TimVickers
 | This user may have left Wikipedia. TimVickers has not edited Wikipedia since 13 December 2021. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
|
|
| Peer reviews with no or minimal feedback |
|---|
|
|
|
|
If your review is not in the list of unanswered reviews, you can . |
You have a message
edit
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Thank you for the invitation. I will try to follow the Enzyme Kinetics article and make contributions when I can. User:Todd40324 (talk) 9:39, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Homo Sapiens interbreed with Homo Neanderthalensis
editI have provided some additional sources which the general reader can also understand. For us scientists, youtube may seem an unreliable source, but that is only the case if the source itself is unreliable, which is why I have collected videos from somewhat reputable sources such as the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) and others. This is so the general public can also partake and understand some of the main concepts of human evolution whereas if I only used peer reviewed scientific journals, the only people reading them would be the small minority of scientists on planet Earth. But as source of reference I will nonetheless continue to include peer reviewed scientific sources so that the scientific community will began to understand that human evolution is not the way they want it to be, but far more complicated series of migrations, evolution due to the selective pressure of their respective geographical location and possible interbreedings resulting in the modern day Homo Sapiens who happen to be part Homo Neanderthalensis and the Chinese anatomically modern Homo Erectus who may either be part Homo Neanderthalensis due to possible interbreeding or it is possible the Homo Erectus in China did not significantly interbreed with the Homo Neanderthalensis and that the anatomically modern Chinese Homo Erectus alive today simply retain what seems to be "neanderthal" genes because the Neanderthals were direct descendants of Homo Heidelbergensis which happens to be either a separate species or subspecies of Homo Erectus, and as such they both carry similar genes and passed them into their progeny in both respective evolutionary branches. Thank you! Please watch :
1.) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpQiBPdFtog&NR=1
2.) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y9zVEQCIiRs&feature=related
| ||||
Content
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Message from immunize
edit You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter
edit
| |||
about removed article
editHello Tim,
I created article about artist Dimitry Gerrman, but when I tried to add it to wikipedia I got message that you removed on 09/29/2009 another article with the same name, because copyright problems. My article is the new one. Could you please help me to add this article or please explain what could I do at this case.
Thank you.User:Markus50 (talk) 10:42, 02/14/2012 (UTC)
The file File:Organic Apple.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused image, the source file has been deleted, and the licence is no longer verifiable
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 17:00, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- I've removed this tag, because there's an unfortunate circle going on here. The source file was deleted because it wasn't being used due to this file format being preferred, and now we want to delete the preferred copy because the source file was deleted in favor of this one. If we need to have the license of the source file visible to non-admins, then the source file should be restored. WhatamIdoing (talk) 18:26, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
- I posted a request on Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion#File:Organic_Apple.png --TheImaCow (talk) 18:31, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
