer, don't you have a comment to offer? It seems you have participated in two of the instances I have quoted here. Obviously you have more experience in this. Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 12:25, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

re: Barnstar

Thanks. Haven't seen one of those in quite some time (which is no surprise, since I've been minimally active for a while now). Chubbles (talk) 22:22, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

New MfD on User:TrueBlood12

... is here, since you contributed to the last discussion I thought I'd notify you. Yunshui 雲‍水 11:50, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Halifax, Nova Scotia

An editor has questioned your close at this AFD. Discussion can be found at WT:AFD#Halifax, Nova Scotia. Also, I noticed this diff from that AFD - I get your frustration, but dude, calm down. Flipping out doesn't help, as you know. UltraExactZZ ^Said ~ Did 14:55, 16 March 2012 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Plummer v. State

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have on for deletion. The nominated article is Plummer v. State.

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plummer v. State. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You are welcome to edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. --Guy Macon (talk) 19:44, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Moving pages and disambiguation of names

Do as you please, but if the page is to redirect your own name (Maraba), because keeping a desambigação the page name (Maraba, Brazil)? There are precedents for the same case: Bethlehem Parauapebas and Araguaína. It is useless or unnecessary continuation of disambiguation. Hallel (talk) 04:23, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

inre Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Silver Drive-In

User:Milowent's point at the AFD got me thinking as well. As the sources he found show a regional, if not world-wide or country-wide notability, I have used his searches and provided a contectual and sourced mention at Johnstown, Pennsylvania#Landmarks... one of the few places where it makes sense to send readers seeking such knowledge. Seem okay with you? Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 06:10, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, this is RomeAntic14 and I wanted to talk to you about the message you sent me about vandalism. I haven't been on my Wikipedia account in 12 days, unless someone is hacking my account and no one is recognizing that. I just wanted to let you know, so have a good day!! —Preceding undated comment added 01:32, 19 March 2012 (UTC).

Insults

There's really no reason to phrase your comment like this.—Kww(talk) 03:03, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

I agree I believe your comments were a bit unneccesary, plus your statement isn't true either, you don't know if the Album will be released now or in 10 years. JayJay^{Talk to me} 17:32, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Steven Curtis Chapman

Not sure why you seem to be going after articles that I have made/edited in that subject, but just because an article is poorly written or sourced does not mean it is automatically a redirect. If you took more than a cursory look at "Dive" in Google, there is certainly enough information to warrant a page with the Dove Awards and all - maybe alterting, you know, the author of the page is better than a decision to redirect for no apparent reason. FTSOTC is even more notable, although certainly not that well written - once again, you could tell me that and I'd fix it. Finally, the 'bad charts' are all Billboard charts that are available at Billboard.biz. Toa Nidhiki05 01:33, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Move of Kit Carson Park

Regarding your recent move of Kit Carson Park (Escondido, California) to Kit Carson Park: Please see a comment on that move here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kit Carson Park (Escondido, California). Thanks. --MelanieN (talk) 17:54, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Blood on the Dance Floor (group)

Hello TenPoundHammer. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Blood on the Dance Floor (group), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not previously been deleted via a deletion discussion. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 19:19, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Chocolat Edit

I would like to come here, not to question your edit, but to question your lack of professionalism when writing on the section where one justifies their edits. I was a little taken back by the sudden "attack", it was relevant and I agree with the edit actually, but yeah next time.... maybe not that kind of behavior would be good. Chocolat ≈ Dubulge (Chat Me Up) 22:00, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

April Fools

Didn't really appreciate the revert. You in a large portion of the world it is still April Fools. – Lionel ^(talk) 00:59, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Fifty articles blanked in under half an hour?

A new record, I'm sure!

Added to Wikipedia:Requests for comment/TenPoundHammer 8-(

Andy Dingley (talk) 09:08, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at ItsZippy's talk page.
Message added 18:37, 2 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 18:37, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Halo Burger

I'm trying to avert an edit war, but I need help with the Halo Burger article as I reached 3RR. Can you help? Steelbeard1 Steelbeard1 (talk) 21:03, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

He's still at it. Steelbeard1 (talk) 13:27, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi

I'd started a Propose for Deletion on the Dennis Morriseau article and it was undone by someone who'd edited the article heavily, so I feel I've gotten myself involved yet again in something I don't really know enough about. The article seems to be pretty clearly mostly based on Morrisseau's own self promotion and publication, rather than any actual or real accomplishment. I looked at the process you pointed me to but am having difficulty figuring what to do next. I think the article's potential deletion is worthy of discussion but need some help with wading through what must seem to be a simple process to more experienced editors. Thanks Vttor (talk) 23:55, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Much thanks. Vttor (talk) 00:46, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Notifying related WikiProjects of proposed deletions

Hi TenPoundHammer. You recently proposed the deletion of Gallery (APA/'zine). While I do not intend to contest this proposal, I only happened to learn about it because I had the article watchlisted. Notification of projects tagged on the talk page (e.g. WikiProject Furry), as suggested in {{prod}}, would be appreciated by project members, and in some cases might help to find the sources you could not. In this case, the initial author (who was also not notified) was an anonymous IP that had since been blocked, making it even more important to let active users know. GreenReaper (talk) 06:49, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Reply

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Meclee's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Meclee (talk) 15:25, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi TenPound,

I didn't know if you had seen it or not, it is so cute. ! Penyulap ☏ 05:28, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

I knew they looked familiar - followed the file back to Flickr and sure enough, that's Milo and Nyac, from the Vancouver Aquarium. I've got probably hundreds of shots of Milo (on the right) and a few of Nyac... sadly, Nyac passed away a few years ago, and we lost Milo a couple months ago to cancer. =/ Glad they've got such an enduring legacy, though. Tony Fox (arf!) 18:10, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Hello tony, is there a way I might have a look at any of the images that you have, they could be useful to me for making an animated userbox, or other projects. Are they on the web ? or possibly a screenshot of the thumbnails could be emailed or uploaded ? Penyulap ☏ 12:39, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 20:47, 5 April 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Disambiguation link notification for April 6

Hi. When you recently edited Southgate Mall (Elizabeth City), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Winn Dixie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

If You Love Me (Let Me Know)

(Re-)done. The protection interface has had clashes with my browsers recently (I'm visiting my family and using their computers), occasionally rejecting protection commands. Thanks for pointing out the error. Deryck C. 16:45, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

I otter ask someone who knows how to stuff

cause I only know how to .... so I would naturally want to what my bullshit detector (see I didn't image there, are you thankful?) identified as post 911 personal propaganda off this and keep the cool pic. I was thinking attack images need to be notable, but I do like Nuns with Guns !! Someone was wanting a mascot for wikiproject christianity, so I'm helping out there, I think the top half would be a lovely alternative !proposal for whoever is doing it. Penyulap ☏ 14:41, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

WP:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#TenPoundHammer_switches_from_deletion_to_blanking

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

The thread is here: WP:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#TenPoundHammer_switches_from_deletion_to_blanking

Please don't claim once again that you've not been notified. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:06, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Authorship of Flickr file at Commons

Hi,

As you mentioned you don't visit Commons very often, this is just a message to let you know I've added a comment to your talk page there.

All the best,

Ubcule (talk) 14:46, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

Moving on from the AN/I thread

Dear TenPoundHammer: This is Tristessa here, the admin who jumped in from the blue on the AN/I thread. Please don't hate me; I come in peace. I hope you don't mind me taking this to your talk page; the AN/I thread has (rightly) been closed due to lack of consensus for administrative action. I'd like to discuss a few points with you, and make a few suggestions.

Whilst it's indubitable that you do great work, and lots of it — I'd politely point out that a lack of active opposition doesn't absolve you of responsibility to consider editors' concerns. I mean that purely from a feedback-based perspective. It could be an incorrect perception on my part, but it seems as though you view any sort of criticism of your work by anyone as an attack against you. Related to this is a pattern of riding out storms: editors stating, as you did at AN/I, things like "nobody except X opposes me" as reasons for just moving on without addressing the concerns can create frustrating popularity contests that are likely to repeat endlessly.

I proposed the WP:TBAN given the poor quality of dialogue at the RFC/U, in the hope that it might force you to put the redirect button aside and talk. It wasn't meant as a punishment. It went down like a lead balloon, and probably quite rightly. But would, I ask, it hurt to hold off redirecting articles while they're at AfD for a little while, and to talk to users a little more patiently? Would it hurt, similarly, to explain and discuss patiently and with an assumption of good faith? Would it hurt to slow down a little, calm down, breathe a little more deeply; to understand that opposition is a useful means of gaining feedback as a Wikipedia editor? I hope you may consider this. You might have an easier time as a result, and the editors you've got into conflict with may hopefully understand their own issues better also. With best wishes, --Tristessa (talk) 21:41, 8 April 2012 (UTC)

NBC logos

Thanks, I will, most likely in a few hours when I have the chance. Feel free to add them as well if you happen to beat me to it.  Gongshow ^Talk 02:47, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

I've added them.  Gongshow ^Talk 05:52, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Your feedback would be much appreciated.  Gongshow ^Talk 19:04, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

WikiThanks

WikiThanks

Thanks for your recent contributions! 67.80.64.128 (talk) 12:21, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Re: Kurusha Magzub

I didn't think of it as a hoax, but more of case of someone trying to get his name out there (or his mother trying to get his name out there). He could very well be related to some ancient royal family that is no longer royal, but as far as I know that doesn't make someone notable. Either way, it's going to be deleted somehow. ... discospinster _talk 00:22, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Shenandoah and Ralph Ezell

Hello. I have noticed in a few articles of musical groups that in the 'past members' section of the background section, some members who were in a particular group at one point or another that have since passed away have the term 'deceased' in parentheses. I have done such next to Ralph Ezell's name in the Shenandoah article. Should that be acknowledges as so? Thanks for the info. 1zackman (talk) 02:17, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Lists of lists of lists

I love that article! But I can't come up with a good policy-based argument for keeping it. I expect that my not-vote won't be given a lot of weight. Pburka (talk) 04:04, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Re-protection requests

Soap (talk · contribs) stepped in before I had a chance to look, so they're protected already! Deryck C. 07:17, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Re: Alejandro Garcia

Not according to the hoax template; if it's a case of puffery you can argue for its deletion as an advertisement, which would probably be fine in this case, but that's not strictly speaking a hoax, which is completely made up. I'm not really arguing that the page should stay, and I am not planning on making a case that it should, but I am concerned about process here. Chubbles (talk) 16:51, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, well, I spoke too soon, since it's already gone. So much for process. Chubbles (talk) 16:56, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Re:Louis Tomilson

I saw your message and was going to close it, but JohnCD beat me to it. Good thing, really; it was a joke, probably shouldn't have even commented in it. Lynch7 19:05, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Re: Cameron Finley

Well, it does appear that, after an initial glance, the significant coverage I found on the subject himself was written at the time of his Beaver role...I'll take a deeper look later. As for the article's survival, as I stated in my de-prod edit summary, I believe his case merits having the AfD discussion, at least. I'm interested to see what other people might have to say.  Gongshow ^Talk 03:18, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the compliment. I figure most AfDs get started over concerns about sources, so it just makes sense to post my findings when I find something, support someone else's findings if they beat me to it/find something I missed, or support deletion/redirection if I find nothing. It also helps to think of an AfD as a discussion rather than a debate. The latter seems to have more drama, and who on the Internet wants that?!  Gongshow ^Talk 20:42, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Adminly help

Hello, anyone here? *listens to voice echo*

Anyway, Liam Payne redirects to One direction which redirects to One Direction, creating a double redirect. Liam Payne is full protected though. Can someone fix this? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:18, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

 Done. Fixed by JohnCD. Lynch7 19:22, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

I didn't see that

i was just about fix it i press save it says edit conflict and please don't stalk my contributions i am great editor without my edits 1D pages would look like shit since nobody edits them i literally built their album and single pages from nothing, tour pages so please leave me alone AdabowtheSecond (talk) 20:38, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Human voltage

You ask (on my talk page) a fair question. Clearly we all agree that this article merited deletion, which has now happened. It had already been nominated for {{speedy}} deletion twice under G3, and twice it had been held (not by me) not to qualify under this criterion. You may feel that I was using overkill, and you may be right, but by both !voting at the AfD and adding a prod template I was attempting to make doubly sure that it went!--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 10:46, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

DVD

Can You close the deletion afd thingy on the page now Up All Night – The Live Tour DVD AdabowtheSecond (talk) 22:05, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

Infobox Hindu monk

Do you think that {{Infobox Hindu monk}} redundand to {{Infobox Hindu leader}} or some other infobox? -- Magioladitis (talk) 09:34, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Bubblers

I think if we're going to use Joel Whitburn's books as a source, it's only logical to go by what they actually say, and I think it's impractical and needlessly complicated to have a dozen footnotes for a discography like Johnny Cash's, but I'm basically done adding Bubbling Under peaks anyway. Eric444 (talk) 21:36, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Because it makes things overly complicated and directly contradicts the source. Whitburn's books state in no uncertain terms that the songs peaked at 1xx. At any rate, I finished adding all the country bubbling under peaks yesterday. Eric444 (talk) 22:03, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

AFD One Direction (American band)

could you close the afd for said article its a strong delete were just waiting for an administrator to close it AdabowtheSecond (talk) 12:52, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Ok AdabowtheSecond (talk) 17:37, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Another X for deletion?

How many are there? 86.** IP (talk) 20:21, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi!

Saw you is post on Old Mushu page, can help me ERRORFULL information removal? Has wrong info but denial of! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fuzzy butternut (talk • contribs) 14:27, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Hat tip

Hi TPH, thanks for moving my AfD request over to RfD. I wasn't aware of the latter, though I knew the former listing didn't feel quite right. --BDD (talk) 15:35, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed changes to the criteria for speedy deletion

I would like to propose some changes to the criteria as follows:

1. Merge A9 into A7. The two are very similar, as they both deal with notability issues. (I hope you're not offended by this since A9 was your idea.)
2. Merge U1 into G7. The two are very similar, so why have a separate criterion for userspace?
3. Expand G12 to include any page that could get Wikipedia into legal trouble, including files meeting criteria F3, F4, F5, F6, F7, F9 or F11. Those F-criteria deal with copyright and licensing issues, just like G12. Oh, and there's something else the speedy deletion criteria need to cover so Wikipedia isn't on the FBI's Most Wanted list: illegal files. There are some things that are illegal to display (I think you know what I'm talking about) and must go quickly so Wikipedia doesn't get in legal trouble. Illegal files could be covered by G12 too.

And I propose 2 new criteria:

A11: Unencyclopedic articles with no valuable history, including dictionary definitions, how-to articles, essays, things made up one day and others. A11 would not include articles that could become encyclopedic with a reasonable amount of effort. I know this will be controversial, but please think about it before automatically !voting oppose.

G13: Content forks, especially disruptive ones, where there is no reason to keep. A10, T3, F1 and F8 could be merged into G13. Why have four separate criteria when one will do?

I have proposed these changes to help simplify the criteria, avoid getting Wikipedia into legal trouble and save time pointlessly debating unencyclopedic articles that wouldn't stand a chance of surviving AfD. Thank you for reading these proposed changes, and please share your opinion below. I need your opinions. ChromaNebula (talk) 16:13, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	For being an excellent editor. ChromaNebula (talk) 18:10, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Blah blah blah, filibuster, blah blah blah other articles exist, blah blah blah

Dude do you have me confused with someone else? In Ravensfires User Talk I learned ONLY TODAY that what people are asking for re: not deleting the Foswiki page is 3rd party articles about it - and I've now set out to go find some. I'm brand new to all this WP process - just learning the rules y'all are playing by - so don't be pretending you've told me things before. Save your frustration for someone who deserves it - i'm just trying to help. PaulReiber (talk) 04:24, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Question

• Pardon my ignorance, since I've never seen someone ask to blacklist a string of text in an edit before, only urls and titles, but how exactly does one block a string of text with the wiki interface? I have looked, and I don't see any section of Wikipedia set up to do that. Dennis Brown ® © 18:02, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Hello. You have a new message at Dennis Brown's talk page.

You may want to...

...Request deletion of this, I assume you are not involved. --kelapstick^(bainuu) 22:15, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

I actually CSD'd it...--kelapstick^(bainuu) 22:18, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

I'm sorry.

Sorry TPH, I wanted you to become an admin. You'd make a really awesome administrator, and I know you want the mop really badly. Since you had accepted 7 previous nominations, I thought you'd have no problem with this one. (If your RfA does get deleted, would you like me to recreate it?) I can join WikiProject Country Music as a consolation prize. (Oh, and by the way, I created River North Records for you. Just thought you'd like to know.) ChromaNebula (talk) 23:11, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Template:Cleanup-laundry

Please clarify: If the template is deleted as you propose (apparently in contrast to merging with the general list cleanup template) what do you suggest to happen to the articles currently marked by it? Have you done a check to see if articles tagged with this template are generally not in need of work? (I have not checked the particular usage of this template, I've only happened to come across it occasionally while working through cleanup category.)

RJFJR (talk) 16:33, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you

		The Modest Barnstar
		In recognition of all the work you’ve done lately! 66.87.0.140 (talk) 22:52, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Hacked account

Above likely, into probably territory, as the syntax and spelling errors have remained fairly consistent, but on the offchance, they'd deserve help, even though WP:ROPE isn't necessarily relevant. Dru of Id (talk) 06:30, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Mops

Actually, I think you'd do a pretty good job with one - but I'm a bit of a maverick in some ways... In my early days patrolling New Accounts (I never did NPP as such, just New Accounts), I thought you were an admin for some time. Peridon (talk) 12:10, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Sharon Davis (disambiguation)

Hello. I just thought I'd politely remind you that if you nominate an article for deletion, you should inform the creator. I have added my opinion to the AfD. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 19:22, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

You've just done this again! I'm really surprised that such an experienced editor would do that. Please leave it to the AfD, and please look at the guidelines. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 19:40, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

As you haven't responded to my messages, I've commented at Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/TenPoundHammer. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 10:55, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

There is a mop reserved in your name

I have observed some remarkable contributions from this account. I am curious as to why are you not an administrator. Pardon that you have struck me as the kind of editor who could be a good one, and that you seem qualified by a cursory review. You exemplify the essence of an Administrator without tools! I hope you will consider serving in the fuller capacity.

tps- I have to agree, and my observations date back enough that I am sincere. My76Strat (talk) 12:24, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Just one of the many bins TPH has filled with crap articles.

Agree with above, you are so unapprieciated here. You are like the garbage man of Wikipedia, clearing out the shit nobody else wants to touch. You should be commended, not ostracised. If it wasn't for users like you, Wikipedia would be filled with even more dumpster articles than it already is.

You should see your RFC as a positive recognition of your work, and continue the great work here.--Otterathome (talk) 10:57, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Your RfC/U

I left some detailed feedback at Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/TenPoundHammer that I want to make sure you don't miss. Please carefully consider it. Cheers, Jclemens (talk) 05:21, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Western Media Effect on Non-Western Eating Pathology

Hi. Care to give this the appropriate treatment?♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:19, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

The Hunger Games: Songs from District 12 and Beyond

I own the soundtrack and "Run Daddy Run" is credited to Miranda Lambert and featuring Pistol Annies, so it should be posted as such bud. I don't know why you removed it but that's how it should be posted on here too as it's correct. Swifty*^talk 11:56, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

By the way can I get your thoughts on this? Thanks! Swifty*^talk 13:42, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Swifty's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thanks! Swifty*^talk 01:39, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Question for you

You indicate here that you nominated the page for deletion, but it was actually nominated by Axem Titanium. Are both accounts yours? ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 07:24, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

You Walk Away

I just removed your prod of the article You Walk Away because the company has had coverage in the New York Times and Time Magazine, among other sources. But then I noticed that the article had been previously prodded, which means it should not have been prodded again. I find it's always a good idea to check the history before proposing an article for deletion. Thanks. --MelanieN (talk) 18:31, 3 May 2012 (UTC)

Thoughts, here?

Spotted on NPP - Ferroconcrete (disambiguation). Points to Reinforced concrete, as well as Ferroconcrete, which was, until today, a redirect to the former link on ferroconcrete. The article is now about a branding company which may or may not be notable.

Not sure what to do here. Initial instinct is to revert and speedy the DAB as unnecessary, but I'd like a second opinion on this.

--Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 02:13, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

My only concern, here, is going to be the fact that Ferroconcrete has its history as a redirect, and the sources would say, as you point out, is that an A7 would not be appropriate (assertion of notability comes with the sources). I'll try a revert and db the dab, see where that goes. You think an admin might want a look at this? --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 02:25, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Some nice work

Very nice job nailing it down at Rango (2011 film). I left you a well-deserved laudatory comment on the talk page, along with a suggestion, and I have to say: very precise and meticulous work on your part. With regards, --Tenebrae (talk) 04:48, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Spike nicholson

Struck your G3 tag, replaced with a G10 - it falls within attack pages and the G10 brings page blanking with it. =) --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 06:40, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Kickin' and Screamin'

What do you make of this? See the history for my axe job. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 17:04, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

New CSD

U4. Inactive non-contributing user.

User pages of users that have never edited outside of their user space, and have not edited within the last 365 days, except userpages for anonymous users who have edited, redirects from misspellings of an established user's userpages, should not be linked to from any page, and for the previous name of a recently renamed user (which should normally be left as a redirect to the new name for a reasonable time).

• {{db-u4}}, {{db-inactiveuser}}

What do you think of this new CSD? Based off WP:NOTRESUME, WP:NOT & WP:NOTWEBHOST.--Otterathome (talk) 11:47, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Stand Up (Jessie J song)

New article, and I'm not sure about how low the bar is for singles but this has to be close. Thought it better to just have you eye it. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © 12:38, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Brad Paisley

Whitburn only lists "Water," which peaked at #109 before it was released as a single. Eric444 (talk) 14:32, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Administrators' Noticeboard

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Logical Cowboy (talk) 16:01, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Impressed

[32] You participated, didn't swear at anyone, seemed calm and logical, and even made concession. Well done.

I'm still wondering though, how does Luna get on with Lari, Aaron, Caleb, Jason, Kirk, and Wayne? --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:01, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Discography Question

Hi TPH! I have been working on Johnny River's discography page and I have a question on where to list some of his albums. Many of his albums were recorded live at the Whisky A Go Go but they are what the singles were released from. Should I list them with the live albums or the studio albums. When I think of live albums I think of live versions of the studio version, but in this case they are the same thing. It sounds like a dumb question but figured I would ask. It looks like 4 of his first 5 albums were all recorded in front of an audience. Thanks. Gilliganfanatic (talk) 16:29, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. I'll move them over. Gilliganfanatic (talk) 21:24, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

BJS color

Please see User talk:RHaworth#Deletion of Beijing Subway colours template. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 18:43, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

HELP ME PLEASE

Go look at my talk page one editor is trying to get notable stuff deleted from this encyclopedia.HotHat (talk) 21:54, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

La Costa

Thanks for the second message on my talk. Your suggestion at WP:AN confused me, since the edit you linked is in the middle of a bunch of revisions that are plainly about the singer, so the link in your message at my talk is a lot more understandable. Nyttend (talk) 23:28, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 18:03, 14 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Boring award test

Extended content

The Donut of DOOM You have been presented with The Donut of DOOM Please take a nibble and tell us what you think You'd better keep an eye out for these, there has been some testing on animals and it did not go entirely according to plan. Just thought you should know, I can't imagine how I'd feel if an otter took a nibble. Do feel free to tlx or delete it, it may be dangerous to have it laying about. Unless they'd never eat a donut, I don't know what otters think of human food. Penyulap ☏ 14:51, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Back to the drawing board. I'm sure I will find an award that works someday if I keep at it, sorry for the hassle, although, I expect you have been very busy too. Penyulap ☏ 07:54, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Suggestions for resolving deletion concerns

Hi. I've been reading some recent, threads where some concerns have been raised about some of your deletion work. First, let me thank you for your hard work in trying to improve Wikipedia. Second, I think it would allay much of the concern if you were to make a clear statement voluntarily undertaking certain reasonable restrictions. I give some suggestions below. Please don't take this as a judgment of your past behaviour on each point; I appreciate that some of then intersect with undertakings you have already made elsewhere or things you may already be doing. Feel free to change them as you see fit.

• Take a one month break from deletions.
• Never file a AfD for an article you have filed an AfD for before.
• Never file a AfD within a year of the last AfD on that article.
• If a PROD is rejected, do not file an AfD for a week, and only have you have engaged in discussion on the article talk page.
• When you want to bring a group (e.g. 6 or more) of related articles to AfD for the same reason, test-file one and then file the others only if the first is closed "delete". Also, mention the group in the AfD and notify the relevant WikiProject.
• Withdraw AfD nominations promptly when you foresee an "obvious keep".
• Be moderate in AfD comments. Don't badger !voters. Comment on the policy arguments not the editors.
• Be dilligent in looking for sources for notability deletions.
• Interpret CSD criteria narrowly.

I hope this is helpful for you. Bovlb (talk) 18:48, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

I don't think there's much about the recent ANI silliness that suggests TPH needs to change much about what he's doing. The discussion of "ratios" is ridiculous. Editors are quite able to change their "ratios" right before an RfA, etc. by not nominating controversial articles. That we have an experienced editor who still does that, is a good thing. I think most of those "suggestions" are downright insulting given the triviality of the "concerns" that prompted it. And many go against the spirit of AfD and our community. I'm not speaking for TPH at all. Just voicing my opinion. If you're looking for an opportunity to challenge TPH on his deletions, that was not the ideal opening for it. Shadowjams (talk) 05:37, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for voicing your opinion, but I'm really not trying to challenge anyone here. The two threads I linked to above show that a number of editors have raised concerns about TPH's approach to deletion, and I see no sign that they're going to stop doing so. My suggestions are aimed at helping TPH find a way to defuse the situation. Leaving aside the first one, none of these suggestions are especially burdensome, and all of them would have significant support (but not consensus) as policy. As I said above, some of them are in line with things TPH has already said. It is certainly within the norms of our community for an editor whose practices have been questioned to this extent to explain how they intend to address those concerns in future. In particular, I would hope that some set of assurances like those above would be sufficient to forestall any further rounds of fault-finding and finger pointing. I think that people would prefer such pro-active clarity for the future over any amount of defense of the past. Cheers, Bovlb (talk) 06:21, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Keithpalmer.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Keithpalmer.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:45, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Andy Cherry

Since you participated in Adam Cappa and Moriah Peters, you seem like one that sould participate in the discussion.HotHat (talk) 23:03, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Samestate

Hello, I was wondering do you think this is notable under MUSICBIO.HotHat (talk) 05:35, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

You know of anymore bands that may be notable because I can do some research to see!HotHat (talk) 05:45, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

All Sons & Daughters

Do you think this one is notable at all?HotHat (talk) 07:30, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Rodney Atkins

The article Rodney Atkins you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Rodney Atkins for comments about the article. Well done! There is a backlog of articles waiting for review, why not help out and review a nominated article yourself? GoP_T^C_N 16:09, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

I don't want this night to end.

Just remembered, this is why I got involved in the first place. Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Songs#I_Don.27t_Want_this_Night_to_End, but as I said, I have no great opinion on the matter one way or the other. Cheers. --Richhoncho (talk) 14:23, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks and could you maybe help me?

I appreciate you fixing my AFD I just did Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/2011_BMW_PGA_Championship. Its not the first AFD I've done but I don't know why the formatting went wrong.

Could you help me with this- I want to AFD all yearly articles for The Players Championship. There are ones for 2002 to 2012. Rather than doing 11 separate nominations, can you tell me the shortcut to put all of them together for a AFD discussion? Thank you for the help....William 18:42, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

I replied over at my talk page. Feel free to delete this edit....William 19:06, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Another message for you at my talk page. I screwed up....William 19:25, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Thank you for all the help and being patient with me as I seriously mucked things up. At least I can't much up this message, right?

...William 20:04, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Citation Barnstar

Last year, I realized that the ARC Weekly Top 40 was no longer on WikiPedia. Although it was accurate, a lot of people were unknown of this chart and the MBG Top 40 chart. At first I was a little upset it was not on the website. However, me being subscribed to Billboard, I realized that the information on ARC Weekly was "a little bit off". It says it's supposed to be Airplay and Sales. Unfortunately, the chart has undergone changes that no one else had known. Yes, when I do not want to log into my Billboard.Biz subscription, I do visit ARC rockonthenet. But what I've noticed is that it was pretty much like Top40-charts.com. It seemed off from what it was supposed to be. I looked at Hot 100 Airplay, Mainstream Top 40, and even Pop Digital Songs; it seemed inaccurate. Another thing was that there were about 275 songs in its first year (1980), but there were only 156 songs in 2009. Since I knew the history of Contemporary hit radio and the formats it spawned into, I knew that the website did not provide enough information about its chart change. It was as if it focused on The Billboard Hot 100 from 1980 to 1990, Hot 100 Airplay and Sales from 1991-1996, Top 40 Tracks from 1996-2003, and the Mainstream Top 40 and Pop Digital from 2004-present. Thank you for deleting it on WikiPedia. Someone like me, who was born way after 1980, could have misused an inaccurate chart when trying to re-live Contemporary hit radio in the 1980s DominiquesMusic (talk) 11:38, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Input

You may now want to have your say here about One Sonic Society.HotHat (talk) 00:07, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Here is the source for the AC Songs Chart. I am only able to copy and paste it for now!HotHat (talk) 03:12, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Will you look here, and tell me what you think!HotHat (talk) 06:03, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Article prod

Withdraw it already! It's WP:SNOW! Why won't you admit it? I don't like articles being proposed for deletion while I'm watching it and prepare to expand it. When I get obsessed about something, I tend to stay like that until the problem goes away. (Sorry about my previous comments btw, and thanks for trying to help). - M0rphzone (talk) 04:54, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for responding. Maybe you should take a break if you're tired. - M0rphzone (talk) 20:41, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

I really think you should take a Wikibreak and stop getting involved in these incidents considering you keep making ill-advised prods (recent one for Slashdot effect is one example) like the ones you made previously. - M0rphzone (talk) 22:45, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#XfD Topic Ban for User:TenPoundHammer

I think the subject says it all, but per my comment to your CANVASS on Sandstein's talk page, I'm proposing a six month topic ban from XfD. Regretfully, Jclemens (talk) 21:07, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

FFS TPH, do you know how much it pisses me off to actually have to !vote "support"? Fricking WHY?!?!? (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 21:39, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

What, is it some sort of gravitational pull of the moon or predestination written in Mayan tablets that forced you to hit an edit button, type some stuff, and then hit SAVE??? Carrite (talk) 22:38, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

• Quoting myself: Timbo's Rule 2. So-called "anti-canvassing" rules are a mechanism by means of which a narrow clique can avoid broad discussion and decision by a larger and more inclusive group. (Feb. 2012). How do we get from a run-of-the-mill minor so-called "canvassing" offense to a 6 month topic ban??? I'd like to hear that twisted logic explained... Carrite (talk) 22:33, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 15:05, 28 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

TLS-H

Please could you consider withdrawing your TfD nomination of {{TLS-H}}. While the template has been replaced by {{TLS-H2}}, it is not a simple case of replacing them as the lists follow different formats. I therefore had to revert your edits replacing it, and I don't believe there is any way that the template can be fully replaced before the end of the current TfD. --W. D. Graham 16:55, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "XfD Topic Ban for User:TenPoundHammer (Again)". Thank you. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:51, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

reverted your edit, it's not helpful to your position nor Wikipedia. Based on the current trend on AN I'd suggest taking a break from participation and letting things settle. Wikipedia pissing contests are like WarGames - "the only winning move is not to play" Nobody Ent 20:53, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

• I closed the discussion, not completely proper since I participated, but someone can revert me or call me out if they feel that strongly. I've always liked you and still do (and understand if you aren't liking me much this week). I'm afraid you are going to make an innocent "big" mistake on the wrong day, and bad things are going to happen. I do think you need a break from XfD just to get a different perspective. It has the added benefit of letting things cool down. You certainly have enough other talents to keep you busy for a few months. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © 21:23, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Sam Battistone

Hi. Could you possibly explain this edit (which you also made to a few other pages)? The former owner of the Jazz is probably notable, especially if he's the one who moved the team, so a red link seems OK to me. We needn't worry about disambiguation until someone creates an article at that space. Zagalejo^^^ 02:22, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Hm. I've never heard that before. I do see some merit to your edits, but misdirected links are just a minor annoyance, and are easily fixed. I don't think it's something you should worry about too much. There's no shortage of other things that need fixing. :) Zagalejo^^^ 03:09, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:TenPoundHammer/The Devil's Wiktionary

User:TenPoundHammer/The Devil's Wiktionary, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:TenPoundHammer/The Devil's Wiktionary and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:TenPoundHammer/The Devil's Wiktionary during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:07, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Just wanted to leave a note that if something is in your userspace like this then you don't have to MfD it but G7 it. Cheers! →TSU ^tp* 03:57, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Opps...sorry I didn't open the MfD. →TSU ^tp* 04:00, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

• You nominated User:TenPoundHammer/The Devil's Wiktionary for deletion, notified yourself of your nomination, and then closed the MfD discussion yourself. So how come you didn't go for the superfecta and iVote in the discussion? :) -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 10:37, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
• I think Wikipedia:The Devil's Wiktionary is worth keeping, and thank TPH for not exercising his technical right to {{db-u1}} it. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:34, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

re: SFD

It could be a seven month backlog. Come back to me when it is. There's a seven year backlog on unref'd articles, so your argument is redundant. Lugnuts (talk) 07:01, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

WP:HAMMERTIME

Would it apply to Underwater Soccer, a sport which hasn't been invented yet? --kelapstick^(bainuu) 11:35, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

TenPoundHammer

I just thought to let you know, that nothing says everything you want to say in a deletion discussion better than TenPoundHammer, serious, that says it ALL :) Penyulap ☏ 15:03, 1 Jun 2012 (UTC)

Template:Sudo

Hi. Please close your deletion nomination of Template:Sudo. There's clear consensus against deleting the redirect and your addition of a deletion template is getting in the way of being able to use the template redirect. --MZMcBride (talk) 17:52, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. :-) --MZMcBride (talk) 21:11, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

National-Report methodology

I did some digging and posted some links about the company from the site itself here but my Spanish isn't fluent. Could you verify to see it helps verify anything about the company and methodology? Erick (talk) 00:11, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

So, is that it? Erick (talk) 04:30, 3 June 2012 (UTC)

All That (album)

I am going to redo that page I found some information about it that I can source and give information on it about. Since you are the one who put it up for deletion in 2008 I was wondering if that is okay? I also own the album and can post liner notes. Swifty*^talk 02:19, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Source 1, Source 2 Source 3. I know source one says After All but that was a typo lol! and I also have Dream Come True: The LeAnn Rimes Story which is a biography by Jo Sgammato and on pages 62-64 it mentions All That and it being released in July 1994 and recorded in the spring of 1994 in Clovis, New Mexico. Swifty*^talk 02:58, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

What you mean? Swifty*^talk 03:07, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

What do you think? Swifty*^talk 03:58, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! and did that got it changed to "Studio" question. Should I add Blue as next album? Swifty*^talk 05:03, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! That's done too. LOL! Any other suggestions? Swifty*^talk 05:09, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

I added that it was released on CD and cassette tape. You think that's useful information? Swifty*^talk 05:22, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

KK. When I looked into the history of the first time this page was made I could understand why it was opted for deletion and me being a MAJOR fan since 1997 I knew a lot of back stuff but I know that sources were needed. I remember being a member of her fan club and she found 200 copies of the album that she sold (this was back in 2002) on her official store but I cannot find anything about it as I know that would need a source. Swifty*^talk 06:00, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Deletion of Doghouse Diaries

Although the article has been deleted, I wasn't able to get any response for my last edit, which includes another reference from webmagazine, MakeUseOf. I agree some of these webmagazines I have never heard of, but that doesn't really qualify them to be unreliable sources. For example MakeUseOf, has a full editorial board, and not just from the magazine, but also from its wiki entry it seems like a reliable web magazine. In any case, this was my final comment, if because of this you change your mind, please let me know what I could do.

I have added yet another reference which puts doghouse diaries in the list of Top 8 web comics. This was in the web-magazineMakeUseOf, an independent media magazine, with an independent editorial board. MakeUseOf, Mashable and Gizmodo, each of them have covered Doghouse Diaries well enough to qualify it to be notable. The objection however could be as to whether the above sources are reliable or not. Here are my points why they could be considered reliable

• They are not related to Doghouse Diaries, nor does it seem that they are trying to unfairly promote Doghouse Diaries.
• They have editorial system, for which I refer to their corresponding wiki articles, for example the editorial for MakeUseOf is Editorial staff. Each one of them has an Editor-in-chief and so on.

The clarity of this discussion would be enhanced if the other wiki editors could cite the reason why they think the above references cannot be taken as reliable. Points like Mashable is a trivial source, is a trivial argument.Shashi B Jain (talk) 09:01, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

I understand, Wikipedia is a place where Justin Bieber on Twitter is considered notable, and a webcomic read by thousand of users every day, talked about in popular web-magazines, discussed in a blog by serious academicians from Standford, UPenn etc as 'not so notable'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shashi B Jain (talk • contribs) 10:02, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

I think I'm on to something

Given all your MfD requests, I was thinking of a much more efficient way to do some staledraft housekeeping. I put out a workshop discussion thread here[33] Please post your thoughts there. Thanks. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 10:34, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

Sudo

I've spent a not insignificant amount of time staring into space and wondering just what {{Why is there never a goddamn admin when I need one}} might do. To date, all of my conclusions are either impractical or illegal. Pdfpdf (talk) 15:02, 2 June 2012 (UTC)

{{My Little Pony}}

When I removed the nonexistent article List of non-English-language My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic voice actors from the {{My Little Pony}} template, I accidentally removed List of My Little Pony DVD releases. Thanks for adding it back, as I didn't notice I'd even removed it. Ciaran Sinclair (talk) 01:19, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

CfD

See here I don't know if you've been following this, but you may wish to respond or get someone else involved. I'd be interested in your further perspective. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:03, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Look

Dear TenPoundHammer, I need you to look at chart notability at Notability (music).HotHat (talk) 07:05, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Tgeairn's talk page.
Message added 21:45, 5 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Tgeairn (talk) 21:45, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

examplefarm

Could you help me understand your recent edit of Let Me Go, Lover! Is there a problem with listing recorded versions of a song? BuffaloBob (talk) 21:00, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Bad 25 needs it's own page!

Bad 25 is a brand new album by Michael Jackson yes it's a 25th anniversary edition but all the content on it cannot be added on the original Bad page so same as with Thriller 25 it will have it's own dedicated page. --ADKIc3mAnX (talk) 00:09, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Remove dead links

Hey, I saw your edit in Rubicon, you removed the links to another wikipdia article. A "red" link is an invitation for someone to write a page and unlike "normal" web pages, on wikipedia dead links should stay (except for external sources, or if a better page is available). See WP:RED

Otherwise, thanks! IIVQ (talk) 13:30, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Change

Hi TPH. I made a change to one of your posts.[34] Best! -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 11:41, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Help

I am new to Wikipedia and I am also a writer. I'd like to cite myself or my publication like you do. Can you tell me the best way to do this to fly under the radar? I've noticed that you cite a review that you've written on almost every major country artist out there and I'd like to do the same thing in the blues. Thanks in advance. PleaseAdvise (talk) 21:37, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Ten Pound Hammer please email me at blake@digital-dreamz.net. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Digitaldreamz (talk • contribs) 18:57, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Nominating articles for speedy deletion

Hi. Just a quick reminder for you. Regarding your nomination for speedy deletion of Brocas Helm; always remember to check the talk page and article history first before nominating an article for speedy deletion. With the exception of newly discovered copyright violations, articles that have survived an AFD cannot be nominated for speedy deletion. Brocas Helm had survived one, which can be seen in both the article history and on the talk page. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask. Stephen! ^Coming... 23:32, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Katy Perry GA

Katy Perry article needs a reassessment the references are atrocious, which violates and fails criteria #2 of WP:GACR. I thought maybe you would like pursue it. Kind Regards AdabowtheSecond (talk) 04:46, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Brooks & Dunn review

I have begun a review of the article you nominated for GA status.--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 16:01, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

• There is now a preliminary review to point out some issues that could be addressed quickly to get it GA status.--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 22:29, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
• Added a few more minor points I would like addressed.--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 00:37, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

The article is now listed as a good article. If you haven't already it would be good to do a review of one of the other good article nominations.--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 15:38, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Classy

Nice man ! Looks like a reason to be proud of yourself. —TheDJ (talk • contribs) 23:32, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Kolkata.
Message added 06:21, 4 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DBigXray 06:21, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Re: Pete Francis Heimbold

Thanks. He apparently keeps his surname when he's with Dispatch and drops it for his solo records, which is why a "Pete Francis Heimbold" search probably wouldn't have yielded many results for his work outside the band. Cheers,  Gongshow ^Talk 20:04, 6 July 2012 (UTC)

Imperials images

Doesn't it say that a person can upload an image that he owns? Please explain how these are not viable. I had a hard time trying to figure out how to put another one up (after cropping). It's all so confusing to me. --Musdan77 (talk) 00:31, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Musdan77's talk page.
Message added 02:17, 8 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Musdan77 (talk) 02:17, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Poor nomination judgment--withdraw vs. topic ban

As I've said in both Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reaver (Firefly) (2nd nomination) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Browncoat (2nd nomination), you have either failed to make the most basic efforts to search for reliable sources to demonstrate notability, or you have made such efforts in an ineffectual manner. I really don't think you're going to like how those AfD's turn out. I strongly suggest that you withdraw them now, and topic ban yourself from AfD for six months, so the community doesn't do it for you. There will undoubtedly be some who will defend your nominations based on their own ideas of what AfD should be, possibly enough to save you from an AfD topic ban yet again, but you're just not learning from your mistakes. Every few weeks, here we are again, with you trying to delete something so clearly notable that I legitimately wonder what on earth you're thinking. Take a break, create content, or even better improve some of our notable-yet-the-article-currently-sucks content, rather than trying to get it deleted, please. Jclemens (talk) 07:33, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

• TPH has a userbox boasting that he is #27 in the list of most active Wikipedians. Hasty activity of this kind boosts his edit count and taking more care would slow him down and so push him down that list. For example, notice that, for the article Reaver (Firefly) the article was prodded and then this was reverted and then the article was sent to AFD. The editor who created the article thus got two obnoxious templates on his talk page but, with all the related activity, TPH added lots of edits to his score. Now, what makes this busywork possible is Twinkle. It doesn't seem that Twinkle privileges can be revoked mechanically but perhaps some restriction which would threaten TPH's score might be considered. Warden (talk) 10:37, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

• Totally off base. I've never felt that my ranking is a "high score" of any sort. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:19, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

I'm not going to touch the topic of an AFD ban, regardless of who imposes it, but it does seem you didn't do much WP:BEFORE making those nominations, B and D checks in particular. Can you confirm that you followed these steps, or explain why you didn't find them necessary? --BDD (talk) 16:16, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

• To all the above: I haven't been in the best of moods this week, and I think I took it out on the wiki. Still, I was frustrated that I had found those articles in such poor condition — especially since sources had been brought forth in AFDs from three to five years ago but no one ever felt arsed to put the damn things in the article. It's always somebody else's problem anymore, it seems. I trust that Jclemens et al. will do the legwork this time instead of expecting it to do itself. (Furthermore, I did do a source scan but my first several hits were all tangential, insubstantial or unreliable.) Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:19, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
  • Tell you what--I propose a compromise: I will fix BOTH articles, personally, each within one week of its respective AfD closing as keep, if you agree to a binding, 180 day AfD topic ban, starting from the day I fix the second article to a mutually agreeable neutral third party admin's satisfaction. By "binding AfD topic ban" I mean that you irrevocably consent for that 180 day period to any admin, including me or any other INVOLVED admin, blocking you for the duration of the period if at any point you make an AfD nomination that any such admin deems to be not in the best interests of the encyclopedia. We can wordsmith the terms more if you want to try something like that--will you? It'll save drama at AN, and you have nothing to fear if you behave yourself and follow BEFORE appropriately in each future nomination. Jclemens (talk) 02:07, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Clemens and BDD, I am ashamed. WP:BEFORE isn't mandatory and it never will be. Therefore, it think it wrong to complain that it's being violated as the primary reason for ending TPH's participation in AfDs. pbp 15:07, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

• • • If you are going to talk about an AFD ban, please link to past discussions about this editor, showing it is a regular problem. Isn't there a bot yet to show the large number of AFDs he has started, and how they ended? In one discussion I remember linking to a number of articles he nominated for deletion after being the one to previously nominate them for deletion, and just doing it again if he didn't get the results he wanted. Dream Focus 15:16, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Disposition of "Template:Colt Ford"

I don't think the disposition of Template:Colt Ford is "delete", unless the template is to be deleted. If I am correct, this still has not been fixed on the TfD.--Jax 0677 (talk) 20:03, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Re: Speedy Deletion of Celebrate Recovery

Please excuse my inexperience with this process. I did put some reasoning on the talk page but now I'm unsure of how to back edit the results of the template I've placed on the page. I thought that the article was promotional and unencyclopaedic. If this article has previously been nominated and rejected for speedy deletion then I am happy to withdraw the nomination.

Thank you for your patience. Jschnur (talk) 02:00, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Afd/Sound Check

I'd like to move this article to Sound Check (television series) (to match Soundcheck (radio program)) and redirect Sound Check to Soundcheck, but this might screw up the Afd entry. Has there been a situtation in the past when an article's been renamed midway through an AfD? --Ritchie333 (talk) 09:28, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Noble Jones

Sorry my bad. Goodness gracious. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.111.68.211 (talk) 02:21, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of building materials

TPH, your deletion nomination at the subject AfD does not appear to contain any justification for deletion as articulated in WP:DEL#REASON. Can you please articulate such a reason? Your nomination statement appears to articulate reasons not covered by that (admittedly non-exhaustive) list, and instead references issues clearly fixable by normal editing. In light of past complaints of your alleged abuse of the deletion process as an attempt to spur cleanup, including a past RfC/U on your behavior, your statement will likely be used to determine whether further sanctions should be sought for what I perceive to be your repeated abuses of the AfD process. I would encourage you to be entirely thorough in your explanation. Cheers, Jclemens (talk) 23:30, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Also regarding your closing/withdrawl statement: Articles for Deletion is not for cleanup. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:08, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

If he nominated an article for just that reason, then he really should be banned from his massive number of AFDs he does all the time. He knows better, but refuses to stop doing bad nominations. Dream Focus 01:49, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

I nominated the article because I felt it was unsalvageable, redundant to the category scheme, poorly defined and unverifiable. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:54, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

RfC: Monitec

Hello TenPoundHammer! Could you leave a comment regarding a chart posted at the talk page? Cheers! Erick (talk) 08:55, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Chronicles Of Rick Roll

I suggest to you Chronicles Of Rick Roll as a candidate for speedy deletion. --DThomsen8 (talk) 12:30, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Merge discussion for Pocketing

An article that you have been involved in editing, Pocketing, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. BDD (talk) 04:57, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Kimbola/The AV Squad

Hi, Ten Pound Hammer. I responded in Talk. Sorry, I started the page and than I medical had medical surgeries to deal with. The AV Squad is John Lloyd Miller's company. He is heavily referenced on Wikipedia and per, CMT, is one of the top ten most nominate directors of all time. I thought he merited his own page. Perhaps it should be under his name, not his company? Either way, please don't delete yet. The credits portion is the same, and I can take it from there. I'll finish the page. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kimbola (talk • contribs) 23:56, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Jill King wiki page

Hi 10lb hammer! thank you for getting back to me on twitter. I am writing because I hired a web pr person during the rollout for my last record project on my current label Foundher Records. I asked her to please update my wiki page to reflect the new label, music, new bio information, etc.

I went to wiki to check it out the other day and noticed that what she wrote had been deleted. So, I saw that you are the one that deleted it, or reverted it, or whatever, and thought I would contact you to ask why, and to see how in the future changes and additions may be made to my wiki site. I suppose I will come back here to look for an answer, or you may email me at contact@jillking.com. Thanks so much, and have a great day!

Best, Jill King — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jillkingmusic (talk • contribs) 19:25, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Douglas Maddon edit

• Good morning TenPoundHammer,

Regarding your posting here, would you be so kind as to tell me what happens next?

Sincerely,

-- Gareth Griffith-Jones (talk) 08:24, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Volusia Mall

I'm not really a shopping center editor, but I found several newspaper articles archived on the Internet, which may help develop the article on Volusia Mall. I dropped them on the article's Talk Page. Maybe you could take a look and see what could be useful. Gamweb (talk) 08:09, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: User:Havok/Liars

Hello TenPoundHammer. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of User:Havok/Liars, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Page survived an MfD discussion. If you'd like it deleted, try another MfD nomination. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 23:45, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

If it really was an error on your part, I think you should request speedy close on Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:Havok/Liars_(2nd_nomination). Proposing an MfD, having that fail, then proposing CSD, then have that fail, then proposing a second MfD is borderline harassment of another user. --Surturz (talk) 04:26, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

I doubt that's harassment. Seems more like a genuine accident to me — I speedied it since I thought it was an attack and hadn't realized that I'd MFD'ed it before. The second MFD was also because I hadn't realized I had MFD'ed it before. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:29, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

If you have made a mistake then you should fix that mistake. Please revoke your second nomination and request speedy close. --Surturz (talk) 04:51, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Economic Flywheel graphic

Thanks for the move. Carrite (talk) 18:37, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Njait

Speedy attempt failed. Any ideas?♦ Dr. Blofeld 17:53, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Gratuitous Liking. Notable?♦ Dr. Blofeld 15:27, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Bubbling Column

If you're going to treat the Bubbling Under chart as a separate chart, like you did on Trace Adkins', Blake Shelton's and Kenny Chesney's discographies, how do you want to go about the fact that most singles that charted on the Hot 100 also bubbled under? For example, you only have three peaks in Blake's Bubbling column when he's had 17 singles peak on the Bubbling Under chart. Eric444 (talk) 23:55, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

This new method of creating two columns that will never overlap is making things far more complicated than they need to be. Joel Whitburn's books have always treated the Bubbling Under chart as an extention of the Hot 100 and so have we; when and why did the community decide that they're wrong, especially if we're using them as the source? Eric444 (talk) 00:25, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

DIY Street View

DIY Street View is unreferenced and not notable. Please provide it with your usual attentions, and thank you for your previous effort at my suggestion. --DThomsen8 (talk) 19:36, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Traditional Brick Factory

The Traditional Brick Factory is so badly done, and so overlapping with other articles, that I am suggesting it to you for usual attention. --DThomsen8 (talk) 00:29, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

What happened to the deletion tag?--DThomsen8 (talk) 14:44, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Your mother

Hi TenPoundHammer! I declined the speedy tag you put on Yo Momma, as there is relevant page history that needs to be preserved. Instead I tagged Yo Momma (TV series) for history merge, so hopefully someone who knows what they're doing will come along and fix it at some point in the not-too-distant future. Best — Mr. Stradivarius ^{(have a chat)} 05:59, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

I've merged them to Yo Momma (TV series). Let me know if you need anything else done. Do you want the page be moved to just Yo Mamma? ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 06:11, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Yes please - that's what TPH originally intended. Thanks! — Mr. Stradivarius ^{(have a chat)} 06:40, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

 Done ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 06:50, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

right whale

Please check out the right whale article. I think I fixed it up more. LittleJerry (talk) 22:51, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Hello? LittleJerry (talk)

Talkback

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at GregJackP's talk page.
Message added 21:04, 9 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

GregJackP Boomer! 21:04, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Help with an article?

Hi! I've run across you in the past via AfDs and I could use your help sort of mediating one right now. The article being deleted is The Daisy Chain (historical novel). I'm not asking you to back me up or vote one way or another, but I could use a few mediators to come in and help sort things through. It's getting a little heated.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 04:31, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, your posting here was too late for me to help. --DThomsen8 (talk) 19:33, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Marguerite Knight

It might be good for a quick "Whoops I withdraw" there. Looks like a bad nomination. best, —Tim. Carrite (talk) 16:04, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. I've beefed it up and moved to Peggy Knight. see ya, — Tim /// Carrite (talk) 14:33, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Answer

No, you can delete this as someone else is developing that. It covers much of the same ground. Thanks, -Bill Reid | (talk) 14:07, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

AfD

Hello. I am not sure what the big deal is with the picture of the politician re: AfD in regards to Johnny Prill. Maybe I am missing something but he does not seem notable and this other editor seems to be missing the point. As I said, I could be missing something. Thanks. Jimsteele9999 (talk) 19:01, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

James Anderson (iOS developer)

Please take the appropriate action with this.♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:50, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Songs by theme.

Any comments about Songs about poverty? Cheers. --Richhoncho (talk) 12:02, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Not quite a notable band yet

This popped onto my Articles for Creation radar, and I thought you'd find it amusing : Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cave Painting - band

I know it's a bit bitey but I couldn't help telling them to look at WP:GARAGE and play "spot the difference". I'll go and hide in a small corner now. --Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 12:25, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Contested prod

Hi, I removed your prod tag from List of Keys of the City in the United States because I think the topic is notable enough to at least merit an AfD. Most of the recipients listed on the page are in fact notable (though I have my doubts about the cat) and I would think the sourcing could be improved since local media often report on such events. "Keys to the city" seems like a notable concept, so I think a reasonable case could be made for having a list of notable honorees. This is debatable of course, but I think a wider discussion is needed. Camerafiend (talk) 02:18, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Phidippus

Your message doesn't really chime with his contributions :). Ironholds (talk) 02:41, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Hillbilly Jedi

I just copied and pasted the information from this edit, not even seeing the red link. You'd think I would see small mistakes for being here for so long huh? Haha. — Gabe 19 ^{(talk contribs)} 08:14, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. When you recently edited Alexander Leydenfrost, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Look (magazine) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:50, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Grammy Award for Best Country Song, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Billy Yates (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Input please?

Talk:Taylor Swift discography#Can we get a consensus please? ^_^ Swifty*^talk 23:36, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

SpiritCool

Please look at SpiritCool and see what you think. Notabilty, and probably autobiography. --DThomsen8 (talk) 17:13, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

What the world?

What was up with this??? LOL! ^_^ Swifty*^talk 19:21, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

This poor kitteh is still looking to eat the leftover trout I am using to slap you for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/On the curb.

Bearian (talk) 15:01, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

CSD R3 and page moves

Speedy deletion criterion R3 applies only to newly created page titles, it explicitly "does not apply to redirects created as a result of a move." (emphasis in original). This is doubly so for titles, such as Glossary of 'carny' slang that have existed since April 2010. Thryduulf (talk) 01:09, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

The same applies with regards File:This is the cover art for the soundtrack Irvine Welsh's Beautiful World Ecstasy Remixes by the artist Various. The cover art copyright is believed to belong to the label, Toolroom Records, or the graphic artist(s), Mark Blamire.jpg. There was nothing like a consensus to delete this at RfD - 1 person agreeing with a nominator after less than a day, neither of whom mentioned speedy deletion is not consensus, and as noted above R3 does not apply to redirects created as a result of page moves. Thryduulf (talk) 01:20, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Glossary of 'carny' slang listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Glossary of 'carny' slang. Since you had some involvement with the Glossary of 'carny' slang redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:12, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

K. Michelle neutral notification

Since you've edited K. Michelle's article, do you have any opinion about the sources used for some of the material that's in there? I asked about them at Talk:K._Michelle#Problem_with_sources. Maybe you could weigh in on the discussion?— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 02:29, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Your free 1-year HighBeam Research account is approved!

Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research.

• The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code you were emailed. If you did not receive a code, email wikiocaasi@yahoo.com your Wikipedia username.
• To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1
• If you need assistance, email or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
• A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:HighBeam/Citations.
• HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
• Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
• When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 15:34, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Cert question

Hey, I have a question I thought you might know about, do you know why the RIAA certifies some songs as soon as they hit a certain # of sales, while for others they take their time with? Like with Taylor Swift's Eyes Open, it's sold over 1M copies but it isn't certified platinum, while LBT's Pontoon gets certified as soon as it sells 1M. NYSMtalk page 05:45, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Lavender Hill Mob (band)

I think you were too hasty with your speedy tagging here, TPH. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 14:05, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

It wasn't difficult. The link to Discogs showed the band's label was United Artists Records. A quick search of "Lavender Hill Mob" + "Prigeno" on Google led me to the Billboard and LA Times sources. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 21:23, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

WP:ANI#TenPoundHammer, AfD and WP:IDONTUNDERSTANDIT

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is TenPoundHammer, AfD and WP:IDONTUNDERSTANDIT. Thank you. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:50, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Could do with some feedback

Hello I have created a new template, Template:Sierra Adventure Games which covers all adventure games by Sierra Entertainment and excludes the flight simulators, strategy games and other genres by the same company. The way I see it, Sierra is best known for its' text and click and point adventure games. This template would certainly be a lot easier to read through than the complete list. On the other hand most of the series have their own navigation box, but they are snippets compared to this larger compact navigation box. A good idea would be to place this navigation in each of the series articles plus the standalone games and leave the smaller navigation boxes in the individual game of the series articles. Also Lucasarts has its own Adventure Games template, so it might not be a bad idea to apply the same for Sierra. Tell me what you think about it, cheers. Deltasim (talk) 11:28, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

De-prod

I have removed the {{prod}} tag from Southwest Boulevard (Kansas City), which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks!

P.S. Yeh, it's a template... you know all about PRODS and not adding it back.--Paul McDonald (talk) 20:57, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Additional note I also de-prodded the following:

• Prospect Avenue (Kansas City, Missouri)
• Main Street (Kansas City)
• Gillham Road
• Emanuel Cleaver II Boulevard
• Armour Boulevard
• Vine Street, Kansas City
• Grand Boulevard (Kansas City, Missouri)
• Southwest Trafficway
• Truman Road
• Volker Boulevard

I agree that the articles need better sources and proper editing, but those are issues for "editing" and not "deletion" -- have a super day!--Paul McDonald (talk) 01:10, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Vine Street, Kansas City

I'm find with the PROD, but I am merging some content into 18th and Vine-Downtown East, Kansas City. --AW (talk) 21:15, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

In case you missed it at the latest pitchfork fest, my take...

Borrowing a few lines from Tijfo, because they are right on the mark: "The current batch of nominations is obviously bucking the trend, in particular because TPH entered a field he seems to have little if any expertise in. His deletion nominations were all template text saying basically that he doesn't know how to expand the articles, which comes as little surprise. Hopefully this is a learning experience that WP:IDON'TKNOWHOWTOEXPANDIT is not a good reason to nominate something for deletion, even more so when the nominator lacks expertise in the field. Let's call it a learning experience. I don't think any sanctions are necessary at this point." — Mr. Hammer: bad nominations, please don't go chasing tech stubs on DicDef grounds anymore. The nomination phrasing was also pretty, ummm, battlegroundy, so please do give that a miss, too. The Colonel does not have to list a reason for De-PRODding a piece — PROD is for completely uncontroversial deletion nominations and removal of the PROD template implies that there is controversy. Carrite (talk) 05:10, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

This, too, shall pass. All the best, —Tim ///// Carrite (talk) 05:13, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

He does this all the time, having a long history of it, and ignores all criticism people have heaped upon him for it over the years. Its shameful. Just one batch of articles after another he rushes through, prodding and then if someone notices and deprods them, sending them straight to AFD. Dream Focus 12:06, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

There is a benefit to the project to having a hardline force or two on these matters. He misstepped here, didn't run adequate Google searches before running to AfD, in my opinion. Shit happens... Carrite (talk) 01:36, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Re: The Paseo (Kansas City)

Thanks for the feedback!  Gongshow ^Talk 14:56, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Category:Songs about trucks

Finally gone, about 30 more to go. Cheers. --Richhoncho (talk) 07:59, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

The Olive Branch: A Dispute Resolution Newsletter (Issue #1)

Welcome to the first edition of The Olive Branch. This will be a place to semi-regularly update editors active in dispute resolution (DR) about some of the most important issues, advances, and challenges in the area. You were delivered this update because you are active in DR, but if you would prefer not to receive any future mailing, just add your name to this page.

Steven Zhang's Fellowship Slideshow

In this issue:

• Background: A brief overview of the DR ecosystem.
• Research: The most recent DR data
• Survey results: Highlights from Steven Zhang's April 2012 survey
• Activity analysis: Where DR happened, broken down by the top DR forums
• DR Noticeboard comparison: How the newest DR forum has progressed between May and August
• Discussion update: Checking up on the Wikiquette Assistance close debate
• Proposal: It's time to close the Geopolitical, ethnic, and religious conflicts noticeboard. Agree or disagree?

Read the entire first edition of The Olive Branch -->

--The Olive Branch 19:33, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Re

Hey,
I knew before nominating that I am doing something wrong. And, well, I know that there are articles about every smallest village and tiniest locality. But can you please direct me to a discussion/policy/article on such matters. I read some archives in village pump/policy where no consensus was reached. (revert on my talk page) Harsh (talk) 07:30, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

I think I now need to change my signature to "what did i screw up now?" . And, thanks. That was a poor nomination. Harsh (talk) 07:41, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

ANI

You were mentioned at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive239#Rollback. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley _talk 03:38, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Clarified comments at WP:FAR

Hopefully that is a bit more appropriate [35]. I have never participated in a WP:FAR before so I am a bit unsure of the process. Thanks for the feedback! meshach (talk) 01:14, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

bizarre

Don't remove material from my talk page. Kiefer.Wolfowitz 22:29, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Re: Barenaked Ladies demo tapes

You're welcome. It seems like it's not uncommon for keep/delete arguments to be based on the shape of an article at the time. To me, it keeps things easier when editors stick to demonstrating their ability to evaluate Google/GNews/GBooks/etc. by affirming something like, "I searched and there are no sources" or "I searched and here are some reliable sources." When someone on either side of the fence is shown to be incorrect, they can hopefully learn and improve from it (assuming clue). Anyway, thanks for the nice words. Cheers,  Gongshow ^Talk 00:37, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Western Sizzlin

You're welcome(?) Haha. Talk about cats. If there's one thing I always forget to do, it's adding categories. Thanks for helping me add them. Bonkers The Clown (talk) 05:47, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Re: Bubbling Under

I'm not sure that a consensus was achieved. I was hopeful that the 1/2a/2b/3a/3b/4 poll would make it easy, but only Eric444 made a decisive pick. Here's my take on things:

• Gongshow: Prefers the #101-125 format for the old songs; #1-25 for the new songs. Agreeable to all options (footnotes, separate columns, etc) that accomplish this goal.
• Kww: Prefers the #1-25 format for all songs. Seemed open to the suggestion of #101-125 for the old songs if all BU peaks were to be placed in a separate column.
• Eric444: Prefers the #101-125 format for all songs, citing Whitburn.
• Piriczki: Prefers the #101-125 format for the old songs; #1-25 for the new songs.
• Lil-unique1: Prefers the #1-25 format for all songs.
• My76Strat: Prefers the #1-25 for all songs. Seemed open to using footnotes to explain the BU chart differences.
• TenPoundHammer: You can answer this better than me of course, but if I read the thread correctly, you generally seemed (at least initially) to support Eric444's position.

I think those were all the participants to date. I left a message at Wikipedia talk:Record charts as well. Cheers,  Gongshow ^Talk 23:59, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Esplanade (Kenner, Louisiana), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Target (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:32, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at SchuminWeb's talk page.
Message added 16:54, 15 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

SchuminWeb (Talk) 16:54, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

MI Markose

Consider MI Markose for your usual AfD attentions. --DThomsen8 (talk) 01:17, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Merge discussion for Esperanto music

An article that you had earlier nominated for deletion, Esperanto music, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Naŋar (talk) 13:12, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

re Wikipedia:Confirmation bias bias confirmed

I am gently aghast that you have deleted the above fine and helpful essay, especially since it was a subject of a redirect discussion back last December - where the consensus was that the redirect be kept. While this was not a deletion discussion, I would infer that the inference was that none of the correspondents considered the target page to be a deletion candidate. I indeed suggest that there was in fact a demonstrated consensus to keep the page, via the redirect discussion (and thus fail the CSD criteria) and I should be grateful if you would undelete the page, and allow me to participate in the deletion discussion. Please could you respond at my talkpage, since I am retired, and do not monitor WP communications, but still have my userpage notifications enabled. LessHeard vanU (talk) 21:25, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
ps. Did I miss you getting the mop...? Shame on me!

THP, I've undeleted the page and reopened the MFD, in case you want to comment there. --Floquenbeam (talk) 21:46, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

False prod statements

I happened to look at your prod for "She Said", and noticed that most of the nomination was false. While I could not find sources to justify undoing the deletion, Billboard Hot 100 Sales, Mediabase, and Nielsen Top Singles are not on WP:BADCHARTS. I hope not to find such misrepresentations in future prods.—Kww(talk) 02:01, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Template:Rc-watch-closely

Not active anymore, but got the message regarding the TfD, and just simplified the matter with a db-author request. Thanks for bringing it to my attention, it was an experiment at making certain things more obvious during RC patrol that I abandoned when I left - I was subst'ing it into pages where dates and figured were frequently falsified to make otherwise subtle changes stand out in diffs. Triona (talk) 23:16, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Horne's

Just wanted to let you know I created the Horne's page today. I live about twenty minutes away from the last remaining one in Virginia. I'm still working on it, but I am having a hard time finding information on it after Greyhound sold it. Gilliganfanatic (talk) 00:00, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Could you be a little more accurate with your edit summaries? this edit isn't a revert, it's a redirect to eliminate a content fork. Yes, it was created as a redirect, but every edit since 2009 has been a full article (and the other title was the redirect) and characterizing it as a revert after that much time is a bit of a stretch. Further, the article title (under "Broward Mall") is the one linked on the template {{Broward County Malls}}, the one linked on the template {{WestfieldUnitedStates}} and the one linked on the template {{Mills corp}}. (I am aware of this because this is how I found the article originally.) It's nice that you are standardizing all of the Westfield properties with their new prefixes, but your edit summary was not really an accurate description of what you did. Horologium (talk) 20:19, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Follow-up: I get to learn how to do history merges now, since the two articles are essentially sequential edits of one another. (There was always only one article, with the other title redirected; the only difference was which title was the active one.) If you had redirected the other way around, it would have been easier, but I'll see what I can do to fix it, now that it's all buggered. I'll deal with this tomorrow, since it's way too late tonight to learn something I've never dealt with as an editor, let alone as an administrator. Horologium (talk) 03:17, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

BigCape2012

I suggest that Bigcape2012 be blocked. The last edit on Drake Jensen's page not only added "colourful" commentary, but also added a fictitious band member who plays spoons. In my opinion this amounts to sabotage and ridicule. This user has been warned many times and is still not understanding the rules. This last edit should be grounds for blocking. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.194.127.36 (talk) 13:01, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

WP:MMA

Thanks for helping to make MMA articles on wikipedia better! In September 168 people made a total of 956 edits to MMA articles. I noticed you haven't listed yourself on the WikiProject Mixed martial arts Participants page. Take a look, sign up, and don't forget to say hi on the talk page. Kevlar (talk) 05:17, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Begin Again

Hi Bobby, can I bother you to weigh in at here? Maybe shed some light or common sense for the IP, I tried NYSMtalk page 07:07, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Not TV Guide

Hi, TPH. Do you have any strong feelings about the cable channel placements being listed in so many TV station articles ("The station is seen on cable channel 2 in city A, channel 6 in city B, and channel 9 in other areas of the market")? I really don't think they add anything but clutter, and I think it falls under WP:NOTTVGUIDE, but I don't want to act unilaterally and I don't have time to do a cleanup anyway. JTRH (talk) 21:30, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	For your well-regarded essay, WP:HAMMER, which has been used to rid the project of many frauds. Bearian (talk) 14:34, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Country

How do you think the new country chart is going to affect Whitburn's Country Songs book? Do you think he'll use this new hybrid (crap) chart, or the airplay one? NYSMtalk page 22:18, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

The next edition of Country Songs is coming out in March, I already have it pre-ordered. The Top Pop Singles also notes every song that was #1 on one of 6 airplay charts (Country, alternative rock, mainstream rock, R&B, adult top 40, and adult cotemporary). NYSMtalk page 22:39, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

According to Billboard, even though "Jesse James" is at #51 on Country Airplay this week, it's still considered to have peaked at #57 on the main Country Songs chart. For songs that debuted on Country Airplay this week, like Hunter Hayes' "Somebody's Heartbreak," should an Airplay column be added to his discography, or is Airplay only supposed to be used on song articles? Eric444 (talk) 00:46, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Double Live (Garth Brooks album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stephanie Davis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:28, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

User:NeonMerlin/Main Page

You deleted User:NeonMerlin/Main Page per Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:NeonMerlin/Main Page. As a draft it volited WP:STALEDRAFT, but would it work as a wp:Main Page alternative? I don't know what the page looked like, so I don't know if it would be a viable Main Page alternative. Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Emmette Hernandez Coleman's talk page.
Message added 21:18, 23 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 21:18, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Tenpoundhammer... You removed the changes I made to my wiki page. I don't understand why. It was all accurate information. Tnx, Chris Lindsey — Preceding unsigned comment added by Silvertire (talk • contribs) 23:25, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Re: Sandbox

That sandbox became Gyromancer. Copy-pasted the original article into the sandbox, rewrote it, copy-pasted it back to article space. --PresN 18:30, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Revert

You reverted a user[36] who then created Articles for creation/Kenny Rogers Roasters International, which now is at MfD here. There's tons of AfC pages that could be listed at MfD for the similar reasons as AfC/Kenny Rogers Roasters International. Something seems to be going on with this AfC page/user and I can't figure it out. I took a guess at MfD, but I'm not sure that is the full picture. Your input at the MfD would be welcome. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 12:39, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Talk:Chris Janson.
Message added 13:36, 7 November 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

— Mr. Stradivarius ^{(have a chat)} 13:36, 7 November 2012 (UTC)

Oba Fatai Ayinla Aileru

Please take a look at Oba Fatai Ayinla Aileru, where "Oba" is a title, and should not be in the title. --DThomsen8 (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

Oh, but is this Oba notable? I have my doubts, but then again, I don't know much about Nigeria or its forms of government, either. --DThomsen8 (talk) 22:41, 12 November 2012 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Parodyziac.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Parodyziac.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:05, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

Trailer Choir

My dear friend in country music,

I see that you recently deleted my note that Trailer Choir is no more, noting that it was "not in source." While Facebook is neither my first choice for an encyclopedia source, nor particularly easy to review a past date on, it is indeed still there if you are patient enough to find September 2nd (Try clicking on '2012,' then 'September' below the ads on the right). I can only post a direct link to the picture that was shared along with it but originally posted by another person so doesn't have the words I cite. (https://www.facebook.com/pages/Vinny-Hickerson-Fan-Page-Biggest-Loser-12/145837845507402#!/photo.php?fbid=254204238015635&set=a.201877573248302.28224.169664126469647&type=1&theater) Find this picture on Vinny's page on September 2nd, though, and you will find the post. Since the "Recent Posts by Others" section which was the other part of my source doesn't move so fast as the main page, it is still fairly easy to scroll back and see this part of my source material in an exchange between Vinny and a lady named Donna Cairns.

I will try to find a more reputable source when possible, but when I had time the only source I could find got the details wrong (I follow this band's members pretty religiously on social media so have some context for recognizing possible errors) and I don't have time now to do the grunt work. I thought the end of their band's existance as we've known it was too significant to sit on but I will bow to your more experienced opinion if you disagree.

God bless and happy editing,

Ballaurena81 (talk) 01:55, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Better Dig Two

The November 15th BCU (http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/photos/pdf/2012/BCmw1115.pdf) has an interview with Dann Huff talking about producing the song.

Meanwhile, producer Dann Huff went to a Band Perry concert and recognized the progression the group is making as it moves toward headlining arenas. “We’ve added a few more electric guitars since our first album was released, just because live, it’s a rock’n’roll kind of show,” Neil says. “We definitely want the music on our second album to represent that. I think Dann did a great job capturing that.”

They cut the instrumental tracks in less than three hours with numerous session musicians joining Reid and Neil. Handclaps intensified the demo’s rhythms, and the end result was a musical bed with some dramatic arcs between power and silence. “They really straddle that line,” Huff explains. Their concert has “the power of a rock show, but they have a real kind of stick-to-it-ness about their love for acoustic instrumentation.”

The vocals were fine-tuned during several sessions in the course of a week, ending up with a product that “took the demo and just lit it on fire,” McAnally says. “What’s cool is there’s all these dynamics in the way Dann cut it. It’s way up and way down—it’s like a rollercoaster.”

Eric444 (talk) 21:42, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Removal of paragraph in Marvin (comic strip)

In the future please do not indiscriminately remove paragraphs from a Wikipedia article. I was going through the edits of Marvin (comic strip) and your removal of the paragraph where creator Tom Armstrong discusses his changing the comic strip's characters design because it was not well sourced is not a good reason to remove something, you should discuss it on the article's talkpage first. Thank you for your cooperation and understanding. TheGoofyGolfer (talk) 22:23, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Template:Allele

Hi TPH, I hope you don't mind some friendly advice here. You and I have clashed before about your past reinstating of declined speedy deletion templates, and it just isn't acceptable - if anyone other than the creator of the page disagrees (and it isn't just an admin thing), they can remove it and that's that, even if you are completely convinced you are right. You must then not reinstate it, but should take to PROD or AfD. Edit-warring about it seems especially pointless in this case - it's a harmless template, and it really doesn't matter if it hangs around for another week while it's discussed. So come on, why not stick to what you're good at (and you are very good at what you do) and don't get yourself into any trouble by fighting over this? Don't stir it up at ANI, just move on. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:10, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

TPH, I have defended you in the past, but if you continue editing in this manner (incorrect CDS tags, restoring them, POINTy tags) then we might have to escalate this and consider a topic ban. GiantSnowman 17:23, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Bad future album articles

As an unofficial expert on future albums I'm curious. Have you ever seen an article as bad as Finished With My Ex's Untitled Forthcoming Album (probably soon to be speedied A9). duffbeerforme (talk) 14:04, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

The band is at afd and is likely to be deleted. After that happens A9 will come into play. duffbeerforme (talk) 14:28, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

(TPS) Depending on your definition of "bad", this article might be competition. --Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 21:18, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for deleting the Exit 9B article. I was careless enough to miss the fact that it featured reviews from random people on the internet. StaleCupcakes (talk) 14:40, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Knowledgekid87's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

- Knowledgekid87 (talk) 17:44, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Requested moves

Hi TPH, when closing requested moves, like you did at Talk:Deafness, please move the page's talk archives and subpages along with it. For instance, Talk:Deafness/Archive 1 and Talk:Deafness/Archive 2 were in the wrong place before I got to them. Admins have the ability to automatically move subpages when moving a page; it might be worth waiting for one in similar cases in the future. Also, I've added a link to archive 14 in your archive box above; hope you don't mind. Graham87 03:37, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Your username

Every time I see your username on my watchlist, I get the song Ten Ton Hammer by Machine Head stuck in my head. It is an EPIC song. – Confession0791 ^talk 07:59, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Gadget Boy (2013 TV series)

Hello TenPoundHammer. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Gadget Boy (2013 TV series), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a blatant hoax. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 02:22, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Deleting a sandbox page

You have organised the deletion of a page from my sandbox User:Clpda/Sandbox/List of national libraries earlier this year. I fully admit that I should have cleaned it up myself, since it had been used long ago for development of a page that is now up and running, and apologize for that. However, you were wrong in declaring me "retired" with no input for 3 years, my last contribution dating from August 25th 2011. This is admittedly quite a while, having been unable to contribute out of various reasons, but it is close to reading one's own death notice in a newspaper ;-) Clpda (talk) 11:02, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

An awkward question about your edit in WP:FFD

Hello, TenPoundHammer

I had a question, which is rather awkward, but I hope I am not bothering you. What is this edit actually doing?

If you are confused about what I am asking, here is an explanation: If someone showed me this edit without telling me you did it and asked what I thought, I'd say it seemed like vandalism or trolling: A user deleted a discussion and told its nominator to relist it because no one cares. But your name on top changes everything. You don't vandalize, therefore this edit is not vandalism. So, my question is: What is it?

Merry Christmas

Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 12:13, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Hi. You need to see TPH's very next edit - he wasn't telling the nominator to relist it, he was relisting it himself. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:13, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

List of songs about cities

Long time ago there were lists of songs with people's names in the title. Any idea where the AfD is for them? Might be a useful precedent. Cheers. --Richhoncho (talk) 13:38, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Eureka. After much searching I found it...--Richhoncho (talk) 20:26, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Coin945 articles

As I said on the individual articles' talk pages, please can you send each one that you prodded to AFD instead, per the comments that I made at the "fastest-selling..." AFD? Thankyou in advance:)--Coin945 (talk) 08:58, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

New reply!

Greetings, I have posted a reply here. Best, Tito Dutta (talk) 23:52, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

And yes, thanks, I forgot about that "Housekeeping" option! I was trying to add my rationale that why I was asking to nominate the page! --Tito Dutta (talk) 00:03, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al Kessel.
Message added 04:00, 30 December 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 04:00, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Userspace to mainspace redirects are OK

Continued from Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Tony Fox/Sandbox2...

Yes, we happily redirect from userspace to mainspace. It happens by default every time a user moves their draft into mainspace, the recommended method for creating new pages. If you don't like making these redirects, a soft redirect could be used. What we don't do is redirect from mainspace to userspace, on the rationale that readers shouldn't unexpectedly find themselves out of mainspace. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:27, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Boyz II Men

Appears to be a hoax, like the user explained in his/her next edits. The edit which I reverted was an unexplained one, though. Widr (talk) 16:36, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eight-thousander

I just closed this per WP:SNOW and trust that you do not disagree with this conclusion. Your searching and intuition still seem weak and so it might be better if you start with talk page discussion in such cases. You will be familiar with WP:BEFORE but see also the recent discussion about WP:CHALLENGE at Wikipedia talk:Verifiability#Some thoughts on WP:CHALLENGE where a lighter touch is suggested. Warden (talk) 12:33, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

• See also User_talk:Andy_Dingley#TenPoundHammer. Warden (talk) 19:48, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Message from D3323

I'm sorry to be rude, but what am I suppose to do about that Killer toys page, since you don't like it? Do I have to delete it or something? Tell me, really!!! What should I do? — Preceding unsigned comment added by D3323 (talk • contribs) 05:19, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Re: Jim Garver

Thanks!  Gong show 00:37, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Killer toys

Hello, regarding the article killer toys, I have overhauled it and have provided a more limited list with all entries backed by reliable sources. I've commented at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Killer toys. I hope you will take a look at the new list and my comment. Erik (talk | contribs) 16:28, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for reviewing! Erik (talk | contribs) 18:42, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

ClueBot Commons

Hi. Please could you take a look at your recent post User talk:ClueBot Commons/Archives/2013/January#How did this not get caught? You've included a link, but it doesn't look like a diff. I clicked on it and it attempted to perform a rollback. Thanks. – Wdchk (talk) 02:32, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Franklin episodes page

hammer,could you help with the Franklin episodes page, the plots needs more information, there was six seasons, not three and the air dates are incorrect — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.135.85.247 (talk) 23:51, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Mike Reid (American football)

You might know, I haven't got a clue - isn't this guy now more famous as a songwriter and his namespace moved accordingly/ Cheers. --Richhoncho (talk) 23:16, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Like Red on a Rose, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Acoustic bass (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

can you still re-AfD?

Hi TenPoundHammer, I undeleted Last Res0rt for you, as you indicated there were some points you missed before nominating, which you found out about later. As there were a pretty strong consensus at the time to delete, could you do a procedural re-nomination of the article with the new information made clear? It would be good to get a new consensus whether or not to delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 21:15, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 04:00, 15 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

franklin page air dates

There one more thing you need to do before I can edit in the plot,hammer, put in the air dates86.158.161.65 (talk) 20:07, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Foster bigshow.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Foster bigshow.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Magazines

Hi! I just created Country Music (magazine), which I see has been on your user page list of articles you have been planning to create. It's a minimal stub, so there's still plenty for you to do.

I also see Music Row (magazine) on your list. I'm pretty sure that's the same thing as MusicRow, which has an article. Should that title be changed to a redirect?

PS - I created that article because of my work on Robert K. Oermann, which is another new article you might happen to be interested in expanding. --Orlady (talk) 19:49, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Are You Ready for the Big Show?, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nobody Wins (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:52, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

DYK Nomination

Hello! I know it's been a long time since I have last been in contact with you (I'm not on Wiki as frequently nowadays), but I just wanted to let you know that an album article I recently created is up for a DYK nomination. It's the most recent article I created called, Jan Howard Sings Evil on Your Mind, by Jan Howard. I've never been up for something like this and I don't know if I'm overreacting, but I don't recall many country articles being nominated before, so I find it rather exciting! I just wanted to let you know that something positive has come from one of the country music articles on Wikipedia. I hope you're doing well...if there's country-related Wiki stuff I should be updated with let me know! I'm so far behind on current events on Wikipedia. Take care ChrisTofu11961 (talk) 03:09, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Portal:Harare

I'm confused by the redirection of Portal:Harare. It was redirected because very few articles linked to it, but that would just make it an Wikipedia:Orphan. Is there something I'm missing here? Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 10:06, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Jax 0677's talk page.
Message added 14:34, 24 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Talkback

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at PinkAmpersand's talk page.
Message added 19:07, 27 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Set You Free

I have overhauled the whole article, so I would appreciated your input.HotHat (talk) 20:31, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Sky Sailing

Hi, I just wanted to let you know that I removed the PROD which you placed on the Sky Sailing page; the project appears to meet WP:GNG and WP:MUSIC in its own right, and I have added some sources. Further, the album charted at number 30 on the Billboard 200. There's enough available material online to expand the article, though I don't really have the time or inclination to do so right now. Cheers,  Gong show 08:28, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Saying hi

User Tenpoundhammer, I am JJGeneral1, and I notice that you were helping me on the "Povertyneck Hillbillies" page. I am sorry if I overstepped you by editing and changing the article as things become known. I am still newer to editing wikipedia, but would like to do it more often, and become a "higher being" of wikipedia in good faith. Please contact me and perhaps we can discuss things. You appear to be a person who has a lot of wikipedia editing in your history, and also appear to be very knowledgeable on this subject. If you could help a fellow wikipedian in his quest to become one of the good people out there, please contact me. Also, to help me set up my own user page. Thank you! JJGeneral1 (talk) 19:02, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

‎Donna Hilley

The source at RFD says 'Nashville'... GiantSnowman 01:09, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Well then change the target then, no biggie. GiantSnowman 11:08, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

WP:PUF and WP:FFD closes

Note that on these pages, the {{puf top}} or {{ffd top}} goes after the second header, not before as is done at WP:AFD. Anomie⚔ 03:59, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited MuzikMafia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Clinton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Meetinthemiddle.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Meetinthemiddle.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:03, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Donghak Peasant Revolution

How come no one except me cares about this? I mean, I know most people don't know about this civil war, but this is top-of-the-case. It's been edited by me, two bots, and Twinkle for the last 28 days. Could you help?--Seonookim (talk) 05:38, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Kevin Sharp (heavy metal music singer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kevin Sharp (heavy metal music singer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Sharp (heavy metal music singer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 00:37, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Agenda: Grinding America Down

Before you consider putting this article up for deletion, I would like to explain the problems that have plagued this article.

Please look through the talk page for the article and the edit history. Pull up some of the early versions of the article. I have twice proposed limiting the editing of this article to registered users with a solid editing history. Persons have edited outside of user accounts on a number of occasions. No one has considered my proposals. This is an article that attracts persons with strong and sometimes misguided opinions. They think the article should be a propaganda piece, rather than an article written with an attempt to be objective. I have had my original material almost completely deleted at this point. If you look thru the history of this article and still think it should be considered for deletion, so be it. But, first, please examine this article's history. Thank you. Bill Pollard (talk) 01:27, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Power center (retail) / Retail park

Hi there,

I notice that you redirected the Retail park article to Power center (retail). While this may have been the correct decision (as both are similar concepts under different names) I'm surprised that you appeared simply to discard the existing Retail park article content in favour of a redirect. While there would undoubtedly have been some overlap, the two were not exact duplicates and (IMHO) could have been merged. Ubcule (talk) 20:25, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Roughstock

I got a question for you is Roughstock a notable website to take reviews from and put them on Wikipedia in the critical reviews/reception section?HotHat (talk) 05:40, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

See article, Same Trailer Different Park and Like a Rose. What about Got Country Online and Country Universe? I just want to know what to do in the future?HotHat (talk) 05:43, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Westfield Southgate

It appears the Westfield Group made a change to the entry for this mall in the last month. They at one time listed 'Centre' as part of the name, probably since Australians and the English like to call malls centres. Anyway, you located more info than I did, so that's really what counts. Bill Pollard (talk) 06:50, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Highway Don't Care

My edits on Highway Don't Care weren't vandalism. If you look on iTunes, it credits the song to 'Tim McGraw featuring Taylor Swift and Keith Urban'. Please fix this. Easy4me (talk) 10:56, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Jamey living.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Jamey living.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:05, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Draft Rfc/u

Hi TPH, I have begun a draft WP:RFC/u for Jax. While Banner and BHG have nominated many of his templates and stubs, you're one of the few who have actually initiated dialog with him on his talk page. That would qualify you as a 2nd certifier for the request, I think. Would you agree to do so? Even if you don't, could you take at my draft at User:Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars/RfC draft? Feel free to revise and add diffs where you see fit. Is this the right approach? Have I detailed/requested the right things? Does it come across civil or too harsh? Not harsh enough? Whatever input you can provide will be appreciated? Thanks. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 18:14, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Will you certify? Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Jax 0677. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 20:52, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Jax 0677.
Message added 17:07, 30 March 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Speedy deletion declined: Lancia(truck)

Hello TenPoundHammer. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Lancia(truck), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not a valid A10 as it does expand on the parent article - suggest leaving the AFD to run its course. Thank you. ϢereSpielChequers 20:28, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Deletion policy

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Deletion policy, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Deletion policy and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Deletion policy during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:01, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Deletion policy

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Deletion policy, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Deletion policy and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Deletion policy during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:02, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Deletion policy

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Deletion policy, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Deletion policy and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Deletion policy during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.  — Statυs (talk, contribs) 02:07, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

per the above, Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Andy Dingley (talk) 02:26, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Please note that you are very likely to be blocked from editing for the remainder of the day if you create any additional "joke" deletion requests. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:17, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

jeez, lighten up. not like he's doing anything permanent, and it happens one day a year. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} HAPPY APRIL FOOLS! 03:52, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Good Humor
	In the span of half a second you logged me out and RickRoll'D me good one  Ryan Vesey 03:36, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Some Barnstar Thingy

	The zOMG Barnstar
	If the only two references to Harlem Shake (meme) are a Rick Astley song and Wikipedia blowing up in my face, then the article SHOULD GO DOWN!!! Steel1943 (talk) 04:34, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

April 2013

Please do not refrain from making constructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear not to constitute vandalism and have not been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 14:23, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Read it a little more carefully... The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 18:36, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

A cupcake for you!

Happy April Fools' Day!!! Magioladitis (talk) 19:34, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:TenPoundHammer

User:TenPoundHammer, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:TenPoundHammer and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:TenPoundHammer during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:41, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Deleted under U1, no problem. Also protected because it was previously protected. — Carl (CBM · talk) 19:21, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Can someone undelete my user page? I think CBM took my April Fools request literally

Done. -- Magioladitis (talk) 19:29, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

What a pity that Magioladitis got here seconds before me. I would have declined your request, both because it serves you right, and because it's still the 1st of April. (Incidentally, I am not convinced that CBM did take it seriously, because if so then it's hard to tell why he/she create-protected the page. I think he/she knew damned well it was a joke, and took the joke one step further by deleting and salting.) JamesBWatson (talk) 19:34, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

I reprotected the page because it was already protected. Deleting or recreating a page has the effect of resetting the page protection. — Carl (CBM · talk) 19:46, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

What a pity. So it wasn't a joke. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:12, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Request for Comment

I'm not going to template it, but I think you will want to see this before too long passes. CycloneGU (talk) 21:06, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Reward for those involved in April's First pranks

Hello TenPoundHammer, Eduemoni has given you a shining smiling star! You see, these things promote WikiLove and hopefully this has made your day better. Spread the Shining Smiling Star whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or someone putting up with some stick at this time. Enjoy! Eduemoni↑talk↓ 03:14, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Toxic ravine reply

How can there be sources like internet URL when the internet wasn't created when the game was released? It's a small game like Swords of Chaos, not many people played it like Legend of the Red Dragon so nobody really talked about it in newspapers or magazines. Actually, I bet you can find references for those games in computer magazines back in the day, but those are long gone...

From the link you gave me WP:GNG : "if appropriate sources cannot be found after a good-faith search for them, consider merging the article's verifiable content into a broader article providing context." I did as many search as I could, just can't really find anything else to add. So we should merge both games into broader article? What article? Isn't there another solution to keep the article? You do realize that a lot of articles on wikipedia are just like those games, I understand wikipedia's policy on it, however if we keep deleting articles, it won't become the entire human knowledge encyclopedia it's supposed to be. Zurd (talk) 04:44, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

I just posted a reply here : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Swords_of_Chaos Zurd (talk) 05:14, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Whitburn books

Chartbot is throwing up its hands on one big set of links, those like

• http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/specials/hot100/charts/top100-titles-00.shtml
• http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/specials/hot100/charts/top100-titles-90.shtml
• http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/specials/hot100/charts/top100-titles-80.shtml
• http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/specials/hot100/charts/top100-titles-70.shtml
• http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/specials/hot100/charts/top100-titles-60.shtml
• http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/specials/hot100/charts/top100-titles-50.shtml
• http://www.billboard.com/bbcom/specials/hot100/charts/top100-titles-40.shtml

From context, it looks like Billboard used to have pages that listed the top 100 songs for each decade. Has Whitburn got lists like this in any of his books? If you could provide me with some citations from the Whitburn books that would act as sources for these, it would be easy for me to make Chartbot do the work of correcting the citations. I just need to know what to correct them to.—Kww(talk) 00:18, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Wanna help with an article?

I came across this guy (Dejan Stojanović) while looking at stuff up for PROD. The article has been around since 2010, but I'm seeing a definite lack of RS that I can verify on this article. You willing to help out and wade through this article to see if he's actually notable or not? Even if he is eventually found to be notable, the article has some issues with puffery and tone. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:28, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

• Actually... it looks like the person making the articles is a SPA that only creates articles based around this guy. I'm not going to say that it is the author himself, but it's somewhat fishy that a listing on Amazon directly quotes Wikipedia, which in turn directs to that Amazon entry. Basically put, I'm wondering if this isn't a case of self-promotion that has flown under the radar for a few years, so I'm basically here to ask you to do what you do best. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:30, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oakwood Plaza, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Power center (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:26, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Reginaregina.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Reginaregina.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 09:05, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

little help to gain notability for BeamWars

Hi, I'm bugging you because we talked a little in the past 2 weeks about the deletion of Swords of Chaos and I'm not sure on how to proceed. Here's the thing, I made many changes to the BeamWars articles so it can gain notability, I'd like someone to review it, maybe we need to create an entry for it on en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Video_games/Deletion ? Thanks for your time. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zurd (talk • contribs) 08:35, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

• saw you took out the deletion notice for BeamWars, thanks for your time again! :) Zurd (talk) 20:57, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Tsquarealbum.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Tsquarealbum.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:13, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

File:GliksLogo.gif missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

• File:GliksLogo.gif

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 01:24, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Wagon Wheel

Watch your work. The gold certification is for the Old Crow Medicine Show version, and the sales figure you added was for Darius Rucker's cover. For some reason, the RIAA database doesn't yet show the certification for Rucker's version, even though it's in platinum sales territory. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:08, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

I would suggest the same for you. There are 2 versions listed there - sales for Darius' cover is 429,000 (#1 for the week), sales for OCMS is 1,167,000 (#28 for the week). Next time you want to correct someone else I suggest that you read carefully first. Hzh (talk) 21:28, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Talk:Wilford Brimley/Archive 1#Mormon.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Re: Star Trek

I've got my own projects I don't get enough time to work on, so I think it's unlikely I'll get to that page any time soon. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 13:07, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

about your mindless spamming of citation needed tags in the Star Trek list article

[37] I said this in the AFD, and figured I'll post it here also since you might not keep going back there when you know the result, 8 people said keep so far and you are the only one trying to delete it, to make sure you noticed. If the short paragraph that list the information, also list what episode or book this happened in, it doesn't need a citation tag. Please read the information before you rampage around spamming a fact tag all over an article you clearly don't like and want deleted. Dream Focus 14:48, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Lifeatbest.jpg

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:Lifeatbest.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 21:16, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

April 2013

Hello, I'm Mrfrobinson. I noticed that you recently removed some content from List_of_Get_Fuzzy_characters without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! If you wish to discuss it first on the talk page or nominate for deletion please do. But don't just go blank and redirect content without any explanation other than "fancruft". Mike (talk) 01:54, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

File:GliksLogo.gif missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

• File:GliksLogo.gif

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:14, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Representative peer

You might want to look at Wikipedia:Featured article review/Representative peer/archive2 now with a view to closing as SandyGeorgia does not appear to be around. ww2censor (talk) 22:15, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Timeshift9

No one else had the balls to close this? That is a bit rich. Several of us shut it down right at the start and were over-ruled by an admin. You did the right thing, but don't need to get hostile OK? We are on the same side. Djapa Owen (talk) 22:22, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

I do not believe that my MfD nomination met the criteria for speedy deletion. The debate was closed after less than half of the recommended debate period, and several of the votes assumed I was a sock. I will sumbit to a checkuser and explain my non-registered contribution per Wikipedia:SOCK#LEGIT. 50.113.65.228 (talk) 07:29, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

One would have to wonder why your edit history seems strange 50.113.65.228, after all of the 21 edits six of them are not attacking Timeshift, and last time around you did not edit anything for more than six months after your first MfD. Now you pop up, do six spam removals on inconsequential articles and then launch MfD number two. Do you think we cannot recognise an experienced editor at work, one who knows how MfD's work and how to do things here? Or do you claim to be a child-savant? Djapa Owen (talk) 15:04, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

The Santa Clause

Hello, I responded to your comment at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Santa Clause (series). I hope you'll reconsider your stance in light of the changes made to the article that better indicate the unity of the films under a single scope. Erik (talk | contribs) 15:46, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Koavf's talk page.
Message added 20:12, 2 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

—Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:12, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Your Signature

Just wanted to say I was amused that on your signature, the link to your talk page is titled "What did I screw up now?" which I thought was funny. I liked it and wanted to let you know. It's pretty good, but not so good it deserves a barnstar award, so I guess that's how you screwed up this time! Paul Robinson (Rfc1394) (talk) 16:17, 4 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited All Over the Road (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Intoxication (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:31, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to University Mall (Orem, Utah) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave my operator a message on his talk page. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:52, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Advice sought

Hello TPH. I was worried about WP:NOTCATALOG at Paul Motian and I left a note at the editor's Talk Page. I see that similar concerns may have been raised back in 2011 (see Talk:Paul Motian). I've since taken advice from User:Boing! said Zebedee and he thinks that only the bare ref formatting is an issue. User:Dennis Brown suggested that you might be able to help. Many thanks for your time. Martinevans123 (talk) 21:06, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Mary Was the Marrying Kind

Maybe not a permastub but when I redirected it, it was a two sentence microstub that did nothing to establish the song's notability. Eric444 (talk) 21:24, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Reply - Per WP:IDEALSTUB:

"When you write a stub, bear in mind that it should contain enough information for other editors to expand upon it. The key is to provide adequate context".

The article contained many reviews in the references that could have been expanded upon. --Jax 0677 (talk) 22:27, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Blanking of trivia sections

I've noticed that you tend to remove "popular culture" and "trivia" sections, like that on One, Two, Buckle My Shoe. It's commendable that you care about cleaning up those, but your approach is problematic; by simply removing the whole section you're throwing away a lot of babies with the bathwater, content that should be retained either in the article or at other related topics. Proper cleanup of such sections is not easy - WP:TRIVIA explains that most content should be sourced and relocated, not deleted (only speculative or factually incorrect entries should be removed - except at WP:BLPs; there, it's OK to remove everything unsourced). I know that's a lot of work - if you're not willing to do it, the very least you must do is placing a link at the talk page to your edit removing the section, so that a different editor in the future may find it and properly fix the content (this is all explained in WP:PRESERVE, which is a Wikipedia policy).

"Popular culture" sections in particular are a valuable resource, one of the strengths of Wikipedia with respect to other encyclopedias. Our distributed approach make it easy to surface many examples of cultural references that would be impossible to compile by a centralized team. Although the format in which those are usually first written tends to be poorly presented, they work as a kickstart for someone to later make an encyclopedia section out of those examples. You're preventing that to happen when you remove the whole section without a trace, to be lost in the article's history. Diego (talk) 08:21, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Diego Moya's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time.

Diego (talk) 21:51, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Diego Moya's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time.

Diego (talk) 06:59, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

American board games, 1843–1935

I'd like to understand if I'm missing something. I couldn't find any consensus on a merge, your edit sum said "done" and you removed the merge proposal template. The content wasn't merged, you made a REDIRECT from the article to article Board game. What am I missing, could you explain your action and edit sum and justification please so that I can understand. Thank you. Ihardlythinkso (talk) 21:16, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Your reply (copied from my Talk): "My bad. I forgot to paste the content in. I've redone the merge, and actually put the content from the "American board games" article into Board game now."

Two Qs: 1) The image from the merged article was not carried forward. Why not? 2) I still don't see a merge consensus in that discussion. Just a merge proposal and a short discussion. No consensus. How do you justify coming in and doing the merge in light of that? Ihardlythinkso (talk) 21:34, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Your reply (copied from my Talk): "It's called being WP:BOLD. If there's no discussion either way, then either just do the merge, or just leave it a separate article. I think it should be merged, but it's clear that no one wants to discuss it either way. Why do you think it should not be merged?"

I don't get you. You say "no one wants to discuss it either way", but there was a short discussion on the Talk. And any fair reading of the short discussion by a CRAT would result in "No consensus for merge" or even "Keep as separate articles", since the participant advocating to keep separate, offered several arguments for his position, wheras the editor advocating merge, had only a single argument, and failed to follow up and contend with the reasons given for keeping separate.

I asked you why the photo image was not also merged. No answer from you. Please answer.

I haven't evaluated what my opinion would be about merging, but I see no reason to disagree with the participant who advocated reasons to keep separate. You say you "think it should be merged", but instead of adding your thought and advocacy on the tail of the short discussion at the Talk, you did a REDIRECT without informing anyone or discussing, then when I reverted you and asked what justification you have to merge, you reverted me and went ahead with the merge again. I think this is much too forceful, and I don't see you as a collaborator, just as a "clobberer". I will be reverting your merge for the reasons given here. Please start collaborating and communicating in future. You did the same thing at ICCF U.S.A.. (A REDIRECT which essentially destroyed the article content, which I reverted saying it was no way to delete an article and if you wanted to do that you should open an AfD, and on the AfD you opened you subsequently wrote that your REDIRECT was reverted without reason, which was false. You circumvented process in order to remove content then, and you've circumvented process now.) Ihardlythinkso (talk) 22:34, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Perhaps I agree with the merge, I'm not sure. (Another way to go is to merge as you have done, then fork later, if other similar articles are created.) But I don't like the way you went about it, forcing me to restore the article at ICCF U.S.A. as well as the article today. Please don't destroy articles using REDIRECT. Ihardlythinkso (talk) 23:27, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Wikipedia:OTRS_noticeboard.
Message added by Theopolisme at 21:27, 15 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

List of minor recurring characters in Star Trek: The Next Generation

Can you boldly rename it to List of Star Trek: The Next Generation characters? That way, we can add more characters. --George Ho (talk) 08:42, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Y Done .--George Ho (talk) 13:14, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

C. H. Parsons Co.

Since you've withdrawn the AfD nomination for this article, do you plan on adding sources to it, as you suggested that I do on my talk page regarding the pocket pet article? Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:46, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Country rap may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:40, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

George Strait

Strait's article now has the claim, in two different places, that he has 60 number one songs. This website, http://sixtyforsixty.com/, seems to be the source, but it doesn't look reliable to me. Billboard only has him at 44. Care to take a look? 75.164.246.111 (talk) 02:54, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Tintin

Thanks for your note, TenPoundHammer. I agree, the Legacy section probably isn't in the same state it was when the article was made FA, so I do plan on having a go at it later. Feel free to help. I tried adding the photo of Hergé to this section but was shot down; see the recent history of the article for the reason and feel free to help think of a way to put that photo in there. I have added some of the "citation needed" myself as I am currently working on the citations; of course it's not easy to research and find sources sometimes, but I do own a few Tintin reference works. Feel free to look at each tag and see if you can find sources. The goal is to re-submit this article for FA again someday soon. I see someone finally is working to keep the Michael Farr article. Talk to you again soon I hope. —Prhartcom (talk) 11:40, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Draft topic ban Jax

I would like to see you comments and additions to User:The Banner/Workpage28, the draft for a topic ban proposal regarding Jax 0677. Hope to hear soon. The Banner talk 12:08, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Reply - The navboxes I created that were in TfD either should not be there and/or were started before April 25, 2013. Also, there is no proof that I am filibustering, and I am permitted to respond to charges against me and those as to why a template should be kept with relevant statements. --Jax 0677 (talk) 16:43, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Re: Galleria Post Oak

What do you mean, "mall never went by this name"? It was that name in the very early 1970s--unfortunately I can't remember anymore what the source was. TheListUpdater (talk) 04:15, 23 May 2013 (UTC)

Dispute comment

Hi. Would you care to comment here regarding an original research dispute at My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy? Dan56 (talk) 10:05, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Proposal: topic ban for Jax 0677 regarding templates

As you are named in the proposal: the proposal is filed here The Banner talk 15:42, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

College Park Mall (Saskatoon)

You left a note on my talk page regarding the deletion of the wikipedia page --> College Park Mall (Saskatoon) which I see has been deleted. The reason that page was created was in response to a discussion to start some shopping mall pages. The comment about no sources is true, there are not too very many sources about shopping malls unless there is a news item about it for some reason or t'other, but for the most part there are just shopping advertisements which don't help, so I don't know if shopping malls will make it big on wikipedia. No biggie about the deletion, I think the discussion has tapered off as well to create those types of pages. Have a great day. SriMesh | talk 21:17, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

All Cried Out

I haven't been able to find the producer. Eric444 (talk) 03:05, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Karen Staley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgetown, Pennsylvania (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:46, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Paul Motian

It's now nearly two weeks since I left a note at the article Talk Page, without any response from the editor concerned. But he has apparently not edited since 3 May. In fact, no-one has responded. Do you think I should go ahead and remove all those links? Thanks. Martinevans123 (talk) 15:28, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Wuthering Heights (band)

You PRODded this, and it was deleted. Undeletion has been requested at WP:REFUND, so per WP:DEL#Proposed deletion I have restored it, and now notify you in case you wish to consider AfD. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 21:27, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Virginia State Route 674

674 is a secondary state route in Virginia. Each county can have its own route (ex.: 674 in Prince William County is different than 674 (Hunter Mill Rd.) in Fairfax County). Also, secondary routes do not exist in cities (like Manassas). Hence the original long name. I tried renaming the article back and it wouldn't let me. Please restore the original title. --Tim Sabin (talk) 13:53, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

The Gonnabees

A year ago you PRODded this, and it was deleted. Undeletion has now been requested at WP:REFUND, so per WP:DEL#Proposed deletion I have restored it, and now notify you in case you wish to consider AfD. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 09:40, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

The Adventures of Tintin

Greetings TenPoundHammer. I would be honored if you took a look at the To Do list over at Talk:The Adventures of Tintin. —Prhartcom (talk) 17:01, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

"His other company"

It’s not KTM that is buying Husqvarna, but KTM’s CEO and part-owner Stefan Pierer. He bought it with his ‘other’ company Pierer Industries AG. This is not connected to Cross AG, the owner company in which both Pierer and Bajaj hold shares.

Please stop redirecting Pierer Industries AG to Husqvarna motorcycles, they are not the same. All the searches say the same thing. Unless you can cite a source to justify the redirect, it's wrong. -- Cdw ♥'s ♪ ♫(talk) 01:41, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Jonathan Groff

Jonathan Groff is a 28 year old actor. The Jonathan Groff who was on Jeopardy is, I'm assuming, a considerably older television producer. Same name and in the relatively same business, yes, but two different people nonetheless. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.15.166.249 (talk) 05:06, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

Civil language in edit summary

Hello, I noticed that you made a comment in your edit summary on the page Interstate 196 that didn't seem very civil. Although it can sometimes be easy to become frustrated with other editors, abusive language is best avoided. Cheers. Melbourne3163 (talk) 06:43, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi

Hi! Can you please explain why you used this particular edit summary? Thanks! --Rschen7754 06:28, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

• Because I'm apparently the only one on the Internet who can use lead/led properly? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 07:03, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
  • Your edit summary was unnecessarily hostile. Please do not use such summaries again. --Rschen7754 00:44, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Blowin' Smoke may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:58, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Wheel of Fortune (U.S. game show)

I've begun the GA review for Wheel of Fortune (U.S. game show), and it looks ripe for promotion. I'd like your thoughts on a few minor points, listed at the review page. Thanks for your effort on this one. I watched a lot of this with my folks as a kid, and it's fun to see it up for GA. -- Khazar2 (talk) 02:20, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Good Articles Recruitment Centre

Hello! Now, some of you might have already received a similar message a little while ago regarding the Recruitment Centre, so if you have, there is no need to read the rest of this. This message is directed to users who have reviewed over 15 Good article nominations and are not part of WikiProject Good articles (the first message I sent out went to only WikiProject members). So for those who haven't heard about the Recruitment Centre yet, you may be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around it (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers: Recruiters: The main task of a recruiter is to teach users that have never reviewed a Good article nomination how to review one. To become a recruiter, all you have to do is meet this criteria. If we don't get at least 5-10 recruiters to start off with (at the time this message was sent out, 2 recruiters have volunteered), the Recruitment Centre will not open. If interested, make sure you meet the criteria, read the process and add your name to the list of recruiters. (One of the great things about being a recruiter is that there is no set requirement of what must be taught and when. Instead, all the content found in the process section is a guideline of the main points that should be addressed during a recruitment session...you can also take an entire different approach if you wish!) If you think you will not have the time to recruit any users at this time but are still interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters but just fill in the "Status" parameter with "Not Available". Co-Director: The current Director for the centre is me (Dom497). Another user that would be willing to help with some of the tasks would be helpful. Tasks include making sure recruiters are doing what they should be (teaching!), making sure all recruitments are archived correctly, updating pages as needed, answering any questions, and distributing the feedback form. If interested, please contact me (Dom497). Nominators, please read this: If you are not interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still help. In some cases a nominator may have an issue with an "inexperienced" editor (the recruitee) reviewing one of their nominations. To minimize the chances of this happening, if you are fine with a recruitee reviewing one of your nominations under the supervision of the recruiter, please add your name to the list at the bottom of this page. By adding your name to this list, chances are that your nomination will be reviewed more quickly as the recruitee will be asked to choose a nomination from the list of nominators that are OK with them reviewing the article. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along. A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.--Dom497 (talk) This message was sent out by --EdwardsBot (talk) 14:53, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Hey TenPoundHammer, I'm Asmetr, a fairly newer editor. Recently, I've encountered some bugs with Sonic and All-Stars Racing Transformed, and was wondering, are bugs mentionable (or, dare I say, notable) on Wikipedia? Please respond on My talk page.

Talkback

I just got a talkback notice from you directing me here--were you just pointing me to the Wheel article again or am I missing something? Cheers, -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:39, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Good Article Barnstar
		For your contributions to bring Wheel of Fortune (U.S. game show) to Good Article status. Thanks, and keep up the good work! -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:47, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

A cupcake for you!

For writing WP:HAMMER, one of the most useful essays on Wikipedia. It came up during Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mariah Carey's fourteenth studio album, where the article creator actually said "Im sorry but Arron, Robin, Gene ,and Starcheersspeaksnewslostwars obviously have a personal agenda against Carey...so all of your votes dont count...lets wait for new users: New Voting Here" Whereupon I voted "delete" in the new voting section. Howicus (talk) 18:38, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Comments subpages for G-6

I noticed you marked a couple of commments pages as G6. I agree that they are CSD material and marked them as G6 and was told to send them to MFD. Kumioko (talk) 21:47, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

Your edit at Del McCoury Band

Hi there. I was asked to look at your change to the article in question. Using provocative language such as LIES even in an edit summary is not a good way to build a collegial environment. Also, while there was a single reference, might it have been better to replace the unreferenced template with ref-improve (which is what I have done). Just trying to smooth out some feathers in the community. Hasteur (talk) 13:45, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Tim McGraw

I have nothing against listing Curb Records first. I just think that Taylor Swift and Keith Urban should stay because their single "Highway Don't Care" has already been listed as a #1 duet, song, video, and country music event on certain charts. I don't think Nelly Deserves to be on McGraw's associated artists section. That is O.K. to get rid of as long as you agree. Thanks for cooperating: Signed: RZ To Reply, CLICK HERE —Preceding undated comment added 00:34, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

• Tim has collaborated with Taylor and Keith at the ACM Awards, on the video single, and recording the song. This is like saying that Karen Fairchild, Kimberly Schlapman, Phillip Sweet, and Jimi Westbrook shuldn't be associated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryan Zich (talk • contribs) 00:42, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

• I don't think it's nessecary to make them collaborate several times to be associated. Explain why. RZ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryan Zich (talk • contribs) 00:48, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

• Well maybe we should find the person who did it in the first place — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ryan Zich (talk • contribs) 01:12, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

• I meant you and your worthlessness. How eldly are you? Ryan Zich (talk) 01:23, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

• Well I apologize very much. My son just passed so I'm a little grumpy recently. Just please: respect your elders. God Bless. Ryan Zich (talk) 01:31, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Livealittlekenny.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Livealittlekenny.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:29, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Ronan (song)

I also could not find any reference to the producer of the song either and don't have an answer. What is clear though is that it was produced for Taylor Swift's Red album. Although not included in the album later on, probably producers of the other songs in the album produced this one as well. But your question was a great opportunity to visit this beautiful song again and I added a new info about the title of the grieving mother's blog. I dedicate to you another amazing song, this one about child brain tumor by Canadian duo RyanDan called "Tears of an Angel" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZgjKQpaZbE - werldwayd (talk) 07:40, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Novel (musician)

Hi - just wanted to drop you a note to tell you that I've removed the prod you placed on Novel (musician), as there were multiple sources from which to compose a decent bio. Cheers,  Gong show 05:45, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Karl Michael,

for me, fails WP:1EVENT. I can't see another notable event associated with him listed. What's your opinion on it?--Launchballer 17:53, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

The Swon Brothers

I found Zach Swon's and Colton Swon's full names and birthdates, and I put them on the article, and some editor deleted them. So, I am wondering is it okay to use these sources or not for that information.HotHat (talk) 21:59, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

The policy on BLPPRIMARY is what has me worried about this information, so what do you think about this sourcing now?HotHat (talk) 23:08, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

This kitten ate the trout I was going to serve to you!

Bearian (talk) 20:15, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Karl Malone

Not all list sections are trivia sections. Lists are sometimes the best way to organize things, and most of the items on that last are clearly significant (eg, being a league MVP). Much of that content is probably available in the article body already, but it's nice to have it in a compact form.

But, whatever. I don't feel like fighting over this. Zagalejo^^^ 20:41, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Websites

I have started the discussion, so lets talk if you want.HotHat (talk) 07:55, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Recent Edits to my Pages

Sir, I appreciate your contribution to Wikipedia, and am glad to have you in our community. I would like to know, with all best interest, why you have done your past edits to Jase Robertson, and First Baptist Church (Panama City, FL). I have noticed that you have redirected the article Jase Robertson to the page Duck Dynasty, but I am currently working on Biography articles for all cast members of the show. Also, the page for First Baptist Church (Panama City, FL) has been nominated for deletion, but I will discuss this on the page's entry. Thanks! Carwile2 (talk) 15:47, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

RESPONSE TO YOU about Randy Taylor-Weber

Number one, it actually was proving the song peaked. Number two, check the third source where it lists him as the writer. Elias.gatito (talk) 09:07, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Done

I went ahead and got it done with Music review sources, if you would like to edit go ahead and be my guest.HotHat (talk) 07:46, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Would you like me to do one like that for Country music?HotHat (talk) 03:17, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Andrew Gold Edit

The Family Feud item had a bad citation. If you can find a reliable and Wiki-approved citation that confirms his appearance, its date, etc., please feel free to restore the tidbit. - Movieola

Please check the citation again. Thanks! - Movieola

I saw nothing on Google News when running that search, except for a YouTube comment - and YouTube is not on Wikipedia's approved citation list. And just for the record, what, specifically, does it say behind a pay-wall at the Denver Post that makes this such a significant addition to the Gold Wiki page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Movieola (talk • contribs) 02:31, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

To reiterate, I did a search on Google NEWS, and only saw the YouTube comment. The Google News link you provided did show someone's Denver Post comment in passing about seeing the show on television. While I don't think that's particularly authoritative, this is a rather minor issue, so if you are determined to include it and believe it important enough to include and believe that the citation is valid, I've got nothing more to say on the subject. Movieola — Preceding unsigned comment added by Movieola (talk • contribs) 02:45, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Unnice dirty laundry crusade

Hi TPH,

Sorry if my comments tend offensive. I do not have a crusade against you. I suggest you review my comments in the RFC/U. Sometimes, your overly short nominations annoy. Often, something is definitely wrong with the page, but you provide so little reliable detail in the nomination that it is of no help in the review. If we were working side by side in real life, I would probably have poked you in the ribs. Communicating with you is awkward, because you are so rarely responsive. However, I don't want to complain, because I can see you are at working doing more important things, improving mainspace.

My wish for you is that you would try to stop relying on the word "stale", and instead say why something is stale, and consider that a fully marked up mainspace-worthy looking page is probably not what others consider "stale". If you don't like my poking, I will modify. My impression is that you don't even notice. Your usename, combined with cute otters that are nimble unlike a hammer, but scare me with their likelihood to bite, confuses me as to how best talk to you. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:36, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Yes, you are right. Needlessly going too far. Apologies. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:30, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Suggestions

I have got another started New Publications.HotHat (talk) 04:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Posting on a retired page

Do not post messages on my old talk page: Ashbeckjonathan. If you want to post messages, please post on my new talk page, WisconsinBoyClevelandRocks228844. Thank you. WisconsinBoyClevelandRocks228844 (talk) 17:28, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Have you forgotten not to post messages on my old talk page; Ashbeckjonathan? You could have posted that message, AfD Jason Horowitz, on my new talk page. WisconsinBoyClevelandRocks228844 (talk) 16:08, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I misunderstood; my bad. WisconsinBoyClevelandRocks228844 (talk) 15:59, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Will you create a suggested Article?

Hello, TenPoundHammer. Can I please ask a professional Wikipedian that an article be created on the topic of the Country Music singer Buddy Brown (who is most popular on YouTube). His official website is LOCATED HERE (URL). Thank you. MinnesotaCountryBoy (talk) 01:36, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Please Write me back on my talk page MinnesotaCountryBoy (talk) 01:39, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

• Okay. Thank you for your help and cooperation. MinnesotaCountryBoy (talk) 05:20, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Policy development

You are more than welcome to comment on Ground rules.HotHat (talk) 07:24, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asok (Dilbert)

Closed as keep. Since you're a proponent of sources being utilized in articles, and per your concern about this article, would you be interested in expanding it per the available sources? My time is limited per involvement in several activities, so perhaps you may be interested. Northamerica1000^(talk) 07:53, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

deleted article Endlessly (song)

Hi - I did add categories to my page. Anyway all my hard work and dedication has now been deleted. Thanks a lot. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Metamatica (talk • contribs) 09:04, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Bupropion FAR

Hi TPH - A while ago, you created the FAR for Bupropion (WP:Featured article review/Bupropion/archive1). A user has completed quite a bit of work on the article in the meantime. If you have the time, it would be appreciated if you could return to the review and update your comments. Thanks! Dana boomer (talk) 21:49, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Twinkle

What is Twinkle? WisconsinBoyClevelandRocks228844 (talk) 18:20, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

That makes sense. How often do you use the word, 'thingy'? — Preceding unsigned comment added by WisconsinBoyClevelandRocks228844 (talk • contribs) 19:52, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Secretary of Consumer Affairs of Puerto Rico

Hi,

It seems that you are confusing Secretary of Consumer Affairs of Puerto Rico with List of Secretaries of Consumer Affairs of Puerto Rico. The Secretary of Consumer Affairs of Puerto Rico is a post, similar to the Ministry of Consumer Affairs of other nations, and is a Cabinet-level officer of the Cabinet of Puerto Rico as well as being a member of the Council of Secretaries of Puerto Rico as established by the Constitution of Puerto Rico.

If you are interested in expanding the article you can either do a search in Google for 'Secretario de Asuntos del Consumidor' or extract information from the law that created such post.

Hope this clears things up.

—Ahnoneemoos (talk) 20:31, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

A pie for you!

Thanks for noting the double deletion. Praveen (talk) 08:09, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

What did I...

Hi, thanks for closing at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2013 August 11. However, there was no need to close it there and move to the Speedy page; we can also implement speedy cases straight from the main Cfd pages.

Also, you missed, in placing the Cfd top template. IIRC, where it goes is different from Afd.

Well, your sig does ask! – Fayenatic London 08:59, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

title capitalization need to be fixed.

Hi. Could you please fix these? Late For Nothing needs the "f" on "for" lowercased and Your Pretty Face is Going to Hell needs to have "Is" capitalized. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.225.136.1 (talk) 16:08, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the AFD move

There's too many steps for that process! --Dejitarob (talk) 23:07, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Deaton-Flanigen

Strangely, no. At least, none that I've come across. Eric444 (talk) 02:58, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

The Presidents of the United States of America (band)

Thanks for reverting [en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Presidents_of_the_United_States_of_America_(band)&oldid=569325099 my edit] on The Presidents of the United States of America (band), did not see te entire vandalism. Good job for [en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Presidents_of_the_United_States_of_America_(band)&oldid=569587024&diff=prev your edit]. SefBau :  msg  15:16, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

JPG fixed

your Image has been fixed please check for inaccuracies - regards FOX 52 (talk) 20:28, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Mark Collie

Hi!

I've been working with Tubasection on a Mark Collie page that more accurately and completely represents his body of work, which is equal parts songwriter, producer, actor and philanthropist. We've fixed some factual errors, restructured the page, removed illogical date breaks (albums don't have an end date) and added a appropriate material and tables.

Currently the page is in my sandbox. Can you take a look and tell us how to proceed? With this sort of change is it protocol edit the existing page, or submit anew? Many thanks for your help and guidance. Kimbola (talk) 20:41, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Charlie Worsham

Hi there, I see you edited Charlie Worsham's birthplace. Could you help me fix the first paragraph of the article: "born in Jackson" and "originally from Grenada". Should it be "raised in Grenada"? Thanks! Richard Apple (talk) 21:58, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Keith Moon

I left {{Place missing}} in the article as a reminder to me to fish out my copy of the DVD mentioned in the reference, and cite a specific time (ie: mm:ss), so the quotation is properly verifiable. Unfortunately, said DVD is currently buried somewhere in my house in a non-notable box in a non-notable cupboard. I think that's the right tag to use, it's basically the DVD equivalent of {{Page needed}}. Yes, I know you shouldn't normally cite things from half-baked memories, but I thought I'd get away with this one. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 10:27, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Miscellany for deletion - yvh11a

I created this page Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Yvh11a/BillyMaysOneForTheAngels in 2009 and promptly forgot about it. It contains no redeeming content and isn't very funny. Please delete it. Yvh11a (Talk • Contribs) 17:29, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cherryland Center may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• [[H. C. Prange Co.]] (now [[Younkers]]) and [[Sears]] had been confirmed as the other anchors.<Ref>{{cite news |title=Prange department store to go in mall |author=David Hayes |newspaper=Traverse

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:08, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Strong Enough (Travis Tritt album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Tritt |year=2002 |publisher=Columbia Records Nashville |format=CD booklet |publisherid=CK 8666)}}</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:23, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Cherry Bowl Drive-In

You might want to redact your deletion nomination statement. I most certainly did leave an edit summary explaining why I deprodded the article [38]. Furthermore, since I added several news sources (not all of them freely available online), your statement about what kind of sources were added is also false. I suggest you withdraw the nomination all-together. It's quite clearly a historic and notable institution. Take care and have a great week. Candleabracadabra (talk) 12:58, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Seeking a One-Time Exemption From TenPoundHammer's Law

Hi TenPoundHammer,

I have been working on a draft for an article for the next Slayer album for about the last 15 months or so. I would like to say that I have read your policy, and do generally agree with it. However, you make note that exceptions do exist, and I believe my draft is such a case. As of now, it has 22 citations, and a large body of text. I personally feel that the draft, as it currently sits, would make a worthwhile addition to Wikipedia, even in the state that it currently is. I have thought about just taking it live, but I'd really like to get your blessing for an exemption before I do, lest the page be nominated for speedy deletion.

Additionally, you mention Radiohead's In Rainbows as having been a valid exception. I believe that a comparison of content in my draft with this revision] of In Rainbows (the fifth revision from the day the article was started) supports the validity of my request.

Thank you for your help,--L1A1 FAL (talk) 20:02, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

I wouldn't write "TBA is..." unless the album is actually called TBA. Instead write "Slayer's eleventh studio album..." Gendralman (talk) 04:41, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Addressed the above. I had been thinking that I should probably rewrite that anyway though. With that said, does my draft seem notable enough at this point in time to be moved to article space though? Thanks.--L1A1 FAL (talk) 19:47, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Ok, thank you for clearing my draft. I may put it live either today or tomorrow then. Have a good one --L1A1 FAL (talk) 23:14, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Deletion notifications

I've just noticed the closure of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Citation needed. This was something of a surprise (though I never really intended it to be a mainspace page) - but in future, could you please check page authors have been notified of the discussion? I wrote almost all of this years ago, and would have had no idea it was removed if it hadn't been for a bot cleaning up redirects... Andrew Gray (talk) 19:51, 14 October 2013 (UTC)

Weird. Looks like an effect of a history merge from pre-existing redirects. (Beats me as to why...). One mystery solved, at least. Andrew Gray (talk) 17:55, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation#Proposal for a new rule for media adaptations and multimedia franchises

Greetings! There is an ongoing discussion at Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation#Proposal for a new rule for media adaptations and multimedia franchises, where the apparent inconsistency in results has been noted between Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Nightmare on Elm Street (disambiguation) (deleted by unanimous agreement) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Resident Evil (disambiguation) (kept by a substantial consensus). Since you participated in one of these discussions, you may wish to contribute to our efforts to craft a useful compromise with respect to the proposal under discussion. Cheers! bd2412 T 14:56, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Can you take another look at Crime scene getaway - especially the sourcing?

Bearian (talk) 17:59, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Logan Grove

I have responded to your request at Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 18:04, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2013 October 15

You participated in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A Nightmare on Elm Street (disambiguation). Join in the deletion review for your comments. --George Ho (talk) 14:51, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

If interested, the disambiguation page is now undeleted, so I have proposed disambiguating the first film of the same name and giving the non-disambiguated title to the disambiguation page. Here's the link: Talk:A Nightmare on Elm Street. --George Ho (talk) 19:21, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Time to reconcile...

Look...you and I have been at it ever since you tried to delete a few of my articles. Although I find your edit comment very unkind and unnecessary, I admit that I was wrong in making the edit in the first place. I am willing to try and abolish our animosity, because we do seem to be very similar (compare infoboxes), and could work well if we worked together and set aside our history. Let me know what you think on my talk page. Carwile2 ^{*Shoot me a message*} 23:18, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Joe Fryer

Hi, i have read the wikipedia article on reliable sources and i would like your insight or opinion on this: a story he has done for NBC News would that work? or something else? help me if can find some about him, Thanks ACase0000 (talk) 22:03, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Clarification....

I don't mean to be intrusive, but it is rather unclear to me what your response is. I apologized for my mistake (I have become wiser through more editing), but did not get an answer to my original request. Please let me know...

By the way, just out of curiosity, what made you decide to come back to that after such an amount of time?

You don't have to answer if you don't feel like it; my purpose is to reconcile, not make things worse. Carwile2 ^{*Shoot me a message*} 01:52, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Good!

Glad to hear it! I will let you know if I need any help! Carwile2 ^{*Shoot me a message*} 00:40, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Live in the Studio 1979

Glad I could help! Cheers,  Gong show 16:32, 26 October 2013 (UTC)

Deletion

I don't think it's permitted to restore a WP:CSD tag that was removed by another user (unless that user was the page creator, of course). In any case, mind commenting in the deletion discussion that I started? Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 12:10, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Never mind. Dogmaticeclectic (talk) 04:29, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Incidental

Yes, I did read. You didn't. Sapphorain (talk) 08:26, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter

Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 20:38, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Towson Place

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 08:04, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Resources Global Professionals

Hi - I'm going to build an article about Resources Global Professionals, a professional services company with 70 offices worldwide. I have some good third party coverage and think they pass the noteworthiness test for an entry. There appears to be some history from four years ago with an earlier version of the article, deleted several times and eventually moved by you to the user Tweetah's page, where it languishes today. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Tweehtah/Resources_Global_Professionals Is it better to start a new article, or revert your move and edit the original to clean it up? Please advise. Tweetah does not appear to have been on Wikipedia since. Timtempleton (talk) 00:39, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Doug Stone photo

When you get a moment can you give your approval here, so we can call the issue “resolved” – Many Thanks FOX 52 (talk) 05:16, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Why did you reduce it? I have restored the full size. Secondarywaltz (talk) 15:44, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Hasteur's talk page.
Message added 02:33, 4 November 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hasteur (talk) 02:33, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Doug Stone

The article Doug Stone you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Doug Stone for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ritchie333 -- Ritchie333 (talk) 11:00, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

can you help please?

the title of this page Atlanta Institute Of Music isn't correct. the "o" on "of" should be not capitalized, is there a way to maybe change the name so the "of" can be lowercased? Just something I noticed that looked really wrong, thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Second Skin (talk • contribs) 09:02, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

thank you sir. i thought you were an admin thats why i asked but i didnt know. still kinda new here but i read a bunch of guidelines on how stuff works — Preceding unsigned comment added by Second Skin (talk • contribs) 09:12, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Doug Stone

The article Doug Stone you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Doug Stone for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ritchie333 -- Ritchie333 (talk) 10:32, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Doug Stone

Gatoclass (talk) 15:32, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 in American music

Wise master, what are your thoughts on this matter? Bearian (talk) 18:09, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Civility Barnstar
	Thank you again for clarifying a troublesome interpretation of WP:HAMMER at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 in American music. Bearian (talk) 22:00, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Pleasure Island

The article was created on January 24, 2007. (Incidentally, there were two IPs who left talk page comments with their recollections of the park, one in 2008 and one in 2013. They could be fake too, but it seems like a lot of effort for a hoax.) TheCatalyst31 ^{Reaction•Creation} 04:12, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Serramonte Center may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• an original anchor. After that chain's closure in 2001, [[Target Corporation|Target]] replaced it (while also maintaining its much older Colma store, which is less than a mile away. In 2002, the

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:31, 14 November 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Template talk:Template sandbox

Its a sandbox page. Its purpose is to give a place for people to test things, as documented here. Revert it to the previous version with the notice and move on. -- Netoholic @ 01:02, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

Otters

What happened wit your North American river otters? Did they left? Or you dismissed them? Or are they still editing? Warrington (talk) 21:11, 22 November 2013 (UTC).

I did got them from you, and had them myself on my page (Warrington was the name) [39]. Was my first userbox... Change my name, but still the same person! Hafspajen (talk) 22:51, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

FYI: ANI for User:66.108.179.42

FYI: Since you were involved in editing Drunk Last Night, I am writing to inform you that there is an ANI for User:66.108.179.42 here. --Jax 0677 (talk) 00:12, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Drunk Last Night

We are getting constant unnecessary information added to the Drunk Last Night page. I keep reverting the edits but he keeps putting them back. What should we do about it? I also contacted User:Eric444 about the manner. SR11 (talk) 18:05, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Reply - See my post directly below this one about the ANI against the IP address. --Jax 0677 (talk) 00:15, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Grossmont Center at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 05:52, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

George Jones

Hi, TenPoundHammer. I was thinking about getting George Jones to GA/FA status. Right now, I think the article is mostly unsourced, but we could use books and the sources to support the article. For its structure, we should use Elvis Presley as a model to get the article up to GA/FA status. If you have any thoughts about this, please let me know. Thanks, Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 13:04, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

RE: 'Wheel of Fortune' edit I made..

Hello, and thank you very much for your warm welcome, that was quite kind. I also appreciate you not flaming me! lol.

However I just want to raise one point: The edit I made to the Wheel of Fortune page was purely translation. I found the wording of the article to be lacking in the area that I edited. What I did was re-word what was already written (yes i did elaborate though) That is why I didn't cite anything when I made the changes. I thought my final product was much easier to understand, the only reason I even went to make the edit was because last night I visited my folks and we watched Jeopardy! and Wheel of Fortune because it's a bit of a tradition with us lol. Anyway toward the end of the episode, we all got into a debate concerning one of the rules of the show. My dad said one thing, My mother and I said another (ma and I were right, it was very obviously what we had said it was) My father is a person who can NOT stand being wrong.. ever. So we were forced to get the laptop and look up the answer. When I came to the Wiki article in question I exclaimed "A-HA! Prepare to eat your words Pops!" and I proceeded to read an excerpt which vindicated mom and myself.

Unfortunately my father countered with a long-winded attack on the articles wording and said because of the wording that we were wrong, which is not specific enough to be anything but subjective and therefore did not count, and he wins.

So I made that edit! lol!

Anyway, thank you again for the warm welcome, and I apologize for neglecting the S.O.P for Wikipedia. I just wanted to tell you my story while I was at it.

- Deadsyundcore (talk) 22:34, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

quotations and MOS

Hiya. First off, the MOS discourages unnecessary capitalization. Second, without quotes, phrases like, "bankrupt wedge", mean that a wedge has declared bankruptcy. Primergrey (talk) 05:39, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Grossmont Center

Hello! Your submission of Grossmont Center at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 20:49, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Please see new note on DYK nomination page. Yoninah (talk) 22:43, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Please see reply on DYK nomination page. Yoninah (talk) 23:30, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library Survey

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi ^{t | c} 15:10, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Grossmont Center

Orlady (talk) 23:22, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	Thank you for your recent updates on Wikipedia, and in particular for your DYK nomination of Grossmont Center. I have to admit it was a pretty interesting hook! Keep up the good work. Happy editing, ComputerJA (☎ • ✎) 05:36, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Rouse Properties

Template:Rouse Properties has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Dough4872 02:03, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

A template for you

Since you love to nominate my templates for deletion I suggest you check out Template:Scott Cooper.--TheMovieBuff (talk) 18:07, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, TenPoundHammer. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 20:24, 16 December 2013 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Nikkimaria (talk) 20:24, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Beyond the Season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jim Rooney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Wagon Wheel

I guess I was too much overexcited to discover an Irish guy doing "Wagon Wheel" a hit again and months before Darius Rucker, that I misplaced some of the links. Anyway thanks for correcting them. On this occasion, some songs from "Country and Irish" genre artist Nathan Carter since I know you do enjoy country music. "Wagon Wheel", "Where I Wanna Be", "Caledonia". And for the festive day wishes to you, this smashingly beautiful song from Leigh Haggerwood and Florin Street Band "My Favourite Time of Year". werldwayd (talk) 18:35, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Happy New Year TenPoundHammer!

	Happy New Year!
	Hello TenPoundHammer: Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Wikipedia's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, HotHat (talk) 05:25, 1 January 2014 (UTC) Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2014}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

I just hope your year of editing ahead will be great!HotHat (talk) 05:25, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to University Mall (Tampa, Florida) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | location = [[Tampa], Florida]], [[United States]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:54, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 13 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Columbia Mall (Missouri) page, your edit caused a missing references list (help | help with group references). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:35, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Advertising Tag

Hi, I'm Kimmask. I noticed you put an Advertising tag on the Jim Wilkes that I edited. I have since rewritten some of the copy. Can you please remove the advertising tag? —Preceding undated comment added 19:21, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Glenn Frey

Hi TenPoundHammer! Just a friendly reminder that civility applies to edit summaries too, and this doesn't give me a "Peaceful Easy Feeling". I'm sure I screw up a lot too, and there are times I still feel like the "New Kid in Town". Feel free to drop me a note on my talk page if you think there are things I can do better. Thanks and "Take It Easy"! GoingBatty (talk) 03:11, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Byron Gallimore

Hello TenPoundHammer. You reverted this on grounds of "poorly formatted". I agree with your observation, however I was thinking should we not leave the article with the table and tag it for improvement? Lot of information was in there. FYI, I have left the edit as it is. Thanks, Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 20:19, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Findlay Village Mall

Hello, TenPoundHammer,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Findlay Village Mall should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Findlay Village Mall .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, ColonelHenry (talk) 04:23, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Forest Fair Village, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page West Chester, Ohio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

The babysitters

You have no proof that the film summary was copied from anywhere. At best you can argue it's an original work, except it isn't, since it's detailing events in a published movie. Hundreds of articles on movies have summaries, some more detailed than others. Arguing that it's a copyright violation to write a summary of what happened in a movie is basically saying writing a detailed book report is a copyright violation. They both provide information on the content of the movie/book. The articles on the Bourne movies all have detailed summaries, A Beautiful Mind, Gladiator, Blood Diamond, etc. If you can prove it was copied from somewhere, great, but if that's the case, then provide a source. In any event, summaries are accepted parts of movie articles, apparently on the premise that a summary is not a copyright violation, but an account of the contents of the movie because it's the topic of the article.

Jonjames1986 (talk) 01:01, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

A cookie for you!

Please accept this traditional wiki-cookie as a token of my appreciation for your continued admin gnomish edits. They are both needed and appreciated! Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 18:03, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

"Author requests deletion" CSDs

Hi TPH, this is a bit bureaucratic, I admit, but I think Whpq was right in reverting your adding of a U1 tag to the now deleted page User:DummyAccountPAB. The way the wording is now, U1 requires the user request deletion of the page, which he or she did not do. G7, however, despite being called "Author requests deletion," explicitly allows blanking to be taken as a deletion request. A moot point in this case, since the page ended up deleted anyway, but I think you could expedite these processes in the future by using the right CSD. Again, this is fairly bureaucratic, but I think it's legitimate to interpret CSD language strictly (there's a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion/Archive 50#U1 repeal proposal that shed some light on the subtle distinction between U1 and G7). --BDD (talk) 17:51, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

The reason I removed the speedy tag was that the author explicitly did not request deletion. Per Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:DummyAccountPAB, the author stated "Please blank the page but do not delete it." which is the opposite of asking that the page be deleted. I'll also point out that under the G7 criteria is states " If the sole author blanks a page other than a userspace page or category page, this can be taken as a deletion request.", so even without the request in the MFD discussion, user page is not qualified under G7 as it is currently worded. -- Whpq (talk) 19:46, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Sure, good point. The author did do the opposite of requesting deletion. I hadn't noticed that G7 exempts user pages from blanking, though. That seems counterproductive. --BDD (talk) 19:55, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

I suspect that the exemption for user space pages is due to the nature of those pages, especially subpages. They are often drafts with blanking made to clear stuff and then other stuff placed in the draft. Blanking such pages isn't sufficient evidence of a desire for deletion. -- Whpq (talk) 20:11, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Please consider closing AFD

See: [40] thank you Zeddocument (talk) 13:01, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Question

Hi The page A Woman's Deeper Journey Into Sex was taken down as the film was yet to be released. The film will premiere at the Byron Bay International Film Festival(attached link. It will then close the WOW Film Festival in Sydney. As the film now has several external links (attached) is it possible to put the page up again, as discussed when it was taken down? http://www.bbff.com.au/official-selection/bbff-2014-official-selection-a-womans-deeper-journey-into-sex/ http://www.echo.net.au/2014/02/women-able-buy-sex/ http://www.wift.org/wow/ (Chaucer 06:14, 19 February 2014 (UTC))

Dear TenPoundHammer, I created As Sure as the Sun and it is 100-percent notable. Yet years ago, someone created the song "As Sure as the Sun" redirect page, and now I am wondering what we need/can to do on this matter?HotHat (talk) 11:38, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

You did an excellent job, I just wanted to make sure you knew that, thank you very much!HotHat (talk) 16:00, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

A Woman's Deeper Journey Into Sex

Hi The page A Woman’s Deeper Journey Into Sex was taken down as the film was yet to be released. The film will premiere at the Byron Bay International Film Festival(see link). Then screen at the WOW Film Festival in Sydney. As the film now has several external links (included) is it possible to put the page up again, as discussed when it was taken down? http://www.bbff.com.au/official-selection/bbff-2014-official-selection-a-womans-deeper-journey-into-sex/ http://www.echo.net.au/2014/02/women-able-buy-sex/ http://www.wift.org/wow/ (Chaucer 06:25, 19 February 2014 (UTC)) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coalfacesally (talk • contribs)

Civility

I was reviewing a few of your recent contributions just now, and I noticed some profanity and incivility in edit summaries. (The two most recent examples: [41] and [42]) Please try to remain civil, even when frustrated! Hostile language can create a toxic editing environment and can be discouraging, especially to new editors. Everyking (talk) 09:04, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Re

See: "Invisible" (Hunter Hayes/Bonnie Baker/Katrina Elam) ©2014 Songs Of Universal, Inc., Happy Little Man Publishing (BMI)/Play Fairchild Music (ASCAP)/Devan Publishing (ASCAP)/Katrinkadink Music (ASCAP). Produced by Dann Huff and Hunter Hayes ©�2014 Atlantic Recording Corporation for the United States and WEA International Inc. for the world outside of the United States.

Source: http://finance.yahoo.com/news/hunter-hayes-announces-were-not-011500240.html

G.M (talk) 16:19, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

It's true. Thanks for fix. G.M (talk) 16:39, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Christopher DeStefano

You might want to visit Chris DeStefano (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). Apparently the article is out of date, and the sky is falling. Guy (Help!) 17:11, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Move request

Dear TenPoundHammer, I forgot to put the "s" on the Forks, so I need you to move it for me if you don't mind File:TwinForkLP.jpg?HotHat (talk) 10:41, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

I just want to thank you for the advice.HotHat (talk) 04:06, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Creepin'

You turned "Creepin'" from a redirect to an article and kudos for that. Slightly confused by the hatnote though, as I don't see how "Creepin'" relates to "Another Star" (though admittedly I'm not an expert on either artist) What did I miss? Thanks. --Jameboy (talk) 20:20, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Oh yeah. Not sure how I missed that, I should have just done a Find. Oh well, cheers. --Jameboy (talk) 18:45, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Editor review#RfC: Should we mark WP:ER as historical?

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Editor review#RfC: Should we mark WP:ER as historical?. As you participated in Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Editor review (2nd nomination) last year, you may be interested in the current RfC discussing closing and marking ER as historical. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 02:53, 3 March 2014 (UTC)

Masterchef New Zealand (series 5)

Hi, I was wondering if you know anything about creating elimination tables for game show-type tv shows. In this article, two duos were split up and one person from each duo was eliminated, whilst the other one from each team were teamed up with each other. I was wondering if there was any precedent, because I don't know how to display it in the article. Ollieinc (talk) 03:46, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Page Question

Hello there. I was trying to edit Byron Gallimore's page and you took down the links to singles, albums he produced, etc. I used several wikipedia templates from several other producers (Will.i.am, and others) so just wondering why it was taken down or what can I do to get it back up? This man's is a legend and I hate to not have his accomplishments out there.

Do let me know.I am the labeler! (talk) 20:52, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Rodney Mason

I made a mistake in my edit summary declining the Rodney Mason Prod. Dab pages are eligible for Prod, contrary to what I said in the decline. That said, I do believe the Prod should remain because there are multiple entries that mention a Rodney Mason. GB fan 01:34, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Template:Jennifer Nettles

FYI, it is bad practice to relist a TfD in which you have participated. Hope this helps. --Jax 0677 (talk) 23:37, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

April Fools' Day

Happy April Fools' Day, TenPoundHammer! Eyesnore (pc) 00:00, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

King of April Fools

That would be you, Hammer. I'm (literally) laughing out at your nominations. Especially this one. — Status (talk · contribs) 04:29, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Help

@Spartaz: apparently took my April Fool's joke seriously and deleted my userpage. Can someone please undelete it? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 06:48, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

He restored it...I don't think you should keep doing that! ansh666 07:06, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

At least you closed the nomination yourself, to save others the effort. -- Trevj (talk · contribs) 07:52, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Rollback

Did you just use rollback on me? [43] Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:41, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

You might want to take a step back and think about whether you really want to be abusing rollback as part of your april fools day campaign. Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:55, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Delete my userpage?

I'm so mad... that I wasn't there to make a snarky remark and endorse deletion! That really gave me a good laugh! Well... not as good as the laugh that your userpage MfD gave me when someone took it seriously. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 07:25, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Puthir

I tried PROD on the article Puthir, but the creator deleted it and a notability tag without any explanation. Would you please take a look, and perhaps propose an AFD? --DThomsen8 (talk) 15:05, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2014_March_22.
Message added 07:31, 3 April 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Jax 0677 (talk) 07:31, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

SpongeBob Comics

I would merge to List of SpongeBob SquarePants merchandise since there are few sources and ghits so the article can be expanded to cover any comics. JJ98 (Talk) 08:47, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Marty Haggard at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 19:22, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

You dumbass edit summary

You know that's a terrible idea. If nothing else, sets a bad example. Dougweller (talk) 15:19, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Marty Haggard

Hey there! Just to let you know your nomination at Template:Did you know nominations/Marty Haggard is looking good but just needs a QPQ adding. Cheers - Dumelow (talk) 21:56, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

The Crossings at Northwest

I noticed you moved the Northwest Plaza article to a new name. Is there any reason you didn't create a new page for the redevelopment instead of moving the page? Since the mall is being torn down, it seems like that should be enough of a "split" to justify creating a new article for the new site and leaving the article about the mall as it was. kcowolf (talk) 23:39, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

The only example I found with a quick search is ZCMI Center Mall vs. City Creek Center in Salt Lake City, though that's probably short enough that it could be merged with the new article. I also found another counterexample, Blue Ridge Crossing which covers the history of Blue Ridge Mall. Given those and the examples you pointed out, I'm fine with the rename. Thanks! kcowolf (talk) 23:56, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Marty Haggard

The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Sovereign

You can take a listen to the new album on iTunes Radio.HotHat (talk) 04:29, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Now mentioned at target

Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2014_March_8#The_Haircuts. Cheers. Hope that satisfies your concern. All the best. In ictu oculi (talk) 14:53, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Your first edit

It's been nine years, did no one tell you yet ? ;) Dave Rave (talk) 21:10, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

List of Total Drama characters

As you can see, the article was now deleted, so since you were the one who first requested the deletion, then can you tell us how to perform the TNT process now that we have to start all over again? I don't want to re-create the article yet until you decide what should be best to add into the new article. Giggett (talk) 18:39, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

please stop removing Jay Demarcus as a producer on Rewind (Rascal Flatts song) and Rewind (Rascal Flatts album)

your constant removal is based on personal opinion and not sources which all sources and album and ep liners credit Demarcus outside of Rascal Flatts. Also I am surprised you were not blocked for personal attack as calling someone a "dumbass" as you did here is highly uncalled for because you do not agree with the inclusion of the name which is only your personal opinion and that needs to be kept of the site. thank you and have a good day. 184.16.71.34 (talk) 01:23, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

also may i point out all three are credited outside rascal flatts as writers on "She Must Like Broken Hearts" is tat not redundant? 184.16.71.34 (talk) 01:31, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Perry.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Perry.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:44, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello old buddy,

Could you have a look at User:Richhoncho/Songs by theme for me, with special reference to the bit about lists. Cheers. --Richhoncho (talk) 08:39, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

I thought Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2014_April_25#Category:Songs_about_rain would interest you, especially the subsequent creating of a list by the closing admin, after all, otters need water which comes from rain. :) Feel free to respond here. --Richhoncho (talk) 09:59, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Indeed, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs about rain might have got a response. Too late, I cry, the deed is done, it is deleted. Hurrah for commonsense. --Richhoncho (talk) 11:40, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Please see...

WP:Edit warring, WP:Ownership of articles, WP:Personal attacks and WP:INTIM since you broke all four. 50.121.36.219 (talk) 02:39, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Joaquin Santiago

Hi TenPoundHammer, yes I reverted your removal of my father in the Teatro Puerto Rico article. Let me explain myself. My father is no hoax, as Damiens, who has had an issue with me claims. I am not sure, but I believe that you or someone else emailed me under the name of Roberto Blondet, claiming to admire my work and asking questions about my father's article and that if the theater. It is difficult to find these old 1950s sources, but I do have the clippings from some old Hispanic papers and photos (A little yellowish) in my possession. If you are interested and if you have a fax number I can fax them to you or mail you copies and you can see for yourself that my dad was the real deal. Maybe you can give me a idea has how to use them as a source.Tony the Marine (talk) 22:47, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

• That's the thing. I didn't write the article and as a personal policy I do not interfere with the articles written by others nor do I regularly check up on them since I do not include them in my "watchlist". I agree with you on that source, where did the creator of the article get that from? The situation is that I have the newspaper clippings, but my father did not bother to include where they came from, I also the front pages of "Ecos de Broadway" from 1953 and 1954, plus photos of my father on stage with the mike. Besides, if I cite them, my friend Damians will right out and cite "COI". Look, if someone wants to put the article for AfD, well what ever, but not as a "hoax" just because there is a lack of cyber evidence. Tony the Marine (talk) 03:05, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

New artist notification

I have created and established the article on Big Smo, for you to edit at your leisure, editor TenPoundHammer.HotHat (talk) 06:40, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Eric Lee

I don't suppose you can quickly have a look at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Eric Lee? It's an old Articles for creation draft about a possibly notable country music artist that might be salvageable. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 13:48, 23 June 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Talk:WZKT

Hello TenPoundHammer. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Talk:WZKT, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Just redirect it. Should have been done when the page was moved really. I'll redirect it now. . Thank you. GedUK  12:11, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Warning

This edit summary is completely inappropriate. Werieth (talk) 12:11, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Jeez! If YOU don't know, ...

You seem to be to me, (without doubt/exception), one of the more confident editors.
(Ahhhhh - Buggerit. It's past midnight. What can I say concisely? Think ...)
I rarely agree with you, but I respect you. Pdfpdf (talk) 14:47, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Pointy thing

The Hard Worker's Barnstar

I'd just been following some links around and for some reason I ended at your talk page, and I remembered you from a while back and wondered what you were doing. And WOW! What a massive amount of everyday gnome work you do (in addition to article creation), fixing things, improving things, cleaning things up, putting out the trash. It's the kind of work that should be recognized more around here — Alan / Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:03, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Reversion

Please be careful not to use WP:TW to revert to versions with typos/spacing errors. [44]. AldezD (talk) 16:06, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

Just A Quick SRoMG Note

You promised to do a strip for SRoMG #1987, and haven't submitted it yet. Should I count you as "no longer interested"? (Please respond at those forums either way, as this was mainly chosen as something of a PM that you were likely to see) ^Thanks, _{Luc "Somethingorother" French} 15:56, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

WP;NENAN

This might be of interest for you, as it is your work that is under discussion: Wikipedia talk:Templates for discussion#Request for Comment: WP:NENAN. The Banner talk 11:02, 27 July 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Crowtuesday.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Crowtuesday.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:43, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

F-41

Regarding this edit, do you have the rest of the citation information? I pride myself on keeping citations on the Michigan highway articles complete. At a minimum, page numbers, publication location and publisher are needed. If there is an ISBN or OCLC number for the book, that would be great too.

I hope that doesn't sound too picky, but I'm nearing the end of over 6 years' work on this collection of articles, and my goal is to get featured and good topics put together on the various parts of the State Trunkline Highway System. That means polishing articles, and keep them polished to a basic level of consistency regarding date formatting, capitalization, etc. Imzadi 1979 → 21:38, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

This is the source I used, from the Wayback machine. The listing for the Oscoda airport clearly shows an "Old M-171" routing. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 22:10, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks~ :-) Imzadi 1979 → 03:56, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Proposal

There is currently a discussion, you might be interested in, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Record_charts#Inclusion_of_Amazon.2C_Spotify.2C_iTunes.2C_Beatport_under_digital_charts Thanks. prokaryotes (talk) 18:28, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Write You a Song may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Compiled from liner notes.<Ref>{{Cite AV media notes |title=Write You a Song |others=Jon Pardi |year=2014 |type=CD booklet |

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:49, 17 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Mall at 163rd Street may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• real-estate-listings/Miami/FL/mall-at-163rd-street/#overview Mall at 163rd Street property website]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:49, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sturgill Simpson may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• ! scope="row"| ''High Top Mountain]'

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:59, 24 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Briarwood Mall, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Skating rink. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Masters of the universe characters

I think this maybe of interest to you I since you have participated in AFD's by myself. I believe the likes of Stinkor and Moss Man should be split if you disagree or agree I have started a discussion at Talk:List of Masters of the Universe characters. Dwanyewest (talk) 20:02, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

Consistency

Michigan's highway articles do not hyphenate the abbreviations for US Highways. Instead they use a non-breaking space between the "US" and the number. It would be appreciated if you would do the same when making additions to articles. Thank you, Imzadi 1979 → 00:29, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	I agree with you completely about the page you requested for deletion in 2008. I too am campaigning to get it deleted, as it has now reached 2014 and the page has only gained more explicit detail. I hope you're still on here. It would be great to get a movement going to get rid of the page once and for all! Redzimus (talk) 18:36, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

An April Fools trout for you!

Anon126 has given you a WikiTrout! Trouts promote WikiFun and hopefully this one has made your day more fun. Spread the WikiFun by giving someone else a trout, especially when they are doing something silly. Happy slapping! Congratulations on getting your user page deleted for two April Fools' Days in a row! Maybe this will become another tradition Well, hope to see you next year!

Spread the fun of trouts by adding {{subst:Troutalt}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!

Issue with insertion

In this edit, you inserted new information into the middle of a paragraph. There are three issues with that:

1. That entire paragraph before the change was cited to the map footnotes at the end of the paragraph. After the change, it appears that only the second half is still cited to those maps while the first half is cited to the source you inserted.
   • In the future, if you make such an insertion, you should copy the citations to the end of the sentence before your addition so that they stay cited to their source.
2. That was historical detail added to a section that isn't about the history.
   • That insertion should have been made to the appropriate spot in the road article's history section.
3. There are much better sources for that information, like The Grand Rapids Press. Little alarms go off in my head when a website talks about a construction project in Jenson and Grandville, Michigan, yet uses "Minneapolis, MI" as the location under the headline. Just because it's near the top of the Google results doesn't make it a suitable source, especially for a Featured Article.

Also, but when you add a footnote to an article, check to see how that article is formatting dates. It's a bit annoying, but easily fixable, to switch "17 September 2014" to "September 17, 2014" so that the footnote matches the style used by the rest of the article. It's a minor detail, perhaps, but such things are scrutinized when these articles go through FAC. Imzadi 1979 → 16:07, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Also, can you watch for issues related to what I corrected in this edit? You left out the fact that it was a press release, you didn't include the author/contact, you left out the date it was released, and you misattributed it to being in a published work entitled Michigan Department of Transportation instead of being published by the Michigan Department of Transportation. Also, the date formatting thing popped up again: the MOS does say that for article subjects with a clear connection to the United States, except the military, we are supposed to use "Month DD, YYYY" formatting. Imzadi 1979 → 16:21, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

• @Imzadi1979: Uh yeah, don't edit tired, apparently. Didn't know that press releases have to be explicitly noted. Also, reftools uses DDMMYYYY by default and I don't know how to change it. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 20:32, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
  • You may have to manually edit the dates to put them in the proper style. Formatting citations is one of those things that requires a bit of human supervision, especially when using automated scripts or tools. You need to use a modicum of thought to process the information about the source into an effective, and consistent, citation for use in an article. Microsoft Word purports to format bibliographies in APA, MLA or Chicago formatting for use in research papers, but I've found that its automated tools only get you about 75% of the way to a properly formatted list of references. The same goes for a lot of automated tools for Wikipedia. Imzadi 1979 → 20:08, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

All information about Diane Eskenazi in this article is factual and can be checked with many other articles and sites such as http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0260634/ http://golden-fillms.wikia.com/wiki/Diane_Eskenazi http://www.buildpeace.com/news.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.138.131.209 (talk) 03:43, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Diane Eskenazi

The subject article was PRODed by yourself - it has been restored as a contested PROD. You may wish to consider WP:AfD in the light of this result. Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 14:22, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

All of the information in the article about Diane Eskenazi is factual as can be checked with many other articles and websites including: http://www.buildpeace.com/news.html http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0260634/ http://golden-fillms.wikia.com/wiki/Diane_Eskenazi — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.138.131.209 (talk) 03:44, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Charlie Rich, Jr.

Are you certain that this deletion will not be controversial? Bearian (talk) 12:51, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

• @Bearian: Why would it not be? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 12:51, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

It might be controversial because he's the son of a beloved African-American country singer. Arguably, he passes WP:MUSICBIO, having toured nationally. Bearian (talk) 13:04, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Interstate 94 in Michigan may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• I-94 is notable for containing the first full freeway-to-freeway interchange in the United States (connecting to the Lodge Freeway ([[M-10 (Michigan highway)|M-10]]), and for comprising the first

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:15, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Colorado Mills, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nike. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Share Your Love, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas McClary. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Are you responsible for the deletion of the Vern Monnett Wikipedia article? If so, what criteria did you use? He is a well known musician and actor, and the article was well cited. Please respond. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.174.226.48 (talk) 20:14, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Super Grit Cowboy Band

An editor wrote to Wikimedia about Super Grit Cowboy Band, believing it needs improvement, but not feeling comfortable directly editing. I encouraged that person to contribute to the talk page or directly to you, so this is a heads up in case you get a post about that article.--S Philbrick(Talk) 17:29, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

November 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Trisha Yearwood discography may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:43, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Greatest Hits So Far...

Just so you know, since Greatest Hits So Far... was a single-revision redirect prior to your tagging of it, you could have performed the move yourself without needing an admin's help. Jackmcbarn (talk) 02:51, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Black Dog (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kostas. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

WP:BRD

WP:BRD: go read it. It might not be policy, but it is a good idea all the same.

Then read my comments about crappy editing practices on my talk page. A "?" is not a mile post. If you don't know a number to put there, leave it blank. It looks unprofessional, especially on a Featured Article to do such a thing. In the meantime, I'm going to go finish making myself something to eat so that I don't blow my stack at you. I suggest you leave the situation alone as well for a while. When I return, I plan to look at the official Michigan maps from MDSH/MDSHT/MDOT to find an appropriate timeline, and then insert the missing milepost. I will then replace any other old company maps as sources as the Michigan articles use official state maps for historical facts. Imzadi 1979 → 04:14, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Kelsea Ballerini

The link here wasn't working because Kelsea Ballerini's name needed to be added to Template:BillboardID. I fixed it for you. Eric444 (talk) 12:59, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Comment request

Hi! I was wondering if you could possibly comment on this discussion? Thanks! Chihciboy (talk) 20:45, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Wikimedia genealogy project

Just wondering if you have any thoughts re: the idea of WMF hosting a genealogy project. If so, feel free to contribute to this discussion. And apologies if I have made this request before. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 16:52, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Dawn Sears

Her date of birth is listed here as December 7 but I can't find a more reliable source. Eric444 (talk) 19:57, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Sturgill Simpson - infobox deletion

Hi there, just curious as to the reasoning behind deleting the notable_instruments information, as it seems to be part of the standard infobox for musicians... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Infobox_musical_artist -- I think Sturgill's prowess on the guitar justifies this callout. If you want that sourced I can do that.

On the same page the infobox for artists includes current_members also as a standard infobox. And Sturgill has a band under his name.....

I am following up on this because the explanation you gave did not make sense to me given how this infobox template is shown as a default -- and how I have seen it deployed on many band pages.

I also think having the information in the infobox is a nice way to cleanly present the information.

Thanks - Erika BrillLyle (talk) 19:53, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

addendum:

Also, if you delete information like this, I would like it to at least appear somewhere on the page. I guess I'm just wondering why you thought it would be okay to delete the information completely and leave what seemed like a semi-snarky note....

I would like to undo your edits but don't want to get in a flame war with you. So that's why I am reaching out here. All the best, Erika BrillLyle (talk) 20:02, 12 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Moonshine in the Trunk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clavier. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Alabama band.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Alabama band.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:40, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Miami Midnites

Thank you for your concern on the Miami Midnites page. If you would have read the article you would see the team plays in the FBA as well as the ABA (I welcome you to nominate some of the hundreds of poorly written ABA articles). Miami are affiliated with a world-wide known team in Maccabi Haifa. I included references to national news media outlets and added the team logo today. TheScottDL (talk) 01:30, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of German quotation

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at TenPound Hammer's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Erica Blatt Harkins

Hello, Thank you for your message, I left you also a message on the contesting page. Why is my reference 13 on the deletion list? It was there yesterday, it was clarified and removed. That is an original German quotation from a German Journal of Ophthalmology: Klinische Monatsblatter fur Augenheilkunde. The Letter R. stands for Rudolf, the first name of "Thiel" the author of the German article. Please let me know. Thank you.

(Erica Blatt Harkins (talk) 20:02, 13 January 2015 (UTC))

Correction; ref 4not 13

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at TenPoundHammer's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Erica Blatt harkind

Correction: the ref. for deletion is #4, not #13. Thank you. (Erica Blatt Harkins (talk) 20:21, 13 January 2015 (UTC))

Message on my talk page

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at TenPoundHammer's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Erica Blatt Harkins

I left you a message on my talk page (Erica Blatt Harkins (talk) 22:17, 13 January 2015 (UTC))

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Reporting Harassment / Wikihounding" OTRS ticket 2015011510021553. Thank you. Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 01:33, 16 January 2015 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 16 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Band Famous (2nd nomination) page, your edit caused a cite error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Saving Country Music Can NOT Be Under Reviews for any singles, or albums!

Stop taking quotes from Saving Country Music and putting them under singer's critical reception sections for any music pages(this and Country Perspective for that matter), these are non notable critics, and should not be used in an Encyclopedia article. You could just as well buy a web domain and write these reviews yourself, it does not mean your opinions belong on Wikipedia.

Disambiguation link notification for January 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Holly Dunn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBS Records. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Johnny Prill

A while ago you started an afd for Johnny Prill. In your nomination you stated "(a two-sentence review on his single, a couple brief blurbs in the Detroit Free Press — "Disc of the week" is definitely trivial)." Can I ask you to clarify if you remember well enough? Did you read multiple pieces from Detroit Free Press. Did they go beyond one or two sentences? Would you call the depth of coverage? Thanks for your time. duffbeerforme (talk) 16:54, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zac Brown Band, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Toes (song). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Good Humor
	I've read many Joke April Fool's day deletion nominations, and you are the unambiguous ringleader of it all. You've given me a good laugh. Mr. Guye (talk) 01:14, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Long time no see

There's one at AfD right now that's right down Main Street for you, I think: Jason Eady. Needs improvement in case you need something to work on, a pretty obvious Keep. best, —Tim /// Carrite (talk) 12:37, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

About your (non)participation in the January 2012 SOPA vote

Hi TenPoundHammer. I am Piotr Konieczny (User:Piotrus), you may know me as an active content creator (see my userpage), but I am also a professional researcher of Wikipedia. Recently I published a paper (downloadable here) on reasons editors participated in Wikipedia's biggest vote to date (January 2012 WP:SOPA). I am now developing a supplementary paper, which analyzes why many editors did not take part in that vote. Which is where you come in :) You are a highly active Wikipedian (58th to be exact!), and you were active back during the January 2012 discussion/voting for the SOPA, yet you did not chose to participate in said vote. I'd appreciate it if you could tell me why was that so? For your convenience, I prepared a short survey at meta, which should not take more than a minute of your time. I would dearly appreciate you taking this minute; not only as a Wikipedia researcher but as a fellow content creator and concerned member of the community (I believe your answers may help us eventually improve our policies and thus, the project's governance). PS. If you chose to reply here (on your userpage), please WP:ECHO me. Thank you! --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 23:14, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

Citation formatting

Re: this edit, can you please, please remember to use the same date formatting as the rest of an article when inserting citations? Can you also try to remember the difference between a published work, which includes things like the names of websites, newspapers, journals, books, or magazines. MDOT is not a work; rather it is the name of a government agency that in that case published a press release, making it a publisher. If you are using some sort of script to create that edit, I'll remind you that you're still responsible for any edits you save to any article, and you could immediately re-edit the article to better comply with the date formatting and citation styling if that script doesn't allow you to customize what you're saving. Leaving it to others when you "otter know better" is very aggravating. Imzadi 1979 → 23:38, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

Whoa, I forgot about that dating thing. I also forgot that {{cite press release}} is a thing. Some of the nuances of citation escape me since I've never had to deal with the finer details before. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:01, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

It's exceedingly frustrating though to have created high-quality and consistently formatted articles, taking them high up the assessment scale, only to have people mess things up. Yes, I-94's article isn't that high up the scale at the moment, but every one of these additions adds up to make the last bit of work I need to get around to finishing that much harder.

In short: if an article uses one style of date formats, then anything you add to that article should comport to that format, even if it's a crappy start-class article. Imzadi 1979 → 00:05, 22 February 2015 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Rules for Fools

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Rules for Fools, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Rules for Fools and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Rules for Fools during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 00:55, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Can I turn your userpage upside-down per WP:APRILFOOLS?

Wanted to turn a page upside-down but figured I'd ask first. (Please pop a talkback notif on my talkpage when you respond, thanks) -G.A.WILMBROKE [ USER / ALT / TALK / CONTRIBS ] 03:53, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion (4th nomination)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion (4th nomination), a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion (4th nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion (4th nomination) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Bosstopher (talk) 10:09, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

User talk:Nakon

Mind dropping him a note asking for some more good faith wrt IP editors re these edits?

If you need any reassurance, I'm on a college campus and as such where I am on campus changes my IP. Furthermore, re-connecting to wifi will occasionally re-assign a new IP. Regardless, he should assume good faith. Thanks. 165.91.13.43 (talk) 14:09, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Nominated for AfD

Hey, the article for Ben Sorensen's REAL Country had just enough in the article to show where it'd maybe pass speedy criteria so I've declined the speedy and nominated it for AfD instead. I doubt very seriously it'll pass unless someone can pull a Hail Mary, but I figure this way nobody can contest it. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:52, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 4 May

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Heavy Is the Head (Zac Brown Band song) page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:29, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Throughhell.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Throughhell.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

Cam (singer)

You beat me to it. Damn you!! Just kidding. I added some additional information and created a redirect. Nice job with the chart history!!! --Plovanski (talk) 20:01, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

The Wikipedia Library needs you!

We hope The Wikipedia Library has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and we need your help!

With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:

• Account coordinators: help distribute free research access
• Partner coordinators: seek new donations from partners
• Communications coordinators: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
• Technical coordinators: advise on building tools to support the library's work
• Outreach coordinators: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
• Research coordinators: run reference services

Sign up now

Send on behalf of The Wikipedia Library using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited M-55 (Michigan highway), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Logan Township, Michigan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 8 July 2015 (UTC)

List of best-selling girl groups

Hi TenPoundHammer – yes, I know, your heart probably sank when you saw the title of this post, it's a nightmare you've spent the last three years trying to forget. I noticed that you AfD'd this article back in 2012 and I read through that discussion – I entirely agree with the arguments you and Status put forward back then, and I don't think the article is in any better shape now. I've discussed my two major areas of concern on the talk page: specifically, that the overall list of best-selling girl groups worldwide is missing some fairly obvious omissions, simply because we can't source figures for them; that there is no point trying to have separate tables for physical and digital sales in this day and age; and that the list of best-selling singles in the US is fundamentally flawed as it only consists of singles by the Spice Girls and million-sellers from 2005 onwards. GabeMc's argument that it could be improved by using the RIAA Gold & Platinum database is no good as it won't include any certifications from before 2005, so you have to look elsewhere for sources: I stated mine in the talk page discussion, but I can't guarantee I haven't missed any.

I suspect if it goes to AfD again, it will come up against exactly the same counter-arguments – the best compromise suggestion I can come up with for the US singles section is to simply list the singles that have been certified platinum or double platinum using the RIAA database and the BHSA book, without trying to rank them. Although frankly, I agree that this whole article is next to useless. I'm also having to contend with a few Fifth Harmony obsessives who insist that "Worth It" has sold 2 million in the US, without providing any evidence (the cited article next to the song's entry clearly states 1.2 million, backed up by the fact it's only been certified single platinum by the RIAA). Any comments, suggestions, observations, or do I simply throw my hands up in the air at the whole thing? Thanks for your time. Richard3120 (talk) 16:21, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Don't It

Just noticed you edited my revision to Don't It by Billy Currington... I'm certain the song is not in B major, so I'm not sure why my edit was undone? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MusicRowRadio (talk • contribs) 18:32, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

List of County-Designated Highways in Michigan

I overhauled List of County-Designated Highways in Michigan so that it uses a single table per the formatting from WP:USRD/STDS/L. In the process, I removed some entries from the page because they've never appeared on the official state maps. I went through all of the maps from 1970 through 2015 to make sure that I got all of the years figured out appropriately. As I noted on the list's talk page though, 6 numbers never appeared on the official state maps, and I think you had been the one who added 4 of those. I have plans at some point to look at some old Alger County plat atlases at the research library in the Marquette Regional History Center, so I may be able to restore H-09 and H-60 to the table.

If you know of a set of old maps that show them, we can add rows in the table for those other designates and create the missing redirects for them. However, it appears you added them based on a single map. It would be nice if we had a range of years to establish an approximate time frame for when they appeared and when they disappeared. Given the history of these designations, even Bessert's site is quite lacking in information about each designation. If you have enough old maps to allow us to pinpoint the first and last years for F-07, F-09, F-17 and F-24, and if you could get me copies so I could trace their routes on MDOT"s PRFA site to compute their lengths, that would be great. Imzadi 1979 → 01:24, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

I assume you're talking about all the routes in Ogemaw County such as F-7, F-12, F-22, etc., most of which were never on the MDOT maps? Most of those came from a 1978 road map that I don't know the current location of, but they're all still marked on Google Maps (albeit minus the "F"s). I went down F-22 (Rose City Road) earlier this year, and do know that at least it is still signed in the field. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:42, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Yes, but are there any other maps to flesh out the range of years? At least with the official maps, we have access to a full set from 1970 through 2015 and can note when the various designations appeared and disappeared. Unfortunately, we can't rely personal observations, so we need maps showing these. Imzadi 1979 → 01:53, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

@Imzadi1979: Unfortunately I don't have any other Ogemaw County maps from the appropriate era on hand, nor can I find the 1978 map I used as a source in 2009. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:54, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

@Imzadi1979: I found something that's a start. [This] is a scan from the "Michigan County Atlas" by Universal Map, which uses a map from their 1988 map "Northern Highlands". This verifies all of the mysterious "F" routes in Ogemaw county, although there seem to be two different number systems going on. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:53, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

essay

TPH, why do you want to delete your extremely helpful essay "Wikipedia:Alternatives to the "Expand" template:" ? I'm holding off a bit on doing the deletion. DGG ( talk ) 03:13, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:EngFram/sandbox

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:EngFram/sandbox. Why? From WP:MFD, "Note that we do not delete user subpages merely to "clean up" userspace. Please only nominate pages that are problematic under our guidelines." Even if the page was for some obscure reason "problematic", you could have simply blanked it instead. Starting an MfD discussion for such pages is a total waste of time and effort. It's not as if I had hundreds of subpages with that username, or if anything polemic or copy-violating was buried there. Perhaps only start deletion discussions for pages that really need to be deleted... Fram (talk) 11:45, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

I'm sorry, are you (and by extension @Keegan: in this case) completely incompetent or what? I come here to ask about an MfD you did, and your response is to tag the corresponding user sandbox talk page with speedy G2, even though Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G2 clearly states "This criterion does not apply to pages in the user namespace". The full contents of the page were "Test talk", so nothing remotely harmful or problematic there. Restore both pages (sandbox and talk page) at once and stay away from useless deletions in the future. There is more than enough that needs to be done on WIkipedia (both the encyclopedia and the backoffice) that you don't need to waste time on useless and policy-ignoring deletions which are of benefit to absoluetly no one and nothing. Fram (talk) 06:28, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi Fram, I hope you're doing well. Enjoyed your Signpost op-ed.

Anyway, it's not very nice to insinuate that I'm incompetent as an admin for deleting a page whose sole edit is "test talk" after the main page was deleted per discussion. Whatever, though. Good to see you back. Keegan (talk) 07:01, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

G2 does not apply to pages in user space, so no matter what happened to the main page (which I tried to discuss with TPH above, with the only response being the deletion of the talk page), it should not have been speedy deleted, but instead TPH should have been given the info that he should not use speedy deletion criteria incorrectly. If you had done that, you would have probably noticed the above post by me and seen what caused this unusual action by TPH. Getting pages deleted with clearly incorrect rationales only to rile up another editor is very bad manners, and that you inadvertently helped him doing this is not so good. But yeah, yours is a mistake, and I shouldn't have treated it the same way, his action is rather hard to defend though. Anyway, can you please restore both pages? Or do I have to open a DRV for something as stupid as this? Fram (talk) 07:14, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

@Fram: If you're back active and this is breaking your workflow, I can undelete User:EngFram/sandbox without DRV. I don't see why the need to undelete a talk page, but why not as well. Could you just please be a little less gruff about things that at least I'm pinged in in the future, not that we run across each other so much :) We're to be colleagues, after all. Work for you? Keegan (talk) 07:19, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

You're right, I was (am) pissed off about TPH's actions, but shouldn't have lumped you in with them for making a minor mistake. The undeletion of the two pages is more out of principle: don't mess with user pages (subpages, talk pages...) unless they are harmful in some way; deletion is a last resort. If the sandbox was in some way a problem, blanking it would have solved that just as well. And TenPoundHammer, if you are asked about why you did some action, don't make it worse by not replying (leaving a template that treats me as a newbie is not replying) but by taking further incorrect action instead. It doesn't reflect well on you. Fram (talk) 07:26, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

I've restored User:EngFram/sandbox but not the talk page because that's just as silly as deleting it. Let's let bygones be bygones with TPH and move on. Keegan (talk) 07:29, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks. Note that "not editing for a few months" should never be a reason to delete a sandbox in the first place, but it's a bit too late for that now. Fram (talk) 08:50, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited T-R-O-U-B-L-E, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Little Texas. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:41, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Chris Janson

There must be something wrong with the Billboard website. I tried using the search on Billboard biz but no combination of his name or song titles yields any results. Eric444 (talk) 17:25, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

I used issues of the Country Update to source the Country Airplay peaks. Eric444 (talk) 18:12, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

With this ever dramatic world and winter coming, here's a cup of tea to alleviate your day! This e-tea's remains have been e-composted SwisterTwister talk 05:24, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

how i broke AGF?

I only bring back assault weapon system section, source is show itself. how that break good faith?ping me on replyMahfuzur rahman shourov (talk) 04:53, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Olkhovska Iryna

Please do an AFD on Olkhovska Iryna, not notable, deleted before with a different title, SD removed. Please help me.--DThomsen8 (talk) 13:00, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Meat and candy.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Meat and candy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:50, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Leewards Creative Crafts

The article Leewards Creative Crafts has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:07, 16 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Season's Greetings

File:Xmas Ornament.jpg

To You and Yours!
FWiW Bzuk (talk) 18:06, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Thanks

For so closely monitoring my old subpages. There must not be anything of greater importance going on on Wkipedia. The cost of storage for old drafts must be enormous.Edison (talk) 04:08, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

References

Hi. Please review WP:REFB to avoid {{bareurls}}. Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 08:01, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

AFD

As you previously participated in a related discussion, you may be interested in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States presidential election, 2024. Reywas92^Talk 23:05, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Certified Supply Chain Professional (2nd nomination)

Please note that performing a Merge is fundamentally different from blanking and Redirecting a page. Redirects are typically performed after a merge has been completed. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:29, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

February 2016

Hello, I'm Northamerica1000. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, it's important to be mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors, who may be frustrated by certain types of interaction, such as your addition to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of names in English with counterintuitive pronunciations (4th nomination). Please do remember that Wikipedia strives to be an inclusive atmosphere. In light of that, it would be greatly appreciated if you could moderate yourself so as not to offend.

• Telling users at a discussion page "If you think it can be fixed, do it; if not, then don't bother saying anything" (diff) is uncivil, and you should redact these comments. Your tone at the discussion has actually discouraged an editor from improving the article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:36, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

AfD request

Please consider an AfD on M.G.Nagamani, as not notable.--DThomsen8 (talk) 13:40, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Your attempted PROD on M.G.Nagamani disappeared without a reason. What should be done?--DThomsen8 (talk) 14:57, 17 February 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Diamond Rio

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Diamond Rio you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process is complete. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Prhartcom (talk) 19:30, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

Finished my responses; the ball is back in your court. Prhartcom (talk) 21:53, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

The bot didn't deliver the message again, but as you know, this article is now GA. Be sure to thank your reviewer next time. Best, Prhartcom (talk) 13:38, 6 March 2016 (UTC)

April Fools

Hello there, today is April Fools' Day! However, are you ever going to be active again today? Eyesnore 01:11, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deletion (3rd nomination)

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deletion (3rd nomination) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

@TenPoundHammer: Just no. Stop this garbage of recursions

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Eyesnore 03:41, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

LoCash

I found the information on Amazon.com, but I can't figure how to get the link to Wikipedia. You can revert my edit if you wasnt. I saw the album is to be released in June. No official word yet. I apologize for the unsourced edit. David829 (talk} 03:21, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

inre Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard III (2008 film)

I just performed some work on it and so @TenPoundHammer: Might you agree that this somewhat better now than what you first nominated?? And as the film's 2007 world premiere has been verified, the redirect from Richard III (2007 film) needs to be looked at after an anticipated keep. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 00:55, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Shrey singhal

Shrey singhal was deleted as Shrey Singhal. Not notable.--DThomsen8 (talk) 23:17, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Paarvati kiriyath bharath

Paarvati kiriyath bharath is not notable. Please look.--DThomsen8 (talk) 12:25, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

US 33 Ohio

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give User:TenPoundHammer/sandbox a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into U.S. Route 33 in Ohio. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. –Fredddie™ 00:58, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Sorry about the template, but the attribution part of it is serious business. As you recall, I helped finish the junction list and by cutting and pasting, you've wiped out my contributions. I could claim a copyvio and have the article deleted, but I generally follow WP:DBAD. In the future, tag the redirect with a WP:CSD#G6 and move the page when the admin deletes the redirect. –Fredddie™ 01:01, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Walden Galleria L&T.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Walden Galleria L&T.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:12, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

You removed the tag, but note that Fastily restored the tag again. If Jack has contacted OTRS, then the 'no permission' tag should normally be replaced by {{subst:OP}}. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:19, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

Exit lists

If I-275 is on your to do list, you might want to get any tweaking done sooner rather than later. That article is at FAC now. After it's done, I do plan to take I-94 there as well. After those, I-675 is another consideration for FAC. (If you look on the list of articles at Book talk:Michigan State Trunkline Highway System, it's bookended by FAs, and I'd need a third Interstate FA this year to bump Wikipedia:Featured topics/Interstate Highways in Michigan from a GT to a FT.) Imzadi 1979 → 05:53, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for cleaning up

Thanks for speedy tagging Talk:Brian slingerland and Talk:Wanted (1961 film). I've never experimented with closing AfD discussions before, and so it came as a surprise to me that the script I'm using created the talk pages again. If I close an AfD discussion in the future I think I'll do it manually. Thanks again, /wiae /tlk 01:44, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Sean Shibe

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Deskford's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

--Deskford (talk) 22:28, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Chris Janson Edits

Hello! We represent Chris Janson at his record label and are trying to provide the most up-to-date information. Per the artist's request, it's imperative that his full-length album release on Warner Music Nashville is mentioned in the his summary before his previous EP releases and songs written for other artists. Please refrain from removing that information. We appreciate your attention to detail and enthusiasm for Chris and his music, but let's be sure it's prioritized by featuring the most important and recent information. He's no longer with Bigger Picture or Columbia. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.119.229.162 (talk) 17:07, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Jennifer Nettles

FYI, the merge has been reverted. Frietjes (talk) 15:34, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

• There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Jax 0677 (talk) 15:36, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

Deletion of {{Persondata}}

Hi TenPoundHammer,

I'm the bot who is deleting {{Persondata}}. I noticed your edit on Sharon Vaughn in which you added {{Persondata}}. This template is deprecated and deleted. Please stop adding {{Persondata}}. In case you want to support the Persondata project you can help with the migration of the dataset to Wikidata at KasparBot's tool. See Wikipedia:Persondata or contact my operator T.seppelt in case you have any questions.

Thank you very much, -- KasparBot (talk) 01:01, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Deletion pending for File:Walden Galleria L&T.JPG

Hello, TenPoundHammer. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Walden Galleria L&T.JPG — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

• If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

• If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:37, 12 August 2016 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Walden Galleria L&T.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Walden Galleria L&T.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, BOT-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate your file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 03:00, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

FYI

Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection#User:TenPoundHammer - up to you, but it would save some idiot swatting. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:21, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Is this the case?

"is substantially identical to the deleted version, and any changes do not address the reasons for which the material was deleted. The following discussions may be relevant: AfD. See CSD G4."

Since I have not seen the article as you previously deleted I don't know the state of it. But having just seen your deletion nomination clearly this gold-selling album does address the reason you gave for nominating it for deletion. In ictu oculi (talk) 10:04, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Merry, merry!

From the icy Canajian north; to you and yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 14:07, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

M-99

Can you do a favor since you have access to the sources, and I don't? If it's possible to create clippings of those articles and then use those links in the citations, that would be awesome. Otherwise, can you answer who announced the plans? It would really be better to flip that first sentence ("Plans were first announced in 1970 to expand M-99 within the Lansing city limits.") from passive to active voice, like "<The Michigan Department of State Highways> first announced in 1970 that it has plans to expand M-99 within the Lansing city limits." Or did the city announce that? Otherwise, no complaints on your addition; that's the sort of thing we need more of: updates to highways sourced to actual newspapers. Imzadi 1979 → 02:26, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

The source says that MDOT itself announced the expansion plans. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:32, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Good deal. If it's possible to convert those articles into clippings, I'd appreciate that, but I know that that might not be possible with that subscription level. Imzadi 1979 → 04:24, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 27 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Wheel of Fortune (U.S. game show) page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 28 January 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Billy all i wanted.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Billy all i wanted.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:14, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bryanaustin.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bryanaustin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bryanaustin.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bryanaustin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Onestepbeyond.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Onestepbeyond.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:38, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Curtis wright album.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Curtis wright album.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dudehonky.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dudehonky.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:39, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dudemowrey.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dudemowrey.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Trout

Whack! You've been whacked with a wet trout. I don't think that's what you meant... — Train2104 (t • c) 03:35, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Doitright.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Doitright.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Harteralbum.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Harteralbum.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:31, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jamesongroove.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jamesongroove.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:27, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Song stubs

Thank you for the tip about the song stubs. It sounds complicated, but not a problem. David829 (talk) 23:36, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Deprodding of Stunt Copter

I have removed the {{prod}} tag from Stunt Copter, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Pavlor (talk) 11:19, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jeffknight1.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jeffknight1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jeffknight2.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jeffknight2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 4 March 2017 (UTC)

Song content

I have a question for you. Where would go if wanted to find the story behind a certain song like the two examples you gave me? David829 (talk) 09:44, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Added a tag function edit suggestion

Mostly directed to you, at the TfD on the dubious tag. Thanks for your initiation and effort there, and hope you can do an edit to the tag function, so that it can become more accurately used. Cheers. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 19:03, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Like a lot the thought that went into "The... Law." Cheers. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 19:06, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Look at Us

I found a short review for Craig Morgan's hit "Look at Us" it's in the review for his I Love It album at the AllMusic website, but I had trouble getting the link to show in the reference column properly. Would you be able to fix it. Thanks David829 (talk) 21:48, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Live by Request (Kenny Rogers album)

Per WP:ALBUM, an album may be notable if "the single or album has appeared on any country's national music chart". As the album appeared at #68 on the US Billboard Top Country Albums chart, this satisfies the criteria for inclusion. Pretty silly I had to come back four years later to see why an image got orphaned to see the article was more or less deleted. CycloneGU (talk) 16:20, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	I have been using this diff from you recently in discussions. It's a bit blunt, but it does have a serious message behind it. Given WP:HAMMER, perhaps this should be "TenPoundHammer's second law?" Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 19:46, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Hello!

Good night, and don't act crazy tonight! Eyesnore 00:05, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

April 2017

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Recursion. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Eyesnore 00:55, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 April 1

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 April 1, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 April 1 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 April 1 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 01:06, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

AFDs

You've been creating some AFDs recently, but you forgot the golden rule. -- The Voidwalker ^Whispers 01:08, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks again for the help! Here, have a Barnstar. :) Hajiru (talk) 03:10, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Diamond Rio Edits

Okay, so it looks like we might both be off a bit on the timing of the band's founding. In this interview http://www.cmt.com/news/1531903/20-questions-with-diamond-rio/ Marty recognizes that he and Brian were not in the band when it was founded, but that Jimmy and Dan were. At the time the Grizzlies and the TMB were founded, there wasn't a Jimmy or a Dan in the lineup. So, maybe we can put the actual founding of "Diamond Rio" at the time Jimmy and Dan started playing together. Which, of course, would be later than the 1982 date that the page shows. UtahCountryBoy (talk) 14:03, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Portal:Curreweqds

I don't think this was an appropriate use of rollback. To quote "Use of standard rollback for any other purposes – such as reverting good-faith changes which you happen to disagree with – is likely to be considered misuse of the tool." An admin declined your speedy request with a reasonable edit summary: there is an MFD already open. The information seemed well formed, it could be moved to another appropriate location. That is what the MFD is for, let it run its course and comment at the MFD. Woody (talk) 19:17, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

There isn't any such rule, but that is not the reason why it was declined twice by different admins. The reasoning on the talk page is sound. It doesn't look like a test page to me. It is a well formed table. The content may be useful elsewhere. I take it that you don't disagree the rollback was inappropriate? Woody (talk) 19:43, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mcguinnalbum.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mcguinnalbum.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

G8 noms of certain video game templates

I've reverted a number of the G8 noms you've done for a number of templates.

The "main" topic of the template does not need to exist to give the navbox value. Please be more discerning in the future. (Some of them might fall under CSD, but G8 is not one of them.) --Izno (talk) 12:54, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

A cup of coffee for you!

Thanks for proposing so many obsolete, unused, old-style templates for deletion. Those templates are a distraction and it helps to remove them. Blue Rasberry (talk) 16:18, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Template G2's

I've denied your G2 on Template:TH featured host, since it doesn't look like a test page (and it was created by someone working for WMF, apparently). But thank you for all the other articles-as-templates you've been cleaning up! I assume you're working off an orphaned templates report, there are probably countless more used only on a user sandbox, as that seems to be a fairly common thing now. What do you think is causing people to create these? I suspect something to do with VisualEditor and users attempting to play with the sandbox heading...though I haven't actually used VE to make constructive edits, so I have no idea how easy/hard it is to end up working in the Template namespace. – Train2104 (t • c) 01:07, 9 June 2017 (UTC)

That was not the only one. See on my talk page. That sub template made a lot of sense until an (as I around those years had come to recognize) extreme pro German (language) / anti Dutch (language) editor made it an orphan. I'm pretty sure this disguised obliteration of a proper source had never been spotted by his main adversary. Only the latter, though usually logically and factually correct (or at least well aware of reasonable controversies) but less diplomatically capable and thus always stubbornly alone WP-'disrupting', was finally banned later on... For WP's sake, it might be best to integrate the old version and thus the footnote (or the proper source that the latter contained) into the present main template (which was renamed [incorrectly], thus having made the never renamed footnote an orphan of slightly harder to detect origin). But I expect either 'Dutch' or 'Flemish' related articles on WP never to be both adequate and stable enough to bother. Anyway, any 10 year old template could not possibly be a good candidate for speedy deletion. Nothing might suddenly justify the rush!
​▲ SomeHuman 2017-06-10 13:10-13:19 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mikewalkeralbum.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mikewalkeralbum.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

TfD for Template:Cultural Leonesa squad

Hi mate, how are you?

You nominated this template for deletion with a quite strange reason: "unused". The template is transcluded through 11 pages (all players of this very same club), and the template itself is valid through WP:FPL, as the club is now a Segunda División team. I could not understand the reason of your nom, as it's the same as Template:FC Barcelona squad, Template:Sevilla FC squad and so on.

Can you please explain the nom to me?

Thanks, MYS77 ^✉ 20:30, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Lack of cover photo of Sam Hunt's single "Make You Miss Me"

Can you help me to get a cover photo of Sam Hunt's single "Make You Miss Me" please. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.41.228.188 (talk) 14:10, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

June 2017

Your recent editing history at The J. Geils Band discography shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:22, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Dragonlance articles by quality log

It wasn't undeleted: a bot simply re-created it. I've redeleted it and protected it against recreation with a message of Improperly being recreated by bot. Humans, feel free to request unprotection. Nyttend (talk) 16:57, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Twinkle and TfD

Hi, just a note that Twinkle isn't that smart when it comes to placing TfD notices on templates. If the template begins with a wikitable or wiki header formatting, then it's going to all get messed up (like here), unless a newline is inserted right after the tfd notice. – Uanfala 09:08, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Just brining this up again: if the template starts with a wikitable, then the tfd nomination will garble it beyond all recognition, see for example [45]. This can be avoided by simply inserting a newline right after the tfd nomination template. Thanks! – Uanfala 13:35, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Other dead/unused templates...

Perhaps you'd like to nominate all the old unused/redirected templates here? User:Legoktm/AWB/TR/All copyright templates (and possibly break older revisions in the process <scowl /> ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:48, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Succession boxes

Hey TenPoundHammer, just bringing this up with you since you've been around country music articles longer than I have: we generally keep succession boxes on the articles of country songs that went to number 1, right? Don't know what to make of the removal. Ss112 14:56, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

My only concern was that it's one of the only number 1 country songs that doesn't have a succession box in place while the preceding and succeeding number 1s do. Ss112 19:16, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Whlrradio articles

Hi, sorry but I can't delete any of these articles you tagged as A7 as they all assert a placing on a national music chart that doesn't look like a blatant lie. You'll have to PROD them (I won't contest) or maybe file a bulk AfD. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 13:04, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

B.E.R. band response to TenPoundHammer

Please do not delete the pages I created. This is for a real group called B.E.R and the members I put on wikipedia are real people as well. They did actually chart on iTunes. Could we talk about this? Whlrradio (talk) 15:14, 19 July 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Us Tareyton smokers would rather fight than switch!/GA1

TenPoundHammer, please don't neglect to notify the WikiProjects associated with this article that you have opened the above-linked GAR. If there are any significant contributors to the article from a decade ago who are still around, please notify them too; it's part of the requirements for opening a GAR that the notification be made of potential interested parties, who might be able to work on improving the article to address the concerns raised by your reassessment. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:49, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

• @BlueMoonset: I notified two of the Wikiprojects, as the third one listed is dead. The two most active users on the article are also long retired. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:59, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Thanks. At least this gives a chance for someone, if interested, to work on the article. BlueMoonset (talk) 00:03, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

All Fall Down

A blue link is required for an entry on disambiguation pages and it makes little difference if it is a redirect. older ≠ wiser 05:57, 8 August 2017 (UTC)

"Body Like a Back Road"

Hey, can you find reliable genre sources of Sam Hunt single "Body Like a Back Road" please, thank you. (24.41.228.188 (talk) 21:31, 18 August 2017 (UTC))

Speedy deletion declined: Hamilton Records

Hello TenPoundHammer. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Hamilton Records, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: notable parent companies. Thank you. SoWhy 10:39, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

What's the point in tagging all those record company articles for speedy deletion, when each and every one can be redirected to the parent companies per WP:ATD? Regards SoWhy 10:41, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Captain Go

Hello TenPoundHammer. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Captain Go, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: having two or more notable members is sufficient for notability per WP:BAND #6, not to mention significance. Thank you. SoWhy 10:48, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

About the article Assorted Jelly Beans

Hi 10£H.
In my opinion, I think this would be better discussed at an WP:AfD. The article has links:

• Assorted Jelly Beans (album)
• What's Really Going On

While the references in the main article are are best sketchy, I think it should at least merit a deletion discussion.
Your thoughts about this?
Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 11:18, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

Edit summaries

You may want to be careful. Your use of all capital letters and the word "fucking" in edit summaries such as this and this are uncivil and can become a blockable offense if they continue to pile up. Please remember to remain calm when editing. Thank you. DarkKnight2149 17:17, 4 September 2017 (UTC)

The dream in 2001 isn't the world we live in today

Someone needs to decide whether the encyclopedia is more important, or the editors' pleasure.

I'm just not interested in Googling for a story about the 2006 Costa Book Awards. I'd rather write an article about the dart-throwing champion in the Gemutlich Pub in Kigali, Rwanda, Then I can make a list of left-handed African dart champions.

FFS Rhadow (talk) 23:37, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Jimmy Ritchey

Hey Mr. Hammer, I know you're a country music guy. Jimmy Ritchey is nominated for deletion at AfD, I wonder if you could take a look at the piece and offer your opinion there, one way or the other. best, —tim /// Carrite (talk) 16:59, 7 September 2017 (UTC)

Thank you

I really appreciate your addition to the Jimmy Ritchey page. I had created the page, but I entered a world I don't know a whole lot about. I was extremely impressed with your ability to find information on him. Thanks again! Citationhelper ^(talk) 00:51, 8 September 2017 (UTC)

Re: By the Way (Lindsay Ell song)

Hi, happy to help. It did strike me odd that finding and adding content wasn't done, when googling "by the way" + "lindsay ell" results in plenty of usable material. I think it's best for the project to simply fix the issue in cases like this when it's easy to do so.  gongshow  talk  22:58, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

Years in football navboxes

Per your nomination, you may be interested in this discussion. --woodensuperman 08:15, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Cross County Mall (Illinois) at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; if you would like to continue, please link the nomination to the nominations page as described in step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 11:42, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Hey, pard, you're missing something...

Try this on...

This editor is a
Master Editor IV
and is entitled to display this
Orichalcum Editor Star.

Carrite (talk) 00:30, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello, TenPoundHammer. You have new messages at Talk:Auntie (song).
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DYK nomination of Cross County Mall (Illinois)

Hello! Your submission of Cross County Mall (Illinois) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:50, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Please see new note on your DYK nomination. Yoninah (talk) 21:10, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

Deprod: Auntie (song)

Hello, I have deprodded Auntie (song) because a comment on the article's talk page indicates that deletion is not uncontroversial. I have no prejudice against nominating this article at AFD. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 01:37, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

Thirty Seconds to Mars fifth studio album

This looks like a textbook WP:HAMMER, but I can actually find sources like Billboard that talk about it. Is it still worth an AfD, simply because we can't keep an article at that title long term, or is the exception that proves the rule? Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 15:12, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Mungo Jerry discography

I understand your claim that this section is a summary of other articles; however, I do not see an exception to WP:V that would permit the use of other Wikipedia articles as a source for summarized lists. Even if there were, the appropriate articles would need to be specified. Many of the songs in that section don't even have an article, so I can't tell what it is supposed to be summarized from. Please direct me to the appropriate guidelines for this. Thanks! Scr★pIron^IV 20:53, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Texoma Shore

I'm confused as to why you reverted my redirecting an article that failed WP:NALBUMS with the summary "Album released". Yes, you did add two references after the fact, but the concern was that the page was unreferenced—it's irrelevant that the album has now been released, because as I pointed out in my summary, albums that have been released and fail notability still get redirected per WP:NALBUMS. I'm not denying that Blake Shelton is a notable artist or that the article could be expanded, but a notable artist doesn't guarantee notability for everything they release. Ss112 01:47, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Also, I just realised I forgot to reply to your section about Devin Dawson on my talk page. I'm aware who he is and what he's achieved, as I generally update the US Country peaks weekly. However, the article at that time did not communicate his notability, as simply having a charting song or album does not guarantee notability. There are multiple artists who rank on the Country Airplay weekly who don't have articles. Sure, it's an indication they may be notable (or have enough on them to warrant having an article on them), just as WP:NSONGS and the above NALBUMS state, but not a guarantee in and of itself. Ss112 01:51, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

I thought you would reply here. But I just want to point out—an album having charting singles from it doesn't guarantee notability for the album itself. An artist can chart with singles but totally fail to place with the album. It doesn't mean a lot. Ss112 01:57, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Yes, I noted that you expanded Devin Dawson already. However, an artist charting does not guarantee notability for them alone and never has, as stated on WP:MUSICBIO: "may be notable if they meet one of the criteria". That's all I'm trying to say. If I send you a message on your talk page, please reply here in future. Thanks. Ss112 01:58, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the recognition!

I certainly do thank you for the Barn Star. Much appreciated! Scberry (talk) Scberry (talk) 11:12, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Texoma shore.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Texoma shore.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:39, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

TfD

Hi, I've taken the liberty of reverting your "speedy close" at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2017 November 27#Template:Infobox personal name: the proposal there is not for the deletion of a non-existent template (in which case your close would have made perfect sense), but for the recreation of a template previously deleted at TfD and its merge with another template, which I assume you must have overlooked. If I'm wrong, feel free to redo your close. Thanks! – Uanfala 20:57, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

ANI Experiences survey

Beginning on November 28, 2017, the Wikimedia Foundation Community health initiative (Safety and Support and Anti-Harassment Tools team) will be conducting a survey to en.wikipedia contributors on their experience and satisfaction level with the Administrator’s Noticeboard/Incidents. This survey will be integral to gathering information about how this noticeboard works - which problems it deals with well, and which problems it struggles with.

The survey should take 10-20 minutes to answer, and your individual responses will not be made public. The survey is delivered through Google Forms. The privacy policy for the survey describes how and when Wikimedia collects, uses, and shares the information we receive from survey participants and can be found here:

• https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/2017_AN/Incidents_Survey_Privacy_Statement

If you would like to take this survey, please sign up on this page, and a link for the survey will be mailed to you via Special:Emailuser.

• Sign up here to receive a link to a survey

Thank you on behalf of the Support & Safety and Anti-Harassment Tools Teams, Patrick Earley (WMF) talk 21:12, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewing

Hello, TenPoundHammer. As one of Wikipedia's most experienced Wikipedia editors, Would you please consider becoming a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After gaining the flag, patrolling is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 21:35, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, TenPoundHammer. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Old Dominion

I have no idea why you removed my edit. If you object to someone else's edits, then remove theirs only. My edit was meant to improve and update the lede (the lede is meant to summarise the content of the article), I see no reason why you should remove it. Hzh (talk) 02:04, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Paul J. Scoptur

Please consider Paul J. Scoptur for deletion. Tags show why.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 00:04, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Seasons' Greetings

...to you and yours, from the Great White North! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 03:31, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Articles for Creation Reviewing

Hello, TenPoundHammer. AfC submissions Random submission ~8 weeks 1,677 pending submissions to update I recently sent you an invitation to join NPP, but you also might be the right candidate for another related project, AfC, which is also extremely backlogged. Would you please consider becoming an Articles for Creation reviewer? Articles for Creation reviewers help new users learn the ropes of creating their first articles, and identify whether topics are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Reviewing drafts doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia inclusion policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. (After requesting to be added to the project, reviewing is not mandatory. One can do it at their convenience). But kindly read the reviewing instructions before making your decision. Thanks. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 03:01, 29 December 2017 (UTC)

Bebe Miller

Just a heads up, I took your PROD off of Bebe Miller. She is quite famous, and sources are easily found.104.163.153.162 (talk) 07:05, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018

Hello, I'm Northamerica1000. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, it's important to be mindful of the feelings of your fellow editors, who may be frustrated by certain types of interaction, such as your addition to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cognitive and linguistic theories of composition. While you probably didn't intend any offense, please do remember that Wikipedia strives to be an inclusive atmosphere. In light of that, it would be greatly appreciated if you could moderate yourself so as not to offend.

Please stop ordering users to perform edits on articles in the manner you have done at this AfD discussion. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:11, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Please be careful about what you say to people. Some remarks, such as your addition to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Public domain film can easily be misinterpreted, or viewed as harassment. Wikipedia is a supportive environment, where contributors should feel comfortable and safe while editing. Thank you. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 04:24, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Bandini

FYI Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Automobiles#Bandini, if you are instrested in discussion about your editings -->Typ932 ^T·C 09:47, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.

This should come as no surprise. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:55, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

In the spirit of otters, would you consider resolving the ANI discussion by voluntarily agreeing to avoid any and all things related to AfD for, oh, let's say two weeks? Deep breaths, counting to ten, and all that. JoJo Anthrax (talk) 18:06, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Edit summary for proposed deletions

Hi, I noticed that you left an edit summary just saying "add" when proposing a page for deletion.[46] This was probably unintentional, but it would have been preferable to make a subsequent dummy edit with the summary "Propose deletion" in order to give fair notice to any page watchers.

Best wishes – Fayenatic London 10:03, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

I came here for similar reasons. Please do try to use edit summaries to sum up your changes correct. Calling this a "fix" or changing a tag "add" is not helpful and can even be misleading. Taking a few seconds to write "tagged for speedy deletion" or "change to specific tag" should not really be a problem, should it? Regards SoWhy 17:56, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

I don't intend to pile on but WP:PRODNOM clearly states:--Make sure to provide an edit summary that clearly indicates that the page has been proposed for deletion..That's quite a necessity esp. for ease of people keeping track over articles from watch-lists.Winged Blades^Godric 18:07, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

And I came here for the same reason, as you are still using the same cryptic edit summary for proposed deletions even after the messages above. As pointed out above an edit summary clearly indicating that deletion is being proposed is not optional. Do you really want to get banned from proposing deletion for such a silly reason? 86.17.222.157 (talk) 16:44, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

And here[47] is another one. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:36, 17 January 2018 (UTC).

I came here for the same thing. This editor has a long history of careless/frivolous nominations see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history#Likely hoaxes & Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/History of Ghana (1966–79) and disingenuous edit summaries writing "add" when he was actually proding. He is a detriment to the project and I have no faith in his work. Absolutely terrible! Senegambianamestudy (talk) 20:53, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Prodding by stealth. See this[48]. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:44, 18 January 2018 (UTC).

AfD/PROD @ AN/I...

Sorry that shit is going south on you, I just bumped into the thread yesterday, after the snowball was already rolling downhill. The poet John Trumbull wrote, "No man e'er felt the halter draw / With good opinion of the law," but I hope you don't let the AN/I festivities get to you. The comment made that there are plenty of other ways for you to help WP is apt, so please do try to avoid being bitter. I think the path back will require a year or so's worth of solid AfD participation pumping up the "agrees with consensus" numbers, avoidance of aggressive language (I know you don't suffer fools gladly; you'll need to learn to suffer them silently), and some earnest self-criticism showing understanding about what got people steamed in the first place. That'll take some introspection, of course.

In any event, I know some of the good stuff you've done for the project and I hope you continue to do that. Nominating stuff for deletion is a microscopic aspect of keeping this site on the path to improvement, as you know. Don't feel bad about any of the bullshit; you've been around here long enough to know that there is indeed some bullshit that must be endured. best, —tim /// Carrite (talk) 12:43, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

About Google.

Hello TenPoundHammer.

I noticed you have been having problems searching on google, this I noticed on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tropical marine climate and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Felipe Cardeña where you ask Why does this stuff never come up when I google things?^[49].

I don't know your location and it could be caused by any number of reasons, but it is most likely related to your search preferences, lanaguge settings, browser settings or region. The best way to find the most Google search results is to to use a fresh browser, don't login to Google, and if applicable use a VPN to access the United States https://www.google.com/ website (In Europe certain sites are restricted from Google for privacy reasons for example, other regional differences apply). Google also has helpful guides such as this for more advanced search syntax. Generally speaking just putting the search term in " " quotes into your local google site will not give you anywhere near the full results.

I hope this helps. Ilyina Olya Yakovna (talk) 13:45, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Excellent advice.198.58.168.40 (talk) 19:51, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Deletion review

WP:DRVPURPOSE is your friend. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:19, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. This is barely acceptable at any time. To do it now when you're at ANI for much the same already - I can't imagine how you think this is appropriate. Andy Dingley (talk) 20:53, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Topic ban from deletion activites

I have closed the ANI thread about you with the following consensus that you are indefinitely topic-banned from all deletion activities, broadly construed.

I have stressed that indefinite is not infinite, and I hope this can be appealed at some point, and numerous people have said you have done a lot of good work for the project over many years, which I have seen myself. I have one of your quotes you made at an AfD some time back on my user page, so this isn't a decision I took lightly as I do have sympathy for your point of view. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 23:26, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Topaz War Relocation Center cleanup

Hi, I noticed that you put some cleanup tags on Topaz War Relocation Center. I've finally sourced everything on the page and I'm working on tightening the scope. Which sections do you think have too much detail? Which list do you think would be better presented as prose? Also, do you think each "notable internee" should have a source for their being interred? Thanks. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 21:25, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Alan Jackson

Let me know if other related articles need protection from the sock. Also, if he returns to this article, please ping me when you report at RFPP. If I'm around I'll PP it. Thanks--Dlohcierekim (talk) 04:44, 2 March 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maternal insult

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maternal insult requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

unfunny joke in wikipedia space, not a real AfD.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Prince of Thieves (talk) 18:08, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

• Look I see you did a whole bunch of these, since April 1 is coming up again could you please help the project by dealing with your jokes from last year. Either by putting them in your userspace, archiving them onto some memorial page, or G6 deletions would all be absolutely fine. Thanks. Prince of Thieves (talk) 18:12, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

userfied-- User:TenPoundHammer /Articles for deletion/Maternal insult--Dlohcierekim (talk) 19:00, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

• You may want to add your input to Wikipedia:Village_pump_(proposals)#April_fools_cleanup_(proposal). Prince of Thieves (talk) 19:08, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

RfA

RfAs seem to be of fashion these days, so would you be interested in one? You seem to be a really good candidate. L293D (☎ • ✎) 18:01, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Happy Easter!

Here are some easter eggs.

And hope you enjoyed your spring break... if you have one. Remember: don't go crazy again like you did last year! Eyesnore 00:00, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia is no longer accepting or storing joke XfD nominations. Eyesnore 00:03, 1 April 2018 (UTC)

Talk:Forest Fair Village/GA1

TenPoundHammer, I noticed you tried to add a note on the WP:GAN page, but you aren't supposed to edit that page directly since the bot rewrites it every 20 minutes; the message has since disappeared.

I'm happy to add to your note on the reviewer's talk page, if you'd like me to. If, despite the note, they haven't returned to the review in the next several days, I'm also happy to arrange to have the nomination put back into the GAN pool with no loss of seniority, to wait for another reviewer. You may or may not wish to do that, depending on whether you think it's worth waiting for AmericanAir88 to return, since the backlog of unreviewed nominations is currently over 400.

Adding a note, which I don't think is necessary at this point, can be done by editing the GA nominee template on the article's talk page and adding the note text to the |note= field. The bot will pick up the note, typically in under half an hour, and add it, properly formatted, to the GAN page. Best of luck with this nomination. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:59, 13 April 2018 (UTC)

My apologies

Dear Hammer,

I give you my deepest apologies to delaying the review. I went from being on vacation to having a huge work week with ANOTHER business trip. I apologize for the delay. I have posted the issues with the article and this review is still continuing. I hope you can still trust me. Thank you

AmericanAir88 (talk) 23:09, 14 April 2018 (UTC)

Alan Jackson

This has probably been rehashed several times over, but wouldn’t extended confirmed protection on all Alan Jackson-related articles help somewhat? Or is the “information” usually inserted into unrelated articles? -A lad insane (Channel 2) 00:26, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

So it's not really contained, then? -A lad insane (Channel 2) 04:01, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Congratulations

Congratulations on passing. Your dedication and hard work was fantastic. I hope we can work together in the near future. Have a fantastic day. If you need any help on anything just ask. Thank you for your hard work. AmericanAir88 (talk) 01:11, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

i have a new fiend

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ichabbie396. --Dlohcierekim (talk) 11:41, 2 May 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mirandaflowers.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mirandaflowers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Garfield at 25:In Dogs Years I'd Be Dead listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Garfield at 25:In Dogs Years I'd Be Dead. Since you had some involvement with the Garfield at 25:In Dogs Years I'd Be Dead redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 23:28, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Michael ray amos album.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:54, 24 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Dierks mountain.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:16, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Down home iv.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:26, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Hojo what gives?

Edited the Hojo section. Reversed?

What gives?

Here's the actual hotel.

It's an actual Howard Johnson restaurant. Visited by multiple people. Verified by the hojoland fb group. I get this isn't the best of sources,but I posted a picture of the freakin menu. What do you need?Cman41886 (talk) 19:35, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Dan shay self titled.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:19, 29 June 2018 (UTC)

Newspapers.com links

Can you please create clippings to the articles? As it stands right now, because you're linking to the full page, only other subscribers to Newspapers.com can read the articles, but if you used clippings, others could read those articles without a subscription. There are instructions here on how to make clippings. Imzadi 1979 → 19:23, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

• @Imzadi1979: Sure I'll look into that. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:57, 30 June 2018 (UTC)

Notes at GAN

Hi. You can't add comments to the GAN page directly, but you can at the template. I have tried to do it for you. It may take a while to appear on the page (has to wait for the bot to run). Let me know if this doesn't work or you are not happy with it. AIRcorn (talk) 05:57, 18 July 2018 (UTC)

Beader

Please look at Beader and maybe you agree with me that it should be deleted.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 01:42, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Lynne tough.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 19:58, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Songs for the saints.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 20:00, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

File:Lynne sunrise.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 20:07, 26 July 2018 (UTC)

Idea

I read your AN thread. I believe you should rescue articles instead of putting them up for deletion. I have added sources to and expanded at least half dozen of unreferenced articles from the BLP backlog. It looks better if you save an article than delete it. Maybe you can join the Article Rescue Squad, and collaborate with us there. Once you do that maybe you will be allowed to go back to deletion activities without any restrictions. You should delete, not the articles in the backlog but those tags on them by fixing them up JC7V7DC5768 (talk) 17:27, 27 July 2018 (UTC)

August 2018

Hello, I'm Jax 0677. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Excision discography that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Jax 0677 (talk) 13:09, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

El Goonish Shive deletion

I think that El Goonish Shive is more notable now than it was in 2010. Maybe the article should be undeleted and given to an interested user (not me) to update? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mèþru (talk • contribs) 23:20, 17 August 2018 (UTC)

Deletion "Zlatko Sudac"

Hi, you reverted my attempt to delete the article "Zlako Sudac" for formal reasons. Can you help me with the technical aspects? (The German wikipedia requires obviously different formal aspects). Best, Mr. bobby (talk) 08:23, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sawyerbest.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sawyerbest.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Truebeliever.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Truebeliever.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:51, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Frustrated reverts

TPH, I know exactly where you're coming from with this, this and this; I do the same sort of editing myself. However, we've just had a protracted AN thread about your problems at XfD, and your general conduct of "why the f*** can't anyone add any f***ing sources" did come up for criticism. Can you just dial it back a bit, because I'd hate diffs like this to be used against you in a future noticeboard thread. Cheers. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 11:51, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

@Ritchie333: Agree, just came here because of this, I guess a topic ban from blanking articles is on its way. I noticed that TPH has a recent history of blanking articles with the edit summary "not notable" or "no sources found" when there clearly are sources. Should be more careful. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 22:53, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

This is reason to reinstate the whole XfD topic ban and extend it to blanking as well. He was given the WP:ROPE and this is what he did with it. Andy Dingley (talk) 23:23, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

[50] [51] Andy Dingley (talk) 23:24, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

@Andy Dingley: Seems to have been going on for at least a couple of years [52]. There's no way that he does any kind of WP:BEFORE before blanking the articles, using that one as an example, a simple Google search is all I needed to confirm that sources do indeed exist [53] [54]. The other ones I notice are in fact, WP:PERMASTUBs, such as the ones you linked, but "not notable" is not accurate, and "no sourcing found" is a lie when there are sources. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 23:54, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

@Champion: @Andy Dingley: Songfacts is not a reliable source as its content is user submitted, but the Billboard source is definitely fine. I did do WP:BEFORE on at least the Julie Reeves songs and came up with nothing. My redirects were not meant as a means of eliminating the content, but rather a way of saying "This is currently a stub that, per WP:NSONGS, can be redirected to the album or artist". I have no problem whatsoever with the redirects being undone (although I would greatly prefer it if the undoer would add sources while doing so). I'm not trying to permanently eliminate the content. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 06:20, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Maybe it needs deletion (or redirection). The problem is that we do not trust you to do that, as such a single-handed action.

If you think it needs deletion, then use PROD or AfD, and throw it into an appropriate open forum for discussing that. But the idea that, because you'd until recently been banned from XfD altogether, so now you should just do the same deletions (because song deletions are pretty much always going to end up as redirects to the artist) as quiet redirects and hope no-one notices, is just not a good idea. Andy Dingley (User talk:Andy Dingley|talk]]) 08:57, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Reinstating the topic ban seems reasonable (NB: I have never had any interaction with TPH before this ). I have just dug up this and it seems that it has been going on for years and I think it should be dealt with (again). - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 06:45, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Adding things to the Wikipedia:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia

I am writing to you since I don't have much experience editing Project Pages but you seem to be the expert on that Page. I already put this in the Talk page.

After seeing that the "Spanish Tickler" was a long-lasting hoax I found that the Mask of infamy, Heretic's fork, and Knee splitter which all came from the same hoax sources. They were all deleted on 20 July 2018. You can still see them using the archive.org website.

• "Heretic's fork" had existed since at least July 2006. This archive shows that it was in the category of "Articles lacking sources from July 2006" archive. That means it lasted at least 12 years.
• "Knee splitter" had existed since at least February 2009. This archive shows that it had been an "orphaned article" since February 2009 February 2009. That means it lasted at least 9 years.
• "Mask of infamy" had existed since at least 2008 since it had a source retrieved then. [55]. That means it lasted at least 10 years.

Can these be added to the page as long-lasting hoaxes?

BananaBaron (talk) 00:57, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Changing a citation URL

I came across one of your recent edits, where you modified a citation removing the archived URL that's freely accessible and replaced it with one that exists behind a paywall. I'm curious as to why the latter is preferred? Is there a recommendation somewhere in our guidelines that supports this move? --GoneIn60 (talk) 23:57, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

September 2018

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Incite (band) . Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --Jax 0677 (talk) 22:19, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Emeraude (talk) 08:23, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Thanks for reviewing Urban Retail Properties, TenPoundHammer.

Unfortunately Barkeep49 has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

I know you went through some effort to have this restored. I am not seeing the kind of citations that meet NCORP being present and so am marking it unnreviewed for another pair of eyes

To reply, leave a comment on Barkeep49's talk page.

Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 12:59, 14 September 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Beersound.jpg

The file File:Beersound.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-free album cover being used in a decorative manner in Beer for My Horses (film)#Soundtrack. Non-free album cover art is generally allowed to be used for primary identification purposes in stand-alone articles about albums, but its use in other articles is generally only allowed when the cover art itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary as explained in WP:NFC#cite_note-3 and the context for non-free use required by WP:NFCC#8 is evident. There is no such commentary for this particular album cover anywhere in the article, and the use of soundtrack album cover art in articles about films or TV programs is generally not allowed for this reason as explained in WP:FILMSCORE

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:00, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Blue Tacoma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pacific Coast Highway (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Colonial Plaza

Hello! Your submission of Colonial Plaza at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 19:03, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Colonial plaza postcard 1962.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:22, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

DYK for Colonial Plaza

On 3 October 2018, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Colonial Plaza, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that when the Colonial Plaza shopping center opened in 1956 in Orlando, Florida, its sidewalks were tinted green to reduce glare? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Colonial Plaza. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Colonial Plaza), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Alex Shih (talk) 00:01, 3 October 2018 (UTC)

Rock me

We are obviously discussing the attribution of composers of the song. However, when you rush to revert, here take a little more care to complete the structure. If you are going to remove the sentence about Grusin being a composer, your objection, put back the content of who he is and how he is associated with the composition so the lede makes sense. Trackinfo (talk) 17:59, 12 October 2018 (UTC)

‎Template:User WP Earth science

I didn't think that was a good idea. In speedying the rest of the project pages, I think I bent the rules a bit (it seems to me that G8's more for pages technically dependent on another), but I figured it was easier and nobody would object, so IAR. However, the userbox was transcluded on several pages, so one or more of the users might want to complain, and they'd be able to say correctly that I'd used the criterion for a situation where it wasn't meant to be used. Nyttend (talk) 02:01, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

File:Stone country.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:05, 13 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, TenPoundHammer. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Leannblue.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Leannblue.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:49, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Pinmonkey.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:01, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

List of names in English with counterintuitive pronunciations keeps growing, and having more babies too

Looks like List of names in English with counterintuitive pronunciations inspired another editor to create a similar list at Silent English alphabet. Facepalm FWIW, I'm honestly coming to the point where I believe Wikipedia long ceased merely being an encyclopedia, and that WP:N should just be scrapped, or at least greatly expanded. WP:V is worth fighting for, as that keeps away lawsuits, among other things, but I just don't think we'll ever put the strict notability genie back in the bottle. It wastes too much time better spent on improving content itself. - BilCat (talk) 07:55, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Season's greetings

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello TenPoundHammer, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Happy editing, Abequinn14 (talk) 06:26, 25 December 2018 (UTC) Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

TfD this if you need to. Abequinn14 (talk) 06:26, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Golden Hour (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Celeste (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Black dog ost.jpg

The file File:Black dog ost.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-free album cover being used in a decorative manner in Black Dog (film)#Soundtrack. Non-free album cover art is generally allowed to be used for primary identification purposes in stand-alone articles about albums, but its use in other articles is generally only allowed when the cover art itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary as explained in WP:NFC#cite_note-3 and the context for non-free use required by WP:NFCC#8 is evident. There is no such commentary for this particular album cover anywhere in the article, and the use of soundtrack album cover art in articles about films or TV programs is generally not allowed for this reason as explained in WP:FILMSCORE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 04:19, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Steve O'Brien

The article Steve O'Brien has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't appear to meet the notability requirements. Only somewhat notable event is serving as a gameshow announcer.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Cameron₁₁₅₉₈ ^(Talk) 22:28, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Houser magnolia.jpg

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:02, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Giant rat

I reformatted the page as a disambiguation page, which is what it's more suited for. There is no single "giant rat", and it could refer to any number of species. Harizotoh9 (talk) 06:10, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Brooks-Dunn-Reboot-Cover.png

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for the calculation of the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 18:03, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mcbridepromo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mcbridepromo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:28, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Blocked for incivility/personal attacks/etc.

Based on the evidence presented in this discussion, the concerns of several editors that your comments in edit summaries are not acceptable, and your response to those concerns, I am blocking your account for 1 week. I presume you can figure out how to use either {{unblock}} or WP:UTRS to request an unblock should you wish to edit Wikipedia before the block expires. I would recommend any unblock request indicates how you intend to change the way you interact with others. --Jayron32 20:05, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

@Jayron32: That's fine, my plan was to take a self imposed wikibreak anyway. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:59, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

I know it's hard to bite the bullet and apologize when you're at wits' end, but you would not have been blocked, had you simply backed off and apologized for becoming a little too hostile. You're a legendary editor with a clean block log. You undoubtedly know what we want to hear in this situation, and we will be perfectly reasonable if you change your tone in an unblock request. If you genuinely just want to step away, that's fine, but you should know that it's not too late to resolve this situation amicably. Regards, ~Swarm~ {talk} 06:39, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

@Swarm: I did leave a note with Jax 0677 suggesting ways that they can improve their editing methods. I feel that I was civil in my tone, and they agreed to take my advice. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:10, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

So you said something to someone that was civil, after a grossly obnoxious tirade against them and only after you were taken to task for it. What do you want, a medal? The bottom line, TPH, is that you will curb your disgraceful behaviour towards others or it will be curbed for you - I'm surprised you've been allowed to get away with it for so long and that your block log is so sparse. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:24, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

Today's Wikipedian 10 years ago

Awesome

Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:23, 13 April 2019 (UTC)

Blocked again

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TenPoundHammer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I confess to being both drunk and tired when I snapped at Jax 0677 and reacted more harshly than I should have. I didn't even REMEMBER my previous block at the time, I was that unfit to edit. I will also undergo a voluntary restriction from any interaction with him, possibly by not editing any page he has edited within the past 24 hours or directly reacting to any of his tags. (I also have a couple GA nominees in the pipeline and don't want to be unavailable to respond should any actions be needed on said articles. But what's more important is that I will work to enact a self-imposed restriction from crossing paths with Jax 0677. And oh yeah, not editing while drunk and/or tired.) ETA: The discussion and block also happened while I was at work and couldn't get any words in about it.

Decline reason:

WP:NOTTHEM also applies to blaming your behaviour on a bottle. Wikipedia is not rehab; civility is required, no matter if you've had a coupla brown pops. Please have a VERY GOOD look at WP:RECIDIVISM when you come back in a month. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 01:41, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Reminder on talk page etiquette

Just a reminder that WP:OWNTALK and WP:BLANKING specifically disallow the removal of "Declined unblock requests regarding a currently active block." Nil Einne (talk) 05:09, 26 April 2019 (UTC)

Unblock, take 2

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TenPoundHammer (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Somehow the mere fact that I am blocked has enticed User:Jack Gaines to start antagonizing me again and taking great joy in my block; see [56] [57] [58] It's clear they're trying to use my current block as a means of wasting Wikipedia resources and targeting me directly, and it's clear that Jack Gaines is taking great joy in rubbing my block in my face. Two socks in less than three days? Clearly they're going to keep doing this for the duration of my block and frustrating a lot more than just me -- they're going to be frustrating admins who have to block their socks across multiple projects, and editors who have to rollback all their vandalism.

As with last time I requested an unblock, I will undergo a voluntary editing restriction against anything that Jax 0677 has recently edited, and possible supervision if desired. Both of my blocks regarding my actions toward them were absolutely justified. Jack Gaines' recent spree here shows me what it's like from the other side, and I don't like it on the other side either. I don't want Jack Gaines' socks to keep rubbing my block in my face for the next few weeks, which I know they will given their edit history, both with me and otherwise. Now that I'm on the "other side" I think I know moreso than ever what it's like when I lash out at Jax 0677. Getting Jack Gaines off my back is one concern here, but their recent actions have inspired me more than ever to get off Jax 0677's. Like Jax 0677, I'm just an editor trying to help the project, and neither Jax nor I need anyone needling us. None of us needs that, because harassment of another editor creates a ripple effect through multiple editors. I was wrong, and I don't need anyone trying to use my wrongs against me. I would not antagonize Jax 0677 over being blocked and go "ha ha, you're blocked"; I shouldn't antagonize them over anything else, either.

tl;dr: I would like to stop ongoing harassment from both the giving and receiving end. —Preceding undated comment added 01:59, 4 May 2019‎

Decline reason:

You've been warned repeatedly for incivility and personal attacks. Looking through the archives at AN/ANI, I see warnings in 2010, 2012, 2014, 2018, 2019, and more. I think we need something more than "an LTA vandal is trolling me, so please unblock me". This is a pattern of behavior that has gone on for years. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:12, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Purely regarding the abusive sockpuppets, I have  IP blocked the vandal on enwiki. I can't do anything about commons, though. Reaper Eternal (talk) 03:02, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

@Reaper Eternal: I believe they have circumvented IP blocks in the past. The user has also harassed me on Simple, Spanish, and even French Wikipedias in the past, and their edit history suggests that harassment will be ongoing and widespread. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:06, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

I can semiprotect this page if it becomes necessary due to block-evading socks, but unfortunately there isn't much I can do about any other wikis. Personally, I had to globally disable cross-wiki notifications due to abusive sockpuppets who enjoy harassing administrators and checkusers. Reaper Eternal (talk) 03:12, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

@Reaper Eternal: Fair enough. The rest of my request for unblock still stands. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:16, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Please do not remove declined unblock requests. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:23, 7 May 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protection

Can I please get my talk page indefintely semi-protected to help thwart any Jack Gaines socks? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:51, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

I have semi-protected your talk page for two weeks and will extend it if disruption resumes then. Let me know. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 01:58, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Temporary sanity.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Temporary sanity.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 07:52, 1 June 2019 (UTC)

Talk:Tracy Lawrence/GA1

Hey, just letting you know I'll be reviewing Tracy Lawrence's good article nomination. You can find the review here Talk:Tracy Lawrence/GA1 but you know the drill. Props on getting so many country artists (quite a few of which I recognize!) to GA and I'm looking forward to reviewing this one! Toa Nidhiki05

Per your response at my talk and your fixing of the reference issues, I've gone ahead and passed the article. Great work, and keep it up (if you want) - it's not easy to get an artist page (let alone one for an artist popular before the internet was big) to that quality but you've done it again and again. Toa Nidhiki05 03:27, 2 June 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 14

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Great Lakes Crossing Outlets, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Black Friday (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:29, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Rolling Stone charts

I don't know that any other users have had concerns with including the new Rolling Stone charts yet. We've had WP:RSCHART written by Nice4What, and this essay was mentioned at WT:CHARTS. Nobody has had an issue with it yet. Its methodology is clear, they're just trying to be an alternative to Billboard. Who knows how long it will last. Ss112 17:20, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Trisha Yearwood

Awesome, thank you! ChrisTofu11961 (talk) 19:54, 4 August 2019 (UTC)

Wonderful news! Thank you for your assistance in getting Trisha's page listed among the good articles on Wikipedia. It's always good to have a country artist (even better a woman in country music) get recognized. Thanks again! ChrisTofu11961 (talk) 01:23, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:There's More Where That Came From.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:There's More Where That Came From.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:38, 7 August 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chris Lane, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Laps Around the Sun (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:44, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Special Barnstar
	Eight years late, given for recognizing a crud portal when no one else recognized it. (Next time, provide a more detailed nomination, and it won't be Speedy Kept even if it winds up being Kept. That was also their fault, because anyone could have provided a rationale.) Robert McClenon (talk) 23:42, 28 August 2019 (UTC)

Lorrie Morgan

Hi! I just wanted to take a moment and congratulate you on Lorrie Morgan's article. I reviewed it and submitted it as a "good article". Hoping I followed all the guidelines correctly. Just waiting for the bot to put the GA icon on her page. ChrisTofu11961 (talk) 18:22, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

• @ChrisTofu11961: Thanks. I'm not sure about that source you added so I reverted it since it seemed to promote a WP:PEACOCK phrase that was not elaborated on in the body. otherwise I think you conducted the review well. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 22:30, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

The Editor's Barnstar

		The Editor's Barnstar
		Excellent work on articles. You deserve it. AmericanAir88(talk) 23:01, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Excellent work

Hello TPH,

Excellent work on Tri-County Mall. It was one of the best GANs I have reviewed. Keep up the great work. I highly recommend FA in the future for Tri County. See you around. AmericanAir88^(talk) 19:23, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

• @AmericanAir88: Thanks. I was finding a lot of stuff on Tri-County after working on Forest Fair Village, which I also got to GA. I have a newspapers.com account, and it's been quite valuable in expanding coverage of shopping malls. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 20:10, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

@TenPoundHammer: I applied for the Wikipedia Library for newspapers.com and was approved, but they never gave me any activation account. Must be nice to have that resource. Great job on the article. See you around. AmericanAir88^(talk) 20:15, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

@TenPoundHammer: Great job on the outlet mall as well. You are fantastic. AmericanAir88^(talk) 22:59, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

@AmericanAir88: If you want to make it three, you can also check Swifton Center. I have several other mall articles on my watchlist which I plan to improve when I have time. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:01, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

@TenPoundHammer: I will get on it. I sent a barnstar below as well for your great work. AmericanAir88^(talk) 23:03, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Crazynights.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Crazynights.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:30, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Patsy Cline

Hello! I have nominated the Patsy Cline article for GA status. I spent August-September extensively cleaning it up. It was quite a job, but it is finally done! I would appreciate if you could look over it for any grammar errors, spelling, etc. I believe it is important for someone as iconic as Patsy to have a quality article, so please let me know your thoughts. ChrisTofu11961 (talk) 02:11, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

• @ChrisTofu11961: Sure, I'll look it over either tonight or tomorrow. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:30, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Thank you so much! Happy to have finally conquered her article! ChrisTofu11961 (talk)

Your topic ban has been lifted

By community consensus, your topic ban on initiating deletion discussions has been lifted. Please see Special:Diff/919893695. Several people in the WP:AN discussion have said that this should be your final chance, so you should probably tread carefully. If you have trouble, please consider asking an admin for help. Some admins have a lot of experience at AfD. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:45, 6 October 2019 (UTC)

Like a River to the Sea

I saw your G6 tag, and understand what you're trying to do and why you need admin assistance. However, since you've probably got a better idea of what to do than I have, I've given you page mover rights so you can do these sort of things directly. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 10:41, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

• @Ritchie333: It's still not letting me move it over top the redirect. How do I do this without G6ing? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 13:58, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

If you go to Like a River to the Sea (song), click "Move" and type "Like a River to the Sea" as the destination, you should now get a message "The destination page "Like a River to the Sea" already exists. Do you want to delete it to make way for the move?" and an additional checkbox, "Yes, delete the page". Click on that checkbox, then click "Move" and the old DAB page will automatically be G6 deleted. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 14:00, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

@Ritchie333: It's not giving me that message at all. It still just says "The page could not be moved: a page of that name already exists, or the name you have chosen is not valid." Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 14:01, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

Hmmm. I've never had the page mover right without having admin rights, so I'm not sure - check the instructions at WP:ROBIN and see if User:Andy M. Wang/pageswap is helpful, or failing that, ask at WP:VPT. I'd like to know the answer so I can give somebody else this advice in future. I've seen non admins delete things per G6 so it's definitely doable. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 14:38, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

@Ritchie333: I just re-tagged it for G6 since it's uncontroversial. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 22:43, 9 October 2019 (UTC)

In a case like that, it's best to go back to that user to sort it out. CSD isn't for complicated, weird cases - they just clog up the system (and really, since it was declined, I can't reasonably conclude it's definitely uncontroversial in this case). WilyD 05:49, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

@Ritchie333: Non-admins (regardless of whether they are page movers or not) can only delete redirects with one revision that point to the page they are trying to move (although there is a proposal on phabricator to relax that to "pages that have always been redirects, regardless of target and number of revisions"). What page movers can do is move pages without leaving a redirect (which then lets them move a new page to the vacated title, and if done three times in succession allows them to swap the titles of two pages). The page mover right isn't really suited to what TenPoundHammer is trying to do here, so an admin would be necessary. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 20:18, 12 October 2019 (UTC)

Uptown Funk

Hello,

Let me start by thanking you for reviewing Uptown Funk, but that review was quite fast. The bot didn't even assumed it and you forgot to add it to the Wikipedia:Good articles page, I did it for you. Actually, it might be one of my best works so far, so no worries. However, be careful with the reviews, you barely pointed out anything and some nominators/reviwers might have something to say about it and not enjoy that kind of process. MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 00:44, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Greetings, MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 00:44, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

TenPoundHammer, it is indeed unusual to post and pass a review at the same time. There was also a problem with the GA template you created on the article talk page, which didn't have all of the required fields; I fixed it when I noticed the issue. (It's probably safest to copy the template at WP:GANI and fill it in, so you don't forget any required fields.) Also, although it happened with a different review, please don't edit the WP:GAN page directly; the bot recreates it every 20 minutes, and automatically generates the proper format for the various entries. if you open a review page, the bot will pick up on it. (The edit was not formatted correctly, and could have caused issues if it hadn't been overwritten with valid formatting by the bot.) Thanks for your work at GAN; I'm sure you'll learn the various ins and outs in no time. BlueMoonset (talk) 08:28, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

Scotty McCreery Tour section

Hi! I was wondering why you deleted Scotty McCreery's tour section on his page. I think it's relevant to his bio & I've seen other artists pages have touring info (some with very little touring). Thanks in advance. Tiffany240 (talk) 23:10, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure I've seen several articles/sources for each of these tours. If these sources are added, can this section be re-added to the page? Also, from the content on the page it seems at least 3 of the tours in question don't seem to be elsewhere in the page. The tours also happen to be his most recent tours (w/Old Dominion, Jimmie Allen, etc.). If it's a matter of content which is already referenced elsewhere, it seems a good amount is not in the article.Tiffany240 (talk) 24:18, 14 October 2019 (UTC)

You gave me a great laugh

Hello TPH, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ten Pound Hammer made me actually laugh out loud. Good work. Also, how are we going about the mall reassessment? AmericanAir88^(talk) 19:15, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Duplicate RfD

The RfD for Mia's Index of Anthro Stories etc. was relisted on 27 Oct, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 October 27#Mia's Index of Anthro Stories. I've therefore removed the duplicate discussion you pasted on today's listing. Regards. PC78 (talk) 12:47, 1 November 2019 (UTC)

Tracy Byrd edit

Please tell me why you removed my recent edit of this page. I edited it to include the new record release. Catitude98 (talk) 04:56, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Garth Brooks

I've added a discussion on the talk page for the Garth Brooks discography article discussing the Chris Gaines singles, because being that they are indeed Garth Brooks songs, there's no good reason for them not to be included. If you can give a better reason than "already included on Chris Gaines article", I'd love to hear it. Dpm12 (talk) 12:25, 15 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eric Darken, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cashbox (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:29, 27 November 2019 (UTC)

Anne Cochran moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Anne Cochran, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Lapablo (talk) 14:46, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Anne Cochran has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Anne Cochran. Thanks! Lapablo (talk) 14:49, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Roger Miller

Thanks a lot for notifying me that you delisted the article. I re-call the barnstar I gave you in 2011.Lost Fugitive (talk) 07:32, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

In other words, continuing to keep the barnstar on your awards page after receiving this message would reflect a fraud on the Wikipedia community.Lost Fugitive (talk) 07:56, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

I reverted all the unsourced bullshit you added to the article in order to get it delisted.Lost Fugitive (talk) 07:56, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

House of Mercure

The House of Mercure is so bad and so useless, it should be deleted. Help me out and do so.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 01:56, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Eddy Raven

Hi there, TenPoundHammer! I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Eddy Raven you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days, but I've made substantial progress so far, and I have comments awaiting your attention. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this review! —Shrinkydinks (talk) 00:02, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Update: 8 December 2019, 1:00am GMT — I have completed a total review of this article for each good article criterion. It is currently passing on every dimension except 1a (clear prose) and 2b (reliable sources)—criteria on which it is close to being a good article and just needs some attention from you! Great work, TenPoundHammer, for your hard work on this article over the last 7 months, as well as for their patience in waiting for this article to be GA reviewed (6 months 12 days on the wait list—crazy).

GA Status: Close to GA pass! Needs attention from you in the outlined areas. I've given a lot of comments on the article's prose for clarity and readability. These may feel like a burden (really sorry—you've done great work so far), but I'll feel GREAT about this as a good article once they're addressed! If my comments are unduly fine-toothed, I'll welcome the advice of a GA mentor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shrinkydinks (talk • contribs) 00:58, 8 December 2019 (UTC)

Update: 10 December 2019, 9:00am GMT — Thank you for thoroughly addressing my notes! Just 3-4 more small things and you'll be good to go for GA status. Thanks, Shrinkydinks (talk) 17:45, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Update: 11 December 2019, 1:00am GMT — Thank you for your hard work; Eddy Raven is now an approved Good Article! The bot should come through here with a note for you soon. Congrats! —Shrinkydinks (talk) 01:02, 11 December 2019 (UTC)

Hello ten pound hammer

Can I contact you directly with a Wikipedia question? Thanks CountrySongwriter (talk) 21:02, 17 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Sound of a Million Dreams (song), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mama Tried (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Good luck

豊かな十年へようこそ/WELCOME TO THE D20s

Miraclepine wishes you a Merry Christmas, a Happy New Year, and a prosperous decade of change and fortune.
このミラPはTenPoundHammerたちのメリークリスマスも新年も変革と幸運の豊かな十年をおめでとうございます！
フレフレ、みんなの未来！/GOOD LUCK WITH YOUR FUTURE!
ミラP 04:09, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

"Walled garden of hoaxes"

Hi. By chance I saw your post at ANI about the "walled garden of hoaxes". I'm interested in what the "walled garden" here means. Searched around but couldn't find an explanation for the term in this context. Could you enlighten me? Popcornduff (talk) 13:56, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) @Popcornduff: See WP:Walled garden for the basic meaning; I guess, specifically to these articles, it means there was one or a few editors preventing anyone from questioning the articles' veracity. Of course, the articles themselves are now deleted so we can't see who those editors were  :) ——SN54129 14:00, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Ah, I thought I'd seen a page like that on Wikipedia at some point, but for some reason couldn't find it. So I guess these pages were all linking to each other to make them seem more convincing? Popcornduff (talk) 16:41, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Good work on catching this TPH. Popcornduff and Serial Number 54129 if you want to see one of the most elaborate walled gardens ever take a look at User:Rhododendrites/Chaney and its talk page. The amount of work and cooperation put in by those editors in dealing with that is IMO a good example of one of wikipedia's strengths. Cheers and happy new year to all. MarnetteD|Talk 17:56, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

P.S. love the otters TPH :-) MarnetteD|Talk 17:56, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

Jimmie Allen

Bobby, I’m the original producer/writer and development company that brought Jimmie to town. I’d like to chat with you if possible about more details.

Thnx!

Kevin Wayne Kwayne6226 (talk) 05:18, 31 December 2019 (UTC)

Sacred Harp wiki

There's a lot of information about Sacred Harp that's probably not encyclopedic. In addition to How Sacred Harp music is sung which you recently PRODed, there's also Leading Sacred Harp music and Pitching Sacred Harp music. When I first saw those articles I took a fairly lenient tack and left them as they were, but what do you think about migrating this stuff to an external platform, like Wikia or something? Ibadibam (talk) 20:14, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Laurie Faso for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Laurie Faso is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laurie Faso until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ミラP 15:54, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Wonderland Village for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wonderland Village is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wonderland Village until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Esprit15d • talk • contribs 20:20, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Crystal Gayle

Hi there! Thank you so much for your review of my article! I plan to continue contributing more to the women of country music. My next project (when I get time) will be Jan Howard's main article. I plan to review some of your articles you previously posted for GA nominations but I have been sick and busy with work myself. I plan to before the end of the month! ChrisTofu11961 (talk) 20:24, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Wonderland Village

Hi, I saw your rewrites on Wonderland Village -- just want to point out that you cut off some of the last sentence in the lede: "This configuration lasted throughout the late 1990s, by which point the closure of both Service Merchandise and Montgomery Ward"... I'd fix it but I don't know what you intended to say. :) -- Toughpigs (talk) 23:48, 13 February 2020 (UTC)

Steve Wariner

Hi! Thanks for checking that. Was not aware about the number's under ten nor the POV language. I will keep editing and finish Steve's article today. I will recommend to you before I make any final decisions that you add another paragraph or 2 to the overview of his article. He's had a long career and I think it would be helpful for readers to get a glimpse of that in the overview. Right now, it's not reading like that and more can be added. Also, if you look at other GA music articles, many of the artists that have had long careers have a longer intro. Perhaps you could organize the overview with one paragraph that highlights some of his work from the 80s. Then, a separate paragraph for the 90's/2000's. I think by doing so, it will present his career a little better. ChrisTofu11961 (talk) 19:27, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

• I think I got a little more into the intro. That look better? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:56, 24 February 2020 (UTC)

Intro looks great now. It is now a GA article. Congratulations! ChrisTofu11961 (talk) 02:31, 25 February 2020 (UTC)

This Woman Needs

Hi! Thanks for letting me know about "This Woman Needs". I meant to go back and fix it and I forgot, thanks again. David829 (talk) 11:15, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Tracklisting format

I wanted to invite you to weigh in on a dispute I'm currently having over formatting the tracklisting for Brandy Clark's Your Life Is a Record with another editor who created the page and imposed his own 'style' that it apparently clashes with. Would love to have additional feedback on this matter. See: Talk:Your_Life_Is_a_Record CloversMallRat (talk) 05:17, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Cam (singer) GA nomination

I've reviewed the article Cam (singer) against the GA standards and have placed it on hold. Since Legobot doesn't seem to have sent a message, placing one here to inform you of the review. Hog Farm (talk) 00:55, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Jan Howard

Hello. In case you have not seen already, an article I just cleaned up (Jan Howard) is featured on the main page under the "recent deaths" section. She is also pictured in that section. Hope you are doing well. ChrisTofu11961 (talk) 15:23, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Not Saying

I'm not saying, haha, you did something amiss (re your otter photo). I think I will create a Johnny Slade page and would like your input. Also I guess reply on my talk page, not that it matters but seems fine to me.Snowboard0001 (talk) 08:42, 31 March 2020 (UTC)

Cam

Thanks for finishing. Happy to share credit. Thanks for thinking of me. ChrisTofu11961 (talk) 21:38, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Modernponderer (talk) 14:24, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shooter Jennings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Electric Rodeo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:21, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Steve Buckingham article

Hi, TenPoundHammer. Thanks for your edits on Steve Buckingham (record producer). I need help. An IP editor, 2600:8805:4100:1ae0:15f4:b244:7cad:6d69 has made several unsourced edits, adding juicy tidbits to the article but never an edit summary. The last straw is when he altered and added to a direct quote from a cited source, (which I have corrected). He has no talk page, so how do we communicate with this person to explain these no-no's. Thanks Eagledj (talk) 13:44, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

May 2020

Hello, I'm CrazyBoy826. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Texas Education Agency accountability ratings system have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. CrazyBoy826 16:28, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Discography discussion

Hi TenPoundHammer. I am having a discussion with another user about the reasons behind splitting the Lynn Anderson discography into two separate album and single pages. If you have time, I would love your input in this discussion, since you have done extensive discography work with numerous artists. See the following talk page if you're interested Lynn Anderson discussion and find number 233 in the contents, which is titled "Lynn Anderson discography". ChrisTofu11961 (talk) 23:57, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for your input! We'll see what happens. ChrisTofu11961 (talk) 01:34, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Whiskey myers album.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Whiskey myers album.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:51, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Invite to Revive WikiProject:Shopping Centers!

Hey there, TenPoundHammer! I'm Windyshadow32, a new member of the sadly inactive Wikiproject Shopping Centers. I am trying to revive this project to highlight the unique stories of malls across the country and the world especially as we lose more and more of them. Undoubtedly, we will lose shopping malls due to the challenges we face at this moment. I want to document these stories before it is too late, but I can't do it without your help. I can tell by your contributions to Wikipedia and the extensive list of pages that you have created on the topic that you care about retail and will bring the right insight to the project. I would love to have your assistance in assessing the qualities of the different articles and placing them in the proper categories. Please let me know if you'd be willing to help; I really appreciate it!

Windyshadow32 (talk) 06:35, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Haha

Your edit summary. Please check the Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Fictional elements‎ for more of that stuff, we can always use more input :) --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:11, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marty Stuart, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Burn Me Down.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:14, 13 August 2020 (UTC)

Retail Importance Assessment

Hi TenPoundHammer! Since you're a member of WikiProject: Retailing, wanted to let you know we're currently discussing importance assessment criteria for the project on the talk page. Thanks! Tfkalk (talk) 23:21, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Colonial plaza postcard 1962.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Colonial plaza postcard 1962.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Princenashville.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Princenashville.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:46, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Auld Lang Syne

This article is about the poem/song rather than particular performances thereof. A consensus was reached a long time ago that we'd stop swamping the article with particular recordings and use in particular films - there were just too many of them. I have started a thread on the talk page for the article (actually I seem to have started two) :) We may need to start a list article (Filmography/Discography of ALM or words to that effect)? -Soundofmusicals (talk) 21:28, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

DYK for Tri-City Pavilions

On 23 September 2020, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tri-City Pavilions, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the $10 million Tri-City Mall in Mesa, Arizona, began to lose stores and customers ten years after opening, and even a multimillion-dollar renovation could not save it? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tri-City Pavilions. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Tri-City Pavilions), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 12:02, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Chesney here and now.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Chesney here and now.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of List of minor characters in Peanuts for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of minor characters in Peanuts is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of minor characters in Peanuts (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jontesta (talk) 19:45, 8 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Country Squire, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washboard.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

When you make an AfD non-administrator close please make sure you follow the instructions. Thank you, CapnZapp (talk) 14:58, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

• @CapnZapp: Which one is this in reference to? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:36, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Jmmsnowman.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jmmsnowman.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:34, 31 December 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bigloveinasmalltown.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bigloveinasmalltown.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:26, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The Kinleys.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Kinleys.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:51, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Wikipedia:Noticeboard for Orissa-related topics

Hello TenPoundHammer. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Wikipedia:Noticeboard for Orissa-related topics, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: This page has existed for eight years, but was blanked and MfD'd. Thank you. JJP...MASTER!_{[talk to] JJP... master?} 15:13, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Hey

Are the otters still around? User:Kafka Liz ^{Your wife is less than no one} 01:15, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

• @Kafka Liz: They are everywhere. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:35, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Closure of Papyrus AfD

Hello, I am asking to immediately withdraw the non-admin close of the Papyrus AfD per WP:SUPERVOTE. It's not an appropriate closure as no consensus has been gained as to the article's fate._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 10:19, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Usain Bolt

This article does not seem to meet good article criteria anymore as there are some unsourced claims, some dead links, and the article isn't written very well (a legacy section is desperately needed). It would take a major rewrite to get the article back to GA status, which is why I would suggest starting a GA assessment for the article. X-Editor (talk) 21:55, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

• @X-Editor: That's not my area of expertise, but I'll look into it. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:58, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

@TenPoundHammer: Sounds good. Seeing as it's not your area of expertise, maybe we could get some editors from the Wikiprojects atheltics, running, olympics, and jamaica to work on fixing the article. X-Editor (talk) 22:02, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Steve Azar

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Steve Azar you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. ChrisTofu11961 (talk) 21:23, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sleep ∞ Over

The article Sleep ∞ Over has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No reliable coverage, only passing mentions. Fails WP:MUSICBIO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jalen Folf (talk) 03:25, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mason Dixon (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Rules for Fools (3rd nomination)

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Rules for Fools (3rd nomination), a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Rules for Fools (3rd nomination) (2nd nomination) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Rules for Fools (3rd nomination) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. jp×g 02:50, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Manwithmem.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Manwithmem.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Nicholsxmas.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nicholsxmas.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:59, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Revelationalbum.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Revelationalbum.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:09, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TR life changes.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TR life changes.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:55, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

MfD nomination of a joke AfD you created for April Fools' 2021

Hi, I'm letting you know that I've nominated a joke AfD nomination you created for deletion, as it didn't get significant participation on April Fools'. You can participate in the deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Unfunny AfDs from April Fools 2021. Thanks you. Elli (talk | contribs) 12:53, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Southern Symphony

Hi, I was wondering if you could make an article for Russell Dickerson's album Southern Symphony? I noticed that there wasn't one made after it came out. David829 (talk) 09:25, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

• @David829:  Done Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:47, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Hammond Square Mall

Thank you so much for helping me out expanded that page. Saiff Naqiuddin (talk) 18:05, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Kim Richey

Here's another page you could work your editing magic on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kim_Richey

It's looking pretty paltry, especially in regards to her biography, and doesn't even include a mention of 2019's A Long Way Back: The Songs of Glimmer. 2600:1700:D5E0:73B0:10E1:227:4D3:8D8 (talk) 03:50, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

JeremyLR68

Hi Ten Pound Hammer, regarding the T. Graham Brown discography studio album additions, I have the "From a Stronger Place" album in front of me and can take photos of the front and rear covers and CD. It was self-released by Brown's own label Acme Sounds [Capitol had dropped him several years earlier] and sold at his concerts until stock became depleted. In 2008 the indie Nashville label Aspirion Records re-issued "From a Stronger Place," but that release also went out of print.

There is a May 9, 1996, issue of the Shelby Sun Times available on Newspapers.com where Brown reveals that "'From a Stronger Place' is the title cut from the new album we're finishing up.".

Also, Brown gave a 2011 interview to Medium where he details how he came to record "From a Stronger Place." I have copied and pasted his relevant comments below in three paragraphs.

From a Stronger Place slipped in virtually under the radar.

T Graham Brown: We cut all nine songs in my home studio in 1995 with Steve Wariner and Marty Stuart — good buddies of mine — on guitar and mandolin, respectively. From a Stronger Place contained the original version of “Wine into Water,” and Steve played guitar and sang harmony. It was so good that we had him do it again when we re-cut it in 1998 on the official Wine into Water album. One crazy memory that is burned in my mind…I was upstairs, looked down, and there were two black snakes in the swimming pool. Very strange and it never happened again.

We later went to Hodgenville, Kentucky, best known as the birthplace of Abraham Lincoln, to mix the record at a church turned studio. I remember sleeping in the converted Sunday school classrooms and grilling out on an old grill. The guy had an automated A.M. radio station in the church building. The sanctuary was a big recording room with Iso booths — aka sound isolation — along the perimeter. The control room was where the pulpit and choir space was. There was even a baptismal.

We didn’t spend hardly any money on it, maybe $2,000. We had a few CD’s made and called them “advance copy.” They were only available at my concerts. I would have to look for a bit to find any, because we sold out and didn’t have any more made. It’s a very cool record to have been cut at the house. This was before anyone had Pro Tools on their laptop and could record anywhere there was a mic. In 2008 I decided to release it on a wider scale via Aspirion Records, and you can find it digitally or on CD. Aspirion was a small label in Nashville largely devoted to distribution — getting albums into stores. The label didn’t really do projects or put up much of a budget for them. It’s no longer in existence.

In June 2020 Time Life Music digitally reissued four of Brown's studio albums including "From a Stronger Place."

In October 2020 Brown dropped "Bare Bones," acoustic reimaginings of 12 of his greatest hits courtesy of the same label--Time Life. I am not an expert at adding citations on Wiki so fingers crossed you are able to access each one. Lastly, "Praguefrank's Country Music Discographies" has the most extensive Brown sessionography and discography online.

--Jeremylr68 (talk) 05:12, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia talk:Notability (music) § WP:NSONG

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Notability (music) § WP:NSONG. Erpert ^{blah, blah, blah...} 09:15, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Dirty Heads discography

Please do not remove {{OTD}} from Dirty Heads discography without resolving the issue. Thanks! --Jax 0677 (talk) 11:22, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

Dobie Center

I do not agree with your edits to Dobie Center. I'll try to tweak that section of the article to satisfy your concerns with it you but I'll take this up to ArbCom if necessary. TerraFrost (talk) 23:23, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

I've readded the section as Notable People and have removed the cruft from that section. If you have an issue with a Notable People section then I suggest you also delete University of Texas at Austin#Notable people, List of University of Texas at Austin alumni, List of University of Texas at Austin faculty, Austin, Texas#Notable people, List of people from Austin, Texas, etc TerraFrost (talk) 23:29, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

GAN Backlog Drive - July 2021

Good article nominations | July 2021 Backlog Drive
July 2021 Backlog Drive: This Thursday, July 1, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number, length, and age, of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Sure

Then why list any? Especially those that have closed or are already no longer in business? KansasC785 (talk) 00:46, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

helpful chap

You said a discussion was ongoing, I clicked said notice and it redirected me to nothing KansasC785 (talk) 00:49, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 17

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Billy Yates (singer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KFDN.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

1987 (What the Fuck Is Going On?)

Hi. Any interest in giving this old FA a once over on its talk. Its not a very well remembered record, and I think is refs are probably fine, and would like to grandfather, but as a fan prob have blind spots. Ceoil (talk) 11:01, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:I Hope You Dance (album).jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:I Hope You Dance (album).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:47, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

August for GANs

In case you didn't see it, Comfortable Chair has not been signing on since late July regarding your GAN currently active. ErnestKrause (talk) 14:22, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

Talk:Mickey Guyton/GA1

TenPoundHammer, I noticed that you've been trying to get the attention of The Most Comfortable Chair to get them to return to their review; unfortunately, they haven't edited on Wikipedia at all since July 31, just about a month ago.

How would you like to proceed? After a month, I think we can consider the nomination abandoned by the reviewer; would you like this to go back into the pool of nominations awaiting a reviewer? There would be no loss in seniority, and the nomination would be the oldest of the unreviewed nominations if that were to happen. If you'd like to wait a little longer, we can do that, too: the nomination will be three months old on September 13. Please let me know. Thanks, and I'm sorry for the delays you've had. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:50, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

• @BlueMoonset: That sounds like a plan to me. Go for it. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:59, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

I just heard back from The Most Comfortable Chair on their talk page, and they send apologies for not withdrawing sooner. The nomination is now back in the pool of unreviewed nominations with no loss of seniority, and will show up as the oldest unreviewed nomination after the bot updates the list in about eleven hours. Best of luck in getting a new reviewer soon. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:18, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

September reviews

It seems like your GAN for Mickey Guyton is listed for a longer time than my GAN nomination for the music group BTS. If you could do the review for the BTS article then I could offer to do the review for your nomination to try to move the articles forward. What do you think? ErnestKrause (talk) 15:33, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

• @ErnestKrause: I'll take a look at it, sure. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:21, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Nothing But the Truth

Hi – I noted you removed the notability tag from this article yesterday. I don't disagree that the article has sources, but I question whether any of the sources display any notability for the album. The second and fourth sources are a biography of McAnally and just mention the album in a list of releases. The first source is a primary source interview with McAnally in a local magazine which focuses on his life rather than the album. The third source doesn't appear to mention the album or the artist at all. And the fifth source shows chart positions for the single, which already has its own article, so it's just duplicating the information there. I know you are interested in country music, so do you know of any sources that would show the album itself is actually notable? Richard3120 (talk) 17:09, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

• @Richard3120: I found a pretty substantial writeup on the album in Orange Coast magazine which I added to the article. The album had a major charted single which is also a pretty obvious sign of notability. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 22:36, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Well, I can't say I agree with either of those points, personally – the write-up you talk about is the interview I already mentioned, and I don't think the mention of the album in that article is substantial at all. And I disagree that a major single makes the album notable, that would be WP:INHERITED notability. But I know the artist was certainly notable, so I think there's a good chance that other sources exist in print form from the time. Richard3120 (talk) 23:19, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Walden Galleria construction.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Walden Galleria construction.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 19:18, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Walden sign.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Walden sign.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 19:18, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Heart Shaped World (Jessica Andrews album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Rodriguez.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:You Can't Spell Slaughter Without Laughter.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:You Can't Spell Slaughter Without Laughter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:05, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

The Greencards

This one's at FAR. Progressive bluegrass, not country, but still wondered if you might be interested in giving this one a look. Has good bones, just hasn't been updated for the last 10 years and 2 albums. Hog Farm _Talk 05:45, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Levy's (department store)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Levy's (department store) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. – S. Rich (talk) 02:27, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Beringpages.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Beringpages.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Piratesbest.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Piratesbest.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 29 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Hampton Towne Centre for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hampton Towne Centre is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hampton Towne Centre (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DGG ( talk ) 02:11, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Unused Templates Task Force

Hi, TPH, If you're interested, you can join the Unused Templates Task Force I created which deals with the unused templates backlog since you're active at Tfd's. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:12, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

By the way, since you have helped create a dent in reducing the backlog of unused templates, I created somewhat of a guide to deal with the backlog on the task force's talk page. It's a bit out of date since last week. But if it helps, here it is. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:45, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Decision to close down AfD discussion on "Mile Road System (Michigan)"

Greetings. Your decision to close down the AfD discussion on "Mile Road System (Michigan)" seems to have been rather hasty and also wrong: There was only one single respondent and the proposal has been up for only a week, which is the minimum time required before closing down an AfD but not the maximum time allowed. As it happens, I'd have suggested a Redirect as well, but that's beside the point. The point is not to create a bad precedent and more misuse of WP:BOLD. Plus, you contravened WP:CLOSEAFD: An editor in good standing who is uninvolved may close AfDs in certain circumstances. You were the initiator! You cannot be more involved than that. I'd suggest you re-open the discussion. Take care. -The Gnome (talk) 16:03, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Higher education accreditation

Per comments in the discussion, you really should withdraw this one. Perhaps the article would be better titled as "Accreditation in higher education" to make clear that the title is compound, but I think that there has to have been some misunderstanding for this to have been nominated at all. BD2412 T 18:34, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

XfD and notifying creators

Hi! When you nominate a page for deletion, you're generally expected to notify the creators and/or substantial contributors to that page. For example for the case of TfD, that's step III of WP:TFDHOWTO. When nominating using Twinkle, which you appear to do, the tool will automatically send a talk-page message by default unless it's been told not to. I've notified the creators of Template:Manitoba Interlake and Template:Cursive script, but haven't looked into any of the others. – Uanfala (talk) 16:45, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

• @Uanfala: Sorry about that. I had turned off the notification system because I'd done several in a row by obviously inactive editors and forgot to turn it back on. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 02:00, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

👀

A return to editing... Robert K S (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) AldezD (talk) 04:30, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Seriously, this is just harassment. Robert K S (talk) 19:03, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Hollywood Science

USer:TenPoundHammerI am a bit back up rn but will get to it in a a few weeks. Sooner if possible.Super (talk) 06:21, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Long Black Train

You removed some genres from Long Black Train, but didn't explain why. 2601:C7:C201:C640:6434:F270:9B3C:B5A9 (talk) 18:31, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

Tagging pages for CSD G13s

Hello, TenPoundHammer,

Please review Wikipedia:G13. You are mistagging some user pages with CSD tag when they are not eligible for G13s. Just because pages are abandoned drafts in User space doesn't make them eligible to be deleted as G13s. They need to have an AFC template or no content but Article Wizard placeholder text. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:30, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

GAN Backlog Drive – January 2022

Good article nominations | January 2022 Backlog Drive
January 2022 Backlog Drive: On New Year's Day, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage.
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).

Peso in My Pocket

Hi, I was wondering if you could make an article for Toby Keith's album Peso in My Pocket? There hasn't been one made, thanks. David829 (talk) 09:17, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

• @David829: Took care of that for you. Thanks for asking. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:37, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

Help

I have posted twice on [this talk page] and e-mailed <wikipedialibrary@wikimedia.org> twice, but gotten no response about this.

I signed up for Wikipedia library abount a month ago and have yet to get my login credentials for Newspaper Archive. What's the holdup? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:54, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

holdup? —usernamekiran • sign the guestbook • (talk) 09:02, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

• Admins have no influence over TWL. You could try posting on the talk page of WP:TWL, as that seems more active than the Meta talk page. Katie^talk 11:31, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Category:Songs about divorce

Hi old buddy from years ago! I note you added a song to this category, yet you successfully nominated it for deletion years ago in fact, too long ago to remember. I bring this to your attention because seconds later, and quite coincidently, I have just nominated it for deletion again. --Richhoncho (talk) 00:43, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Malls & Retail Pages

Do you know any mall or retail pages (ideally U.K. based) that need a fair bit of work done to them? --GeekBurst (talk) 20:02, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

@GeekBurst: I don't know of any UK based ones, but a lot of the bigger and more successful malls could still use work in the US. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 20:06, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Is there a list somewhere? --GeekBurst (talk) 20:15, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

I'd say Category:B-Class_Shopping_center_articles and anything less than "B". Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 20:22, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Off Topic: Do you get noticed each time this page is updated and do you have any suggestions on where I could get some username ideas on wiki? I’m thinking I want a name geared towards shopping or something ‘vague’. I’m not really planning to update tech pages, so not sure why I picked this name haha. --GeekBurst (talk) 20:30, 20 February 2022

Hot sam

Hey I’m doing a project over hot sams is there any additional important stuff that you can tell me about the rise and fall of the company that isn’t on its wiki page 2600:387:C:6A1A:0:0:0:2 (talk) 17:43, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

• Pretty much what is already in the article is the best I can give you. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:44, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

The Red Paintings

I'm having trouble with a single-purpose anonymous editor who removes content, which is reliably sourced. Specifically they remove early EPs (prior to moving to Brisbane), they remove the artist's non-performance name.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 21:12, 11 March 2022 (UTC)

Wholesale deletions, the user is not heeding warnings against disruptions. See recent history.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 12:09, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

Actually that information is incorrect as the sources are either broken links or do not relate to the subjects written. Please do more through research before undoing clean up work. Have you actually taken a minute to clock the sources related to the information? Seems not. Alan191919 (talk) 01:36, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

The same user is also removing content at the related artist's release, Cinema Love. See User contributions for 85.56.220.216.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 12:09, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

The saga continues, another user Alan191919 claims to represent Trash McSweeney and has put the article up for a second AfD – two days after the previous was closed as Keep (see here). While that AfD is in process, this user has deleted whole sections from the parent article and related releases (see contributions). Help is needed.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 00:56, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Yes because those sections have no viable sources, look for yourself actually hit the sources links? Also the releases you are referring too have no sources to claim they actually existed. Explain to me how an article can exist on record when their is no reliable record to prove it? Alan191919 (talk) 01:38, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Four-part harmony

Just wanted to add to the chorus, though differing from my initial disposition, your closing of the discussion was correct. I was thinking to change to keep myself, due to the discussion. Hyperbolick (talk) 05:34, 20 March 2022 (UTC)

Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders: Making The Team

I saw your comment on my page, and I can understand that. Although, I do want to know if the section where it was added that the show would be air on another platform is information that should be included and whether it should be added back. Bentheswimmer11 (talk) 23:46, 1 April 2022 (UTC)

ITN recognition for Jeff Carson

On 2 April 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Jeff Carson, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 03:56, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Rez Biz

The article Rez Biz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I created this article in 2008 as a good-faith request from another user, but I don't think it stuck. The sources already in the article are dead and don't seem to have been archived, and I could find no other coverage whatsoever. The award it won is not a notable award.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Never Not Funny Page

Why do you keep deleting the guest list from the Never Not Funny page? The fans find it very useful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DenisRemillard (talk • contribs) 16:48, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Deprodding of All Things Comedy

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from All Things Comedy, which you proposed for deletion. I believe this deletion at least requires some discussion and a more thorough WP:BEFORE. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! TipsyElephant (talk) 15:34, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Hey

We seem to be on the opposite sides of some deletion discussions of late, but I wanted to let you know that for every PROD of yours that I may disagree with, there are a dozen that I nod along with. Cheers! BD2412 T 18:53, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strict (disambiguation)

Hey, Ten,

Please do not tag any pages that get transcluded, like with speedy deletion tags. Doing so causes all of the pages that the page gets trancluded to to also be tagged for speedy deletion and it can be a challenge tracking down the exact page that has the actual CSD tag on it. In cases like this, it might just be easier to ask an admin friend to delete the page rather than having another admin accidentally delete valid pages that mistakenly display a CSD tag. Admins are careful, but we aren't always prefect. ;-) Thanks! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:15, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Music article question

Hey there! Long time no chat. Got a musician-related article question for you, since I know that's your thing. I'm trying to spur myself into doing some content work, and eyeing up Marcus King as something I think I can push up into GA range with a little work. But, some of the material I'd like to use finds itself over on The Marcus King Band. I'm not totally sure if having two articles is the best idea; he's the bandleader for the MKB, and the band members don't seem to be notable in and of themselves. Would it be your opinion that merging the material from the MKB page to his article and redirecting would be the right way to handle this? If so, I'm going to start an offline rewrite with that in mind. Thanks! Tony Fox (arf!) 05:16, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

• I'd say combine to whatever name seems to be in more common usage. This seems a similar case to Charlie Daniels vs. Charlie Daniels Band. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:37, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

  Great, thanks, I'll see what I can do! Tony Fox (arf!) 16:17, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

Deprodding of The Naughty Show

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from The Naughty Show, which you proposed for deletion. I removed the PROD because the contents of the article could be merged into Sam Tripoli or the All Things Comedy network if those articles are kept. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! TipsyElephant (talk) 17:41, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

removing links to an article that still exist

If the article still exist, you shouldn't go through removing all links to it. You going around removing links to it reduces how many people will go to that article and see its at AFD again, and participate. Since you are the one that sent it to the current AFD, that does look bad. Please revert yourself. It takes too long for anyone else to do it one article at a time. Dream Focus 15:53, 7 April 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited National awakening of Romania, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National awakening.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

New article

Would you be able to take a quick look at Goodbye Normal Street? My first attempt at writing an album article - would've had somebody look at it before moving to namespace, but needed it to be out of my userspace to add the non-free album cover. Turnpike's article shows more charts and a sales figure, but I'm not entirely sure where to find good information on that. I'm sure the writing's rough, but at least it's a start-class supported by three solid newspaper pieces and an AllMusic professional review. Hog Farm _Talk 23:15, 9 April 2022 (UTC)

• @Hog Farm: Looks quite good. Only thing I'd say is make sure you use the full names of the songwriters the first time they appear in the track list (unless you need the first initial or full name to avoid ambiguity). Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:25, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
  • Thanks for taking a look! Not sure if your taste in country extends to Turnpike or not, but my favorites from the album are "Gin, Smoke & Lies", "Wrecked", and "Good Lord Lorrie". Hog Farm _Talk 00:51, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Notice of noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding issues with which you have been involved. Dream Focus 03:07, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Rezbiz logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rezbiz logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Where We Started

Hi, I was wondering if could make an article for Thomas Rhett's Where We Started album, thanks again. David 829 (talk) 11:54, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Bettie James Gold Edition

Hi, I was wondering if you could make an article for Jimmie Allen's album Bettie James Gold Edition, thanks. David829 (talk) 09:32, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

 Done Bettie James Gold Edition now has an article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:51, 14 April 2022 (UTC)

Help

Can someone help me with the {{infobox person}} on Janie Fricke? For some reason, the {{infobox musical artist}} content isn't displaying inside of it and I can't figure out for the life of me what's going on. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:32, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

That seems to have been resolved in this edit. — LauritzT (talk) 04:39, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Five Finger Death Punch discography

The "Compilation albums", "Singles" and "Rarities" at Five Finger Death Punch discography still need references with proper dates. Please do not remove tags without solving the issue. --Jax 0677 (talk) 01:11, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

I fixed the dates. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:11, 17 April 2022 (UTC)

Deprodding of I'm with the Band

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from I'm with the Band, which you proposed for deletion. I've added a reference to another book review.. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! Schazjmd (talk) 16:59, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al-Mawrid (2nd nomination)

Hi - I suspect you've read which way the wind's blowing correctly, nevertheless I would recommend self-reverting here and leaving open for another to close. Less than 24 hours is possibly too little time, but the larger concern is WP:INVOLVED. WP:NACD does indicate not to close where one has expressed an opinion. Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 21:11, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

I thought you were allowed to close AFDs if you withdrew? This seems needlessly bureaucratic. I can't foresee anyone disagreeing to three votes for "redirect" in under 24 hours, so what good would it do to reopen it? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:15, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi - a withdrawal equals keep, so it cannot be closed as redirect. Even a withdrawal (as keep) should not be self-closed. I did have a look at this very briefly, it's an organisation claiming international branches in multiple countries, I'm not totally convinced it's an open and shut case. Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 21:21, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

This still seems pointless, but I reopened the AFD anyway. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:22, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

Thank you. Apologies if I appear WP:BURO. Regards, --Goldsztajn (talk) 21:26, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

Dan Shafer

Hello, TenPoundHammer,

When I was closing the AFD for this article and looking at the page history, I was surprised to see that it was you who decided that the article was in good enough shape to move it from Draft space to main space. Did your opinion of the sourcing change over time? I was just surprised to see the change of opinion over the past 7 months. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:45, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

I moved it to article space after a good-faith request from the article's subject. Then I came across the article again later on and re-evaluated it. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 22:48, 24 April 2022 (UTC)

You were contacted by the article subject? That's unusual. Thanks for the explanation. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:23, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Added more sources for the article, Starveillance

Hi, TenPoundHammer. I noticed that the article that you wanted to delete was the article, Starveillance due to having no sources. I had to add more possible sources including the ones that you removed to improve the article. I sorry I did it, I just wanted to fix the article to prevent it from being deleted.--VictorRocks (talk) 17:23, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

PRODs

Hello, again, TenPoundHammer,

If you look at Category:Proposed deletion as of 24 April 2022, you'll see that there are 269 articles that were PROD'd this day. That is quite a lot more than a typical day which is between about 15-50 articles that are PROD'd. I know you aren't responsible for all of these pages but you PROD'd quite a lot of them!

There's really only two admins who review PRODs these days and each article that is tagged needs to be reviewed individually to make sure it is eligible for proposed deletion. If you could pace yourself and PROD fewer articles each day but over more days, that would help us manage the workload a little better. There is no rush with deleting unnecessary articles and so if you again find a lot of these articles in the future, please think about tagging 10-20/day over a week rather than 100+ on one day.

Also, you really need to post a notification for each of these articles on the talk page of the article creator. I see you use Twinkle, so make sure that the "Notify page creator" box is checked off every time you tag a page for any type of deletion (CSD, PROD, AFD/TFD/CFD/etc.). This is an important step in the deletion process that shouldn't be skipped. Thank you for doing this with each deletion tagging in the future.

This is a message coming from me, as one of the two admins who regularly review PRODs and I'm just speaking for myself. Reviewing proposed deletions is just one of the tasks I do each day and I can see that next Sunday will be a busy one! Thanks again. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:08, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Yeah, I kinda fell down a rabbit hole full of short-lived TV show articles and just didn't know when to stop. A few of them have already been contested. I'll pace myself next time I find a stretch like that. (I've got my eye on the {{history shows}} articles, but I'll pace myself on those.) Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:00, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

I'm working on a list of articles I plan to prod and I'll spread them out over the next however many days so as not to overwhelm the queue.

Also I've found that like 80% of the articles I've nominated, the article creator was clearly no longer editing, so in those cases I saw no reason to notify the creator. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:55, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

I don’t understand; you were just asked stop with all the prods, so now you switched to a frenzy of AFDs? And why are so many of them Food Network series? Erpert ^{blah, blah, blah...} 10:04, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Because they are unsourced stubs for which I could find no sources? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:06, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

Also, as pointed out in the AFDs I did nominate, Liz's issues had nothing whatsoever to do with AFD. Are there 300+ television AFDs currently running with my name attached? No. Was my rationale valid? Clearly it must be if others are agreeing that the articles I nominated should be deleted. I also hardly think that fewer than five Food Network shows is "so many". Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:12, 27 April 2022 (UTC)

A much deserved thank you

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		Hello TPH. Your work here at the 'pedia is always appreciated. When you take the time to create something like this you truly deserve this barnstar. Best regards and many thanks MarnetteD|Talk 02:46, 28 April 2022 (UTC)

TV prods

I'm on my smartphone on vacation at a pool and just checked in to see you PROD the ESPN adaptation of The Bronx is Burning. You said you found nothing but PR sources, but, on my phone at a pool, I can see sources like this on the first page of Google results for "The Bronx is Burning" + "John Tuturro". The editor who complained about your PRODs at RFUD may have a point about your WP:BEFORE searches can use work. I can dig into the archives for better sources when I'm back at my laptop. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:40, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

I was going off what newspapers.com gave me, which was nothing but TV Guide listings out the ass. My fault for not checking ProQuest, which immediately gave multiple good sources that I added. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 20:42, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

These nominations remain absurd. Can an Admin please move to topic-ban this clearly incompetent editor. Nfitz (talk) 22:18, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

"Clearly incompetent". Yes, so incompetent that I've spent far more time improving articles than nominating any. Like this, this, and this. Not to mention all the AFDs I've made that have closed as "delete", or the two GAs and two DYKs I've got in the pipeline. Yes, all clearly the work of an "incompetent" editor who needs to be "banned" for "lying". Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:39, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

Nfitz, mind WP:NPA. That went too far. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:53, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

@Muboshgu: I've already filed the ANI. Seems I'm not the only editor Nfitz is hounding. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:55, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

I'll head over there. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:58, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

I do see some hits on Newspapers.com too.[59][60][61] I admit I'm biased as a Yankees fan, but I remember this getting press, given the involvement of Turturro and Platt, back in the day. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:58, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

I already threw a few sources into the Bronx Is Burning article. Again, that was my fault for not including Proquest, but my first scan of newspapers.com gave me nothing but TV Guide listings. It's clearly notable. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 00:59, 9 May 2022 (UTC)

DYK for Black Opry

On 10 May 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Black Opry, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Black Opry is a website and musical revue that helps raise awareness of Black artists in country music? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Black Opry. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Black Opry), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Full Blown Rose

Hello, TenPoundHammer,

I just deleted this article that you PROD'd and noticed that you didn't post a notification on the talk page of the page creator. Do you make this decision in each case based on whether or not the page creator is an active editor?

Considering how busy you are with tagging pages for different types of deletion, I think it would be simplest if you just set up your Twinkle Preferences to always "Notify page creator" and let Twinkle take care of this in each case, whether or not the editor is still active on Wikipedia. I don't mean to be overly bureaucratic but just doing it, as a rule, is like using your turn signals when you drive whether or not there is a car behind you, it's just a good practice and habit to maintain. Also, some editors might be currently inactive but they set up their Wikipedia Preferences so that they get an email message if someone posts a note to their talk page so there is always a chance, perhaps remote, that they could be notified and come back to improve an article. You never know, it could happen!

Thanks for all of your work on the project, by the way....I don't know how you come across so many marginal articles that either need a little bit of help or to be removed from the encyclopedia. I see your work every day when I patrol CSD categories, look over PROD lists or cruise through the day's AFD log, you are very active and while I don't always agree with your evaluation of articles and their potential improvement, I do appreciate the effort and care you put into the time you spend here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:45, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Sometimes I think it forgets to notify because I reload the page too quickly after prodding or something? Other times I know that the article creator is no longer active and I guess I forget to turn it back on for later ones. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:52, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

See, it did it again. Livin' for the Apocalypse, I had "notify creator" turn on and it still didn't do so. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:17, 11 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Bureau of Sabotage for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bureau of Sabotage is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bureau of Sabotage until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

–LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 09:49, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kit 'n' Carlyle

The article Kit 'n' Carlyle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable comic, thin sourcing at best. I created this ages ago but given its age, G7 might not be justified.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peepoodo & the Super Fuck Friends (2nd nomination)

I have thought long and carefully about if I should write this, if I can find the right words to convey this with kindness, I hope that tone comes through.

Regarding this AfD, there are three things that I wanted to give you feedback on:

1. You seem to have started the AfD on the incorrect belief that the previous and recent AfD only brought up a weak source. It did not, it brought up a reliable, academic source. (A careful reading of the earlier AfD makes that clear)
2. You seem to have doubts about the reliability of a peer reviewed academic source, perhaps because it was written by a PhD student. As others have pointed out robustly, peer reviewed academic sources are generally considered to be ideally suited as sources for an encyclopaedia. I notice that you've not replied to others pointing that out.
3. The fact that this was SNOWBALL closed as keep by the original AfD nominator just a few weeks ago, I suggest, is a worthy of your note and I think if you nominate something so soon after a SNOWBALL keep, there is an onus on your to ascertain why that happened.

With the greatest of humbleness, I ask you to reflect if maybe you are rushing? You nominate a lot of articles for deletion. Many of them succeed. You remove a lot of content. I urge you to take care. And I thank you for your obvious huge effort to improve Wikipedia. CT55555 (talk) 18:37, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Charlestowne Mall

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Charlestowne Mall you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.

Looks like Legobot fell asleep at the wheel and forgot to ping you, I'm just copying and pasting its normal message. My review comments are available at Talk:Charlestowne Mall/GA1, feel free to respond when you can. Etriusus 00:05, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

ty

you're doing the wiki-lords work here. Thank you for saying what we've all been wondering. PRAXIDICAE💕 21:50, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

I may be breaking a few eggs to make an omelette, but it seems some people are bound and determined to throw the eggshells back in. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:54, 21 May 2022 (UTC)

AFD formatting

Hi there, just asking you because you seem to be active in AFD - after closing a discussion, it screwed up the formatting of the log? The entire page is now blue. Templates all seem fine, yet when I remove Derick Hall and preview changes, it goes back to how it is meant to be. Any thoughts? MaxnaCarter (talk) 03:22, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

You forgot to put a {{ab}} at the bottom of the discussion page. I fixed it. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:25, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Was about to come and and say further closures fixed it, but looks like you fixed it. Thanks a lot. MaxnaCarter (talk) 03:31, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Too many proposed deletions and AfD nominations. Canvassing.

Hi TenPoundHammer. According to this contributions link, between 12 May 2022 and 30 May 2022, you nominated 637 articles for proposed deletion (based on a search of "Notification: proposed deletion"). In the same time period, you created 183 articles for deletion discussions (based on a search of "Creating deletion discussion page"). This is at too fast of a rate. You are averaging 35 proposed deletions a day and 10 AfD nominations a day. I am unable to keep up with finding sources for the deletion discussions listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Television. I have had several articles I have wanted to write but have not written. I have instead spent a significant portion of my time participating in the large number of television AfD discussions to find sources so that articles about notable television series are not deleted.

I have concerns about the quality and accuracy of the AfD arguments based on my comment here and Artw (talk · contribs)'s comments here and here. Please significantly slow down the number of nominations you are making. I think seven seven proposed deletions per week and seven AfD nominations per week would be more reasonable numbers. Would you be willing to reduce the number of deletion nominations to what I have suggested?

I have concerns about canvassing. In a large of AfD nominations for "List of people on the postage stamps" such as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of people on the postage stamps of Jordan, you pinged two editors who had previously supported deletion of "List of people on the postage stamps" articles but who had had no prior involvement in the "List of people on the postage stamps of Jordan" article. You did not ping or notify DGG (talk · contribs), who had removed the proposed deletion you had added. You did not ping the editors from this AfD who had worked on improving the "List of people on the postage stamps of the Faroe Islands" article. Cunard (talk) 23:35, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

I started a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#TenPoundHammer: prods and AfDs (permanent link). Cunard (talk) 07:39, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

People on postage stamps

Relizing that the German list included Adolf Hitler made me realize something. If there is any encyclopedic value to these lists, and I doubt there is, they need to be organized by year, not alphabetically. Of course, that will in a lot of cases lead to clutter of some monarchy being listed in lots of years. How many years have stamps bearing the likeness of Elizabeth II been issued? Any article that remains I think should be reordered to list the context by year, not alphabetically. That lists can stand for 19 years without sources (March 2003 to May 2022 is actually a little over 19 years) makes me unhopeful that there can ever be enough maintenance on these lists to justify them.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:49, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

Vote

Hi, Can you tell me where I voted several times here? I have only a vote, deleted by you, and discussions. Discussions are not votes. Please revert the deletion. Turbojet (talk) 18:08, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

A thought on PRODs.

I'm not here to tell you how to go about your business, but I think a lot of these one-shot shows built around a reasonably notable host/star could more easily be merged/redirected to the article on that person. I am specifically thinking here about Elvira's Halloween Special (which I have proposed to redirect to Cassandra Peterson#Filmography), and Capitol Gains (which I have proposed to merge to Peter Barnes (journalist)). PROD and AFD can invite an almost instinctive opposition based on the sheer desire to keep things in the encyclopedia. Merge proposals, and perhaps even redirect proposals, I think, do not, since they are more about moving content around than about eliminating it. BD2412 T 22:09, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

I'm always gunshy on redirects because I've had way too many instances of people reverting them literally less than two seconds after I make them. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 22:10, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Well if you do it speedily, yes. However, if you put {{merge to}} and {{merge from}} templates on the respective articles, and open a talk page discussion proposing the merge (with more or less the same rationale as you would put into a deletion discussion), then wait a week or so, you can then accurately say that you made the proposal and no one contested it. I generally frame merge proposals for things like this along the lines of a merge until additional content develops to justify breaking out again, which I think is a particurly strong position to take, since it's not absolute. BD2412 T 22:17, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

• Could you provide a link to a diff of any of the "too many instances of people reverting them literally less than two seconds after I make them" that you refer to above? Thanks! Jacona (talk) 16:27, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Piratesdixie.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Piratesdixie.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

An unsouced article for over 17 years has someone argue there is evidence for keeping it

This is just boggling my mind. List of people on the postage stamps of Italy has been unsourced for over 17 years. What evidence says we should keep the article? What evidence exists on an unsoured article? This is getting crazy.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:08, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

These AFDs seem to have brought out the philately nerds. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 22:32, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

I suppose they have just as uch a right to their share as the many other more troublesome varieties of nerds (everyone has their own choices here) . And I do not see why you say undocumentable . Every comprehensive philatant source includes hem as a matter of course. Most have articles here. The few that don't ate the sort ofred links that can correct for systematic bias. (I suppose I should mention I lost interest in this field in hgih school and gave my collection to my younger cousin.) Jusr as the images on coinage are a major field of academic study as an auzxiliary to history, so is this. DGG ( talk ) 07:41, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

Words, words, words. Too bad that there is no evidence for most countries that this is a "major field of academic study", or that "most have articles here" is not really true or relevant, as most had dreadful articles here which finally get deleted, despite your indiscriminate deproddings. Fram (talk) 07:56, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

• The article in question is still without sources. Then there was the really nasty comment left on the discussion of List of people on postage stamps of Israel, that amounted to a very rude personal attack against me. I also noticed that DGG's comment comes off as totally incomprehenisble since there are so many misspelled words, including high. Being a long time observer of Wikipia it is obvious to me that Philatelycruft needs to have the brakes put on it, just as we put the brakes on Starwarscruft and Lordoftheringscruft among many others. The level of coverage we currently has is totally out of connection with what is actually justified by what can be found in reliable sources.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:59, 2 June 2022 (UTC)

  I think once the dust settles and the outstanding AFDs are closed, the ones closed as keep need to be re-evaluated. (I think @RandomCanadian jumped the gun by re-nominating the Faroe Islands one so quickly.) Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 14:49, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

• I have to say this is one of two things that have distracted me from doing what I really want to do, which is to get through reviewing Category:1901 births. The other is an ANI which was originally about an editor falsely accusing me of targeting his articles for deletion, but has now somehow turned into a proposal that would essentially ban me from nominating virtually any Olympian article for deletion. Evidently punishing the victim of uncivil behavior is perfectly acceptable on Wikipedia.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:29, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

BADNAC

This is entirely unacceptable. WP:INVOLVED applies to AfD NACs just as much as anything else. Obviously, you thought it was an OK thing to do, so... yeah. You really shouldn't be making NACs, given that thought process. I'm going to DRV this, regardless of whether or not you revert yourself, to get some eyes on your actions. Cheers, Jclemens (talk) 01:38, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

What point would there be in dragging it out? Literally everyone said to redirect, so I saw no point in letting it continue. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:41, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Deletion review for Darkover (TV series)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Darkover (TV series). Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Jclemens (talk) 01:44, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pam Tillis, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Avon and Broadway.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:06, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

List of people on postage stamps of the Czech Republic

I nominated List of people on postage stamps of the Czech Republic for proposed deletion. You endorsed this. Someone else removed it. I am not sure it is worth bringing to AfD until a few more current discussions on similar articles close. The fact that it is sitting longer and longer with no sources is not good for Wikipedia though. I also find it interesting that an alledgely "mythological" knight is one the list, one who we even lack an article for.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:55, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of List of sexual orientations for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of sexual orientations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of sexual orientations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Reaching out since you endorsed the prod. Happy Editing--IAmChaos 01:51, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:26, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

People on postage stamps lists

Thankyou for your contributions to the deletion process. I have actually found one of these articles that has existed on Wikipedia for over 20 years without a source. This is probably a record, since I am not sure Wikipedia is actually fully 21 years old.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:58, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

Which one was it? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:58, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

• • The parent article Lists of people on postage stamps.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:39, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
• That list pre-dates all the others. It started out as an attempt to list everyone who ever appeared on a postage stamp anywhere. This was its first opening paragraph. "Although many smaller countries will put a hodge-podge of international personalities on their stamps in an effort to make sales to collectors, countries with a more respectable issuing policy will more often feature people who have played an important role in the country's own history and culture. For a Wikipedian, a list of such people can be a source of inspiration to find more obscure topics to write about."John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:41, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

DYK for NetPark Tampa Bay

On 8 June 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article NetPark Tampa Bay, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that East Lake Square, a failed shopping mall in Tampa, Florida, was converted into a business park known as NetPark Tampa Bay in 1999? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/NetPark Tampa Bay. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, NetPark Tampa Bay), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:02, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Something in the Orange

The article Something in the Orange has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Songs appears non notable. 3 of the sources are Billboard...which is irrelevant because just charting does not automatically mean there should be an article for it. The USA Today source just says that the song is on a Spotify playlist. The CMT article mentions the song in passing, but the article is about the artist, not the song. The Rolling Stone article give a small capsule review of the song, not in-depth enough to count towards notability. Alternate to deletion would be a redirect to the album.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 18:58, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

Edits at List of awards and nominations received by The Wire

We seem to be going back and forth on wording in the lead here. Your initial edit called the section "POV", which doesn't make sense by itself – it's perfectly acceptable to cite opinions as long as they are attributed (which the lead does by remarking "Many have called..." and citing four independent sources). After I undid it, you then deleted it again and called it "subjective" and "fan-like". Again, subjectivity shouldn't be an issue since this is well-sourced, and issues with tone don't justify deletion. I'm open to suggestions for different wording, but when reliable sources say "The Wire might forever be the biggest Emmy snub of all time" and "This might be Exhibit A in the case against the validity of the Primetime Emmy Awards", outright removal feels unjustified. Thoughts? RunningTiger123 (talk) 00:03, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

New message from Robert McClenon

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:ARC. I have listed you as a proposed party to an arbitration case concerning Conduct During Deletion Discussions. As we know, ArbCom may or may not accept a case. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:24, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Elvira Kralj

Elvira Kralj is the first article I have ever seen that lead with mention the subject was on a stamp. This person may be notable, but we need better sourcing and more substance to show that.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:42, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

British TV

Hello, TenPoundHammer,

I was noticing all of these empty categories for American TV in the 1920s and tracked them down to articles that were deleted in an AFD you started for articles that they use to contain. If you are interested in this subject, there are similar articles for 1920s British TV that you might want to look over in Category:Television in the United Kingdom by year. I still think a merger of these articles into one for a decade might be more useful than an outright deletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:49, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

I'll take a look at them, but I literally never seem to get results when I make merge proposals. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:52, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

Beat Charlie Moore

In your prod for Beat Charlie Moore, you said Zero results on ProQuest, Newspapers.com, or GNews. Not even directory/TV Guide type results.

I'm not sure how you failed to get results with Newspapers.com. In addition to hundreds of TV schedule listings (I gave up after 50 pages of results), I also found these following refs. As Moore's article states, From 2004 to 2010, Moore hosted ESPN's Beat Charlie Moore, which was the sports network's top-rated outdoors show (bold mine), supported by Boston Magazine. And on ProQuest, I found that Chuck Woolery won an Emmy for his guest appearance on Beat Charlie Moore. I'll remove the prod and do some work on the article later with these sources. (I know my first ref displays an error, I have to figure out how to include a URL for each page.) Schazjmd (talk) 17:16, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

If a newspaper article is split between two pages, I just link the first one and put both page names in the "page" field. I legitimately got nothing but directory listings after checking every page of ProQuest and, like you, found nothing but 50 pages of directory listings mixed in with a few false positives. Good work. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:27, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

References

Category:Shopping malls by management company

Hi, following your nomination that is currently relisted at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2022 June 8#Category:Shopping malls by management company, I added some questions. I did not mean to torpedo the whole idea, but if you don't reply it looks like it will go nowhere. Just notifying you again in case you missed the initial ping. – Fayenatic London 10:29, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Luckiestman.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Luckiestman.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 13:28, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom case request

FYI, at the currently open RFAR (WP:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Requests for arbitration), there are people suggesting you be added as a party to the case. I'm just the messenger, I've no opinion either way. I just noticed that it appeared you hadn't been informed. If you have been informed somewhere, sorry for the extra notice. --Floquenbeam (talk) 19:39, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

I think I was informed before, but I feel no reason to contribute here. To my eyes, the discussion has gotten so far out of hand that I feel there's nothing I could contribute. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 19:51, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

False HAMMERs

I recently spotted a dispute at Untitled Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles film and thought, "oh boy, that looks like a textbook WP:HAMMER" - but I can't in all good conscience send it to AfD as it's got too many sources to Variety, for one thing. Elsewhere I see Untitled Marvel Halloween special, Untitled fifth Indiana Jones film and Untitled Nas album. Have things started changing so that reliable sources are more likely to cover works in progress (possible if they've all been stalled because of COVID) or are these just exceptions to the rule? Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 15:42, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

WP:HAMMER always had exceptions. That's why I said "likely". Even from the beginning, I added a notable exception. Also, the Untitled Nas album isn't a WP:HAMMER, as it was releasexd in 2008 and officially has no title. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:46, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Oh right - shouldn't it be Untitled (Nas album) then? Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 15:47, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

It's not called "Untitled" though; it really is untitled. I'm fine with the title as is. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:50, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Single charts

I've seen plenty of articles on albums that include charts for the album's singles. Personally, I think that these charts are useful, and even if it's more common for articles not to have these charts than to have them, I think it makes a lot of sense to have them. Is there a specific policy against them? Jpcase (talk) 21:03, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

My interpretation of Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums/Album_article_style_advice#Charts is that it should only include the albums charts such as Top Country Albums or Billboard 200. To include the singles charts too is redundant to the artist discography and prone to clutter, especially if the artist has made a large number of charts. The chart info should be contained on the discography table and the articles of individual songs where applicable. Furthermore, if you look at good or featured articles on albums, such as 1989 (Taylor Swift album), they do not include the singles discographies in the album article proper. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:07, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums/Album_article_style_advice#Charts doesn't say that you should "only" include album charts. It leaves the matter open-ended. Personally, I don't think it makes the article cluttered. It's nice having all of that information together in one place. I don't really edit articles about albums that often, but whenever I read those articles, I'm generally interested in knowing how any album's singles charted, and it's nice not having to navigate to a separate discography article for that information. So I'm always glad whenever I see that chart info about singles has been included in an album's article. --Jpcase (talk) 21:25, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Arbitration case opened

You were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conduct_in_deletion-related_editing. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conduct_in_deletion-related_editing/Evidence. Please add your evidence by July 9, 2022, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conduct_in_deletion-related_editing/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, firefly ( t · c ) 11:14, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Upcoming Meghan Trainor album

Hi! The same user has created another article for Meghan Trainor's yet-untitled upcoming album at MT4* (Placeholder). I wanted to ask what should be done with it, since WP:G4 does not apply(?). Does it need to go through a whole AfD or is there something quicker?--NØ 12:08, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Deletion review for Hablemos de Salud

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Hablemos de Salud. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:04, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

June 2022

Hello, I'm Northamerica1000. I noticed that you recently removed content from Talk:Ty Herndon without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.

• Please do not remove user commentary from talk pages. See WP:TPO for more information, where it states, "The basic rule, with exceptions outlined below, is to not edit or delete others' posts without their permission." North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:08, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

topic ban

No time frame was set for any appeal of this sanction, but the usual advice is to wait at least six months, and of course there is the arbitration case complicating matters. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:33, 20 June 2022 (UTC)

Extra sources on discographies

Hi. Not sure if you intended to also remove the Australian source below the chart position along with the US charts (which have updated) on Luke Combs discography, but the chart position is not in the citation at the top of the column yet so I've restored it otherwise it was left unsourced. If you did intend to remove it, please check to make sure australian-charts.com or whichever other chart column it is has updated with the data first. Thanks. Ss112 05:08, 28 June 2022 (UTC)

Deprodding of Solar eclipse of April 23, 2191

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from Solar eclipse of April 23, 2191, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! 🪐Kepler-1229b | talk | contribs🪐 19:33, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Threat made against you at English Vikidia

Good morning TenPoundHammer. I'm Christian, an administrator of the English Vikidia. We've had a threat made against you this morning, which I have deleted and hidden. It was made on a user page for you, but you're marked as not registered on our site.

The threat used offensive language about you, and the poster intimated that they wanted you to leave Wikipedia or they would get you "excluded" from the site. I will protect the user page and talk page for your username, and ensure they can't be used.

If you have any questions, please post them here as I also contribute to this Wikipedia (occasionally, but not much!)

Regards,

Dane|Geld 06:48, 8 July 2022 (UTC)

Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society

Dear TenPoundHammer/Archive 14,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more. ​

Best regards, Jax 0677 (talk) 05:34, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for the deletion nominations

I'm greatly enjoying going through all of your deletion nominations on webcomics. Going through the sources, learning about webcomics I haven't read, getting drawn back into Wikipedia, I really appreciate that you did this. Cutting cruft also makes the Webcomics WikiProject better overall. Deleting articles can be a thankless job and it's sad to see some of these articles go away, but it's for the best and I wanted to let you know how much I value this :) ~Maplestrip/Mable (chat) 18:43, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Oh hey

Remember Richard M.? I finally got around to properly filing for his deletion off Wikidata (as well as all his relatives), and was able to point to your 2018 edit-filter request as supporting material. DS (talk) 03:29, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

• @DragonflySixtyseven: Not sure who that is. Remind me? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:54, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
  • This guy.Not a good idea to mention his full name, I think, as he may at some point search for himself. DS (talk) 13:24, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Rapid fire deletions without due diligence and your prior AN/I

As a heads up you appear to be recreating the behavior that led to this previous AN/I - rapid fire deletions in a particular field without due care and attention. Of particular concern to me are this prod [62] and this AfD[63] two where it is particularly obvious you have done no investigation despite a claim of WP:BEFORE. Given the rapid pace at which you are blanking/prodding/AfDing webcomics articles I am sure there are more. I would request that you slow down and take more care - if not the matter may be raised at AN/I again with the addition of the false claims you've made since the close of the last one (and the close of evidence gathering from the resulting arbComm.) Artw (talk) 16:17, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Today's Business

This article which you PRODded in May and was deleted has been raised at DRV, and therefore speedily restored. Stifle (talk) 08:22, 22 July 2022 (UTC)

Proposed decision posted

Hi TenPoundHammer, in the open Conduct in deletion-related editing arbitration case, a remedy or finding of fact has been proposed which relates to you. Please review this decision and draw the arbitrators' attention to any relevant material or statements. Comments may be brought to the attention of the committee on the proposed decision talk page. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Barkeep49 (talk) 01:20, 23 July 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conduct in deletion-related editing closed

An arbitration case Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conduct in deletion-related editing has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

• 7&6=thirteen (talk · contribs) is topic banned from deletion discussions, broadly construed.
• Johnpacklambert (talk · contribs) is banned from taking the following actions: (1) participating in deletion discussions, broadly construed; (2) proposing an article for deletion ("PRODing"), but not contesting a proposed deletion ("de-PRODing"); and (3) turning an article into a redirect.
• Lugnuts (talk · contribs) is warned against making personal attacks, engaging in battleground behavior in deletion discussions, and other disruptive deletion behavior.
• Lugnuts is banned from taking the following actions: (1) participating in deletion discussions, broadly construed; (2) contesting a proposed deletion ("de-PRODing"); and (3) creating articles that comprise less than 500 words, including converting redirects into articles.
• Lugnuts is indefinitely banned from Wikipedia.
• TenPoundHammer (talk · contribs) is topic banned from deletion discussions, broadly construed.
• The Arbitration Committee requests comment from the community on how to handle mass nominations at Articles for Deletion.

For the Arbitration Committee, -- Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 22:02, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conduct in deletion-related editing closed

Your Wikimedia Commons page

I just reverted an edit that someone put on your Wikimedia Commons page. It was an insulting comment they left for you. So I reverted it.  :) Beauty School Dropout (talk) 01:28, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Ray Herndon external link

Why did you take it out?Mwinog2777 (talk) 07:59, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Deceptive edit summaries

Please do not leave deceptive edit summaries, as you did here. Note that I'm not necessarily disagreeing with the content of the edit, just your lying edit summary. It's rude to other editors and a violation of policy. Thank you. 16:32, 3 September 2022 (UTC) Sundayclose (talk) 16:32, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

One time collaborators

Regarding this, not that I really care, but none of these are one time collaborators. Jelly Roll has two albums in collaboration with Haystak, two albums with Lil Wyte and four (!) albums in collaboration with Struggle Jennings. I thought this qualifies them as related, but I'll leave that for you to decide. Happy editing! --Muhandes (talk) 00:25, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Good Person

Hi, I was wondering if you can make an article for Ingrid Andress' album Good Person? Thanks. David829 (talk) 21:07, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Recent Dwight edit

Your edit about Dwight's two singles in 2016 makes the following sentence kind of awkward - "A year after this albums's release...", but I'm not going to try to change it. -- Pete Best Beatles (talk) 01:22, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

"Leave The Light On" by Bailey Zimmerman

I'm not sure if you are somebody who appreciates notifications like this. But I noticed that "Leave the Light On" by Bailey Zimmerman does not yet have an article. I don't know how notability works with country albums, but I figured that since it hit the top 10 of the BB200 and has three top 40 hits that it would probably also qualify as notable. I saw you created the pages for the album's two big songs, and figured you may want to create that album page too. I'd do it myself, but don't really know how. Nikki Lee 1999 (talk) 17:44, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

I haven't found any reviews or anything of it yet, but it is on my to-do list. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:27, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Out in the Middle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roots music.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 29 October 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ps shake.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ps shake.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ps thehits.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ps thehits.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Youhavetheright.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Youhavetheright.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mcbridepromo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mcbridepromo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Erskine Village, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Statler Brothers 1 web artist.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Statler Brothers 1 web artist.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 03:18, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

@Whpq: as I am topic banned from XFDs, so thanks for pointing this out. I was worried the photo was going to be deleted entirely for some obscure reason, but turns out it may actually be the opposite. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:20, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

I've added a clarification. I cannot establish that the photo you used is a publicity photo with no copyright notice. That would need to be established in order to keep that specific photo -- Whpq (talk) 03:25, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

@Whpq: I have no idea why the image was deleted. You weren't calling for deletion here. There was no argument for deletion made. Can you explain and maybe help me find an image that would meet fair use? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 20:00, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

I identified in the nomination that at least one free image of the group exists. So if used as non-free, the image you uploaded is replaceable with a free image. Many publicity photos from that era are public domain but you have to provo it. I could not b establish that for the photo you uploaded so a license change to PD was not possible. -- Whpq (talk) 22:57, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

@Whpq: Would this one be viable? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:26, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Yes, it would qualify as {{PD-US-no notice}}. It is usually a good idea in these cases to upload the back of the photo first, and then upload the front of the photo as a new version of the same file just to show the back and front for proof that the no notice conditions have been met. The only thing is that the listing version of the image is splatted with watermarks. -- Whpq (talk) 03:33, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Valley View Center RMTR

This one didn't need an admin, I was able to do it with a round robin swap. Future ones like this can go in the normal section! :) Sennecaster (Chat) 00:17, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Patty Loveless

Hello! Your submission of Patty Loveless at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Bruxton (talk) 02:09, 18 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy Seventeenth First Edit Day!

Hey, TenPoundHammer. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Chris Troutman (talk) 17:52, 29 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy New Year, TenPoundHammer!

Happy New Year!

TenPoundHammer,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 20:39, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 20:39, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

I Can't Get Over You

At the RM for I Can't Get Over You (Brooks & Dunn song) you linked to WP:PRIMARY where I assume you meant WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Just FYI. Station1 (talk) 08:36, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Patty Loveless

On 11 January 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Patty Loveless, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Patty Loveless's musical career rebounded after she underwent surgery to repair a blood vessel on her vocal cords? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Patty Loveless. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Patty Loveless), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Vanamonde 12:03, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

Tyler Hubbard

This image is being removed because we've tried to update with a newer image of him that was provided by Universal Music Group Nashville (his record label) and that was being reverted back to this picture from 2013, 10 years outdated for this artist. Then we used an award show image (didn't work either) since no image can be added, we want to remove the image all together. Countrymusicfan012 (talk) 16:59, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Who is "we"? If this is I shared account then you msut hand it over to 1 person as shared accounts are not allowed per the TErms of Use. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 17:06, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

I say "we" loosely. I am early editor and wanting to update his image based on what is on his website and what is on Universal Music Group Nashville's website for him. That's all I'm doing is trying to update his image. Countrymusicfan012 (talk) 17:07, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

You can't use anything from his website or record label without permission. Someone from the label would have to submit it to OTRS or upload it themselves if they want a certain image to be used. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:08, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

That's not a reason not to have an image at all. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:06, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Then how can we get an updated image there, He looks nothing like that now. and is on his own and not with Florida Georgia Line anymore, He is a solo artist. Countrymusicfan012 (talk) 17:08, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

See above. You can upload an image only if it belongs to you or comes from a site that has a Creative Commons license. "He looks nothing like that" is not a reason to delete an image unless a newer one exists. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:09, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

He does have new ones. I understand that Wiki is all about rules, but c'mon, this image is 10 years outdated. Countrymusicfan012 (talk) 17:10, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

I switched it with an already available one from 2018. If you have a newer image that you own, or that comes from a Creative Commons-licensed site, then you can upload that. The only other option would be to contact Hubbard or his label personally and ask if they'd be willing to donate one. But "it's outdated" is not in and of itself a reason to have no image at all if properly licensed ones exist. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:12, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

I just put the image they asked me to put on his page for him. How can I get this one to stay? Countrymusicfan012 (talk) 17:18, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

That one is acceptable and should be allowed to stay. (Sorry for accidentally reverting it at first; when I first loaded it, the image was glitched out but that seemed to be a bug on my end.) Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:20, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

It's the image that is all over his social media pages also. Countrymusicfan012 (talk) 17:20, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

If you, personally, own the image, then that's fine. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:21, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

No, it's his facebook profile photo. I see that it got reverted again. How can we get that image to stay? Countrymusicfan012 (talk) 17:30, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Then that means he owns it and it can't be used unless he or his reps say so; you putting it on Commons is a copyright violation. Best we can do is the 2018 image. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:34, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

But what do I need from his label to show that they sent it and wanted me to add it to wikipedia? Countrymusicfan012 (talk) 17:34, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Find out who owns the rights to the image and have them follow the instructions here. Have whoever owns the image e-mail it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org following the template at that link. That way, the response team on Wikimedia Commons has a written declaration of the image being released for use. Until then, the 2018 image is the best we can do. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:40, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! big help :) Countrymusicfan012 (talk) 17:48, 30 January 2023 (UTC)

Russell Dickerson

Hi I was wondering if you could make an article for Russell Dickerson's self-titled album? Thanks David829 (talk) 09:03, 03 February 2023 (UTC)

This Is the Heavy

Hi, I was wondering if could make an article for Mitchell Tenpenny's album This Is the Heavy? Thanks David829 (talk) 09:33, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

EvanTheMusicMan

Thanks for closing the ANI report. I meant to do that but forgot. You mentioned one IP address which the editor has used, but I saw several more. As far as I remember none of those that I saw has edited recently enough to justify a block, but it's pretty likely, based on history, that the editor will now evade the block. If you see anything that looks like that, please feel welcome to let me know, and I'll consider blocking IP addresses or sockpuppets. JBW (talk) 19:10, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Riverbend Mall

What you mean by no lists? Nostalgia Zone (talk) 20:01, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Shopping mall articles should not have lists of anchors, as listing any store violates WP:NOTDIR. This was established as early as 2008. If you look at any good article-class shopping mall article such as Colonial Plaza, at no point does it resort to a list. The anchors can and should be included in the text. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 20:11, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Who was this aimed at?

Who are you talking to here? Nobody intentionally tagged the article as a stub after it grew to the size it is now, and it was obviously just not removed yet. Even at seven-thousand bytes, as I finished editing it after initially creating it, it was still primarily a track listing without a single complete prose section, which is what the album WikiProject guidelines state a stub is. Arguably it was already start-class, but I was erring on the side of caution as I often do when creating articles on albums yet to be released. Again, the main point here is that it's not like it was intentionally left there because I already knew it was at least start-class when it was released: [64]. Ss112 23:38, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Palenque Norte Deletion Discussion

Hi, can you link me to the discussion on the deletion of Palenque Norte? I clicked through the logs from May 25, 2022 back to the end of the month but wasn’t able to find the record. If I’m missing something obvious, forgive my ignorance as I haven’t been an active editor for some time now, but this particular deletion result strikes me as surprising so I’d like to understand what went into the decision. Thanks. Nathan McKnight -- Aelffin (talk) 08:37, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

@Aelffin: There was no discussion. It was deleted via WP:PROD which does not form a discussion page. According to the deletion log the reasoning was "Not notable; lacking coverage in independent sources". If you think you can rescue the page, you can ask for it to be un-deleted at WP:REFUND. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:58, 17 March 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Spelling on the Stone

On 22 March 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Spelling on the Stone, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that "Spelling on the Stone", released in 1988 by an uncredited vocalist purporting to be Elvis Presley, inspired a number of Elvis sightings eleven years after his death? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Spelling on the Stone. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Spelling on the Stone), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Aoidh (talk) 12:04, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Burnindaylight.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Burnindaylight.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:08, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Pirates of the Mississippi

The article Pirates of the Mississippi you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Pirates of the Mississippi and Talk:Pirates of the Mississippi/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 00:03, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Pirates of the Mississippi

The article Pirates of the Mississippi you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Pirates of the Mississippi for comments about the article, and Talk:Pirates of the Mississippi/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 02:43, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Alt country

I'm thinking that the "Suggested listening" section at Alternative country needs to go away, but wanted to see what you thought on this. Hog Farm _Talk 13:56, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion...

You proposed the 'Sex Court' article that I created for deletion. Can I ask why, and if there is any way that you would withdraw this request? I realise the article might be poorly sourced, etc., but it was a real program.

Also, I notice that several of adult stars have articles about them here on Wikipedia; what makes this more particularly worthy of deletion...?

EDIT: I apologise for only contacting you now; various reasons, but mainly personal, related to mental health.

Noble Korhedron 20:38, 25 April 2023 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noble Korhedron (talk • contribs)

(talk page stalker) Noble Korhedron: Proposed deletion is a system where an editor tags the article, and if no one objects after a week, it is deleted. In this case, someone did object, stopping the process and not deleting the article. CLYDE ^{TALK TO ME}/_{STUFF DONE} 03:27, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Billboard links

Hi TPH. The other day you expanded the section on Corey Kent's version of Wild as Her and used a few single chart templates. Just a reminder to check to make sure the links to artists' Billboard chart pages work; at the moment, Corey Kent doesn't have any. In other words, this link doesn't show anything. Thanks. Ss112 10:07, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Billboard really needs to get their shit together. Half their chart links don't work for no reason I can discern. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 13:53, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

I agree, but even after this, I see you made Tennessee Orange without checking if the chart links work.... Ss112 09:31, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Charlieodonnell announcement.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Charlieodonnell announcement.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:08, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Could you create a wikipedia page for the Australian Country artist Zoee

Could you create a wikipedia page for the Australian Country artist Zoee 2600:1004:B140:3DB7:75AA:6FFD:9214:3F1C (talk) 17:50, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mary Chapin Carpenter

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Mary Chapin Carpenter you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 11:04, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mary Chapin Carpenter

The article Mary Chapin Carpenter you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Mary Chapin Carpenter and Talk:Mary Chapin Carpenter/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 23:00, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

Jelly Roll

Hi TPH. As I assume you're more familiar with Jelly Roll's career than I am, would you happen to know or think that he is still releasing songs to rock radio from Whitsitt Chapel? CloversMallRat removed "She" and "Unlive" as singles from the album, which I initially reverted, then reinstated as I can't find evidence that they were released to radio (making them "proper" singles). I figured they were released to rock radio as they've only charted on the Rock Songs chart and not any country charts, but perhaps not. I still don't think Jelly Roll would only be releasing singles to country radio as he's never been exclusively a country artist but in the absence of evidence I'm leaning towards not calling them singles. Ss112 02:26, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

I would say look for a source explicitly citing them as singles. If no such source exists, then it would be OR to call them such. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:56, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Mary Chapin Carpenter

The article Mary Chapin Carpenter you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Mary Chapin Carpenter for comments about the article, and Talk:Mary Chapin Carpenter/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of BennyOnTheLoose -- BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 16:21, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Orrall&wright.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Orrall&wright.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:38, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

The 25 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal

		The 25 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal
		Thank you for all your work! --evrik (talk) 15:34, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Adom (artist)

Hi Bobby! I think you might be able to help with Anton Cosmo (Adom) former member of the band Boston. After 23 years someone just decided he was not notable aymore. Please have a look and help if you can. Cheers and God Bless! 74.78.194.27 (talk) 07:09, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

There was a consensus to redirect in the deletion discussion. Please do not circumvent deletion processes by undoing what they did. If you disagree with the results, may I suggest submitting the article to deletion review? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 07:16, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Trout Fishing in America (duo)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Trout Fishing in America (duo) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ArcticSeeress -- ArcticSeeress (talk) 12:02, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Trout Fishing in America (duo)

The article Trout Fishing in America (duo) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Trout Fishing in America (duo) for comments about the article, and Talk:Trout Fishing in America (duo)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ArcticSeeress -- ArcticSeeress (talk) 19:41, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Buffalo Club

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Buffalo Club you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Eurohunter -- Eurohunter (talk) 20:07, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

GAR notifications

When nominating articles for GAR, you are required to notify involved users and WikiProjects. You can find the template for doing so in the WP:GAR instructions. Could I request you to do that for this reassessment and this one (see the relevant comment in the latter). ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:24, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Restless Heart

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Restless Heart you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 16:03, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Restless Heart

The article Restless Heart you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Restless Heart and Talk:Restless Heart/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 16:40, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Restless Heart

The article Restless Heart you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Restless Heart for comments about the article, and Talk:Restless Heart/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 17:22, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

DYK for The Buffalo Club

On 28 August 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Buffalo Club, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that to promote the Buffalo Club, Rising Tide Records sent packages of plastic buffalo to music industry executives in Nashville? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Buffalo Club. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, The Buffalo Club), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of TL;DR for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article TL;DR is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TL;DR (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

QuickQuokka ^{[⁠talk • contribs]} 18:19, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

A cheeseburger for you!

Just wanted to say I've noticed the Diamond Rio article going from barely-there to sheer excellence, and wanted to say thanks for getting it there! You rock! Paigeisnotreal (talk) 01:58, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hardy discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page One Beer.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Restless Heart

On 13 September 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Restless Heart, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that record executive Tim DuBois locked the members of Restless Heart (pictured) in an office for seven hours until they came up with a name for the band? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Restless Heart. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Restless Heart), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 03:25, 13 September 2023 (UTC)

The Closer You Get

Hi. I think you meant to link WP:PRIMARYTOPIC at your RM, not WP:PRIMARY. No big deal, just FYI. Station1 (talk) 06:27, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Randallcoffee.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Randallcoffee.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Category:Vince Vance & The Valiants songs has been nominated for renaming

Category:Vince Vance & The Valiants songs has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 18:58, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

A reminder to please test artists' chart links when you create song articles

TPH, I know you probably find it annoying, but I think I've asked you twice here before to please test the links generated by the single chart templates to see if they work. I've just tagged you on the two articles it occurred on today, and on George Birge's song article you even had "Nate Smith" as the artist. Both Nate Smith and George Birge do not have artist chart history pages on Billboard yet. There are a number of country artists who still don't. Yes, I know it's inconvenient, and yes, Billboard's site is stupid and inconsistent. I'm not accusing you of adding false chart positions, but you know as well as anyone information needs to be properly verifiable with working links. Please just copy the sources from their discography tables in future if you notice the links don't work—they're always supplied on the artists' articles if they don't have chart history pages, as I've ensured this. Thanks. Ss112 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

• @Ss112: I keep putting them in as placeholders and then forgetting to fix them. Sorry about that! Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:19, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

Ear Biscuits

I just wanted to drop a note on your talk page letting you know that I have manually reverted your WP:BLAR to Ear Biscuits. Feel free to take it to AfD if you would like. TipsyElephant (talk) 15:50, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

First Contact

You were the first WP editor that I met... in May of 2008. You responded to a (("help me")) request and then sent me on my way into WikiWorld. Thank you for that. Since that time editing Wikipedia has become a part of my daily life. I see that you like to create articles for musicians. I wonder if I could ask you to take some time and take a look at User:Buster7/sandbox-Zachary Rapp-Rovan and assist me in creating a quality article. It has been years since I created any biographical articles and those, in no way, required the dexterity of creating an article about a professional musician. Rapp-Rovan is also a graffiti artist which is how I became aware of him through a gallery showing of his artwork last year in Chicago. An article that presents the duality of his creativity is my goal. Any time or collaboration or advice you can provide will be greatly appreciated. Thank you. Buster Seven Talk (UTC) 15:08, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

• @TenPoundHammer: Buster Seven Talk (UTC) 15:04, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

  Sorry, thought I answered you already. This isn't really my field of expertise, but I'll see what I can do. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:53, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Jo Hikk songs

A tag has been placed on Category:Jo Hikk songs indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:17, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Randy Travis

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Randy Travis you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Lightburst -- Lightburst (talk) 17:44, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

March 2024 GAN backlog drive

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Randy Travis

The article Randy Travis you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Randy Travis for comments about the article, and Talk:Randy Travis/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Lightburst -- Lightburst (talk) 23:41, 22 February 2024 (UTC)

Without objection, I will prepare a DYK nomination for this article and name you as the creator. If you an objection let me know. I do some work in that area and this article as a new GA qualifies. You can add a hook and or monitor the nomination. I have extra QPQs to use as well. Lightburst (talk) 15:12, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

I'm fine with that. I was considering a DYK myself. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 17:49, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dan Seals and his guitar.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dan Seals and his guitar.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:41, 24 February 2024 (UTC)

Sammy Cashat

I included a verifiable, reliable reference that reflects that Sammy was a Cashat, not Kershaw. The link is to a local paper, for the obit of his father and clearly lists all his sons as Cashat, not Kershaw. Why do you feel that the ref was not reliable? Frank042316 (talk) 21:13, 25 February 2024 (UTC)

The source does not give Sammy Kershaw's last name as Cashat. It just says "three sons, Samuel Paul..." To say this supports his last name is WP:SYNTH. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:26, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

What? The article very clearly lists his 3 sons, as all having his last name of Cashat: ‘Samuel Paul, Minos Jr, and Gerald James CASHAT.’ Nothing could be clearer, and it is indeed a reliable reference. But, even though it is behind a paywall, at least you have found a source that also confirms this, so we will let your edit stand. Frank042316 (talk) 12:33, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Before you move that to DRV...

Aren't you topic banned from deletion discussions, broadly construed? If so, I'd make triple sure that posting to DRV is even allowed. Floquenbeam (talk) 18:51, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Good point. Who should I ask? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:54, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Hmmmm.... I guess the admin who enacted the topic ban, as a first step? If I'm skimming the ARCA right, this is like the opposite of what you got the topic ban for, so maybe it will be fine? But even better, IMHO, especially while you have an an active ARCA request up, is that you postpone the DRV request until you see what the results are. Either you'll have no topic ban anymore, in which case a DRV request is fine, or you'll still have a topic ban, in which case a clarification request from the admin who imposed the ban would make sense. Floquenbeam (talk) 19:04, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Press Your Luck

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Press Your Luck you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grungaloo -- Grungaloo (talk) 23:45, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Press Your Luck

The article Press Your Luck you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Press Your Luck and Talk:Press Your Luck/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grungaloo -- Grungaloo (talk) 23:22, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Press Your Luck

The article Press Your Luck you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Press Your Luck for comments about the article, and Talk:Press Your Luck/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Grungaloo -- Grungaloo (talk) 02:04, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sawyerborn.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sawyerborn.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:58, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

Redirecting an article that was kept at an AfD you started

Hi TenPoundHammer. You nominated Monkey-ed Movies for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monkey-ed Movies in May 2022. I provided sources at the AfD, which was closed as "keep". Today, you redirected the article with the edit summary "redirect to more notable spinoff per lack of sources". Please do not redirect articles when sources exist and have been found already. Thank you. Cunard (talk) 11:03, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Over the past few days, you've redirected Monkey-ed Movies (link), Skating's Next Star (link), Monkey Life (link), 2 Minute Drill (game show) (link), and Monsters We Met (link) for lacking sources. I've been able to find sources for all of these so have reverted the redirects. I am worried that this is resuming what happened at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive1101#TenPoundHammer: prods and AfDs. The ANI report led to Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Conduct in deletion-related editing, which resulted in a topic ban from deletion discussions. Please stop redirecting television articles that you cannot find sources for. It is time-consuming to find sources for so many articles and then source and expand them. Cunard (talk) 12:43, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

@Cunard: Thank you for rescuing these articles. One of my frustrations with AFD prior to the topic ban was when someone would come along and say "keep, I found sources", and the article would get kept but nobody got around to adding them to the article. Of course, I could have just fixed this by adding them myself and not haranguing you and/or other editors. I did take your sources into consideration when I redirected those articles, as I was uncertain if any of them were sufficient. Since you've decided to undo the redirects and add the sources, I'm not going to fight it. I apologize for hounding you on this in the past, and thank you again for fixing them up. If you see anything else on User:TenPoundHammer/Article cleanup that might need a fix, you're welcome to do it as I trust your source-finding skills. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 16:26, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

I understand your frustration with articles remaining unsourced. I try my best to find sources at each AfD I participate in. I do not always add sources to the articles because in many cases, there are many AfDs I want to participate in and there is just not enough time. I hope that other AfD participants will share the workload of adding sources. And I want to leave time for my other Wikipedia activities like writing articles on topics I'm interested in.

Redirecting can be considered pseudo-deletion. In the past few days, you've redirected five television series articles where I was able to find sources to meet Wikipedia:Notability#General notability guideline. Regarding taking the sources I found into consideration and being uncertain they were insufficient, in the case of Monkey-ed Movies, there was a consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monkey-ed Movies to "keep". Please stop redirecting articles as it is leading to notable topics no longer having articles. When editors have redirected large numbers of articles in the past, I've suggested that they take the articles to AfD which draws a larger audience since much fewer editors will notice a bold redirect. But as you have a topic ban from deletion discussions, you cannot take them to AfD. If the topic ban was not in place, I'd be worried about too many AfD nominations happening again. I hope you continue your good work at User:TenPoundHammer/Article cleanup on sourcing articles but recommend that you stop redirecting articles. Cunard (talk) 09:23, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Bizzyruthless.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Bizzyruthless.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ~ GB fan 11:45, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bizzyruthless.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Bizzyruthless.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:09, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Charlestowne Mall Removal Mistake

You made a mistake because there is PHOTO PROOF of the Marshalls store being there at Charlestowne Mall. Apparently I can’t source it because apparently Facebook links are not reliable even though the photos came from a government organization.

Here is the source:

Marshall’s Charlestowne Mall 1990s Leo Berard

Leo Berardi (talk) 18:26, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

"Adom (artist)" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Adom (artist) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 March 20 § Adom (artist) until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 22:12, 20 March 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia/Ruda Real

The Wikipedia:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia/Ruda Real page has been renominated for deletion. You are being notified because of your participation in the previous discussions. Should you desire, any comments to the discussion are welcome at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia/Ruda Real (2nd nomination). Thank you — CactusWriter ^(talk) 03:00, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Randy Travis

On 4 April 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Randy Travis, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that, after Randy Travis lost most of his singing ability to a stroke in 2013, James Dupré has sung his songs for him in concert? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Randy Travis. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Randy Travis), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Z1720 (talk) 00:38, 4 April 2024 (UTC)

Amendment request: Conduct in deletion-related editing declined and archived

Amendment request: Conduct in deletion-related editing, which you filed, has been declined and archived to Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment/Archive 126 § Amendment request: Conduct in deletion-related editing. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 13:59, 20 April 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedians by Number of Edits

User TenPoundHammer has dropped to #164 on the list with 275,615 edits, just to let you know that your profile list your ranking incorrectly. 67.177.96.125 (talk) 01:07, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Amendment request: Conduct in deletion-related editing

You are involved in a recently filed request for clarification or amendment from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Amendment request: Conduct in deletion-related editing and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the Wikipedia:Arbitration guide may be of use.

Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:48, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uptown Scottsbluff (2nd nomination)

I know you're unable to participate, but it feels wrong not to advise you of the discussion. We'll see where it shakes out. Don't let your otters eat me, and enjoy your time away. Star Mississippi 02:15, 14 May 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Butt Drugs

On 18 May 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Butt Drugs, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Butt Drugs in Corydon, Indiana, had Butt Liquors and free parking in the rear? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Butt Drugs. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Butt Drugs), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:04, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

Thanks

I saw that a few years ago you removed content that had sourced iTunes from an article about an album Larry Norman released in 1969. Your article summary was classic! ("iTunes, really?). That article is a mess and I am working on it now. I am SO grateful when I stumble across wise editors like you who aren't afraid to be bold and cut content en masse when the content is inappropriate. Although it's been a few years, I still want to say thanks, because editors don't get enough praise even when it's due. MarydaleEd (talk) 00:50, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Mass AfDs despite warnings to gain experience + TAGTEAM. Thank you. 2.28.124.7 (talk) 18:06, 23 May 2024 (UTC)

Please reply here

I realized you created The Coast Is Clear disambiguation page. Just for the sake of wp:commonname, can the page be moved to either coast is clear or Coast Is Clear? Signed 102.158.167.122 (talk) 13:17, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Proposed motion

There is a proposed motion at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Motion: TenPoundHammer suspended topic ban for blank-and-redirecting (BLARing) which affects you. For the Arbitration Committee, HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 22:52, 1 June 2024 (UTC)

Motion

Following an amendment request, the following motion has been adopted:

TenPoundHammer (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is indefinitely topic banned from removing all content in an article and replacing it with a redirect (commonly known as a blank-and-redirect, or BLAR). This topic ban will be suspended for a period of 12 months. This topic ban may be unsuspended and imposed onto TenPoundHammer if disruption by BLARing restarts, as determined by any of: (1) a consensus of administrators on WP:AE, (2) at least two arbitrators indicating "support" to unsuspend at WP:ARCA, with no opposition from other arbitrators indicated up to 48 hours after the second support, or (3) a majority of active arbitrators at WP:ARCA if there is opposition as indicated in condition 2. After 12 months, if it has not been imposed, the topic ban will be automatically lifted.

For the Arbitration Committee, HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 19:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Arbitration motion regarding Conduct in deletion-related editing

The Arbitration Committee has resolved by motion that:

TenPoundHammer (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) is indefinitely topic banned from removing all content in an article and replacing it with a redirect (commonly known as a blank-and-redirect, or BLAR). This topic ban will be suspended for a period of 12 months. This topic ban may be unsuspended and imposed onto TenPoundHammer if disruption by BLARing restarts, as determined by any of: (1) a consensus of administrators on WP:AE, (2) at least two arbitrators indicating "support" to unsuspend at WP:ARCA, with no opposition from other arbitrators indicated up to 48 hours after the second support, or (3) a majority of active arbitrators at WP:ARCA if there is opposition as indicated in condition 2. After 12 months, if it has not been imposed, the topic ban will be automatically lifted.

For the Arbitration Committee, HouseBlaster (talk · he/him) 19:53, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard § Arbitration motion regarding Conduct in deletion-related editing

Your GA nomination of Exile (American band)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Exile (American band) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tbhotch -- Tbhotch (talk) 19:24, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Exile (American band)

The article Exile (American band) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Exile (American band) and Talk:Exile (American band)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tbhotch -- Tbhotch (talk) 20:01, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Exile (American band)

The article Exile (American band) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Exile (American band) for comments about the article, and Talk:Exile (American band)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Tbhotch -- Tbhotch (talk) 20:44, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of University Park Mall

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article University Park Mall you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Reconrabbit -- Reconrabbit (talk) 13:41, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of University Park Mall

The article University Park Mall you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:University Park Mall for comments about the article, and Talk:University Park Mall/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Reconrabbit -- Reconrabbit (talk) 20:03, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for Apple

Apple has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 00:11, 23 July 2024 (UTC)

New message from Sjones23

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Kris Kristofferson § Lyme Disease - revisited. Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 15:31, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Administrators' Noticeboard Incident

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Jax 0677 (talk) 20:16, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

Maybe change preferences?

I just saw your comment about pronouns on the ANI thread, and on mousing over your signature, the pop-up tells me you prefer "he/him". I think that's generated from the setting in preferences. You might want to change it? Schazjmd (talk) 22:48, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

I didn't even know that was a setting. Thanks! Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 23:05, 28 July 2024 (UTC)

What happened to your otters?

I keep meaning to ask. Now I have. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:49, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

It was a running gag I dropped ages ago because I no longer felt it was necessary. They've gone off to otter-space to have their own adventures. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:55, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Bless them, I liked them. Maybe one day they will find Earth again 😁 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:57, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

AE thread closure

Hello TenPoundHammer,

I have recently closed an arbitration enforcement thread to which you are a party. You are reminded, as you are presently topic banned from deletion discussions, broadly construed, to not make comments on noticeboards or elsewhere on Wikipedia that suggest editors take an article to AfD. This reminder is per the consensus of uninvolved administrators who participated in that thread.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns regarding this.

— Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 01:39, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

2 more long running hoaxes

I saw you added Pratylenchus dulscus to Wikipedia:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia. I'm not sure that I would call that a hoax myself, but Meloidogyne fruglia and Meloidogyne gajuscus were just deleted and were created under the same circumstance (vandalism to a list of plant diseases, followed by making an article corresponding to the vandalized entry). Plantdrew (talk) 17:57, 29 August 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Clarification request: Conduct in deletion-related editing

You are involved in a recently filed request for clarification or amendment from the Arbitration Committee. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment#Clarification request: Conduct in deletion-related editing and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the Wikipedia:Arbitration guide may be of use.

Thanks, Cunard (talk) 05:27, 8 September 2024 (UTC)

Baby Talk

Is there a reason you felt that this article did not meet WP:GNG? In the revision you redirected there was three high quality reliable sources with several more avalible Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 02:27, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Previously there was a loose consensus that merely having a review/recap from IGN or AV Club wasn't enough since they review literally everything, and a lot of the time their reviews weren't terribly informative. Thank you for actually taking the time to beef up the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:10, 28 September 2024 (UTC)

Press Your Luck

What sources do you think I should use to address this bottom quote in the article? I want it to stay. I think it's very strange that neither of these two networks have touched the final episodes in this century, and I think more people should know about it.

Since its launch in June 2015, Buzzr, a Fremantle-owned diginet, has also regularly rerun the show. Along with GSN's airings, a total of 690 episodes have been rerun. For National Game Show Day on June 4, 2023, Buzzr showed #697 in a marathon of first and last episodes. However, it was not the last one, for the show continued for three more months, and approximately 64 episodes. The reason the remaining episodes haven't been rerun on GSN or Buzzr is unknown. However, they all exist.

UPDATE: I added two sources. One of them from BuzzerBlog.

Loyalist2024 (talk) 01:54, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

@Loyalist2024: Buzzer Blog is a self published source and therefore not reliable. As a general rule, don't add info unless you have a third-party source. A random rerun being skipped is not noteworthy on its own. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:35, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

@Loyalist2024: also please don't use contractions like "haven't" in articles (unless it's part of a quote or title), as it's considered too informal. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 03:35, 30 September 2024 (UTC)

Clarification request closed

The arbitration clarification request in which you were a party has been closed and archived. The rough consensus of participating arbitrators was that:

• Proposed deletions and contesting proposed deletions are covered by topic bans on deletion discussions.
• Merge discussions are not deletion discussions, but you should tread lightly so as not to continue behaviors that lead to your topic ban from deletion discussions. Notability tags are similar to merge discussions.

SilverLocust 💬 06:21, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

Did you ever contact User:Digitaldreamz?

In these two edits, User:Digitaldreamz asks you to email him. Did you? I'm looking at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Digitaldreamz, and it looks like he was editing on behalf of several singers we have articles about. If you can confirm that, then we might not have to delete https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Digitaldreamz which are otherwise likely copyright violations... --GRuban (talk) 18:01, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

I don't remember, this was 12 years ago. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:09, 11 October 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Perry Drug Stores (logo).png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Perry Drug Stores (logo).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

Record label spamming itself

Was poking around listening to some alt country, ran into a song by Backyard Tire Fire (did not particularly enjoy FWIW). I went to check out the Wikipedia article for this band given the odd name, and thought it read rather spammy. Turns out this main work on this article is from a user named "Thirtytigers". And yep, Thirty Tigers released one of their albums around the time of that edit. Usually it's the non-notable music stuff spamming itself. Hog Farm _Talk 22:53, 22 October 2024 (UTC)

Edit to Station Mall

Hi. Just curious about your edit to remove the "Former Tenants" section of en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Station_Mall. I thought it offered a bit of historical context. Curious of your thoughts. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kdorse (talk • contribs) 17:44, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

@Kdorse: Please put new posts to the bottom, not the top. I removed the tenants because Wikipedia is not a directory. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 20:50, 27 October 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Hixtape: Vol. 3: Difftape

On 4 November 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Hixtape: Vol. 3: Difftape, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Toby Keith's last recording before his death was a cover of Joe Diffie's "Ships That Don't Come In" on the tribute album Hixtape: Vol. 3: Difftape? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Hixtape: Vol. 3: Difftape. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Hixtape: Vol. 3: Difftape), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

 — Chris Woodrich (talk) 00:02, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

Kris Kristofferson sandbox

Hey, there. If you're interested in helping, I've created a sandbox for a revamp of the Kris Kristofferson article here. Thanks, Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 02:19, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

Due West

Hello, I see that you have made edits to the Due West (band) Wiki page. I am a member of the band, and see there was some incorrect information in your edits. Please let me know where you received your information about Due West. DW Matthew (talk) 18:15, 2 December 2024 (UTC)